Are we going right ? LKC1 - a request/suggestion

[Guest guest]

Respected Members,

If the panel of experts wants to work on such an

exercise, I may request that please take up our charts

for analysis. In this way we could benefit from this

study as well (as we very much desire a son) and later

on - God willing, I can post the results

Also there is another request - please make these

exercises two folds. One for the expert members on

the advanced topics and one for beginners who don't

know anything abt LK but want to learn starting from

very basics like how to cast a horoscope, find the

ascendants, malefic & benefic planets etc.

 

Our details are:

Mukesh Puri, 31-07-67, 11:11 am, Glasgow - Scotland

Sarita Puri, 14-05-76, 4:48 pm, Jagraon - Punjab

 

Regards,

Sarita

 

--- Anshev B Bhardwejj <anshevb wrote:

 

>

>

> Dear Punit ji,

>

> I am glad that you were able to talk to some experts

> on this issue..

> If you see the scope being too wide as an

> impediment, let us start

> the topic with a relatively narrower scope...

>

> Why don't we start with what you suggested... Let us

> analyze this

> chart for native's son..

>

> Regards,

> Anshev

>

>

>

>

>

> lalkitab , Punit Pandey

> <punitp@g...> wrote:

> > Anshev ji,

> > I see a potential problem with LKC1 posted by

> you. In my opinion

> the scope

> > was too wide to be taken by any expert. In my

> opinion, we should

> try to find

> > out something very small and then widening the

> scope. E.g.

> analysis of chart

> > for the native's son's perspective rather than

> analysing the full

> horoscope.

> > Recently I got the chance to talk to few experts

> and believe that

> everybody

> > is interested in such an exercise.

> > Thanks & Regards,

> > Punit Pandey

> >

> > On 4/18/05, Anshev B Bhardwejj <anshevb>

> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Punit ji and Jay ji,

> > >

> > > I share the same concern as Jay ji has

> expressed. This is why, in

> > > order to address the same issue, A little while

> ago, I presented

> a

> > > chart LKC1 (Learning chart 1), but we have not

> seen much

> activity in

> > > that case....

> > >

> > > I agree with Punit ji, that this depends upon

> the learned

> members of

> > > this group (Priyaji, Bhatiaji and LalKitabee ji)

> to take this

> issue

> > > otherwise it won't be possible to address this

> issue...

> > >

> > > Anshev B. Bhardwejj

> > >

> > >

> > > lalkitab , Punit Pandey

> <punitp@g...>

> wrote:

> > > > Jay ji,

> > > >

> > > > You might be knowing that the study of Lal

> Kitab is primary

> > > objective of the

> > > > forum and it is well defined in the forum

> constitution. But the

> > > discussion

> > > > on Lal Kitab is something depends upon the

> members of the

> forum.

> > > As far as I

> > > > am concerned, I can work as a catalyst but can

> not devote time

> in

> > > > participation, it is my problem.

> > > >

> > > > You are right that we have not seen much

> intense discussion in

> the

> > > recent

> > > > past but it is no all. It is the lifecycle of

> this forum,

> > > sometimes we have

> > > > some very good discussions and sometimes we

> don't have any many

> > > good

> > > > discussions. But you can not say that the

> dicussion is being

> > > neglected

> > > > alltogether. I guess, you would also have

> noted the recent

> thread

> > > of Mr. M.R.

> > > > Gupta's chart analysis. It is going great and

> I am sure it

> will be

> > > a good

> > > > learning material for the members, as few

> leading lalkitabists

> of

> > > this forum

> > > > Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji, Lalkitabee ji and

> Priya ji are

> > > participating in

> > > > that thread.

> > > >

> > > > In the past we have tried topic-wise

> discussions but without

> much

> > > success. I

> > > > believe that one leader is required to lead

> such sort of

> > > discussions. For

> > > > example, I am moderating another forum where

> we have seen some

> > > very good

> > > > discussions. One member used to post one birth

> details and

> other

> > > used to

> > > > reply and finally thread initiator used to

> tell the correct

> > > answer. That

> > > > proved a great learning exercise and that

> ticked the

> discussion in

> > > that

> > > > forum. I request you or someone in this forum

> to come forward,

> be

> > > a little

> > > > patient and persuade people to participate in

> something like

> that.

> > > >

> > > > Please feel free to write to me and let me

> know your opinion.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Punit Pandey

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 4/15/05, Jay Nahata <nahata_jay>

> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Punit ji & Friends,

> > > > > Let me divert your attention to something

> important but

> > > neglected. We all

> > > > > came together to better understand,

> criticise, observe and

> > > experiment over

> > > > > the principles of LK. But are we upto the

> right path ? What

> we

> > > are doing

> > > > > here is just troubleshooting but no detailed

> analysis giving

> no

> > > room for

> > > > > appreciation or criticism, observation and

> analysis, etc.

> > > > > Let me propose that we take up one data at a

> time and discuss

> > > it

> > > > > unanimously. So that we can better

> understand the underlying

> > > principle and

> > > > > power of LK.

> > > > > I hope learned members of the group will

> appreciate my

> concern.

> > > > > Regards

> > > > > Jay

> > > > >

> > >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan great trips with Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!

http://travel./p-travelguide