Guest guest Posted November 22, 2005 Report Share Posted November 22, 2005 Rspected Sir, Thanks for the rely! I feel that I am getting into astrology. Is there any link b/w astakvarga sysytem and Systems appropach. I mean to say that according to astakvarga view if 11th hoise has more points thatn 10 and 12th and lagna has more points than 12th , than person is said to rise a lot in life (this viev is irrespective of wheather thes houses contain any mooltrikona sign or not), whereas for us status and rise is determined by not only 11th but also 2nd ,4th sun . why this difference? 2 I read somewhere that all planets except sun and moon own two signs because one sign represents external(material) aspect other sign represents internal(spirtual) aspect.Which seems to be logical. Whereas in system view we only conside the mooltrikona sign thereby completly ignoring one aspect. How does systems view accumulate both aspects in through using of one sign only?? Regards Swarn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2005 Report Share Posted November 22, 2005 Hello Swarn, I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message appended below. Best wishes, - " swarnlatagupta " <swarnlatagupta Tuesday, November 22, 2005 9:57 PM Astakvarga and systems approach. > Rspected Sir, > Thanks for the rely! I feel that I am getting into astrology. > > > Is there any link b/w astakvarga sysytem and Systems appropach. THERE IS NO LINK AND SA DOES NOT BELIEVE IN ASTAKVARGA. >I mean to say that according to astakvarga view if 11th hoise has more > points thatn 10 and 12th and lagna has more points than 12th , than > person is said to rise a lot in life (this viev is irrespective of > wheather thes houses contain any mooltrikona sign or not), whereas > for us status and rise is determined by not only 11th but also > 2nd ,4th sun . why this difference? NO COMMENTS. IN MY VIEW A/V IS COMPLETELY MISLEADING. YOU MAY HAVE YOUR OWN VIEWS. > > 2 I read somewhere that all planets except sun and moon own two > signs because one sign represents external(material) aspect other > sign represents internal(spirtual) aspect.Which seems to be logical. TO ME IT DOES NOT SEEM LOGICAL. > Whereas in system view we only conside the mooltrikona sign thereby > completly ignoring one aspect. RIGHT. How does systems view accumulate both > aspects in through using of one sign only?? SA HAS ONLY ONE VIEW. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NO TIME AND ENERGY FOR DISCUSSING AND COMMENTING ON VARIOUS ASPECTS OF TRADITIONAL/CLASSICAL ASTROLOGY. IF YOU BELIEVE CERTAIN CLASSICAL PRINCIPLES WHICH ARE IN CONTRAVENTION TO SA OR VICE VERSA, THERE IS NO PROBLEM BUT THERE WOULD BE NO REPLY ON THESE. > Regards > > Swarn > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2005 Report Share Posted November 22, 2005 Dear Professor, Thanks or the reply, I dont have a rigid view about any traditional aspects of astrology. I was only trying to clear the wrongly held notions about some views . Regards Swarn , <siha> wrote: > > > Hello Swarn, > > I add my replies/comments to your questions in your message appended below. > > Best wishes, > > > > > - > " swarnlatagupta " <swarnlatagupta> > > Tuesday, November 22, 2005 9:57 PM > Astakvarga and systems approach. > > > > Rspected Sir, > > Thanks for the rely! I feel that I am getting into astrology. > > > > > > Is there any link b/w astakvarga sysytem and Systems appropach. > > THERE IS NO LINK AND SA DOES NOT BELIEVE IN ASTAKVARGA. > > >I mean to say that according to astakvarga view if 11th hoise has more > > points thatn 10 and 12th and lagna has more points than 12th , than > > person is said to rise a lot in life (this viev is irrespective of > > wheather thes houses contain any mooltrikona sign or not), whereas > > for us status and rise is determined by not only 11th but also > > 2nd ,4th sun . why this difference? > > NO COMMENTS. IN MY VIEW A/V IS COMPLETELY MISLEADING. YOU MAY HAVE YOUR OWN > VIEWS. > > > > 2 I read somewhere that all planets except sun and moon own two > > signs because one sign represents external(material) aspect other > > sign represents internal(spirtual) aspect.Which seems to be logical. > > TO ME IT DOES NOT SEEM LOGICAL. > > > Whereas in system view we only conside the mooltrikona sign thereby > > completly ignoring one aspect. > > RIGHT. > > How does systems view accumulate both > > aspects in through using of one sign only?? > > SA HAS ONLY ONE VIEW. > > PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NO TIME AND ENERGY FOR DISCUSSING AND COMMENTING > ON VARIOUS ASPECTS OF TRADITIONAL/CLASSICAL ASTROLOGY. > > IF YOU BELIEVE CERTAIN CLASSICAL PRINCIPLES WHICH ARE IN CONTRAVENTION TO SA > OR VICE VERSA, THERE IS NO PROBLEM BUT THERE WOULD BE NO REPLY ON THESE. > > > Regards > > > > Swarn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.