Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Request to punit and nandkishore ji & kulbir ji

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Reapected Kulbir ji

Kisi Vyakyi ke keh dene maatra se yeh nahi ki lalkitab main

likhi gayi baat galat ho gayi hai.Aaj tak yahi samjhaa jataa hai ki

Raja ko bhagyodya kahenge uska bhagyodya uske level ke mutabik hi

hogaa lekin ek begger ka bhagyodya kahenge to matlab veh rich ho

jayegaa. Lekin bhagyodya ka matlab hai ki kisi ki paristithitiyon

main anukool parivartan.Aur paristhitiyaan to pratyek vyakti ke saath

hain chahe veh raajaa ho ya rank. Aur yeh parivartan ko read karnaa

hi astrology ka kaam hai.Agar koi yeh kahey ki main sabhi sukhon se

porn hoon aur astrological analyses per sandeh karey to use smajhaana

kathin hotaa hai aur veh vyakti samay aane per hi samajh saktaa hai

vaise nahi.Nandu ji ke case main aap dhyaan se mangal, shukra aur

shani ketu aur guru ke vishad vistaar ko poori tarah padhnaa, bilkul

clear ho jayegaa ki mangal bad hai.Aur aapki likhi gayi durusti

bilkul thik hai bhavishya ke liye maine unhain aagah kiyaa hai lekin

remedies koi nahi likhi hai.nandu ji ki mails ke prati pratikriyaain

padhker to unke swabhav main mangal bad ka touch dikh rahaa hai. Aise

vyakti ki naak teekhi aur ankhain saaanp ki aankho ki kroorta se yukt

hoti hain aur jabaan bhi patli hoti hai.bahut spasht aur sfut

uchchaaran hotaa hai lekin likhne main jaldbaazi kartaa hai.Pratyek

kaam main jaldbaazi se kaam karnaa drshtigochar hotaa hai.Kyonki

mangal bad shani per haavi hone ka prayaas kartaa hai gaur se dekhiye

mangal aur shani tatha budh shukra, ketu aur guru ACHANAK CHOT ki

drishti se dekh rahey hain aur yadi aisa vyakti kahe ki " OX GIVES

MILK " to answer dena chahiye ki yes it gives milk more than a

cow.Kyonki veh jab tak practical anubhav prapt nahi ker lega tab tak

use nahi manegaa use practical anubhav milne shuru hotey hain to ek

ke baad ek milney lagtey hain.Ateh haath dekhne ka swaal hi nahi

paida hotaa.Main jaanta hoon ki meri is mail ke baad nandu ji shayd

ekdum se react na karain kyonki yeh karnaa unki kundli ke ek aur

pehloo ko ujaagar keregaa . Unki itni mails padhne ke baad svayam hi

nishkarsh nikaalaa ja saktaa hai.Aur jivan main yadi koi anisht hote

hote reh gaya hai to main keh saktaa hoon ki inki marriage delay

hoker hui hai yaani 28 ki umra ke baad, lekin iskaa abhipray ye nahi

ki anisht samapt ho gaya hai balki anisht apne doosre daur ki tayyari

main jut gayaa hai.aur kab achaanak chot karegaa yeh deep readings se

gyat ho saktaa hai.Aur ab unke jivan ka doosra 35 saala chakra chal

rahaa hai.Im specially saying 2nd 35 years cycle.

With regards

Lalkitabee

lalkitab , " Kulbir Singh Bains "

<ceetabains> wrote:

>

> Nandkishore ji yeh galat baat hai. ilzam nbhi aap lagao vakil bhi

aap

> aur judge aur jallad bhi aap . ab batao to sahi na ki aapke tewe ko

> kisne kaise galat pada. main pahle bhi poocha tha ki mere poochne

par

> aap ke tewe ke 8 symptom bilkul thik match hue. ab aap kaise kahte

> hain ki tewa galat padha. dekhiye bhagiye nahin. agar hum galat hain

> to darusat karo ya phir apni galati maan lo. ab bataiye arrogant aur

> bad mannered kaun hai. apke samne tewe ka analysis pada hai. apne

khud

> swikaar kiya hai kissi aur ne nahin. agar baat shuru karne ka dam

> rakhte ho to kissi logical mod par to khattam karo. aapka faisla

> jahangiri faisla to hai nahin ki apne kaha aur sabne maana. bakiyon

ko

> chahe jitan kaam ho is mudde ke liye main bilkul free hun . chahe

> jitna time lagain par sabit karen ki mera analysis galat tha aur

uske

> muqabla aap mujhe jinse ladwana chahte hain unka zyada thik tha.

> kulbir

>

> lalkitab , " Nandkishore rai rawal "

> <natkhatnandu@r...> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Punit JI

> > Mera teva sahi tha aur hai agar aapke socalled expert use galat

> pdhte hai to ye batana mera kartavya hai ki bhai sahab aap basic

right

> rakhen.Mene aisa kabhi nahi kaha ki aap mere bharose hain .Darasal

> this group has become mental orgy of a few ill knowledge people " NEEM

> HAKIM KHATRAYE A JAAN " A LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS DANGEROUS THING.

> > PLEASE EXPELL ME FROM THIS GROUP I DONT WANT 2 BE THE PART OF

BUNCH

> OF ARROGANT AND BAD MANNERED PEOPLE BYE AND THANKS.

> > NANDU

> > On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 Kulbir Singh Bains wrote :

> > >Punit please don't be lax this time just answer my question and I

> > >would appreciate if nandkishore also contributes. Please check

the

> > >message in which I asked him questions in my first mail.

> > >I asked him if a tree casted shadow on his house.

> > >I asked him if any member of his family had foot problem

> > >I asked him if has a puja room in his room.

> > >I asked him whether he is in debt inspite of good income.

> > >I asked him about the sequence of his birth and his

father/uncles,

> > >which was correct as told.

> > >I asked him if he had a pipal tree in vicinity of his house.

> > >I asked him that he hadn't received a bed in dowry from his in-

laws.

> > >I asked him about son of course his son's condition is

different but

> > >it was true that he be blessed with a son.

> > >Out of the questions I asked the above matched accurately. Of

course

> > >some went wrong but that was the purpose to judge to tasir of the

> planets.

> > >As per my capacity I also tried to give suggestions regarding

remedies.

> > >Punit ji you yourself are a practitsing astrologer at what scale

do

> > >you measure this.

> > >Not out of sense of competition but just to know where I went

wrong I

> > >would like to ask Shri nandkishore ji where did I fare less

compared

> > >to the analysis by vasumati ji and priya ji. And nandkishore ji

the

> > >question based on your uncle and foot trouble was not based on

any

> > >book but on principles taught by umesh. Just for curiosity tell

me at

> > >what scale on the scale of 10 do I fare and how others surpass

me. Let

> > >it be an honest answer please let it not be biased on our recent

> > >rumblings. i would appreciate what priya ji and vasumati have to

say

> > >in this regard.

> > >Kulbir singh bains

> > >lalkitab , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...>

wrote:

> > >> Nandkishore ji,

> > >>

> > >> Main aap ki baat se sahamat nahin hun. Ek prediction fail hone

se koi

> > >> astrologer fail saabhit nahin hota. Iske kai karan ho sakte

hain.

> > >> Shayad hi koi astrologer aisa ho jiske predctions kabhi bhi

fail na

> > >> hue hon. Kya aap kisi ek doctor ka operation fail hone par use

puri

> > >> taraha failure kah sakte hain? Kisi astrologer ke bare main

> nishkarsha

> > >> nikaalne se pahle hamare paas paryapta bada 'sample' hona

chaiye.

> > >>

> > >> Kripya aap is taraha se kisi ki pariksha na lein. Jaisa ki

sabhi

> > >> jaante kain ki kisi bhi vyakti ki kundli ka adhyayan karna

bahut is

> > >> samaya lene wala kaam hai. Aur khas kar ki is group main jahan

sabhi

> > >> ki nighaein aapke analsysis ka chir-phad karne ko tayaar hon.

Hamein

> > >> un sabhi logo ka, jinhone kundli adhyayan main apna samaya

lagaya,

> > >> shukraguzar hona chahiye.

> > >>

> > >> Regards,

> > >>

> > >> Punit Pandey

> > >>

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...