: All members M.R.Gupta- Mr. Kulbir -Mr. Natkhat

[Guest guest]

Respected Members

All of u r now not on the track. Plz. mantain the corum of

the group. Like a family we r together here.All r not same as our

fingers in hand. But if fingers will collective as punch ,then there

self imporatnce will change into group importance.We all r also tied

with the group as fingers.So plz. mantain the system &

proceed.Acadmic Disscussion is the motive of this group.

I saw just a massage of kulbir that Lalkitab interpretepts

the sun.I think he said due to his more aastha to this book but i

think this interpretept Mangal Nek.Now all of u ask for logics. So im

giving some lpgics:-

1.It has red color at cover. which concerned with mangal.But Mangal

has two faces 1st mangal nek 2nd mangal bad. So......

2. It has collected as a book in red cover(Jild).So clear that it is

in square shape. All of u accept that mangal nek is square shaped.

3.This book was written for LOGO KI BHALAI. I mean for the MANGAL

(Kalyan) of peoples.

So i think it is a significance of mangal in astrological way

as well as social way.Even in the very begining of lalkitab had said

that " iski jild ka rang lal surkh khooni hona chahiye.Chatkeela nahi.

(laguage may be differ because im indicating in hindi according to

that view).All of u know that KAARAK of blood is mangal. Now all of u

can make this discussion next. It is my personal philosofy but

according to lalkitab.

Sp Plz . make efforts in this direction. Specially Mr. M.R.

Gupta Ji & Kulbir Ji Natkhat nandu ji.

With regards

Lalkitabee

lalkitab , " Nandkishore rai rawal "

<natkhatnandu@r...> wrote:

>  Dear Gupta JI

> in my previous mail also I have mentioned that this the group of so

called expert who just searchin to put their finger to put in some

hole forgetting that they do have hole also.Dont expect respect or

manners in this group.Except mudit ji and punit pande and 2-3 more

all r illetrate punjabis who dont like any one else 2 communicate in

this group.

>

> Nandu

>

>

> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 mr.gupta wrote :

> >Respectable & Honourable Kulbeerji,

> >You are very right that I have not seen 'Lal Kitab' ki

> >woh kaisi hoti hai, isi liye maine aap jaise mahan

> >guru se kuchh seekhne ki badi aas (not in english

> >please) lagaye aapke forum/durbar mein aaya hun, aasha

> >hai mujh naacheej ko nirash nahin karenge. Advance

> >mein main astrology mein apne aapko bandar kah chuka

> >hoon. Aap kuchh aur namkaran karna chahen to khushi se

> >karen, aapki khushi mein meri khushi hai. Guruji,

> >aapka main bahut aabhari hoon, meri galti ki durusti

> >ka. Durusti karane ka aapka andaj bhi bahut achchha

> >laga - Kaafee humorous (may be spelling mistake) hai.

> >Aapne kaha - Lal kitab sakshat surya mani jati hai -

> >bahut sahi kaha, shayad isi liye use 'Lal' kahte hain.

> >Jiska naam hi 'Lal' hai to woh surya ko resemble

> >karega hi. Guruji, aaj maine aapse do sabak seekhe,

> >aapka bahut bahut shukriya. Ummeed rakhata hun isi

> >tarah humorous mood mein aap mujhe aur bhi seekhate

> >rahenge.

> >Regards.

> >M.R. GUPTA

> >--- rakeshsahgal <rakeshsahgal> wrote:

> >>

> >> Kulbir ji

> >>

> >> Mainu lagdaa hai mainu te twaanu badi chetti

> >> RahuKetu daa khitaab

> >> milan waala hai. Jadd vi forum vich pangaa hondaa

> >> hai tussi te main

> >> sab to agge hone waa - the axis of all evil is it?.

> >> Naale naa vi dono

> >> de RK hi haige.

> >>

> >> What do you think we should ease off?

> >>

> >> Evilly

> >>

> >>

> >> R S

> >>

> >> lalkitab , ceeta bains

> >> <ceetabains> wrote:

> >> > Gupta sahib kabhi lalkitab dekhi hai kaisi hoti

> >> hai jo

> >> > sun/surya/ravi ko forum me act karne se mana kar

> >> rahe

> >> > ho. surya self ko zaroor represent karta zaroor

> >> hai

> >> > par aham ko nahin. darust kijiye. aur lalkitab to

> >> > sakshat surya mani jati hai.

> >> > kulbir

> >> > --- " m.r. gupta " <mrgupta_in> wrote:

> >> >

> >> > > Dear Respectable & Honourable Members,

> >> > > 1] Firstly, I request all members to respect

> >> each

> >> > > other even if somebody commits mistake. One gets

> >> > > respect if he/she gives respect. Please maintain

> >> > > decorum and prestige of the great group. Please

> >> do

> >> > > not

> >> > > allow your SUN (surya/ravi) to act in this forum

> >> (If

> >> > > I

> >> > > am wrong, please somebody may correct it).

> >> Please

> >> > > restrain from passing derogatory remarks on

> >> others

> >> > > for

> >> > > any reason.

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > Tired of spam?  Mail has the best spam

> >> protection around

> >> >

> >

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >           

> >_______________________________

> >

> >Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!

> >http://vote.

> >

[Guest guest]

Respected Members & lalkitabeeji,

Your interepretations by your personal philosofy are

quite convincing. But one imortant expect also has to

be considered that Lalkitab knowledge was given by

'sarathi' of sun (surya/ravi) - 'Arun' to Ravana, and

therefore 'Guru Kulbeerji's observation that 'Lalkitab

sakshat surya maani jaati hai' also holds water. House

No.1 ka swami Mangal hai aur usme surya uchch ka hota

hai aur dono mitra hain. Kya is liye do Gurujion ka

mila jula interpretation hai ? Mangal (Red) ke ghar

(kitab) mein uchch Surya ke sarathi Arun ne Lalkitab

ka gyan diya ! Mera vishwas hai Gurujis is gutthi ko

suljha lenge.

Regards.

M.R. GUPTA

--- lalkitabee <lalkitabee wrote:

 

>

> Respected Members

> All of u r now not on the track. Plz. mantain the

> corum of

> the group. Like a family we r together here.All r

> not same as our

> fingers in hand. But if fingers will collective as

> punch ,then there

> self imporatnce will change into group importance.We

> all r also tied

> with the group as fingers.So plz. mantain the system

> &

> proceed.Acadmic Disscussion is the motive of this

> group.

> I saw just a massage of kulbir that Lalkitab

> interpretepts

> the sun.I think he said due to his more aastha to

> this book but i

> think this interpretept Mangal Nek.Now all of u ask

> for logics. So im

> giving some lpgics:-

> 1.It has red color at cover. which concerned with

> mangal.But Mangal

> has two faces 1st mangal nek 2nd mangal bad.

> So......

> 2. It has collected as a book in red cover(Jild).So

> clear that it is

> in square shape. All of u accept that mangal nek is

> square shaped.

> 3.This book was written for LOGO KI BHALAI. I mean

> for the MANGAL

> (Kalyan) of peoples.

> So i think it is a significance of mangal in

> astrological way

> as well as social way.Even in the very begining of

> lalkitab had said

> that " iski jild ka rang lal surkh khooni hona

> chahiye.Chatkeela nahi.

> (laguage may be differ because im indicating in

> hindi according to

> that view).All of u know that KAARAK of blood is

> mangal. Now all of u

> can make this discussion next. It is my personal

> philosofy but

> according to lalkitab.

> Sp Plz . make efforts in this direction. Specially

> Mr. M.R.

> Gupta Ji & Kulbir Ji Natkhat nandu ji.

> With regards

> Lalkitabee

> lalkitab , " Nandkishore rai

> rawal "

> <natkhatnandu@r...> wrote:

> >  Dear Gupta JI

> > in my previous mail also I have mentioned that

> this the group of so

> called expert who just searchin to put their finger

> to put in some

> hole forgetting that they do have hole also.Dont

> expect respect or

> manners in this group.Except mudit ji and punit

> pande and 2-3 more

> all r illetrate punjabis who dont like any one else

> 2 communicate in

> this group.

> >

> > Nandu

> >

> >

> > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 mr.gupta wrote :

> > >Respectable & Honourable Kulbeerji,

> > >You are very right that I have not seen 'Lal

> Kitab' ki

> > >woh kaisi hoti hai, isi liye maine aap jaise

> mahan

> > >guru se kuchh seekhne ki badi aas (not in english

> > >please) lagaye aapke forum/durbar mein aaya hun,

> aasha

> > >hai mujh naacheej ko nirash nahin karenge.

> Advance

> > >mein main astrology mein apne aapko bandar kah

> chuka

> > >hoon. Aap kuchh aur namkaran karna chahen to

> khushi se

> > >karen, aapki khushi mein meri khushi hai. Guruji,

> > >aapka main bahut aabhari hoon, meri galti ki

> durusti

> > >ka. Durusti karane ka aapka andaj bhi bahut

> achchha

> > >laga - Kaafee humorous (may be spelling mistake)

> hai.

> > >Aapne kaha - Lal kitab sakshat surya mani jati

> hai -

> > >bahut sahi kaha, shayad isi liye use 'Lal' kahte

> hain.

> > >Jiska naam hi 'Lal' hai to woh surya ko resemble

> > >karega hi. Guruji, aaj maine aapse do sabak

> seekhe,

> > >aapka bahut bahut shukriya. Ummeed rakhata hun

> isi

> > >tarah humorous mood mein aap mujhe aur bhi

> seekhate

> > >rahenge.

> > >Regards.

> > >M.R. GUPTA

> > >--- rakeshsahgal <rakeshsahgal> wrote:

> > >>

> > >> Kulbir ji

> > >>

> > >> Mainu lagdaa hai mainu te twaanu badi chetti

> > >> RahuKetu daa khitaab

> > >> milan waala hai. Jadd vi forum vich pangaa

> hondaa

> > >> hai tussi te main

> > >> sab to agge hone waa - the axis of all evil is

> it?.

> > >> Naale naa vi dono

> > >> de RK hi haige.

> > >>

> > >> What do you think we should ease off?

> > >>

> > >> Evilly

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> R S

> > >>

> > >> lalkitab , ceeta bains

> > >> <ceetabains> wrote:

> > >> > Gupta sahib kabhi lalkitab dekhi hai kaisi

> hoti

> > >> hai jo

> > >> > sun/surya/ravi ko forum me act karne se mana

> kar

> > >> rahe

> > >> > ho. surya self ko zaroor represent karta

> zaroor

> > >> hai

> > >> > par aham ko nahin. darust kijiye. aur

> lalkitab to

> > >> > sakshat surya mani jati hai.

> > >> > kulbir

> > >> > --- " m.r. gupta " <mrgupta_in> wrote:

> > >> >

> > >> > > Dear Respectable & Honourable Members,

> > >> > > 1] Firstly, I request all members to

> respect

> > >> each

> > >> > > other even if somebody commits mistake. One

> gets

> > >> > > respect if he/she gives respect. Please

> maintain

> > >> > > decorum and prestige of the great group.

> Please

> > >> do

> > >> > > not

> > >> > > allow your SUN (surya/ravi) to act in this

> forum

> > >> (If

> > >> > > I

> > >> > > am wrong, please somebody may correct it).

> > >> Please

> > >> > > restrain from passing derogatory remarks on

> > >> others

> > >> > > for

> > >> > > any reason.

> > >> >

> > >> >

>

> > >> >

> > >> > Tired of spam?  Mail has the best spam

> > >> protection around

> > >> >

> > >

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >           

> > >_______________________________

> > >

> > >Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!

> > >http://vote.

> > >

[Guest guest]

gurudev baat aastha ki nahin totally logic ki hai lal to mangal ab kitab kya kuch nahin hoti, gyan kuch nahin hota, padhna kuch nahin hota maine natkhat nandu ko abhi message bheja hai padh kar darusti kar lena . joshi sahib ki is kitab ki koi bhi baat asatha ya aapki personal philosphy se pehle logic par khari uttarti hai.

kulbirlalkitabee <lalkitabee wrote:

I saw just a massage of kulbir that Lalkitab interpretepts the sun.I think he said due to his more aastha to this book but i think this interpretept Mangal Nek.Now all of u ask for logics. So im giving some lpgics:-1.It has red color at cover. which concerned with mangal.But Mangal has two faces 1st mangal nek 2nd mangal bad. So......2. It has collected as a book in red cover(Jild).So clear that it is in square shape. All of u accept that mangal nek is square shaped.3.This book was written for LOGO KI BHALAI. I mean for the MANGAL (Kalyan) of peoples. So i think it is a significance of mangal in astrological way as well as social way.Even in the very begining of lalkitab had said that "iski jild ka rang lal surkh khooni hona chahiye.Chatkeela

nahi.(laguage may be differ because im indicating in hindi according to that view).All of u know that KAARAK of blood is mangal. Now all of u can make this discussion next. It is my personal philosofy but according to lalkitab.> >> >> >> > > >> > > >> > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam> >> protection around> >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > >_______________________________> >> >Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!> >http://vote.> >