Guest guest Posted September 11, 2005 Report Share Posted September 11, 2005 Dear Professor, How is the strength of an affliction from a FM determined? Especially in the case of Rahu and Ketu? If in the case of a particular signification there are primary and secondary significators and if the primary significator is afflicted by a FM and the secondary significators are unafflicted ,well placed and of considerable strength how does one determine whether the affliction of the primary significator is stronger or outweighs the strength of the secondary significators? Would it be different if the FM is Rahu or Ketu or would it be the same for all FMs? Also for Rahu and Ketu old age or infancy does not make a difference in the case of affliction? Thanks and Regards, PNR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2005 Report Share Posted September 11, 2005 Hello PNR, I add my replies in capitals to your message. Best wishes, - " pnr312 " <pnr312 Sunday, September 11, 2005 6:44 PM affliction > > Dear Professor, > > How is the strength of an affliction from a FM determined? Especially > in the case of Rahu and Ketu? THE INTENSITY OF AN AFFLICTION IS MEASURED IN TERMS ITS CLOSENESS. IT IS INCREASED IF THE AFFLICTING PLANET IS PLACED IN A MALEFIC HOUSE OR ITSELF IS ALSO UNDER THE AFFLICTION. INTENSIFICATION FURTHER INCREASES IN PROPORTION TO THE WEAKNESS OF THE AFFLICTED PLANET. THE INTENSITY IS MORE WITH MMP'S AFFLICTION IN COMPARISON TO THE AFFLICTION BY AN FM. WHEN KETU IS AFFLICTING AS AN MMP ITS AFFLICTION IS MORE. > If in the case of a particular signification there are primary and > secondary significators and if the primary significator is afflicted > by a FM and the secondary significators are unafflicted ,well placed > and of considerable strength how does one determine whether the > affliction of the primary significator is stronger or outweighs the > strength of the secondary significators? AFFLICTION OF PRIMARY SIGNIFICATOR IS TO BE JUDGED INDEPENDANTLY AND HAS A MAJOR SAY IN BLESSING THE SIGNIFICATIONS. THE STRENGTH OF THE SECONDARY SIGNIFICATORS IS LIKELY TO HELP IN THEIR SUB PERIODS WITH THE HELP OF ASTRAL REMEDIES. > Would it be different if the FM is Rahu or Ketu or would it be the > same for all FMs? IT IS DIFFERENT FOR MMP AND WHEN KETU ACTS AS MMP ITS AFFLICTION IS MORE GRAVE. > Also for Rahu and Ketu old age or infancy does not make a difference > in the case of affliction? RIGHT. > Thanks and Regards, > PNR > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2005 Report Share Posted September 11, 2005 Dear Sir, Thank you for the explanation. Could you elaborate with respect to strengths as in percentages by giving some examples as I am still a little unclear about the comparison of the degree of affliction to the relative strengths of the other FBs. Thanks and Regards, PNR , <siha> wrote: > > Hello PNR, > > I add my replies in capitals to your message. > > Best wishes, > > > > > - > " pnr312 " <pnr312> > > Sunday, September 11, 2005 6:44 PM > affliction > > > > > > Dear Professor, > > > > How is the strength of an affliction from a FM determined? Especially > > in the case of Rahu and Ketu? > > THE INTENSITY OF AN AFFLICTION IS MEASURED IN TERMS ITS CLOSENESS. IT IS > INCREASED IF THE AFFLICTING PLANET IS PLACED IN A MALEFIC HOUSE OR ITSELF IS > ALSO UNDER THE AFFLICTION. INTENSIFICATION FURTHER INCREASES IN PROPORTION > TO THE WEAKNESS OF THE AFFLICTED PLANET. THE INTENSITY IS MORE WITH MMP'S > AFFLICTION IN COMPARISON TO THE AFFLICTION BY AN FM. WHEN KETU IS AFFLICTING > AS AN MMP ITS AFFLICTION IS MORE. > > > If in the case of a particular signification there are primary and > > secondary significators and if the primary significator is afflicted > > by a FM and the secondary significators are unafflicted ,well placed > > and of considerable strength how does one determine whether the > > affliction of the primary significator is stronger or outweighs the > > strength of the secondary significators? > AFFLICTION OF PRIMARY SIGNIFICATOR IS TO BE JUDGED INDEPENDANTLY AND HAS A > MAJOR SAY IN BLESSING THE SIGNIFICATIONS. THE STRENGTH OF THE SECONDARY > SIGNIFICATORS IS LIKELY TO HELP IN THEIR SUB PERIODS WITH THE HELP OF ASTRAL > REMEDIES. > > > Would it be different if the FM is Rahu or Ketu or would it be the > > same for all FMs? > > IT IS DIFFERENT FOR MMP AND WHEN KETU ACTS AS MMP ITS AFFLICTION IS MORE > GRAVE. > > > Also for Rahu and Ketu old age or infancy does not make a difference > > in the case of affliction? > > RIGHT. > > > Thanks and Regards, > > PNR > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2005 Report Share Posted September 12, 2005 Hello PNR, You may refer to http://www.yournetastrologer.com/predicti.htm for measuring strength of planets, effective orb for judging the influence of natal and transit conjunctions and aspects, measuring afflictions; and http://www.yournetastrologer.com/basic/b13.htm for know strength of planets and weakness of planets. Best wishes, - " pnr312 " <pnr312 Sunday, September 11, 2005 10:39 PM Re: affliction > Dear Sir, > Thank you for the explanation. > Could you elaborate with respect to strengths as in percentages by > giving some examples as I am still a little unclear about the > comparison of the degree of affliction to the relative strengths of > the other FBs. > Thanks and Regards, > PNR > , <siha> wrote: >> >> Hello PNR, >> >> I add my replies in capitals to your message. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> >> - >> " pnr312 " <pnr312> >> >> Sunday, September 11, 2005 6:44 PM >> affliction >> >> >> > >> > Dear Professor, >> > >> > How is the strength of an affliction from a FM determined? > Especially >> > in the case of Rahu and Ketu? >> >> THE INTENSITY OF AN AFFLICTION IS MEASURED IN TERMS ITS CLOSENESS. > IT IS >> INCREASED IF THE AFFLICTING PLANET IS PLACED IN A MALEFIC HOUSE OR > ITSELF IS >> ALSO UNDER THE AFFLICTION. INTENSIFICATION FURTHER INCREASES IN > PROPORTION >> TO THE WEAKNESS OF THE AFFLICTED PLANET. THE INTENSITY IS MORE > WITH MMP'S >> AFFLICTION IN COMPARISON TO THE AFFLICTION BY AN FM. WHEN KETU IS > AFFLICTING >> AS AN MMP ITS AFFLICTION IS MORE. >> >> > If in the case of a particular signification there are primary > and >> > secondary significators and if the primary significator is > afflicted >> > by a FM and the secondary significators are unafflicted ,well > placed >> > and of considerable strength how does one determine whether the >> > affliction of the primary significator is stronger or outweighs > the >> > strength of the secondary significators? >> AFFLICTION OF PRIMARY SIGNIFICATOR IS TO BE JUDGED INDEPENDANTLY > AND HAS A >> MAJOR SAY IN BLESSING THE SIGNIFICATIONS. THE STRENGTH OF THE > SECONDARY >> SIGNIFICATORS IS LIKELY TO HELP IN THEIR SUB PERIODS WITH THE HELP > OF ASTRAL >> REMEDIES. >> >> > Would it be different if the FM is Rahu or Ketu or would it be > the >> > same for all FMs? >> >> IT IS DIFFERENT FOR MMP AND WHEN KETU ACTS AS MMP ITS AFFLICTION > IS MORE >> GRAVE. >> >> > Also for Rahu and Ketu old age or infancy does not make a > difference >> > in the case of affliction? >> >> RIGHT. >> >> > Thanks and Regards, >> > PNR >> > >> > >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.