Guest guest Posted May 24, 2005 Report Share Posted May 24, 2005 Dear Priya I am expecting my second child. He/she is due on 5th July. Since my first was a c-section, this one may be too. I had put up a question once earlier whether it is ethical/moral/good to pre-plan the date/time of my childs birth. i myself believe it should be left to God. There is an astrologer though who has taken out the date of 25th June 9:03 PM to 9:12 PM, New Delhi, as the best time for this birth. Any suggestions from anyone? Thanks and best rgds Anjali lalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " <bhooshanpriya> wrote: > Dear Anjali, > > I can understand your concern , it is not advisable at this age to > study the horoscope for other things , other then 'Bal-arishtha'. I > have done that already. Bal-arishth is illness or any untoward > happening which might threaten the life of a child. > > I share your concern as a mother. > > with Love, > > Priya > > > > lalkitab , " anjaliraj1 " <anjaliraj1> wrote: > > Dear Priya Ji > > > > Could you analyse my sons horoscope in totality then please. > > His DOB is 08.08.2000. Time : 02.32PM, New Delhi. > > Could you also pls emphasise what impact 'arishta' has on a persons > > horoscope. > > > > Best Rgds > > Anjali > > > > > > > > lalkitab , bhooshan priya > <bhooshanpriya> > > wrote: > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > > > > Irrespective of what has been said here in the Group , your > > astrologer is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. Yes, the child has `arishta' > arising > > out of the sun + rahu combination. > > > > > > In astrology a child's horoscope should not be studied for many > > matters; but there is one area where it is not only recommended , > it > > is mandatory to study the horoscope of a child for `arishta'. > Arishta > > means , illness and any other unfortunate happening. An astrologer > > must cast the horoscope and study it for `arishta' and > > suggest `samaadhaan' or upaya. If that were not the case , instead > of > > casting a horoscope at the time of birth people would just note the > > time and the date and get it cast only after the child is 12 or 13. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now explaining why your astrologer is right. I am quoting > original > > excerpts from Lal Kitab { 1952 ed} along with page numbers from > Arun > > Sanhita for every one to verify. > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] Rahu is placed in the 9th > > > > > > > > > > > > {a } " rahu khana 9 , 12 mein neech kaha gaya hai " p223 > > > > > > > > > > > > { b } " rahu ab 9guni mandi takat ka malik hoga jo Chandra ko bhi > > madhyam kar > > > > > > dega " p235 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun + Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] " garhan ka manda samay us samay jor par hoga jab dono > > kundali ke 9 ya > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 mein baithe hon " p288 > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination is most vicious when either in the 9th or in the > > 12th . > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 2 ] " grahan ravi ki kismet hoti , varna umra chhoti marta ho " > p > > 287 . > > > > > > > > > > > > Either his kismet will be eclipsed or he will die young. " 45 > saal > > tak umra shaqqi " the fear for life will be up to the age of 45 , > > after that there will be no danger for life. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 3 ] " chahe surya ko grahan lagata ho, magar garmee se aur bhi > > adhik hani > > > > > > > > > > > > karne wala hilta hua hathi hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > Even though the rahu eclipses the sun but it becomes a violent > > elephant capable of greater damage under the heat of the sun. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 4 ] " surya ki drishti ya sath se rahu ka prabhav na sirf > baithe > > hue ghar par > > > > > > > > > > > > manda hoga balki saath lagata ghar bhi barbad hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination would not only damage the house it is in , would > > also damage the adjacent house. This means both the 9th house > > of `bhagya' and the 10th house of ` profession, yash ,father' would > > be damaged. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 5 ] " surya ,rahu ke samay yadi shukra aur budh saath ho to > surya > > graham ka > > > > > > > > > > > > asar bura nahi hoga " p287 > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a `parihar' clause . `parihar' means escape from the > > results . This combination of the sun and the rahu will be > > ineffective if the venus and mercury are together in the kundali. > > Venus and mercury together form masnui SUN . That means if there is > > another masnui {artificial} sun in the kundali , the natal sun will > > get strengthened. > > > > > > I am afraid , there is no masnui sun in the kundali and hence no > > escape from the results. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 6 ] " agar mangal kisi tarah se bhi rahu ko dabata na ho ya > khud > > hi mangal > > > > > > > > > > > > manda ho …. to uttam sehat aur lambi ayu dono shaqqi hongi " p 288 > > > > > > > > > > > > This is another `parihar' clause. If the mars is not ashubh and > > controls the rahu , the combination would not effect; on the > contrary > > if the mangal itself is ashubh and incapable of controlling the > > rahu , then both the health and longevity will be doubtful. > > > > > > Now the matter to be resolved is whether mangal is shubh in this > > kundali or ashubh. In the kundali along with Rahu three planets are > > arranged at: > > > > > > Mercury : 8d 13m > > > > > > Mars : 10d 53m > > > > > > Sun : 22d 16m > > > > > > > > > > > > The mercury and Mars are just 2d 40m apart , close enough to be > > considered as together. The sun and the mercury are far apart some > 15 > > degrees apart. Therefore because of mars and mercury being > together , > > mars would be considered as ashubh. And the surya + rahu > combination > > becomes operative. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now discussing the same phenomena through Vedic astrology. The > > Vedic `parihar' clause says : > > > > > > > > > > > > " agar Chandra , mangal aur brahaspati shubh ho to Rahu janya > dosh > > ka > > > > > > > > > > > > parihar ho jata hai " . > > > > > > > > > > > > If the moon , mars and Jupiter are strong the dosh resulting > > because of rahu is eliminated. In this kundali moon is in scorpio > > hence neech , Mars is in cancer hence neech , and Jupiter is placed > > in its enemy rasi hence weak. There is no help from either of these > > three planets. > > > > > > Therefore there is no `parihar' or respite. > > > > > > > > > > > > In conclusion , the surya + rahu dosh is there. To do the remedy > or > > not is entirely up to you. If I were in your place I wouldn't have > > taken chances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Messenger - Communicate instantly... " Ping " your friends > > today! Download Messenger Now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 Anjali jee, If you are going to have caesarian again , then in my opnion you should plan your day and time . check the day when you deliver the babdy , no gandmool nakstra running and also child will not be manglik. This can be verfied by your astrologer also try to take chart for that day and time periods . this way you can avoid child being born in bad nakshtra. Planets will have eefect only when child is out of mother womb. Regards mukesh lalkitab [lalkitab ] On Behalf Of anjaliraj1 Tuesday, May 24, 2005 8:44 PM lalkitab [lalkitab] Priya : child birth Dear Priya I am expecting my second child. He/she is due on 5th July. Since my first was a c-section, this one may be too. I had put up a question once earlier whether it is ethical/moral/good to pre-plan the date/time of my childs birth. i myself believe it should be left to God. There is an astrologer though who has taken out the date of 25th June 9:03 PM to 9:12 PM, New Delhi, as the best time for this birth. Any suggestions from anyone? Thanks and best rgds Anjali lalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " <bhooshanpriya> wrote: > Dear Anjali, > > I can understand your concern , it is not advisable at this age to > study the horoscope for other things , other then 'Bal-arishtha'. I > have done that already. Bal-arishth is illness or any untoward > happening which might threaten the life of a child. > > I share your concern as a mother. > > with Love, > > Priya > > > > lalkitab , " anjaliraj1 " <anjaliraj1> wrote: > > Dear Priya Ji > > > > Could you analyse my sons horoscope in totality then please. > > His DOB is 08.08.2000. Time : 02.32PM, New Delhi. > > Could you also pls emphasise what impact 'arishta' has on a persons > > horoscope. > > > > Best Rgds > > Anjali > > > > > > > > lalkitab , bhooshan priya > <bhooshanpriya> > > wrote: > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > > > > Irrespective of what has been said here in the Group , your > > astrologer is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. Yes, the child has `arishta' > arising > > out of the sun + rahu combination. > > > > > > In astrology a child's horoscope should not be studied for many > > matters; but there is one area where it is not only recommended , > it > > is mandatory to study the horoscope of a child for `arishta'. > Arishta > > means , illness and any other unfortunate happening. An astrologer > > must cast the horoscope and study it for `arishta' and > > suggest `samaadhaan' or upaya. If that were not the case , instead > of > > casting a horoscope at the time of birth people would just note the > > time and the date and get it cast only after the child is 12 or 13. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now explaining why your astrologer is right. I am quoting > original > > excerpts from Lal Kitab { 1952 ed} along with page numbers from > Arun > > Sanhita for every one to verify. > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] Rahu is placed in the 9th > > > > > > > > > > > > {a } " rahu khana 9 , 12 mein neech kaha gaya hai " p223 > > > > > > > > > > > > { b } " rahu ab 9guni mandi takat ka malik hoga jo Chandra ko bhi > > madhyam kar > > > > > > dega " p235 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun + Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] " garhan ka manda samay us samay jor par hoga jab dono > > kundali ke 9 ya > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 mein baithe hon " p288 > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination is most vicious when either in the 9th or in the > > 12th . > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 2 ] " grahan ravi ki kismet hoti , varna umra chhoti marta ho " > p > > 287 . > > > > > > > > > > > > Either his kismet will be eclipsed or he will die young. " 45 > saal > > tak umra shaqqi " the fear for life will be up to the age of 45 , > > after that there will be no danger for life. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 3 ] " chahe surya ko grahan lagata ho, magar garmee se aur bhi > > adhik hani > > > > > > > > > > > > karne wala hilta hua hathi hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > Even though the rahu eclipses the sun but it becomes a violent > > elephant capable of greater damage under the heat of the sun. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 4 ] " surya ki drishti ya sath se rahu ka prabhav na sirf > baithe > > hue ghar par > > > > > > > > > > > > manda hoga balki saath lagata ghar bhi barbad hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination would not only damage the house it is in , would > > also damage the adjacent house. This means both the 9th house > > of `bhagya' and the 10th house of ` profession, yash ,father' would > > be damaged. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 5 ] " surya ,rahu ke samay yadi shukra aur budh saath ho to > surya > > graham ka > > > > > > > > > > > > asar bura nahi hoga " p287 > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a `parihar' clause . `parihar' means escape from the > > results . This combination of the sun and the rahu will be > > ineffective if the venus and mercury are together in the kundali. > > Venus and mercury together form masnui SUN . That means if there is > > another masnui {artificial} sun in the kundali , the natal sun will > > get strengthened. > > > > > > I am afraid , there is no masnui sun in the kundali and hence no > > escape from the results. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 6 ] " agar mangal kisi tarah se bhi rahu ko dabata na ho ya > khud > > hi mangal > > > > > > > > > > > > manda ho …. to uttam sehat aur lambi ayu dono shaqqi hongi " p 288 > > > > > > > > > > > > This is another `parihar' clause. If the mars is not ashubh and > > controls the rahu , the combination would not effect; on the > contrary > > if the mangal itself is ashubh and incapable of controlling the > > rahu , then both the health and longevity will be doubtful. > > > > > > Now the matter to be resolved is whether mangal is shubh in this > > kundali or ashubh. In the kundali along with Rahu three planets are > > arranged at: > > > > > > Mercury : 8d 13m > > > > > > Mars : 10d 53m > > > > > > Sun : 22d 16m > > > > > > > > > > > > The mercury and Mars are just 2d 40m apart , close enough to be > > considered as together. The sun and the mercury are far apart some > 15 > > degrees apart. Therefore because of mars and mercury being > together , > > mars would be considered as ashubh. And the surya + rahu > combination > > becomes operative. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now discussing the same phenomena through Vedic astrology. The > > Vedic `parihar' clause says : > > > > > > > > > > > > " agar Chandra , mangal aur brahaspati shubh ho to Rahu janya > dosh > > ka > > > > > > > > > > > > parihar ho jata hai " . > > > > > > > > > > > > If the moon , mars and Jupiter are strong the dosh resulting > > because of rahu is eliminated. In this kundali moon is in scorpio > > hence neech , Mars is in cancer hence neech , and Jupiter is placed > > in its enemy rasi hence weak. There is no help from either of these > > three planets. > > > > > > Therefore there is no `parihar' or respite. > > > > > > > > > > > > In conclusion , the surya + rahu dosh is there. To do the remedy > or > > not is entirely up to you. If I were in your place I wouldn't have > > taken chances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Messenger - Communicate instantly... " Ping " your friends > > today! Download Messenger Now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 Dear Anjali ji, First of all, May GOD bless you and your child, always. Secondly, no matter what we can never be greater than almighty. He is the best judge of our deeds. Moreover if it would have been possible than Shri Ramji taken birth on best time. Could he ? We all see best bride and grooms for our children but we all know that couples are made in heaven and they are left here to join hands. So my sincere advice to you would be to have full faith in almighty GOD and pray for the best to happen to your child. And this what we all will do. May GOD bless you and child. Best regards Jai On 5/24/05, anjaliraj1 <anjaliraj1 wrote: Dear PriyaI am expecting my second child. He/she is due on 5th July. Since myfirst was a c-section, this one may be too. I had put up a question once earlier whether it is ethical/moral/good to pre-plan thedate/time of my childs birth. i myself believe it should be left toGod.There is an astrologer though who has taken out the date of 25th June 9:03 PM to 9:12 PM, New Delhi, as the best time for this birth. Anysuggestions from anyone?Thanks and best rgdsAnjalilalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " <bhooshanpriya>wrote:> Dear Anjali,>> I can understand your concern , it is not advisable at this age to> study the horoscope for other things , other then 'Bal-arishtha'. I > have done that already. Bal-arishth is illness or any untoward> happening which might threaten the life of a child.>> I share your concern as a mother.>> with Love,>> Priya >>>> lalkitab , " anjaliraj1 " <anjaliraj1>wrote:> > Dear Priya Ji> >> > Could you analyse my sons horoscope in totality then please. > > His DOB is 08.08.2000. Time : 02.32PM, New Delhi.> > Could you also pls emphasise what impact 'arishta' has on apersons> > horoscope.> >> > Best Rgds> > Anjali > >> >> >> > lalkitab , bhooshan priya> <bhooshanpriya>> > wrote:> > > Dear Anjali, > > >> > >> > > Irrespective of what has been said here in the Group , your> > astrologer is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. Yes, the child has `arishta'> arising> > out of the sun + rahu combination. > > >> > > In astrology a child's horoscope should not be studied formany> > matters; but there is one area where it is not onlyrecommended ,> it> > is mandatory to study the horoscope of a child for `arishta'. > Arishta> > means , illness and any other unfortunate happening. Anastrologer> > must cast the horoscope and study it for `arishta' and> > suggest `samaadhaan' or upaya. If that were not the case , instead> of> > casting a horoscope at the time of birth people would just notethe> > time and the date and get it cast only after the child is 12 or13.> > >> > > > > >> > > Now explaining why your astrologer is right. I am quoting> original> > excerpts from Lal Kitab { 1952 ed} along with page numbers from> Arun> > Sanhita for every one to verify. > > >> > >> > >> > > Rahu :> > >> > >> > >> > > [ 1 ] Rahu is placed in the 9th> > >> > > > > >> > > {a } " rahu khana 9 , 12 mein neech kaha gaya hai " p223> > >> > >> > >> > > { b } " rahu ab 9guni mandi takat ka malik hoga jo Chandra ko bhi> > madhyam kar> > >> > > dega " p235> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Sun + Rahu :> > > > > >> > >> > > [ 1 ] " garhan ka manda samay us samay jor par hoga jab dono> > kundali ke 9 ya> > >> > >> > >> > > 12 mein baithe hon " p288 > > >> > >> > >> > > This combination is most vicious when either in the 9th or inthe> > 12th .> > >> > >> > >> > > [ 2 ] " grahan ravi ki kismet hoti , varna umra chhoti marta ho " > p> > 287 .> > >> > >> > >> > > Either his kismet will be eclipsed or he will die young. " 45> saal> > tak umra shaqqi " the fear for life will be up to the age of 45 , > > after that there will be no danger for life.> > >> > >> > >> > > [ 3 ] " chahe surya ko grahan lagata ho, magar garmee se aurbhi> > adhik hani > > >> > >> > >> > > karne wala hilta hua hathi hoga " p 224> > >> > >> > >> > > Even though the rahu eclipses the sun but it becomes a violent > > elephant capable of greater damage under the heat of the sun.> > >> > >> > >> > > [ 4 ] " surya ki drishti ya sath se rahu ka prabhav na sirf> baithe > > hue ghar par> > >> > >> > >> > > manda hoga balki saath lagata ghar bhi barbad hoga " p 224> > >> > >> > >> > > This combination would not only damage the house it is in , would> > also damage the adjacent house. This means both the 9th house> > of `bhagya' and the 10th house of ` profession, yash ,father'would> > be damaged.> > >> > > > > >> > > [ 5 ] " surya ,rahu ke samay yadi shukra aur budh saath ho to> surya> > graham ka> > >> > >> > >> > > asar bura nahi hoga " p287 > > >> > >> > >> > > This is a `parihar' clause . `parihar' means escape from the> > results . This combination of the sun and the rahu will be> > ineffective if the venus and mercury are together in the kundali. > > Venus and mercury together form masnui SUN . That means if thereis> > another masnui {artificial} sun in the kundali , the natal sunwill> > get strengthened.> > > > > > I am afraid , there is no masnui sun in the kundali and henceno> > escape from the results.> > >> > >> > >> > > [ 6 ] " agar mangal kisi tarah se bhi rahu ko dabata na ho ya > khud> > hi mangal> > >> > >> > >> > > manda ho …. to uttam sehat aur lambi ayu dono shaqqi hongi " p288> > >> > > > > >> > > This is another `parihar' clause. If the mars is not ashubh and> > controls the rahu , the combination would not effect; on the> contrary> > if the mangal itself is ashubh and incapable of controlling the > > rahu , then both the health and longevity will be doubtful.> > >> > > Now the matter to be resolved is whether mangal is shubh inthis> > kundali or ashubh. In the kundali along with Rahu three planets are> > arranged at:> > >> > > Mercury : 8d 13m> > >> > > Mars : 10d 53m> > >> > > Sun : 22d 16m> > > > > >> > >> > > The mercury and Mars are just 2d 40m apart , close enough to be> > considered as together. The sun and the mercury are far apartsome> 15> > degrees apart. Therefore because of mars and mercury being > together ,> > mars would be considered as ashubh. And the surya + rahu> combination> > becomes operative.> > >> > >> > >> > > Now discussing the same phenomena through Vedic astrology. The > > Vedic `parihar' clause says :> > >> > >> > >> > > " agar Chandra , mangal aur brahaspati shubh ho to Rahu janya> dosh> > ka> > > > > >> > >> > > parihar ho jata hai " .> > >> > >> > >> > > If the moon , mars and Jupiter are strong the dosh resulting> > because of rahu is eliminated. In this kundali moon is in scorpio > > hence neech , Mars is in cancer hence neech , and Jupiter isplaced> > in its enemy rasi hence weak. There is no help from either ofthese> > three planets.> > >> > > Therefore there is no `parihar' or respite. > > >> > >> > >> > > In conclusion , the surya + rahu dosh is there. To do theremedy> or> > not is entirely up to you. If I were in your place I wouldn't have> > taken chances.> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Sincerely,> > >> > >> > >> > > Priya > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Messenger - Communicate instantly... " Ping " yourfriends> > today! Download Messenger Now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 Dear Anjali, You have put me into a dilemma . Ethics , destiny , God's will on the one hand and the mother instinct on the other. I am torn between the two. I thought over your question the whole night yesterday otherwise you know I am very prompt in replying. What would I have done if I were in the shoes of Anjali , an expectant mother ? I needed to know an honest reply , a reply that appeals to me. At the end, I came to the conclusion that if I could , I would give my child the best start possible. And if deciding the time of birth gives an advantage to my child , I would. To me it is not a matter of academic discussion , it is an emotional matter that is between me and my child. It was only after the dilemma was solved , I felt so relieved . Now I leave it to you Anjali . You are the mother to be. It is between you and your child. With love, Priya lalkitab , Jai Nahata <jaynahata@g...> wrote: > Dear Anjali ji, > First of all, May GOD bless you and your child, always. > Secondly, no matter what we can never be greater than almighty. He is the > best judge of our deeds. Moreover if it would have been possible than Shri > Ramji taken birth on best time. Could he ? We all see best bride and grooms > for our children but we all know that couples are made in heaven and they > are left here to join hands. > So my sincere advice to you would be to have full faith in almighty GOD and > pray for the best to happen to your child. > And this what we all will do. > May GOD bless you and child. > Best regards > Jai > > > On 5/24/05, anjaliraj1 <anjaliraj1> wrote: > > > > Dear Priya > > > > I am expecting my second child. He/she is due on 5th July. Since my > > first was a c-section, this one may be too. I had put up a question > > once earlier whether it is ethical/moral/good to pre-plan the > > date/time of my childs birth. i myself believe it should be left to > > God. > > > > There is an astrologer though who has taken out the date of 25th June > > 9:03 PM to 9:12 PM, New Delhi, as the best time for this birth. Any > > suggestions from anyone? > > > > Thanks and best rgds > > Anjali > > > > > > lalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " <bhooshanpriya> > > wrote: > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > I can understand your concern , it is not advisable at this age to > > > study the horoscope for other things , other then 'Bal- arishtha'. I > > > have done that already. Bal-arishth is illness or any untoward > > > happening which might threaten the life of a child. > > > > > > I share your concern as a mother. > > > > > > with Love, > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , " anjaliraj1 " <anjaliraj1> > > wrote: > > > > Dear Priya Ji > > > > > > > > Could you analyse my sons horoscope in totality then please. > > > > His DOB is 08.08.2000. Time : 02.32PM, New Delhi. > > > > Could you also pls emphasise what impact 'arishta' has on a > > persons > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > Best Rgds > > > > Anjali > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , bhooshan priya > > > <bhooshanpriya> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Irrespective of what has been said here in the Group , your > > > > astrologer is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. Yes, the child has `arishta' > > > arising > > > > out of the sun + rahu combination. > > > > > > > > > > In astrology a child's horoscope should not be studied for > > many > > > > matters; but there is one area where it is not only > > recommended , > > > it > > > > is mandatory to study the horoscope of a child for `arishta'. > > > Arishta > > > > means , illness and any other unfortunate happening. An > > astrologer > > > > must cast the horoscope and study it for `arishta' and > > > > suggest `samaadhaan' or upaya. If that were not the case , > > instead > > > of > > > > casting a horoscope at the time of birth people would just note > > the > > > > time and the date and get it cast only after the child is 12 or > > 13. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now explaining why your astrologer is right. I am quoting > > > original > > > > excerpts from Lal Kitab { 1952 ed} along with page numbers from > > > Arun > > > > Sanhita for every one to verify. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] Rahu is placed in the 9th > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {a } " rahu khana 9 , 12 mein neech kaha gaya hai " p223 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > { b } " rahu ab 9guni mandi takat ka malik hoga jo Chandra ko > > bhi > > > > madhyam kar > > > > > > > > > > dega " p235 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun + Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] " garhan ka manda samay us samay jor par hoga jab dono > > > > kundali ke 9 ya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 mein baithe hon " p288 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination is most vicious when either in the 9th or in > > the > > > > 12th . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 2 ] " grahan ravi ki kismet hoti , varna umra chhoti marta > > ho " > > > p > > > > 287 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Either his kismet will be eclipsed or he will die young. " 45 > > > saal > > > > tak umra shaqqi " the fear for life will be up to the age of 45 , > > > > after that there will be no danger for life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 3 ] " chahe surya ko grahan lagata ho, magar garmee se aur > > bhi > > > > adhik hani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > karne wala hilta hua hathi hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even though the rahu eclipses the sun but it becomes a violent > > > > elephant capable of greater damage under the heat of the sun. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 4 ] " surya ki drishti ya sath se rahu ka prabhav na sirf > > > baithe > > > > hue ghar par > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manda hoga balki saath lagata ghar bhi barbad hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination would not only damage the house it is in , > > would > > > > also damage the adjacent house. This means both the 9th house > > > > of `bhagya' and the 10th house of ` profession, yash ,father' > > would > > > > be damaged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 5 ] " surya ,rahu ke samay yadi shukra aur budh saath ho to > > > surya > > > > graham ka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asar bura nahi hoga " p287 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a `parihar' clause . `parihar' means escape from the > > > > results . This combination of the sun and the rahu will be > > > > ineffective if the venus and mercury are together in the kundali. > > > > Venus and mercury together form masnui SUN . That means if there > > is > > > > another masnui {artificial} sun in the kundali , the natal sun > > will > > > > get strengthened. > > > > > > > > > > I am afraid , there is no masnui sun in the kundali and hence > > no > > > > escape from the results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 6 ] " agar mangal kisi tarah se bhi rahu ko dabata na ho ya > > > khud > > > > hi mangal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manda ho …. to uttam sehat aur lambi ayu dono shaqqi hongi " p > > 288 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is another `parihar' clause. If the mars is not ashubh and > > > > controls the rahu , the combination would not effect; on the > > > contrary > > > > if the mangal itself is ashubh and incapable of controlling the > > > > rahu , then both the health and longevity will be doubtful. > > > > > > > > > > Now the matter to be resolved is whether mangal is shubh in > > this > > > > kundali or ashubh. In the kundali along with Rahu three planets > > are > > > > arranged at: > > > > > > > > > > Mercury : 8d 13m > > > > > > > > > > Mars : 10d 53m > > > > > > > > > > Sun : 22d 16m > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The mercury and Mars are just 2d 40m apart , close enough to be > > > > considered as together. The sun and the mercury are far apart > > some > > > 15 > > > > degrees apart. Therefore because of mars and mercury being > > > together , > > > > mars would be considered as ashubh. And the surya + rahu > > > combination > > > > becomes operative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now discussing the same phenomena through Vedic astrology. The > > > > Vedic `parihar' clause says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " agar Chandra , mangal aur brahaspati shubh ho to Rahu janya > > > dosh > > > > ka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parihar ho jata hai " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the moon , mars and Jupiter are strong the dosh resulting > > > > because of rahu is eliminated. In this kundali moon is in scorpio > > > > hence neech , Mars is in cancer hence neech , and Jupiter is > > placed > > > > in its enemy rasi hence weak. There is no help from either of > > these > > > > three planets. > > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no `parihar' or respite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In conclusion , the surya + rahu dosh is there. To do the > > remedy > > > or > > > > not is entirely up to you. If I were in your place I wouldn't > > have > > > > taken chances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Messenger - Communicate instantly... " Ping " your > > friends > > > > today! Download Messenger Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 Dear Priya It feels good that you can feel my dilemma. i wish it were easier to decide. is there at all a 'good enough' date and time bet last wk of june and first wk july for my baby to be born? someone told me june 25th between 9:03PM - 9:12PM, New Delhi is a good day. Thanks again for your thoughtful insights. your knowledge is tremendous. Regards Anjali lalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " <bhooshanpriya> wrote: > Dear Anjali, > > You have put me into a dilemma . Ethics , destiny , God's will on the > one hand and the mother instinct on the other. I am torn between the > two. I thought over your question the whole night yesterday otherwise > you know I am very prompt in replying. What would I have done if I > were in the shoes of Anjali , an expectant mother ? I needed to know > an honest reply , a reply that appeals to me. > > At the end, I came to the conclusion that if I could , I would give > my child the best start possible. And if deciding the time of birth > gives an advantage to my child , I would. To me it is not a matter > of academic discussion , it is an emotional matter that is between me > and my child. > > It was only after the dilemma was solved , I felt so relieved . > Now I leave it to you Anjali . You are the mother to be. It is > between you and your child. > > > With love, > > Priya > > > lalkitab , Jai Nahata <jaynahata@g...> wrote: > > Dear Anjali ji, > > First of all, May GOD bless you and your child, always. > > Secondly, no matter what we can never be greater than almighty. He > is the > > best judge of our deeds. Moreover if it would have been possible > than Shri > > Ramji taken birth on best time. Could he ? We all see best bride > and grooms > > for our children but we all know that couples are made in heaven > and they > > are left here to join hands. > > So my sincere advice to you would be to have full faith in almighty > GOD and > > pray for the best to happen to your child. > > And this what we all will do. > > May GOD bless you and child. > > Best regards > > Jai > > > > > > On 5/24/05, anjaliraj1 <anjaliraj1> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Priya > > > > > > I am expecting my second child. He/she is due on 5th July. Since > my > > > first was a c-section, this one may be too. I had put up a > question > > > once earlier whether it is ethical/moral/good to pre-plan the > > > date/time of my childs birth. i myself believe it should be left > to > > > God. > > > > > > There is an astrologer though who has taken out the date of 25th > June > > > 9:03 PM to 9:12 PM, New Delhi, as the best time for this birth. > Any > > > suggestions from anyone? > > > > > > Thanks and best rgds > > > Anjali > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " > <bhooshanpriya> > > > wrote: > > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > > > I can understand your concern , it is not advisable at this age > to > > > > study the horoscope for other things , other then 'Bal- > arishtha'. I > > > > have done that already. Bal-arishth is illness or any untoward > > > > happening which might threaten the life of a child. > > > > > > > > I share your concern as a mother. > > > > > > > > with Love, > > > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , " anjaliraj1 " <anjaliraj1> > > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Priya Ji > > > > > > > > > > Could you analyse my sons horoscope in totality then please. > > > > > His DOB is 08.08.2000. Time : 02.32PM, New Delhi. > > > > > Could you also pls emphasise what impact 'arishta' has on a > > > persons > > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > > > Best Rgds > > > > > Anjali > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , bhooshan priya > > > > <bhooshanpriya> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Irrespective of what has been said here in the Group , your > > > > > astrologer is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. Yes, the child has `arishta' > > > > arising > > > > > out of the sun + rahu combination. > > > > > > > > > > > > In astrology a child's horoscope should not be studied for > > > many > > > > > matters; but there is one area where it is not only > > > recommended , > > > > it > > > > > is mandatory to study the horoscope of a child for `arishta'. > > > > Arishta > > > > > means , illness and any other unfortunate happening. An > > > astrologer > > > > > must cast the horoscope and study it for `arishta' and > > > > > suggest `samaadhaan' or upaya. If that were not the case , > > > instead > > > > of > > > > > casting a horoscope at the time of birth people would just > note > > > the > > > > > time and the date and get it cast only after the child is 12 > or > > > 13. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now explaining why your astrologer is right. I am quoting > > > > original > > > > > excerpts from Lal Kitab { 1952 ed} along with page numbers > from > > > > Arun > > > > > Sanhita for every one to verify. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] Rahu is placed in the 9th > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {a } " rahu khana 9 , 12 mein neech kaha gaya hai " p223 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > { b } " rahu ab 9guni mandi takat ka malik hoga jo Chandra > ko > > > bhi > > > > > madhyam kar > > > > > > > > > > > > dega " p235 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun + Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] " garhan ka manda samay us samay jor par hoga jab dono > > > > > kundali ke 9 ya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 mein baithe hon " p288 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination is most vicious when either in the 9th or > in > > > the > > > > > 12th . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 2 ] " grahan ravi ki kismet hoti , varna umra chhoti marta > > > ho " > > > > p > > > > > 287 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Either his kismet will be eclipsed or he will die young. " > 45 > > > > saal > > > > > tak umra shaqqi " the fear for life will be up to the age of > 45 , > > > > > after that there will be no danger for life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 3 ] " chahe surya ko grahan lagata ho, magar garmee se aur > > > bhi > > > > > adhik hani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > karne wala hilta hua hathi hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even though the rahu eclipses the sun but it becomes a > violent > > > > > elephant capable of greater damage under the heat of the sun. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 4 ] " surya ki drishti ya sath se rahu ka prabhav na sirf > > > > baithe > > > > > hue ghar par > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manda hoga balki saath lagata ghar bhi barbad hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination would not only damage the house it is in , > > > would > > > > > also damage the adjacent house. This means both the 9th house > > > > > of `bhagya' and the 10th house of ` profession, yash ,father' > > > would > > > > > be damaged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 5 ] " surya ,rahu ke samay yadi shukra aur budh saath ho > to > > > > surya > > > > > graham ka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asar bura nahi hoga " p287 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a `parihar' clause . `parihar' means escape from the > > > > > results . This combination of the sun and the rahu will be > > > > > ineffective if the venus and mercury are together in the > kundali. > > > > > Venus and mercury together form masnui SUN . That means if > there > > > is > > > > > another masnui {artificial} sun in the kundali , the natal sun > > > will > > > > > get strengthened. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am afraid , there is no masnui sun in the kundali and > hence > > > no > > > > > escape from the results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 6 ] " agar mangal kisi tarah se bhi rahu ko dabata na ho > ya > > > > khud > > > > > hi mangal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manda ho …. to uttam sehat aur lambi ayu dono shaqqi hongi " > p > > > 288 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is another `parihar' clause. If the mars is not ashubh > and > > > > > controls the rahu , the combination would not effect; on the > > > > contrary > > > > > if the mangal itself is ashubh and incapable of controlling > the > > > > > rahu , then both the health and longevity will be doubtful. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now the matter to be resolved is whether mangal is shubh in > > > this > > > > > kundali or ashubh. In the kundali along with Rahu three > planets > > > are > > > > > arranged at: > > > > > > > > > > > > Mercury : 8d 13m > > > > > > > > > > > > Mars : 10d 53m > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun : 22d 16m > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The mercury and Mars are just 2d 40m apart , close enough > to be > > > > > considered as together. The sun and the mercury are far apart > > > some > > > > 15 > > > > > degrees apart. Therefore because of mars and mercury being > > > > together , > > > > > mars would be considered as ashubh. And the surya + rahu > > > > combination > > > > > becomes operative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now discussing the same phenomena through Vedic astrology. > The > > > > > Vedic `parihar' clause says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " agar Chandra , mangal aur brahaspati shubh ho to Rahu > janya > > > > dosh > > > > > ka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parihar ho jata hai " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the moon , mars and Jupiter are strong the dosh resulting > > > > > because of rahu is eliminated. In this kundali moon is in > scorpio > > > > > hence neech , Mars is in cancer hence neech , and Jupiter is > > > placed > > > > > in its enemy rasi hence weak. There is no help from either of > > > these > > > > > three planets. > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no `parihar' or respite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In conclusion , the surya + rahu dosh is there. To do the > > > remedy > > > > or > > > > > not is entirely up to you. If I were in your place I wouldn't > > > have > > > > > taken chances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Messenger - Communicate instantly... " Ping " your > > > friends > > > > > today! Download Messenger Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2005 Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 Thank you Jai Ji for your blessings rgds Anjali lalkitab , Jai Nahata <jaynahata@g...> wrote: > Dear Anjali ji, > First of all, May GOD bless you and your child, always. > Secondly, no matter what we can never be greater than almighty. He is the > best judge of our deeds. Moreover if it would have been possible than Shri > Ramji taken birth on best time. Could he ? We all see best bride and grooms > for our children but we all know that couples are made in heaven and they > are left here to join hands. > So my sincere advice to you would be to have full faith in almighty GOD and > pray for the best to happen to your child. > And this what we all will do. > May GOD bless you and child. > Best regards > Jai > > > On 5/24/05, anjaliraj1 <anjaliraj1> wrote: > > > > Dear Priya > > > > I am expecting my second child. He/she is due on 5th July. Since my > > first was a c-section, this one may be too. I had put up a question > > once earlier whether it is ethical/moral/good to pre-plan the > > date/time of my childs birth. i myself believe it should be left to > > God. > > > > There is an astrologer though who has taken out the date of 25th June > > 9:03 PM to 9:12 PM, New Delhi, as the best time for this birth. Any > > suggestions from anyone? > > > > Thanks and best rgds > > Anjali > > > > > > lalkitab , " bhooshanpriya " <bhooshanpriya> > > wrote: > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > I can understand your concern , it is not advisable at this age to > > > study the horoscope for other things , other then 'Bal- arishtha'. I > > > have done that already. Bal-arishth is illness or any untoward > > > happening which might threaten the life of a child. > > > > > > I share your concern as a mother. > > > > > > with Love, > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , " anjaliraj1 " <anjaliraj1> > > wrote: > > > > Dear Priya Ji > > > > > > > > Could you analyse my sons horoscope in totality then please. > > > > His DOB is 08.08.2000. Time : 02.32PM, New Delhi. > > > > Could you also pls emphasise what impact 'arishta' has on a > > persons > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > Best Rgds > > > > Anjali > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , bhooshan priya > > > <bhooshanpriya> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Irrespective of what has been said here in the Group , your > > > > astrologer is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. Yes, the child has `arishta' > > > arising > > > > out of the sun + rahu combination. > > > > > > > > > > In astrology a child's horoscope should not be studied for > > many > > > > matters; but there is one area where it is not only > > recommended , > > > it > > > > is mandatory to study the horoscope of a child for `arishta'. > > > Arishta > > > > means , illness and any other unfortunate happening. An > > astrologer > > > > must cast the horoscope and study it for `arishta' and > > > > suggest `samaadhaan' or upaya. If that were not the case , > > instead > > > of > > > > casting a horoscope at the time of birth people would just note > > the > > > > time and the date and get it cast only after the child is 12 or > > 13. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now explaining why your astrologer is right. I am quoting > > > original > > > > excerpts from Lal Kitab { 1952 ed} along with page numbers from > > > Arun > > > > Sanhita for every one to verify. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] Rahu is placed in the 9th > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {a } " rahu khana 9 , 12 mein neech kaha gaya hai " p223 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > { b } " rahu ab 9guni mandi takat ka malik hoga jo Chandra ko > > bhi > > > > madhyam kar > > > > > > > > > > dega " p235 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun + Rahu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] " garhan ka manda samay us samay jor par hoga jab dono > > > > kundali ke 9 ya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 mein baithe hon " p288 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination is most vicious when either in the 9th or in > > the > > > > 12th . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 2 ] " grahan ravi ki kismet hoti , varna umra chhoti marta > > ho " > > > p > > > > 287 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Either his kismet will be eclipsed or he will die young. " 45 > > > saal > > > > tak umra shaqqi " the fear for life will be up to the age of 45 , > > > > after that there will be no danger for life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 3 ] " chahe surya ko grahan lagata ho, magar garmee se aur > > bhi > > > > adhik hani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > karne wala hilta hua hathi hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even though the rahu eclipses the sun but it becomes a violent > > > > elephant capable of greater damage under the heat of the sun. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 4 ] " surya ki drishti ya sath se rahu ka prabhav na sirf > > > baithe > > > > hue ghar par > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manda hoga balki saath lagata ghar bhi barbad hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This combination would not only damage the house it is in , > > would > > > > also damage the adjacent house. This means both the 9th house > > > > of `bhagya' and the 10th house of ` profession, yash ,father' > > would > > > > be damaged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 5 ] " surya ,rahu ke samay yadi shukra aur budh saath ho to > > > surya > > > > graham ka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asar bura nahi hoga " p287 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a `parihar' clause . `parihar' means escape from the > > > > results . This combination of the sun and the rahu will be > > > > ineffective if the venus and mercury are together in the kundali. > > > > Venus and mercury together form masnui SUN . That means if there > > is > > > > another masnui {artificial} sun in the kundali , the natal sun > > will > > > > get strengthened. > > > > > > > > > > I am afraid , there is no masnui sun in the kundali and hence > > no > > > > escape from the results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 6 ] " agar mangal kisi tarah se bhi rahu ko dabata na ho ya > > > khud > > > > hi mangal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manda ho …. to uttam sehat aur lambi ayu dono shaqqi hongi " p > > 288 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is another `parihar' clause. If the mars is not ashubh and > > > > controls the rahu , the combination would not effect; on the > > > contrary > > > > if the mangal itself is ashubh and incapable of controlling the > > > > rahu , then both the health and longevity will be doubtful. > > > > > > > > > > Now the matter to be resolved is whether mangal is shubh in > > this > > > > kundali or ashubh. In the kundali along with Rahu three planets > > are > > > > arranged at: > > > > > > > > > > Mercury : 8d 13m > > > > > > > > > > Mars : 10d 53m > > > > > > > > > > Sun : 22d 16m > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The mercury and Mars are just 2d 40m apart , close enough to be > > > > considered as together. The sun and the mercury are far apart > > some > > > 15 > > > > degrees apart. Therefore because of mars and mercury being > > > together , > > > > mars would be considered as ashubh. And the surya + rahu > > > combination > > > > becomes operative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now discussing the same phenomena through Vedic astrology. The > > > > Vedic `parihar' clause says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " agar Chandra , mangal aur brahaspati shubh ho to Rahu janya > > > dosh > > > > ka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > parihar ho jata hai " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the moon , mars and Jupiter are strong the dosh resulting > > > > because of rahu is eliminated. In this kundali moon is in scorpio > > > > hence neech , Mars is in cancer hence neech , and Jupiter is > > placed > > > > in its enemy rasi hence weak. There is no help from either of > > these > > > > three planets. > > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no `parihar' or respite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In conclusion , the surya + rahu dosh is there. To do the > > remedy > > > or > > > > not is entirely up to you. If I were in your place I wouldn't > > have > > > > taken chances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Messenger - Communicate instantly... " Ping " your > > friends > > > > today! Download Messenger Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.