Are we going right ?

[Guest guest]

Dear Punit ji & Friends,

 

Let me divert your attention to something important but neglected. We all came together to better understand, criticise, observe and experiment over the principles of LK. But are we upto the right path ? What we are doing here is just troubleshooting but no detailed analysis giving no room for appreciation or criticism, observation and analysis, etc.

 

Let me propose that we take up one data at a time and discuss it unanimously. So that we can better understand the underlying principle and power of LK.

 

I hope learned members of the group will appreciate my concern.

 

Regards

 

Jay

[Guest guest]

Are jay ji

baat thik hai aapki fir behti gangaa main to

aapko pataa hi hai ki koi na koi kuchh na kuchh bahaataa jay

Kabhi koi isko MAILI (Dirty) karey to kabhi koi NAHATA JAY

 

Peetey peetey kabhi kabhi yun JAAM badal jaatey hain

PAIGHAM badal jaatey hain aur to aur NAAM badal jaatey hain.

 

Koi baat nahi, chalo in badaltey hue paighamon ko track per laane ki

ek milijuli koshish kartey hain.Aur logon ka solution bhi karnaa

jaroori hai.Vaise ek baat hai ki is samay group ne soch ka ek nayaa

dwar khola hai vaidic jyotish & lalkitab.

With regards

Lalkitabee

 

 

lalkitab , Jay Nahata <nahata_jay> wrote:

> Dear Punit ji & Friends,

>

> Let me divert your attention to something important but neglected.

We all came together to better understand, criticise, observe and

experiment over the principles of LK. But are we upto the right

path ? What we are doing here is just troubleshooting but no detailed

analysis giving no room for appreciation or criticism, observation

and analysis, etc.

>

> Let me propose that we take up one data at a time and discuss it

unanimously. So that we can better understand the underlying

principle and power of LK.

>

> I hope learned members of the group will appreciate my concern.

>

> Regards

>

> Jay

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Jay ji,

You might be knowing that the study of Lal Kitab is primary objective of the forum and it is well defined in the forum constitution. But the discussion on Lal Kitab is something depends upon the members of the forum. As far as I am concerned, I can work as a catalyst but can not devote time in participation, it is my problem.

You are right that we have not seen much intense discussion in the recent past but it is no all. It is the lifecycle of this forum, sometimes we have some very good discussions and sometimes we don't have any many good discussions. But you can not say that the dicussion is being neglected alltogether. I guess, you would also have noted the recent thread of Mr. M.R. Gupta's chart analysis. It is going great and I am sure it will be a good learning material for the members, as few leading lalkitabists of this forum Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji, Lalkitabee ji and Priya ji are participating in that thread.

In the past we have tried topic-wise discussions but without much success. I believe that one leader is required to lead such sort of discussions. For example, I am moderating another forum where we have seen some very good discussions. One member used to post one birth details and other used to reply and finally thread initiator used to tell the correct answer. That proved a great learning exercise and that ticked the discussion in that forum. I request you or someone in this forum to come forward, be a little patient and persuade people to participate in something like that.

Please feel free to write to me and let me know your opinion.

Regards,

Punit Pandey

On 4/15/05, Jay Nahata <nahata_jay wrote:

 

Dear Punit ji & Friends,

 

Let me divert your attention to something important but neglected. We all came together to better understand, criticise, observe and experiment over the principles of LK. But are we upto the right path ? What we are doing here is just troubleshooting but no detailed analysis giving no room for appreciation or criticism, observation and analysis, etc.

 

 

Let me propose that we take up one data at a time and discuss it unanimously. So that we can better understand the underlying principle and power of LK.

 

I hope learned members of the group will appreciate my concern.

 

Regards

 

Jay

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Punit ji and Jay ji,

 

I share the same concern as Jay ji has expressed. This is why, in

order to address the same issue, A little while ago, I presented a

chart LKC1 (Learning chart 1), but we have not seen much activity in

that case....

 

I agree with Punit ji, that this depends upon the learned members of

this group (Priyaji, Bhatiaji and LalKitabee ji) to take this issue

otherwise it won't be possible to address this issue...

 

Anshev B. Bhardwejj

 

 

 

lalkitab , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote:

> Jay ji,

>

> You might be knowing that the study of Lal Kitab is primary

objective of the

> forum and it is well defined in the forum constitution. But the

discussion

> on Lal Kitab is something depends upon the members of the forum.

As far as I

> am concerned, I can work as a catalyst but can not devote time in

> participation, it is my problem.

>

> You are right that we have not seen much intense discussion in the

recent

> past but it is no all. It is the lifecycle of this forum,

sometimes we have

> some very good discussions and sometimes we don't have any many

good

> discussions. But you can not say that the dicussion is being

neglected

> alltogether. I guess, you would also have noted the recent thread

of Mr. M.R.

> Gupta's chart analysis. It is going great and I am sure it will be

a good

> learning material for the members, as few leading lalkitabists of

this forum

> Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji, Lalkitabee ji and Priya ji are

participating in

> that thread.

>

> In the past we have tried topic-wise discussions but without much

success. I

> believe that one leader is required to lead such sort of

discussions. For

> example, I am moderating another forum where we have seen some

very good

> discussions. One member used to post one birth details and other

used to

> reply and finally thread initiator used to tell the correct

answer. That

> proved a great learning exercise and that ticked the discussion in

that

> forum. I request you or someone in this forum to come forward, be

a little

> patient and persuade people to participate in something like that.

>

> Please feel free to write to me and let me know your opinion.

>

> Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

>

> On 4/15/05, Jay Nahata <nahata_jay> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Punit ji & Friends,

> > Let me divert your attention to something important but

neglected. We all

> > came together to better understand, criticise, observe and

experiment over

> > the principles of LK. But are we upto the right path ? What we

are doing

> > here is just troubleshooting but no detailed analysis giving no

room for

> > appreciation or criticism, observation and analysis, etc.

> > Let me propose that we take up one data at a time and discuss

it

> > unanimously. So that we can better understand the underlying

principle and

> > power of LK.

> > I hope learned members of the group will appreciate my concern.

> > Regards

> > Jay

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > *

[Guest guest]

Anshev ji,

 

I see a potential problem with LKC1 posted by you. In my opinion the scope was too wide to be taken by any expert. In my opinion, we should try to find out something very small and then widening the scope. E.g. analysis of chart for the native's son's perspective rather than analysing the full horoscope. Recently I got the chance to talk to few experts and believe that everybody is interested in such an exercise.

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

On 4/18/05, Anshev B Bhardwejj <anshevb wrote:

Dear Punit ji and Jay ji,I share the same concern as Jay ji has expressed. This is why, in

order to address the same issue, A little while ago, I presented achart LKC1 (Learning chart 1), but we have not seen much activity inthat case....I agree with Punit ji, that this depends upon the learned members of

this group (Priyaji, Bhatiaji and LalKitabee ji) to take this issueotherwise it won't be possible to address this issue...Anshev B. Bhardwejjlalkitab

, Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote:> Jay ji,>> You might be knowing that the study of Lal Kitab is primaryobjective of the> forum and it is well defined in the forum constitution. But the

discussion> on Lal Kitab is something depends upon the members of the forum.As far as I> am concerned, I can work as a catalyst but can not devote time in> participation, it is my problem.

>> You are right that we have not seen much intense discussion in therecent> past but it is no all. It is the lifecycle of this forum,sometimes we have> some very good discussions and sometimes we don't have any many

good> discussions. But you can not say that the dicussion is beingneglected> alltogether. I guess, you would also have noted the recent threadof Mr. M.R.> Gupta's chart analysis. It is going great and I am sure it will be

a good> learning material for the members, as few leading lalkitabists ofthis forum> Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji, Lalkitabee ji and Priya ji areparticipating in> that thread.>> In the past we have tried topic-wise discussions but without much

success. I> believe that one leader is required to lead such sort ofdiscussions. For> example, I am moderating another forum where we have seen somevery good> discussions. One member used to post one birth details and other

used to> reply and finally thread initiator used to tell the correctanswer. That> proved a great learning exercise and that ticked the discussion inthat> forum. I request you or someone in this forum to come forward, be

a little> patient and persuade people to participate in something like that.>> Please feel free to write to me and let me know your opinion.>> Regards,>> Punit Pandey

>>> On 4/15/05, Jay Nahata <nahata_jay> wrote:> >> > Dear Punit ji & Friends,> > Let me divert your attention to something important butneglected. We all

> > came together to better understand, criticise, observe andexperiment over> > the principles of LK. But are we upto the right path ? What weare doing> > here is just troubleshooting but no detailed analysis giving no

room for> > appreciation or criticism, observation and analysis, etc.> > Let me propose that we take up one data at a time and discussit> > unanimously. So that we can better understand the underlying

principle and> > power of LK.> > I hope learned members of the group will appreciate my concern.> > Regards> > Jay> >

[Guest guest]

Dear Punit ji,

 

Thanks for appreciating my concern.Secondly I really appreciate your idea of chart discussion and then correct answers. In fact if you will kindly notice you will find that I had tried to initiate such discussions in the recent past but did not get required support. I am ready to try again but will require your and revered members' help in this. I hope I will get it this time.

Waiting for your reply,

 

Regards

 

JayPunit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

Jay ji,

You might be knowing that the study of Lal Kitab is primary objective of the forum and it is well defined in the forum constitution. But the discussion on Lal Kitab is something depends upon the members of the forum. As far as I am concerned, I can work as a catalyst but can not devote time in participation, it is my problem.

You are right that we have not seen much intense discussion in the recent past but it is no all. It is the lifecycle of this forum, sometimes we have some very good discussions and sometimes we don't have any many good discussions. But you can not say that the dicussion is being neglected alltogether. I guess, you would also have noted the recent thread of Mr. M.R. Gupta's chart analysis. It is going great and I am sure it will be a good learning material for the members, as few leading lalkitabists of this forum Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji, Lalkitabee ji and Priya ji are participating in that thread.

In the past we have tried topic-wise discussions but without much success. I believe that one leader is required to lead such sort of discussions. For example, I am moderating another forum where we have seen some very good discussions. One member used to post one birth details and other used to reply and finally thread initiator used to tell the correct answer. That proved a great learning exercise and that ticked the discussion in that forum. I request you or someone in this forum to come forward, be a little patient and persuade people to participate in something like that.

Please feel free to write to me and let me know your opinion.

Regards,

Punit Pandey

On 4/15/05, Jay Nahata <nahata_jay wrote:

Dear Punit ji & Friends,

 

Let me divert your attention to something important but neglected. We all came together to better understand, criticise, observe and experiment over the principles of LK. But are we upto the right path ? What we are doing here is just troubleshooting but no detailed analysis giving no room for appreciation or criticism, observation and analysis, etc.

 

Let me propose that we take up one data at a time and discuss it unanimously. So that we can better understand the underlying principle and power of LK.

 

I hope learned members of the group will appreciate my concern.

 

Regards

 

Jay

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Nahata ji,

 

I am always there. Let us give it a try. Let us see what other members have to say on this?

 

Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

On 4/19/05, Jay Nahata <nahata_jay wrote:

 

Dear Punit ji,

 

Thanks for appreciating my concern.Secondly I really appreciate your idea of chart discussion and then correct answers. In fact if you will kindly notice you will find that I had tried to initiate such discussions in the recent past but did not get required support. I am ready to try again but will require your and revered members' help in this. I hope I will get it this time.

 

Waiting for your reply,

 

Regards

 

Jay Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

 

 

Jay ji,

You might be knowing that the study of Lal Kitab is primary objective of the forum and it is well defined in the forum constitution. But the discussion on Lal Kitab is something depends upon the members of the forum. As far as I am concerned, I can work as a catalyst but can not devote time in participation, it is my problem.

You are right that we have not seen much intense discussion in the recent past but it is no all. It is the lifecycle of this forum, sometimes we have some very good discussions and sometimes we don't have any many good discussions. But you can not say that the dicussion is being neglected alltogether. I guess, you would also have noted the recent thread of Mr. M.R. Gupta's chart analysis. It is going great and I am sure it will be a good learning material for the members, as few leading lalkitabists of this forum Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji, Lalkitabee ji and Priya ji are participating in that thread.

In the past we have tried topic-wise discussions but without much success. I believe that one leader is required to lead such sort of discussions. For example, I am moderating another forum where we have seen some very good discussions. One member used to post one birth details and other used to reply and finally thread initiator used to tell the correct answer. That proved a great learning exercise and that ticked the discussion in that forum. I request you or someone in this forum to come forward, be a little patient and persuade people to participate in something like that.

Please feel free to write to me and let me know your opinion.

Regards,

Punit Pandey

On 4/15/05, Jay Nahata <nahata_jay

> wrote:

Dear Punit ji & Friends,

 

Let me divert your attention to something important but neglected. We all came together to better understand, criticise, observe and experiment over the principles of LK. But are we upto the right path ? What we are doing here is just troubleshooting but no detailed analysis giving no room for appreciation or criticism, observation and analysis, etc.

 

Let me propose that we take up one data at a time and discuss it unanimously. So that we can better understand the underlying principle and power of LK.

 

I hope learned members of the group will appreciate my concern.

 

Regards

 

Jay

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Punit ji,

 

Thanx for supporting me !

I am placing before all the learned members of the group chart of an individual (and neighbour) who always impressed me and I know good deal about him.

His details are02.06.1980

21:31

Bikaner (Rajasthan)

 

Lets start with basic nature and education of the native.

 

This is the same chart that has been put before as I already mentioned to you.

I hope of getting full support of all the learned members and you this time so it becomes a great learning experience for all us.

 

Regards

 

Jay

Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

Nahata ji,

 

I am always there. Let us give it a try. Let us see what other members have to say on this?

 

Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

On 4/19/05, Jay Nahata <nahata_jay wrote:

Dear Punit ji,

 

Thanks for appreciating my concern.Secondly I really appreciate your idea of chart discussion and then correct answers. In fact if you will kindly notice you will find that I had tried to initiate such discussions in the recent past but did not get required support. I am ready to try again but will require your and revered members' help in this. I hope I will get it this time.

Waiting for your reply,

 

Regards

 

Jay Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

 

Jay ji,

You might be knowing that the study of Lal Kitab is primary objective of the forum and it is well defined in the forum constitution. But the discussion on Lal Kitab is something depends upon the members of the forum. As far as I am concerned, I can work as a catalyst but can not devote time in participation, it is my problem.

You are right that we have not seen much intense discussion in the recent past but it is no all. It is the lifecycle of this forum, sometimes we have some very good discussions and sometimes we don't have any many good discussions. But you can not say that the dicussion is being neglected alltogether. I guess, you would also have noted the recent thread of Mr. M.R. Gupta's chart analysis. It is going great and I am sure it will be a good learning material for the members, as few leading lalkitabists of this forum Shri Rajinder Bhatia ji, Lalkitabee ji and Priya ji are participating in that thread.

In the past we have tried topic-wise discussions but without much success. I believe that one leader is required to lead such sort of discussions. For example, I am moderating another forum where we have seen some very good discussions. One member used to post one birth details and other used to reply and finally thread initiator used to tell the correct answer. That proved a great learning exercise and that ticked the discussion in that forum. I request you or someone in this forum to come forward, be a little patient and persuade people to participate in something like that.

Please feel free to write to me and let me know your opinion.

Regards,

Punit Pandey

On 4/15/05, Jay Nahata <nahata_jay > wrote:

Dear Punit ji & Friends,

 

Let me divert your attention to something important but neglected. We all came together to better understand, criticise, observe and experiment over the principles of LK. But are we upto the right path ? What we are doing here is just troubleshooting but no detailed analysis giving no room for appreciation or criticism, observation and analysis, etc.

 

Let me propose that we take up one data at a time and discuss it unanimously. So that we can better understand the underlying principle and power of LK.

 

I hope learned members of the group will appreciate my concern.

 

Regards

 

Jay