Guest guest Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 Dear Anjali, I am not very good at predicting future , I think Nahata ji would be the best person to suggest a date and time. sincerely, Priya lalkitab , " anjaliraj1 " <anjaliraj1> wrote: > Dear Priya > > It feels good that you can feel my dilemma. i wish it were easier to > decide. > > is there at all a 'good enough' date and time bet last wk of june and > first wk july for my baby to be born? someone told me june 25th > between 9:03PM - 9:12PM, New Delhi is a good day. > > Thanks again for your thoughtful insights. your knowledge is > tremendous. > > Regards > Anjali > > lalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " <bhooshanpriya> > wrote: > > Dear Anjali, > > > > You have put me into a dilemma . Ethics , destiny , God's will on > the > > one hand and the mother instinct on the other. I am torn between > the > > two. I thought over your question the whole night yesterday > otherwise > > you know I am very prompt in replying. What would I have done if I > > were in the shoes of Anjali , an expectant mother ? I needed to > know > > an honest reply , a reply that appeals to me. > > > > At the end, I came to the conclusion that if I could , I would give > > my child the best start possible. And if deciding the time of > birth > > gives an advantage to my child , I would. To me it is not a matter > > of academic discussion , it is an emotional matter that is between > me > > and my child. > > > > It was only after the dilemma was solved , I felt so relieved . > > Now I leave it to you Anjali . You are the mother to be. It is > > between you and your child. > > > > > > With love, > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , Jai Nahata <jaynahata@g...> wrote: > > > Dear Anjali ji, > > > First of all, May GOD bless you and your child, always. > > > Secondly, no matter what we can never be greater than almighty. > He > > is the > > > best judge of our deeds. Moreover if it would have been possible > > than Shri > > > Ramji taken birth on best time. Could he ? We all see best bride > > and grooms > > > for our children but we all know that couples are made in heaven > > and they > > > are left here to join hands. > > > So my sincere advice to you would be to have full faith in > almighty > > GOD and > > > pray for the best to happen to your child. > > > And this what we all will do. > > > May GOD bless you and child. > > > Best regards > > > Jai > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/05, anjaliraj1 <anjaliraj1> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Priya > > > > > > > > I am expecting my second child. He/she is due on 5th July. > Since > > my > > > > first was a c-section, this one may be too. I had put up a > > question > > > > once earlier whether it is ethical/moral/good to pre-plan the > > > > date/time of my childs birth. i myself believe it should be > left > > to > > > > God. > > > > > > > > There is an astrologer though who has taken out the date of > 25th > > June > > > > 9:03 PM to 9:12 PM, New Delhi, as the best time for this birth. > > Any > > > > suggestions from anyone? > > > > > > > > Thanks and best rgds > > > > Anjali > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " > > <bhooshanpriya> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > > > > > I can understand your concern , it is not advisable at this > age > > to > > > > > study the horoscope for other things , other then 'Bal- > > arishtha'. I > > > > > have done that already. Bal-arishth is illness or any untoward > > > > > happening which might threaten the life of a child. > > > > > > > > > > I share your concern as a mother. > > > > > > > > > > with Love, > > > > > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , " anjaliraj1 " > <anjaliraj1> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Priya Ji > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you analyse my sons horoscope in totality then please. > > > > > > His DOB is 08.08.2000. Time : 02.32PM, New Delhi. > > > > > > Could you also pls emphasise what impact 'arishta' has on a > > > > persons > > > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Rgds > > > > > > Anjali > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , bhooshan priya > > > > > <bhooshanpriya> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Irrespective of what has been said here in the Group , > your > > > > > > astrologer is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. Yes, the child has `arishta' > > > > > arising > > > > > > out of the sun + rahu combination. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In astrology a child's horoscope should not be studied for > > > > many > > > > > > matters; but there is one area where it is not only > > > > recommended , > > > > > it > > > > > > is mandatory to study the horoscope of a child for > `arishta'. > > > > > Arishta > > > > > > means , illness and any other unfortunate happening. An > > > > astrologer > > > > > > must cast the horoscope and study it for `arishta' and > > > > > > suggest `samaadhaan' or upaya. If that were not the case , > > > > instead > > > > > of > > > > > > casting a horoscope at the time of birth people would just > > note > > > > the > > > > > > time and the date and get it cast only after the child is > 12 > > or > > > > 13. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now explaining why your astrologer is right. I am quoting > > > > > original > > > > > > excerpts from Lal Kitab { 1952 ed} along with page numbers > > from > > > > > Arun > > > > > > Sanhita for every one to verify. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] Rahu is placed in the 9th > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {a } " rahu khana 9 , 12 mein neech kaha gaya hai " p223 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > { b } " rahu ab 9guni mandi takat ka malik hoga jo > Chandra > > ko > > > > bhi > > > > > > madhyam kar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dega " p235 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun + Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] " garhan ka manda samay us samay jor par hoga jab > dono > > > > > > kundali ke 9 ya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 mein baithe hon " p288 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination is most vicious when either in the 9th > or > > in > > > > the > > > > > > 12th . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 2 ] " grahan ravi ki kismet hoti , varna umra chhoti > marta > > > > ho " > > > > > p > > > > > > 287 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Either his kismet will be eclipsed or he will die > young. " > > 45 > > > > > saal > > > > > > tak umra shaqqi " the fear for life will be up to the age of > > 45 , > > > > > > after that there will be no danger for life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 3 ] " chahe surya ko grahan lagata ho, magar garmee se > aur > > > > bhi > > > > > > adhik hani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > karne wala hilta hua hathi hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even though the rahu eclipses the sun but it becomes a > > violent > > > > > > elephant capable of greater damage under the heat of the > sun. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 4 ] " surya ki drishti ya sath se rahu ka prabhav na > sirf > > > > > baithe > > > > > > hue ghar par > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manda hoga balki saath lagata ghar bhi barbad hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination would not only damage the house it is > in , > > > > would > > > > > > also damage the adjacent house. This means both the 9th > house > > > > > > of `bhagya' and the 10th house of ` profession, > yash ,father' > > > > would > > > > > > be damaged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 5 ] " surya ,rahu ke samay yadi shukra aur budh saath > ho > > to > > > > > surya > > > > > > graham ka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asar bura nahi hoga " p287 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a `parihar' clause . `parihar' means escape from > the > > > > > > results . This combination of the sun and the rahu will be > > > > > > ineffective if the venus and mercury are together in the > > kundali. > > > > > > Venus and mercury together form masnui SUN . That means if > > there > > > > is > > > > > > another masnui {artificial} sun in the kundali , the natal > sun > > > > will > > > > > > get strengthened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am afraid , there is no masnui sun in the kundali and > > hence > > > > no > > > > > > escape from the results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 6 ] " agar mangal kisi tarah se bhi rahu ko dabata na > ho > > ya > > > > > khud > > > > > > hi mangal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manda ho …. to uttam sehat aur lambi ayu dono shaqqi > hongi " > > p > > > > 288 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is another `parihar' clause. If the mars is not > ashubh > > and > > > > > > controls the rahu , the combination would not effect; on the > > > > > contrary > > > > > > if the mangal itself is ashubh and incapable of controlling > > the > > > > > > rahu , then both the health and longevity will be doubtful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now the matter to be resolved is whether mangal is shubh > in > > > > this > > > > > > kundali or ashubh. In the kundali along with Rahu three > > planets > > > > are > > > > > > arranged at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mercury : 8d 13m > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mars : 10d 53m > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun : 22d 16m > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The mercury and Mars are just 2d 40m apart , close enough > > to be > > > > > > considered as together. The sun and the mercury are far > apart > > > > some > > > > > 15 > > > > > > degrees apart. Therefore because of mars and mercury being > > > > > together , > > > > > > mars would be considered as ashubh. And the surya + rahu > > > > > combination > > > > > > becomes operative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now discussing the same phenomena through Vedic > astrology. > > The > > > > > > Vedic `parihar' clause says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " agar Chandra , mangal aur brahaspati shubh ho to Rahu > > janya > > > > > dosh > > > > > > ka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parihar ho jata hai " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the moon , mars and Jupiter are strong the dosh > resulting > > > > > > because of rahu is eliminated. In this kundali moon is in > > scorpio > > > > > > hence neech , Mars is in cancer hence neech , and Jupiter is > > > > placed > > > > > > in its enemy rasi hence weak. There is no help from either > of > > > > these > > > > > > three planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no `parihar' or respite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In conclusion , the surya + rahu dosh is there. To do the > > > > remedy > > > > > or > > > > > > not is entirely up to you. If I were in your place I > wouldn't > > > > have > > > > > > taken chances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Messenger - Communicate instantly... " Ping " your > > > > friends > > > > > > today! Download Messenger Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 26, 2005 Report Share Posted May 26, 2005 Dear Priya Thank You v much for all the time and effort you have spent on my sons horoscope. pls. tell me if there is any upay for 'arishta' other than burning copper coin, that would be easier for him to do. also, when would the right time be, to do this upay. i had another question regarding moon in 1st house. does it result in ill health of the native and 'Ma se doori?' what is the remedy for that? since my son has moon in 1st, does it affect his longetivity or mine in any way? or does it mean we will live away from each other or not get along. i am v attached to my child so asking :-). i have moon in the 1st house too. i am the second child of my mother. she passed away with leukemia last july. was the moon in my horoscope responsible as my astrologer says it can shorten the life of the native or the mother - in our case it has affected her. my dob is 26th Jan 1973, 1:20AM, New Delhi. Thanks and rgds Anjali lalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " <bhooshanpriya> wrote: > Dear Anjali, > > I am not very good at predicting future , I think Nahata ji would be > the best person to suggest a date and time. > > sincerely, > > Priya > > > > > lalkitab , " anjaliraj1 " <anjaliraj1> wrote: > > Dear Priya > > > > It feels good that you can feel my dilemma. i wish it were easier > to > > decide. > > > > is there at all a 'good enough' date and time bet last wk of june > and > > first wk july for my baby to be born? someone told me june 25th > > between 9:03PM - 9:12PM, New Delhi is a good day. > > > > Thanks again for your thoughtful insights. your knowledge is > > tremendous. > > > > Regards > > Anjali > > > > lalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " > <bhooshanpriya> > > wrote: > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > You have put me into a dilemma . Ethics , destiny , God's will on > > the > > > one hand and the mother instinct on the other. I am torn between > > the > > > two. I thought over your question the whole night yesterday > > otherwise > > > you know I am very prompt in replying. What would I have done if > I > > > were in the shoes of Anjali , an expectant mother ? I needed to > > know > > > an honest reply , a reply that appeals to me. > > > > > > At the end, I came to the conclusion that if I could , I would > give > > > my child the best start possible. And if deciding the time of > > birth > > > gives an advantage to my child , I would. To me it is not a > matter > > > of academic discussion , it is an emotional matter that is > between > > me > > > and my child. > > > > > > It was only after the dilemma was solved , I felt so > relieved . > > > Now I leave it to you Anjali . You are the mother to be. It is > > > between you and your child. > > > > > > > > > With love, > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , Jai Nahata <jaynahata@g...> > wrote: > > > > Dear Anjali ji, > > > > First of all, May GOD bless you and your child, always. > > > > Secondly, no matter what we can never be greater than almighty. > > He > > > is the > > > > best judge of our deeds. Moreover if it would have been > possible > > > than Shri > > > > Ramji taken birth on best time. Could he ? We all see best > bride > > > and grooms > > > > for our children but we all know that couples are made in > heaven > > > and they > > > > are left here to join hands. > > > > So my sincere advice to you would be to have full faith in > > almighty > > > GOD and > > > > pray for the best to happen to your child. > > > > And this what we all will do. > > > > May GOD bless you and child. > > > > Best regards > > > > Jai > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/24/05, anjaliraj1 <anjaliraj1> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Priya > > > > > > > > > > I am expecting my second child. He/she is due on 5th July. > > Since > > > my > > > > > first was a c-section, this one may be too. I had put up a > > > question > > > > > once earlier whether it is ethical/moral/good to pre-plan the > > > > > date/time of my childs birth. i myself believe it should be > > left > > > to > > > > > God. > > > > > > > > > > There is an astrologer though who has taken out the date of > > 25th > > > June > > > > > 9:03 PM to 9:12 PM, New Delhi, as the best time for this > birth. > > > Any > > > > > suggestions from anyone? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and best rgds > > > > > Anjali > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " > > > <bhooshanpriya> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > > > > > > > I can understand your concern , it is not advisable at this > > age > > > to > > > > > > study the horoscope for other things , other then 'Bal- > > > arishtha'. I > > > > > > have done that already. Bal-arishth is illness or any > untoward > > > > > > happening which might threaten the life of a child. > > > > > > > > > > > > I share your concern as a mother. > > > > > > > > > > > > with Love, > > > > > > > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , " anjaliraj1 " > > <anjaliraj1> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Priya Ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you analyse my sons horoscope in totality then > please. > > > > > > > His DOB is 08.08.2000. Time : 02.32PM, New Delhi. > > > > > > > Could you also pls emphasise what impact 'arishta' has on > a > > > > > persons > > > > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Rgds > > > > > > > Anjali > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , bhooshan priya > > > > > > <bhooshanpriya> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Irrespective of what has been said here in the Group , > > your > > > > > > > astrologer is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. Yes, the child has > `arishta' > > > > > > arising > > > > > > > out of the sun + rahu combination. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In astrology a child's horoscope should not be studied > for > > > > > many > > > > > > > matters; but there is one area where it is not only > > > > > recommended , > > > > > > it > > > > > > > is mandatory to study the horoscope of a child for > > `arishta'. > > > > > > Arishta > > > > > > > means , illness and any other unfortunate happening. An > > > > > astrologer > > > > > > > must cast the horoscope and study it for `arishta' and > > > > > > > suggest `samaadhaan' or upaya. If that were not the case , > > > > > instead > > > > > > of > > > > > > > casting a horoscope at the time of birth people would > just > > > note > > > > > the > > > > > > > time and the date and get it cast only after the child is > > 12 > > > or > > > > > 13. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now explaining why your astrologer is right. I am > quoting > > > > > > original > > > > > > > excerpts from Lal Kitab { 1952 ed} along with page > numbers > > > from > > > > > > Arun > > > > > > > Sanhita for every one to verify. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] Rahu is placed in the 9th > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {a } " rahu khana 9 , 12 mein neech kaha gaya hai " p223 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > { b } " rahu ab 9guni mandi takat ka malik hoga jo > > Chandra > > > ko > > > > > bhi > > > > > > > madhyam kar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dega " p235 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun + Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] " garhan ka manda samay us samay jor par hoga jab > > dono > > > > > > > kundali ke 9 ya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 mein baithe hon " p288 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination is most vicious when either in the 9th > > or > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > > 12th . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 2 ] " grahan ravi ki kismet hoti , varna umra chhoti > > marta > > > > > ho " > > > > > > p > > > > > > > 287 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Either his kismet will be eclipsed or he will die > > young. " > > > 45 > > > > > > saal > > > > > > > tak umra shaqqi " the fear for life will be up to the age > of > > > 45 , > > > > > > > after that there will be no danger for life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 3 ] " chahe surya ko grahan lagata ho, magar garmee > se > > aur > > > > > bhi > > > > > > > adhik hani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > karne wala hilta hua hathi hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even though the rahu eclipses the sun but it becomes a > > > violent > > > > > > > elephant capable of greater damage under the heat of the > > sun. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 4 ] " surya ki drishti ya sath se rahu ka prabhav na > > sirf > > > > > > baithe > > > > > > > hue ghar par > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manda hoga balki saath lagata ghar bhi barbad hoga " p > 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination would not only damage the house it is > > in , > > > > > would > > > > > > > also damage the adjacent house. This means both the 9th > > house > > > > > > > of `bhagya' and the 10th house of ` profession, > > yash ,father' > > > > > would > > > > > > > be damaged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 5 ] " surya ,rahu ke samay yadi shukra aur budh saath > > ho > > > to > > > > > > surya > > > > > > > graham ka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asar bura nahi hoga " p287 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a `parihar' clause . `parihar' means escape > from > > the > > > > > > > results . This combination of the sun and the rahu will be > > > > > > > ineffective if the venus and mercury are together in the > > > kundali. > > > > > > > Venus and mercury together form masnui SUN . That means > if > > > there > > > > > is > > > > > > > another masnui {artificial} sun in the kundali , the > natal > > sun > > > > > will > > > > > > > get strengthened. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am afraid , there is no masnui sun in the kundali and > > > hence > > > > > no > > > > > > > escape from the results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 6 ] " agar mangal kisi tarah se bhi rahu ko dabata na > > ho > > > ya > > > > > > khud > > > > > > > hi mangal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manda ho …. to uttam sehat aur lambi ayu dono shaqqi > > hongi " > > > p > > > > > 288 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is another `parihar' clause. If the mars is not > > ashubh > > > and > > > > > > > controls the rahu , the combination would not effect; on > the > > > > > > contrary > > > > > > > if the mangal itself is ashubh and incapable of > controlling > > > the > > > > > > > rahu , then both the health and longevity will be > doubtful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now the matter to be resolved is whether mangal is > shubh > > in > > > > > this > > > > > > > kundali or ashubh. In the kundali along with Rahu three > > > planets > > > > > are > > > > > > > arranged at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mercury : 8d 13m > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mars : 10d 53m > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun : 22d 16m > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The mercury and Mars are just 2d 40m apart , close > enough > > > to be > > > > > > > considered as together. The sun and the mercury are far > > apart > > > > > some > > > > > > 15 > > > > > > > degrees apart. Therefore because of mars and mercury being > > > > > > together , > > > > > > > mars would be considered as ashubh. And the surya + rahu > > > > > > combination > > > > > > > becomes operative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now discussing the same phenomena through Vedic > > astrology. > > > The > > > > > > > Vedic `parihar' clause says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " agar Chandra , mangal aur brahaspati shubh ho to Rahu > > > janya > > > > > > dosh > > > > > > > ka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parihar ho jata hai " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the moon , mars and Jupiter are strong the dosh > > resulting > > > > > > > because of rahu is eliminated. In this kundali moon is in > > > scorpio > > > > > > > hence neech , Mars is in cancer hence neech , and Jupiter > is > > > > > placed > > > > > > > in its enemy rasi hence weak. There is no help from > either > > of > > > > > these > > > > > > > three planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no `parihar' or respite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In conclusion , the surya + rahu dosh is there. To do > the > > > > > remedy > > > > > > or > > > > > > > not is entirely up to you. If I were in your place I > > wouldn't > > > > > have > > > > > > > taken chances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Messenger - Communicate instantly... " Ping " your > > > > > friends > > > > > > > today! Download Messenger Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.