Mercury and Doubts - Thank you Professor

[Guest guest]

Dear Professor,

With your clarifications, I now start to understand how the FB work when

afflicted.

Thank you so much for your patience and time.

Kind regards, R.

 

siha wrote:

 

Hello RPM,

 

I add my replies in capitals to your message.

 

Best wishes,

 

 

 

-

" RPM "

To:

Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:19 PM

Re: Mercury and Doubts

 

 

> Dear Professor,

>

> Thank you for your replies to my email that was also about Mercury.

>

> Amit has raised the issue of Mercury taking up qualities of the planets it

> conjuncts with.

> According to the SA book, Mercury should be a FB for Capri, but what if it

> is conjunct with the

> Sun, the MMP?

IT WOULD BE AFFLICTED.

Would that make it also be a FM like the Sun?

NO.

You see, I do not understand your

> answer to Amit, so I will rephrase the question:

> OK.

> 1) Would FB Mercury when ruler of 6th (not moolitrikona) and conjunct the

> Most Malefic Planet act

> as a FM?

> NO.

> 2) How would Mercury act being ruler of 6th (not MT) and conjunct the Most

> Malefic Sun?

ITS MT HOUSE SIGNIFICATIONS WOULD BE VULNERABLE TO OBSTRUCTIONS AND SEVERE

DAMAGES.

> 3) If Mercury is the MT ruler of 9th - so apparently very benefic for a

> Capri - but Funct Malefics

> Jupiter and Ketu are occupying its 9th house whilst Mercury is placed in

> the bad 6th house

> conjunct with the Sun, would this mean that this poor Mercury is weak

> because:

> a) conjunct (not combust) the 8th lord Sun;

YES.

> b) it is in the bad 6th house (though it is the lord of the 6th);

YES.

> c) Its Moolitrikona is invaded by funct malefics Jupiter and Ketu plus

> Rahu aspects it:

YES, IF JUP AND KETU ARE NEAR MEP OF THE NINTH HOUSE.

> How would Functional Benefic nature of Mercury, a planet that takes others

> nature, stay the same

> Functional Benefic with so many bad influences surrounding him?

YES IT STAYS AS FB AND CAN BE STRENGTHENED SO THAT IT IS LESS VULNERABLE TO

DAMAGES DUE TO OTHER INFLUENCES.

> Thanks again, dear Professor, R.

>

> --- siha wrote:

>

>>

>> Hello dear Amit,

>>

>> I add my replies in capitals to your message.

>>

>> Best wishes,

>>

>>

>>

>> -

>> " amit_patnaik6 "

>> To:

>> Tuesday, September 20, 2005 10:42 AM

>> Mercury and Doubts

>>

>>

>> >

>> > Dear Professor,

>> >

>> > I was thinking about Mercury and that it is colored by and assumes

>> > the qualities of planets it is conjunct or aspected by, as read in

>> > your books too. " Mercury takes upon itself the qualities of the planets

>> > with which it is associated " .

>> > I have a few questions about that

>> > Say Mercury Venus are conjunct within 5 degrees

>> >

>> > 1) Would Mercury take up Qualities of Venus in addition to its own?

>> >

>> YES.

>>

>> > 2)Would the Qualities be general qualities or/and also qualities of

>> > the the MT and Functional nature?

>> >

>> GENERAL.

>>

>> > 3) If Venus is a FM and is conjunct a Strong FB Mercury Marginally(5%

>> > influence) i:e Mercury is not afflicted in anyway, is such a case how

>> > would be the qualities of planet that Mercury assumes?

>> >

>> IT ALSO HAS SOME INFLUENCE OF GENERAL SIGNIFICATIONS OF VENUS.

>>

>> > 4) Is Mercury the only planet that assumes the quality of other

>> > planets in conjunction ?

>> >

>> YES.

>>

>> > Looking forward to your answers, and appreciate your time.

>> >

>> > Love and Respect

>> > Amit

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >