Guest guest Posted November 1, 2004 Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Dear wadhwa ji , becaz of not confirm the time plz clear these doubts 1. Are you eldest or you have one elder brother? 2. Your educational or work area is diffrent? Clear these doubts than i fix your lagna and after that we decide your upayas Umesh lalkitab , " aswadhwa " <aswadhwa> wrote: > > > Dear Kulbir ji, lalkitabee,Nandkishore ji. > > I think we must not waste any more messages on analysing the Kundli > of shri Nandkishoreji.The fact remains that there are mistakes in > analysing kundlis , however in this forum one must discuss the > shortcomings and try to rectify. > If the details of kundli are posted for analysis by someone, one must > critically look into it and try to learn from the mistakes in > analysis rather than shrugging off the efforts made by the members. > If the members want to analyse i am puting forward a kundli > DOB 12/5/73 > TOB : Midnight(12 Hrs)(Intervening night of 11 and 12) > POB New Delhi > > regards > Arvinder > > > > lalkitab , " lalkitabee " <lalkitabee> wrote: > > > > Reapected Kulbir ji > > Kisi Vyakyi ke keh dene maatra se yeh nahi ki lalkitab main > > likhi gayi baat galat ho gayi hai.Aaj tak yahi samjhaa jataa hai ki > > Raja ko bhagyodya kahenge uska bhagyodya uske level ke mutabik hi > > hogaa lekin ek begger ka bhagyodya kahenge to matlab veh rich ho > > jayegaa. Lekin bhagyodya ka matlab hai ki kisi ki paristithitiyon > > main anukool parivartan.Aur paristhitiyaan to pratyek vyakti ke > saath > > hain chahe veh raajaa ho ya rank. Aur yeh parivartan ko read karnaa > > hi astrology ka kaam hai.Agar koi yeh kahey ki main sabhi sukhon se > > porn hoon aur astrological analyses per sandeh karey to use > smajhaana > > kathin hotaa hai aur veh vyakti samay aane per hi samajh saktaa hai > > vaise nahi.Nandu ji ke case main aap dhyaan se mangal, shukra aur > > shani ketu aur guru ke vishad vistaar ko poori tarah padhnaa, > bilkul > > clear ho jayegaa ki mangal bad hai.Aur aapki likhi gayi durusti > > bilkul thik hai bhavishya ke liye maine unhain aagah kiyaa hai > lekin > > remedies koi nahi likhi hai.nandu ji ki mails ke prati > pratikriyaain > > padhker to unke swabhav main mangal bad ka touch dikh rahaa hai. > Aise > > vyakti ki naak teekhi aur ankhain saaanp ki aankho ki kroorta se > yukt > > hoti hain aur jabaan bhi patli hoti hai.bahut spasht aur sfut > > uchchaaran hotaa hai lekin likhne main jaldbaazi kartaa hai.Pratyek > > kaam main jaldbaazi se kaam karnaa drshtigochar hotaa hai.Kyonki > > mangal bad shani per haavi hone ka prayaas kartaa hai gaur se > dekhiye > > mangal aur shani tatha budh shukra, ketu aur guru ACHANAK CHOT ki > > drishti se dekh rahey hain aur yadi aisa vyakti kahe ki " OX GIVES > > MILK " to answer dena chahiye ki yes it gives milk more than a > > cow.Kyonki veh jab tak practical anubhav prapt nahi ker lega tab > tak > > use nahi manegaa use practical anubhav milne shuru hotey hain to ek > > ke baad ek milney lagtey hain.Ateh haath dekhne ka swaal hi nahi > > paida hotaa.Main jaanta hoon ki meri is mail ke baad nandu ji shayd > > ekdum se react na karain kyonki yeh karnaa unki kundli ke ek aur > > pehloo ko ujaagar keregaa . Unki itni mails padhne ke baad svayam > hi > > nishkarsh nikaalaa ja saktaa hai.Aur jivan main yadi koi anisht > hote > > hote reh gaya hai to main keh saktaa hoon ki inki marriage delay > > hoker hui hai yaani 28 ki umra ke baad, lekin iskaa abhipray ye > nahi > > ki anisht samapt ho gaya hai balki anisht apne doosre daur ki > tayyari > > main jut gayaa hai.aur kab achaanak chot karegaa yeh deep readings > se > > gyat ho saktaa hai.Aur ab unke jivan ka doosra 35 saala chakra chal > > rahaa hai.Im specially saying 2nd 35 years cycle. > > With regards > > Lalkitabee > > lalkitab , " Kulbir Singh Bains " > > <ceetabains> wrote: > > > > > > Nandkishore ji yeh galat baat hai. ilzam nbhi aap lagao vakil bhi > > aap > > > aur judge aur jallad bhi aap . ab batao to sahi na ki aapke tewe > ko > > > kisne kaise galat pada. main pahle bhi poocha tha ki mere poochne > > par > > > aap ke tewe ke 8 symptom bilkul thik match hue. ab aap kaise kahte > > > hain ki tewa galat padha. dekhiye bhagiye nahin. agar hum galat > hain > > > to darusat karo ya phir apni galati maan lo. ab bataiye arrogant > aur > > > bad mannered kaun hai. apke samne tewe ka analysis pada hai. apne > > khud > > > swikaar kiya hai kissi aur ne nahin. agar baat shuru karne ka dam > > > rakhte ho to kissi logical mod par to khattam karo. aapka faisla > > > jahangiri faisla to hai nahin ki apne kaha aur sabne maana. > bakiyon > > ko > > > chahe jitan kaam ho is mudde ke liye main bilkul free hun . chahe > > > jitna time lagain par sabit karen ki mera analysis galat tha aur > > uske > > > muqabla aap mujhe jinse ladwana chahte hain unka zyada thik tha. > > > kulbir > > > > > > lalkitab , " Nandkishore rai rawal " > > > <natkhatnandu@r...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Punit JI > > > > Mera teva sahi tha aur hai agar aapke socalled expert use galat > > > pdhte hai to ye batana mera kartavya hai ki bhai sahab aap basic > > right > > > rakhen.Mene aisa kabhi nahi kaha ki aap mere bharose hain .Darasal > > > this group has become mental orgy of a few ill knowledge > people " NEEM > > > HAKIM KHATRAYE A JAAN " A LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS DANGEROUS THING. > > > > PLEASE EXPELL ME FROM THIS GROUP I DONT WANT 2 BE THE PART OF > > BUNCH > > > OF ARROGANT AND BAD MANNERED PEOPLE BYE AND THANKS. > > > > NANDU > > > > On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 Kulbir Singh Bains wrote : > > > > >Punit please don't be lax this time just answer my question > and I > > > > >would appreciate if nandkishore also contributes. Please check > > the > > > > >message in which I asked him questions in my first mail. > > > > >I asked him if a tree casted shadow on his house. > > > > >I asked him if any member of his family had foot problem > > > > >I asked him if has a puja room in his room. > > > > >I asked him whether he is in debt inspite of good income. > > > > >I asked him about the sequence of his birth and his > > father/uncles, > > > > >which was correct as told. > > > > >I asked him if he had a pipal tree in vicinity of his house. > > > > >I asked him that he hadn't received a bed in dowry from his in- > > laws. > > > > >I asked him about son of course his son's condition is > > different but > > > > >it was true that he be blessed with a son. > > > > >Out of the questions I asked the above matched accurately. Of > > course > > > > >some went wrong but that was the purpose to judge to tasir of > the > > > planets. > > > > >As per my capacity I also tried to give suggestions regarding > > remedies. > > > > >Punit ji you yourself are a practitsing astrologer at what > scale > > do > > > > >you measure this. > > > > >Not out of sense of competition but just to know where I went > > wrong I > > > > >would like to ask Shri nandkishore ji where did I fare less > > compared > > > > >to the analysis by vasumati ji and priya ji. And nandkishore > ji > > the > > > > >question based on your uncle and foot trouble was not based > on > > any > > > > >book but on principles taught by umesh. Just for curiosity > tell > > me at > > > > >what scale on the scale of 10 do I fare and how others surpass > > me. Let > > > > >it be an honest answer please let it not be biased on our > recent > > > > >rumblings. i would appreciate what priya ji and vasumati have > to > > say > > > > >in this regard. > > > > >Kulbir singh bains > > > > >lalkitab , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> > > wrote: > > > > >> Nandkishore ji, > > > > >> > > > > >> Main aap ki baat se sahamat nahin hun. Ek prediction fail > hone > > se koi > > > > >> astrologer fail saabhit nahin hota. Iske kai karan ho sakte > > hain. > > > > >> Shayad hi koi astrologer aisa ho jiske predctions kabhi bhi > > fail na > > > > >> hue hon. Kya aap kisi ek doctor ka operation fail hone par > use > > puri > > > > >> taraha failure kah sakte hain? Kisi astrologer ke bare main > > > nishkarsha > > > > >> nikaalne se pahle hamare paas paryapta bada 'sample' hona > > chaiye. > > > > >> > > > > >> Kripya aap is taraha se kisi ki pariksha na lein. Jaisa ki > > sabhi > > > > >> jaante kain ki kisi bhi vyakti ki kundli ka adhyayan karna > > bahut is > > > > >> samaya lene wala kaam hai. Aur khas kar ki is group main > jahan > > sabhi > > > > >> ki nighaein aapke analsysis ka chir-phad karne ko tayaar > hon. > > Hamein > > > > >> un sabhi logo ka, jinhone kundli adhyayan main apna samaya > > lagaya, > > > > >> shukraguzar hona chahiye. > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards, > > > > >> > > > > >> Punit Pandey > > > > >> > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2004 Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Dear Shri Umesh Ji In reply to the queries you have raised the following are the clarifications:- 1) No elder brother but not the elder son. 2 yes education and work area are different. ever yours Arvinder -- In lalkitab , " Umesh Sharma " <mudit982001> wrote: > > Dear wadhwa ji , > becaz of not confirm the time plz clear these doubts > 1. Are you eldest or you have one elder brother? > 2. Your educational or work area is diffrent? > Clear these doubts than i fix your lagna and after that we decide > your upayas > Umesh > lalkitab , " aswadhwa " <aswadhwa> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Kulbir ji, lalkitabee,Nandkishore ji. > > > > I think we must not waste any more messages on analysing the Kundli > > of shri Nandkishoreji.The fact remains that there are mistakes in > > analysing kundlis , however in this forum one must discuss the > > shortcomings and try to rectify. > > If the details of kundli are posted for analysis by someone, one > must > > critically look into it and try to learn from the mistakes in > > analysis rather than shrugging off the efforts made by the members. > > If the members want to analyse i am puting forward a kundli > > DOB 12/5/73 > > TOB : Midnight(12 Hrs)(Intervening night of 11 and 12) > > POB New Delhi > > > > regards > > Arvinder > > > > > > > > lalkitab , " lalkitabee " <lalkitabee> > wrote: > > > > > > Reapected Kulbir ji > > > Kisi Vyakyi ke keh dene maatra se yeh nahi ki lalkitab main > > > likhi gayi baat galat ho gayi hai.Aaj tak yahi samjhaa jataa hai > ki > > > Raja ko bhagyodya kahenge uska bhagyodya uske level ke mutabik hi > > > hogaa lekin ek begger ka bhagyodya kahenge to matlab veh rich ho > > > jayegaa. Lekin bhagyodya ka matlab hai ki kisi ki paristithitiyon > > > main anukool parivartan.Aur paristhitiyaan to pratyek vyakti ke > > saath > > > hain chahe veh raajaa ho ya rank. Aur yeh parivartan ko read > karnaa > > > hi astrology ka kaam hai.Agar koi yeh kahey ki main sabhi sukhon > se > > > porn hoon aur astrological analyses per sandeh karey to use > > smajhaana > > > kathin hotaa hai aur veh vyakti samay aane per hi samajh saktaa > hai > > > vaise nahi.Nandu ji ke case main aap dhyaan se mangal, shukra aur > > > shani ketu aur guru ke vishad vistaar ko poori tarah padhnaa, > > bilkul > > > clear ho jayegaa ki mangal bad hai.Aur aapki likhi gayi durusti > > > bilkul thik hai bhavishya ke liye maine unhain aagah kiyaa hai > > lekin > > > remedies koi nahi likhi hai.nandu ji ki mails ke prati > > pratikriyaain > > > padhker to unke swabhav main mangal bad ka touch dikh rahaa hai. > > Aise > > > vyakti ki naak teekhi aur ankhain saaanp ki aankho ki kroorta se > > yukt > > > hoti hain aur jabaan bhi patli hoti hai.bahut spasht aur sfut > > > uchchaaran hotaa hai lekin likhne main jaldbaazi kartaa > hai.Pratyek > > > kaam main jaldbaazi se kaam karnaa drshtigochar hotaa hai.Kyonki > > > mangal bad shani per haavi hone ka prayaas kartaa hai gaur se > > dekhiye > > > mangal aur shani tatha budh shukra, ketu aur guru ACHANAK CHOT ki > > > drishti se dekh rahey hain aur yadi aisa vyakti kahe ki " OX GIVES > > > MILK " to answer dena chahiye ki yes it gives milk more than a > > > cow.Kyonki veh jab tak practical anubhav prapt nahi ker lega tab > > tak > > > use nahi manegaa use practical anubhav milne shuru hotey hain to > ek > > > ke baad ek milney lagtey hain.Ateh haath dekhne ka swaal hi nahi > > > paida hotaa.Main jaanta hoon ki meri is mail ke baad nandu ji > shayd > > > ekdum se react na karain kyonki yeh karnaa unki kundli ke ek aur > > > pehloo ko ujaagar keregaa . Unki itni mails padhne ke baad > svayam > > hi > > > nishkarsh nikaalaa ja saktaa hai.Aur jivan main yadi koi anisht > > hote > > > hote reh gaya hai to main keh saktaa hoon ki inki marriage delay > > > hoker hui hai yaani 28 ki umra ke baad, lekin iskaa abhipray ye > > nahi > > > ki anisht samapt ho gaya hai balki anisht apne doosre daur ki > > tayyari > > > main jut gayaa hai.aur kab achaanak chot karegaa yeh deep > readings > > se > > > gyat ho saktaa hai.Aur ab unke jivan ka doosra 35 saala chakra > chal > > > rahaa hai.Im specially saying 2nd 35 years cycle. > > > With regards > > > Lalkitabee > > > lalkitab , " Kulbir Singh Bains " > > > <ceetabains> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nandkishore ji yeh galat baat hai. ilzam nbhi aap lagao vakil > bhi > > > aap > > > > aur judge aur jallad bhi aap . ab batao to sahi na ki aapke > tewe > > ko > > > > kisne kaise galat pada. main pahle bhi poocha tha ki mere > poochne > > > par > > > > aap ke tewe ke 8 symptom bilkul thik match hue. ab aap kaise > kahte > > > > hain ki tewa galat padha. dekhiye bhagiye nahin. agar hum galat > > hain > > > > to darusat karo ya phir apni galati maan lo. ab bataiye > arrogant > > aur > > > > bad mannered kaun hai. apke samne tewe ka analysis pada hai. > apne > > > khud > > > > swikaar kiya hai kissi aur ne nahin. agar baat shuru karne ka > dam > > > > rakhte ho to kissi logical mod par to khattam karo. aapka faisla > > > > jahangiri faisla to hai nahin ki apne kaha aur sabne maana. > > bakiyon > > > ko > > > > chahe jitan kaam ho is mudde ke liye main bilkul free hun . > chahe > > > > jitna time lagain par sabit karen ki mera analysis galat tha > aur > > > uske > > > > muqabla aap mujhe jinse ladwana chahte hain unka zyada thik tha. > > > > kulbir > > > > > > > > lalkitab , " Nandkishore rai rawal " > > > > <natkhatnandu@r...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punit JI > > > > > Mera teva sahi tha aur hai agar aapke socalled expert use > galat > > > > pdhte hai to ye batana mera kartavya hai ki bhai sahab aap > basic > > > right > > > > rakhen.Mene aisa kabhi nahi kaha ki aap mere bharose > hain .Darasal > > > > this group has become mental orgy of a few ill knowledge > > people " NEEM > > > > HAKIM KHATRAYE A JAAN " A LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS DANGEROUS THING. > > > > > PLEASE EXPELL ME FROM THIS GROUP I DONT WANT 2 BE THE PART OF > > > BUNCH > > > > OF ARROGANT AND BAD MANNERED PEOPLE BYE AND THANKS. > > > > > NANDU > > > > > On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 Kulbir Singh Bains wrote : > > > > > >Punit please don't be lax this time just answer my question > > and I > > > > > >would appreciate if nandkishore also contributes. Please > check > > > the > > > > > >message in which I asked him questions in my first mail. > > > > > >I asked him if a tree casted shadow on his house. > > > > > >I asked him if any member of his family had foot problem > > > > > >I asked him if has a puja room in his room. > > > > > >I asked him whether he is in debt inspite of good income. > > > > > >I asked him about the sequence of his birth and his > > > father/uncles, > > > > > >which was correct as told. > > > > > >I asked him if he had a pipal tree in vicinity of his house. > > > > > >I asked him that he hadn't received a bed in dowry from his > in- > > > laws. > > > > > >I asked him about son of course his son's condition is > > > different but > > > > > >it was true that he be blessed with a son. > > > > > >Out of the questions I asked the above matched accurately. > Of > > > course > > > > > >some went wrong but that was the purpose to judge to tasir > of > > the > > > > planets. > > > > > >As per my capacity I also tried to give suggestions > regarding > > > remedies. > > > > > >Punit ji you yourself are a practitsing astrologer at what > > scale > > > do > > > > > >you measure this. > > > > > >Not out of sense of competition but just to know where I > went > > > wrong I > > > > > >would like to ask Shri nandkishore ji where did I fare less > > > compared > > > > > >to the analysis by vasumati ji and priya ji. And > nandkishore > > ji > > > the > > > > > >question based on your uncle and foot trouble was not based > > on > > > any > > > > > >book but on principles taught by umesh. Just for curiosity > > tell > > > me at > > > > > >what scale on the scale of 10 do I fare and how others > surpass > > > me. Let > > > > > >it be an honest answer please let it not be biased on our > > recent > > > > > >rumblings. i would appreciate what priya ji and vasumati > have > > to > > > say > > > > > >in this regard. > > > > > >Kulbir singh bains > > > > > >lalkitab , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Nandkishore ji, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Main aap ki baat se sahamat nahin hun. Ek prediction fail > > hone > > > se koi > > > > > >> astrologer fail saabhit nahin hota. Iske kai karan ho > sakte > > > hain. > > > > > >> Shayad hi koi astrologer aisa ho jiske predctions kabhi > bhi > > > fail na > > > > > >> hue hon. Kya aap kisi ek doctor ka operation fail hone par > > use > > > puri > > > > > >> taraha failure kah sakte hain? Kisi astrologer ke bare main > > > > nishkarsha > > > > > >> nikaalne se pahle hamare paas paryapta bada 'sample' hona > > > chaiye. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Kripya aap is taraha se kisi ki pariksha na lein. Jaisa ki > > > sabhi > > > > > >> jaante kain ki kisi bhi vyakti ki kundli ka adhyayan karna > > > bahut is > > > > > >> samaya lene wala kaam hai. Aur khas kar ki is group main > > jahan > > > sabhi > > > > > >> ki nighaein aapke analsysis ka chir-phad karne ko tayaar > > hon. > > > Hamein > > > > > >> un sabhi logo ka, jinhone kundli adhyayan main apna samaya > > > lagaya, > > > > > >> shukraguzar hona chahiye. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Punit Pandey > > > > > >> > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.