Are we going right ? LKC1

[Guest guest]

Dear Punit ji,

 

I am glad that you were able to talk to some experts on this issue..

If you see the scope being too wide as an impediment, let us start

the topic with a relatively narrower scope...

 

Why don't we start with what you suggested... Let us analyze this

chart for native's son..

 

Regards,

Anshev

 

 

 

 

 

lalkitab , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote:

> Anshev ji,

> I see a potential problem with LKC1 posted by you. In my opinion

the scope

> was too wide to be taken by any expert. In my opinion, we should

try to find

> out something very small and then widening the scope. E.g.

analysis of chart

> for the native's son's perspective rather than analysing the full

horoscope.

> Recently I got the chance to talk to few experts and believe that

everybody

> is interested in such an exercise.

> Thanks & Regards,

> Punit Pandey

>

> On 4/18/05, Anshev B Bhardwejj <anshevb> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Punit ji and Jay ji,

> >

> > I share the same concern as Jay ji has expressed. This is why, in

> > order to address the same issue, A little while ago, I presented

a

> > chart LKC1 (Learning chart 1), but we have not seen much

activity in

> > that case....

> >

> > I agree with Punit ji, that this depends upon the learned

members of

> > this group (Priyaji, Bhatiaji and LalKitabee ji) to take this

issue

> > otherwise it won't be possible to address this issue...

> >

> > Anshev B. Bhardwejj

> >

> >

> > lalkitab , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...>

wrote:

> > > Jay ji,

> > >

> > > You might be knowing that the study of Lal Kitab is primary

> > objective of the

> > > forum and it is well defined in the forum constitution. But the

> > discussion

> > > on Lal Kitab is something depends upon the members of the

forum.

> > As far as I

> > > am concerned, I can work as a catalyst but can not devote time

in

> > > participation, it is my problem.

> > >

> > > You are right that we have not seen much intense discussion in

the

> > recent

> > > past but it is no all. It is the lifecycle of this forum,

> > sometimes we have

> > > some very good discussions and sometimes we don't have any many

> > good

> > > discussions. But you can not say that the dicussion is being

> > neglected

> > > alltogether. I guess, you would also have noted the recent

thread

> > of Mr. M.R.

> > > Gupta's chart analysis. It is going great and I am sure it

will be

> > a good

> > > learning material for the members, as few leading lalkitabists

of

> > this forum

> > > Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji, Lalkitabee ji and Priya ji are

> > participating in

> > > that thread.

> > >

> > > In the past we have tried topic-wise discussions but without

much

> > success. I

> > > believe that one leader is required to lead such sort of

> > discussions. For

> > > example, I am moderating another forum where we have seen some

> > very good

> > > discussions. One member used to post one birth details and

other

> > used to

> > > reply and finally thread initiator used to tell the correct

> > answer. That

> > > proved a great learning exercise and that ticked the

discussion in

> > that

> > > forum. I request you or someone in this forum to come forward,

be

> > a little

> > > patient and persuade people to participate in something like

that.

> > >

> > > Please feel free to write to me and let me know your opinion.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > Punit Pandey

> > >

> > >

> > > On 4/15/05, Jay Nahata <nahata_jay> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Punit ji & Friends,

> > > > Let me divert your attention to something important but

> > neglected. We all

> > > > came together to better understand, criticise, observe and

> > experiment over

> > > > the principles of LK. But are we upto the right path ? What

we

> > are doing

> > > > here is just troubleshooting but no detailed analysis giving

no

> > room for

> > > > appreciation or criticism, observation and analysis, etc.

> > > > Let me propose that we take up one data at a time and discuss

> > it

> > > > unanimously. So that we can better understand the underlying

> > principle and

> > > > power of LK.

> > > > I hope learned members of the group will appreciate my

concern.

> > > > Regards

> > > > Jay

> > > >

> >