PUNIT JI, I AGREE...

[Guest guest]

namaste punit ji, i agree with u, that all these branches are

complimentary, i also feel for remedial measures lalkitab is best,but

i beg to disagree that poll question is ambigous,infact it asks only

opinion of members wht they felt or have experienced thats it.

 

one more thing sir,i tried to download some files from two of ur

groups, lalkitab and , but failed to do so,they r

zipped , can u suggest some other way of downloading..

 

one request as well, i've been learning and practising astrology for

4 yrs now, but i get biased whenever i read my own chart, i just want

to know the reasons for my struggle since 1995, can u help me in this

regard..

 

THANX,

 

sincerely,

 

NISHANT

 

 

 

lalkitab , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote:

>

> Nishant ji,

>

> I am using KP, Lal Kitab and Classical Astrology for a long time and

> found that every branch of astrology is complimentary to each other

> and can be used for past predictions. Though I have repeated at

> several places, I am repeating here again that Lal Kitab is useful

for

> verifying some predefined events and remedies. It is quite hard to

> increase those verifications. KP is useful in predicting yes/no type

> of events and their timings. I don't see Classical Astrology as

> different branch. In fact, KP and Lal Kitab both are part of Vedic

> Astrology only. So the question looks a little ambiguous to me. I

also

> found Nadi Astrology very useful for pinpointing past events.

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

>

>

> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:35:59 -0000, Nishant Aryan

> <nishant_aryan> wrote:

> >

> >

> > dear group members i have created a poll, plz vote on it, exercise

> > ur right to vote and enhance sharing of ideas in this group

> >

> > nishant

> >

> >

> >

> >