Guest guest Posted May 24, 2005 Report Share Posted May 24, 2005 Dear Anjali, I can understand your concern , it is not advisable at this age to study the horoscope for other things , other then 'Bal-arishtha'. I have done that already. Bal-arishth is illness or any untoward happening which might threaten the life of a child. I share your concern as a mother. with Love, Priya lalkitab , " anjaliraj1 " <anjaliraj1> wrote: > Dear Priya Ji > > Could you analyse my sons horoscope in totality then please. > His DOB is 08.08.2000. Time : 02.32PM, New Delhi. > Could you also pls emphasise what impact 'arishta' has on a persons > horoscope. > > Best Rgds > Anjali > > > > lalkitab , bhooshan priya <bhooshanpriya> > wrote: > > Dear Anjali, > > > > > > Irrespective of what has been said here in the Group , your > astrologer is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. Yes, the child has `arishta' arising > out of the sun + rahu combination. > > > > In astrology a child's horoscope should not be studied for many > matters; but there is one area where it is not only recommended , it > is mandatory to study the horoscope of a child for `arishta'. Arishta > means , illness and any other unfortunate happening. An astrologer > must cast the horoscope and study it for `arishta' and > suggest `samaadhaan' or upaya. If that were not the case , instead of > casting a horoscope at the time of birth people would just note the > time and the date and get it cast only after the child is 12 or 13. > > > > > > > > Now explaining why your astrologer is right. I am quoting original > excerpts from Lal Kitab { 1952 ed} along with page numbers from Arun > Sanhita for every one to verify. > > > > > > > > Rahu : > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] Rahu is placed in the 9th > > > > > > > > {a } " rahu khana 9 , 12 mein neech kaha gaya hai " p223 > > > > > > > > { b } " rahu ab 9guni mandi takat ka malik hoga jo Chandra ko bhi > madhyam kar > > > > dega " p235 > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun + Rahu : > > > > > > > > [ 1 ] " garhan ka manda samay us samay jor par hoga jab dono > kundali ke 9 ya > > > > > > > > 12 mein baithe hon " p288 > > > > > > > > This combination is most vicious when either in the 9th or in the > 12th . > > > > > > > > [ 2 ] " grahan ravi ki kismet hoti , varna umra chhoti marta ho " p > 287 . > > > > > > > > Either his kismet will be eclipsed or he will die young. " 45 saal > tak umra shaqqi " the fear for life will be up to the age of 45 , > after that there will be no danger for life. > > > > > > > > [ 3 ] " chahe surya ko grahan lagata ho, magar garmee se aur bhi > adhik hani > > > > > > > > karne wala hilta hua hathi hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > Even though the rahu eclipses the sun but it becomes a violent > elephant capable of greater damage under the heat of the sun. > > > > > > > > [ 4 ] " surya ki drishti ya sath se rahu ka prabhav na sirf baithe > hue ghar par > > > > > > > > manda hoga balki saath lagata ghar bhi barbad hoga " p 224 > > > > > > > > This combination would not only damage the house it is in , would > also damage the adjacent house. This means both the 9th house > of `bhagya' and the 10th house of ` profession, yash ,father' would > be damaged. > > > > > > > > [ 5 ] " surya ,rahu ke samay yadi shukra aur budh saath ho to surya > graham ka > > > > > > > > asar bura nahi hoga " p287 > > > > > > > > This is a `parihar' clause . `parihar' means escape from the > results . This combination of the sun and the rahu will be > ineffective if the venus and mercury are together in the kundali. > Venus and mercury together form masnui SUN . That means if there is > another masnui {artificial} sun in the kundali , the natal sun will > get strengthened. > > > > I am afraid , there is no masnui sun in the kundali and hence no > escape from the results. > > > > > > > > [ 6 ] " agar mangal kisi tarah se bhi rahu ko dabata na ho ya khud > hi mangal > > > > > > > > manda ho …. to uttam sehat aur lambi ayu dono shaqqi hongi " p 288 > > > > > > > > This is another `parihar' clause. If the mars is not ashubh and > controls the rahu , the combination would not effect; on the contrary > if the mangal itself is ashubh and incapable of controlling the > rahu , then both the health and longevity will be doubtful. > > > > Now the matter to be resolved is whether mangal is shubh in this > kundali or ashubh. In the kundali along with Rahu three planets are > arranged at: > > > > Mercury : 8d 13m > > > > Mars : 10d 53m > > > > Sun : 22d 16m > > > > > > > > The mercury and Mars are just 2d 40m apart , close enough to be > considered as together. The sun and the mercury are far apart some 15 > degrees apart. Therefore because of mars and mercury being together , > mars would be considered as ashubh. And the surya + rahu combination > becomes operative. > > > > > > > > Now discussing the same phenomena through Vedic astrology. The > Vedic `parihar' clause says : > > > > > > > > " agar Chandra , mangal aur brahaspati shubh ho to Rahu janya dosh > ka > > > > > > > > parihar ho jata hai " . > > > > > > > > If the moon , mars and Jupiter are strong the dosh resulting > because of rahu is eliminated. In this kundali moon is in scorpio > hence neech , Mars is in cancer hence neech , and Jupiter is placed > in its enemy rasi hence weak. There is no help from either of these > three planets. > > > > Therefore there is no `parihar' or respite. > > > > > > > > In conclusion , the surya + rahu dosh is there. To do the remedy or > not is entirely up to you. If I were in your place I wouldn't have > taken chances. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > Priya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Messenger - Communicate instantly... " Ping " your friends > today! Download Messenger Now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.