birth star

September 21, 2005

Hi PNR,

what is a birth star? Are you referring to the Nakshatras? Please let me know.

Thanks, R.

pnr312 <pnr312 wrote:

Respected Professor,

Although SA does not recognize stars I was wondering if a person's

birth star has any role to play at all? Does it influence the

nature/physical appearance of a person? What kind of significance does

it have if any?

Thanks and regards,

PNR

September 21, 2005

Hi R,

It is the star/nakshatra in which the moon is placed at the time of

one's birth.

When a horoscope is generated you can identify this by seeing the

nakshatra and pada which corresponds to the moon in the table.

Regards,

PNR

, RPM <rupamede> wrote:

> Hi PNR,

> what is a birth star? Are you referring to the Nakshatras? Please

let me know.

> Thanks, R.

>

> pnr312 <pnr312> wrote:

>

> Respected Professor,

>

> Although SA does not recognize stars I was wondering if a person's

> birth star has any role to play at all? Does it influence the

> nature/physical appearance of a person? What kind of significance

does

> it have if any?

>

> Thanks and regards,

> PNR

>

September 21, 2005

Hello PNR,

Birth Nakshatra is only relevant for identifying the balance main period of

the particular planet at birth.

Best wishes,

-

" pnr312 " <pnr312

Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:49 PM

birth star

>

> Respected Professor,

>

> Although SA does not recognize stars I was wondering if a person's

> birth star has any role to play at all? Does it influence the

> nature/physical appearance of a person? What kind of significance does

> it have if any?

>

> Thanks and regards,

> PNR

>

September 21, 2005

Hi PNR,

Yes, that is what I thought. My moon is in Taurus, so it is in Krittika

Nakshatra, however I idnetify myself much more with the Nakshatra where my

Ascendant is, which is Uttara Ashada. Also, by examining my partner's chart, not

knowing correct ascendant, Nakshatra Uttata Phalguini that extends from Leo to

Virgo gives a good description of the person in question, much more than the

Nakshatra where the Moon is.

You also mention pada, does that mean one Nakshatra can then be subdivided into

padas, and if so, what would that be like?

Thanks again, R.

pnr312 <pnr312 wrote:

Hi R,

It is the star/nakshatra in which the moon is placed at the time of

one's birth.

When a horoscope is generated you can identify this by seeing the

nakshatra and pada which corresponds to the moon in the table.

Regards,

PNR

, RPM wrote:

> Hi PNR,

> what is a birth star? Are you referring to the Nakshatras? Please

let me know.

> Thanks, R.

>

> pnr312

wrote:

>

> Respected Professor,

>

> Although SA does not recognize stars I was wondering if a person's

> birth star has any role to play at all? Does it influence the

> nature/physical appearance of a person? What kind of significance

does

> it have if any?

>

> Thanks and regards,

> PNR

>

September 21, 2005

Hi R,

I'm not sure about the nakshatra of the ascendant since the

convention has always been to idenify the nakshatra corresponding to

the moon for the janma nakshatra. But as Professor has replied that

there is no significance apart from the purposes of calculation of

balance of the Dasha of the planet in question I guess we can ignore

the other aspects.

To answer your question, each nakshatra is divided into 4 padas and

each pada occupies specific degrees in a house. This you can

identify from the table. As you have mentioned, UttaraPhalguni

extends from Leo to Virgo which means that the first pada of this

nakshatra starts in Leo and ends with its 4th pada in Virgo.

As far as assessing a persons description from the nakshatra in the

absence of a clear ascendant I guess you should check this with the

professor. I'm sure he'll be able to give you an alternate method.

Hope my explanation helps.

Regards,

PNR

, RPM <rupamede> wrote:

> Hi PNR,

> Yes, that is what I thought. My moon is in Taurus, so it is in

Krittika Nakshatra, however I idnetify myself much more with the

Nakshatra where my Ascendant is, which is Uttara Ashada. Also, by

examining my partner's chart, not knowing correct ascendant,

Nakshatra Uttata Phalguini that extends from Leo to Virgo gives a

good description of the person in question, much more than the

Nakshatra where the Moon is.

> You also mention pada, does that mean one Nakshatra can then be

subdivided into padas, and if so, what would that be like?

> Thanks again, R.

>

> pnr312 <pnr312> wrote:

>

> Hi R,

>

> It is the star/nakshatra in which the moon is placed at the time

of

> one's birth.

> When a horoscope is generated you can identify this by seeing the

> nakshatra and pada which corresponds to the moon in the table.

>

> Regards,

> PNR

>

> , RPM wrote:

> > Hi PNR,

> > what is a birth star? Are you referring to the Nakshatras?

Please

> let me know.

> > Thanks, R.

> >

> > pnr312

> wrote:

> >

> > Respected Professor,

> >

> > Although SA does not recognize stars I was wondering if a

person's

> > birth star has any role to play at all? Does it influence the

> > nature/physical appearance of a person? What kind of

significance

> does

> > it have if any?

> >

> > Thanks and regards,

> > PNR

> >

September 21, 2005

Hi PNR,

Thank you for your explanation, it helps.

After I sent the email, I realized that in Navamsa I have Moon in Capricorn, not

sure about the degree and anyway not sure divisional charts have degrees at all,

but I would say maybe because Moon in Navamsa is where the Ascendant is in Rasi,

then this might be a double Uttara Ashada influence on my chart... but I await

for the professor's reply to clarify all our doubts as he normally does so well

;-).

Dear Professor,

Still regarding my natal moon's strenght, I was trying to find something about

planetary strenght on your website but failed to find it.