Guest guest Posted October 18, 2004 Report Share Posted October 18, 2004 Fellow Lalkitabists, I don't know whether it was for good or bad, right or wrong. But all matters have been sorted out and I can assure you that you will find forum a better learning place. Yesterday, I discussed with many members and more than happy to say that everybody is willing to contribute. I also found myself most fortunate seeing so much love and confidence from members. I also found that few of the points raised by me were just due to miscommunication and misinterpretation. Probably some part has also been played by my ego and now I back out of it. Let us forget it and take the Lal Kitab learning towards the positive directions. During the past we are receiving some very good suggestions. We have decided to implement them in step-by-step manner. Following three suggestions are on the top of the implementation list - 1. Formation of Core Group (Expert Panel) 2. Online Conference using Group Chat 3. Forum Constitution Following are also under consideration on which we will seek your opinion soon. 1. Moderation of Mails 2. Fake Identities 3. Paid consultancy 4. Discussion on Lal Kitab Grammar 5. ….. and many more thing that we will discuss soon I will also write another mail for inviting experts on Expert Panel. Please let me know who all want to contribute to the Expert Panel. I'll write a mail soon regarding the formation of expert panel. And Kulbir ji, let me assure you that no procrastination this time :-) Let us start decoding Lal Kitab…….. Regards, Punit Pandey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2004 Report Share Posted October 18, 2004 Dear Pandey ji may I know who r the persons with whom u have discussed every thing and forming the constitution for the forum?? Nandu On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 Punit Pandey wrote : >Fellow Lalkitabists, >I don't know whether it was for good or bad, right or wrong. But all >matters have been sorted out and I can assure you that you will find >forum a better learning place. Yesterday, I discussed with many >members and more than happy to say that everybody is willing to >contribute. I also found myself most fortunate seeing so much love and >confidence from members. I also found that few of the points raised by >me were just due to miscommunication and misinterpretation. Probably >some part has also been played by my ego and now I back out of it. Let >us forget it and take the Lal Kitab learning towards the positive >directions. >During the past we are receiving some very good suggestions. We have >decided to implement them in step-by-step manner. Following three >suggestions are on the top of the implementation list - >1. Formation of Core Group (Expert Panel) >2. Online Conference using Group Chat >3. Forum Constitution >Following are also under consideration on which we will seek your opinion soon. >1. Moderation of Mails >2. Fake Identities >3. Paid consultancy >4. Discussion on Lal Kitab Grammar >5. ….. and many more thing that we will discuss soon >I will also write another mail for inviting experts on Expert Panel. >Please let me know who all want to contribute to the Expert Panel. >I'll write a mail soon regarding the formation of expert panel. And >Kulbir ji, let me assure you that no procrastination this time :-) >Let us start decoding Lal Kitab…….. >Regards, >Punit Pandey > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2004 Report Share Posted October 18, 2004 Nandkishore ji, The people who were part of the controversy. I believe that taking anyone's name would not be a good idea. But the process doesn't stop there and I am willing to extend to as many members as possible. Everyone's suggestions are invited so that we can form a todo list of the tasks that we have to implement in upcoming time. As always, I request members to write directly to my personal id in order to avoid controversy. Regards, Punit Pandey On 18 Oct 2004 15:55:35 -0000, Nandkishore rai rawal <natkhatnandu wrote: > Dear Pandey ji > may I know who r the persons with whom u have discussed every thing and forming the constitution for the forum?? > Nandu > > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 Punit Pandey wrote : > >Fellow Lalkitabists, > >I don't know whether it was for good or bad, right or wrong. But all > >matters have been sorted out and I can assure you that you will find > >forum a better learning place. Yesterday, I discussed with many > >members and more than happy to say that everybody is willing to > >contribute. I also found myself most fortunate seeing so much love and > >confidence from members. I also found that few of the points raised by > >me were just due to miscommunication and misinterpretation. Probably > >some part has also been played by my ego and now I back out of it. Let > >us forget it and take the Lal Kitab learning towards the positive > >directions. > >During the past we are receiving some very good suggestions. We have > >decided to implement them in step-by-step manner. Following three > >suggestions are on the top of the implementation list - > >1. Formation of Core Group (Expert Panel) > >2. Online Conference using Group Chat > >3. Forum Constitution > >Following are also under consideration on which we will seek your opinion soon. > >1. Moderation of Mails > >2. Fake Identities > >3. Paid consultancy > >4. Discussion on Lal Kitab Grammar > >5. ….. and many more thing that we will discuss soon > >I will also write another mail for inviting experts on Expert Panel. > >Please let me know who all want to contribute to the Expert Panel. > >I'll write a mail soon regarding the formation of expert panel. And > >Kulbir ji, let me assure you that no procrastination this time :-) > >Let us start decoding Lal Kitab…….. > >Regards, > >Punit Pandey > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 Punit JI Please do something 2 avoid this brickbating amongst members.AS A SENIOR MEMBER OF THE GROUP WE EXPECT LOT OF THINGS AND GUIDANCE FROM U. Regards. Ravindra PancholiPunit Pandey <punitp wrote: Nandkishore ji,The people who were part of the controversy. I believe that takinganyone's name would not be a good idea. But the process doesn't stopthere and I am willing to extend to as many members as possible.Everyone's suggestions are invited so that we can form a todo list ofthe tasks that we have to implement in upcoming time.As always, I request members to write directly to my personal id inorder to avoid controversy.Regards,Punit PandeyOn 18 Oct 2004 15:55:35 -0000, Nandkishore rai rawal<natkhatnandu wrote:> Dear Pandey ji> may I know who r the persons with whom u have discussed every thing and forming the constitution for the forum??> Nandu> > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 Punit Pandey wrote :> >Fellow Lalkitabists,> >I don't know whether it was for good or bad, right or wrong. But all> >matters have been sorted out and I can assure you that you will find> >forum a better learning place. Yesterday, I discussed with many> >members and more than happy to say that everybody is willing to> >contribute. I also found myself most fortunate seeing so much love and> >confidence from members. I also found that few of the points raised by> >me were just due to miscommunication and misinterpretation. Probably> >some part has also been played by my ego and now I back out of it. Let> >us forget it and take the Lal Kitab learning towards the positive> >directions.> >During the past we are receiving some very good suggestions. We have> >decided to implement them in step-by-step manner. Following three> >suggestions are on the top of the implementation list -> >1. Formation of Core Group (Expert Panel)> >2. Online Conference using Group Chat> >3. Forum Constitution> >Following are also under consideration on which we will seek your opinion soon.> >1. Moderation of Mails> >2. Fake Identities> >3. Paid consultancy> >4. Discussion on Lal Kitab Grammar> >5. ….. and many more thing that we will discuss soon> >I will also write another mail for inviting experts on Expert Panel.> >Please let me know who all want to contribute to the Expert Panel.> >I'll write a mail soon regarding the formation of expert panel. And> >Kulbir ji, let me assure you that no procrastination this time :-)> >Let us start decoding Lal Kitab……..> >Regards,> >Punit Pandey> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 Punit Your inactivity is rather surprising to say the least, moreso after the discussion we had. NandKishore Rawal has set a new low for the group. He has resorted to profanity. It will be interesting to know what you propose to do about it. I for one am asking you to KICK him out as it is incumbent upon you to ENFORCE DISCIPLINE. R S lalkitab , ravindra panvholi <ravindrapancholi> wrote: > Punit JI > Please do something 2 avoid this brickbating amongst members.AS A SENIOR MEMBER OF THE GROUP WE EXPECT LOT OF THINGS AND GUIDANCE FROM U. > Regards. > > Ravindra Pancholi > > Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > Nandkishore ji, > > The people who were part of the controversy. I believe that taking > anyone's name would not be a good idea. But the process doesn't stop > there and I am willing to extend to as many members as possible. > Everyone's suggestions are invited so that we can form a todo list of > the tasks that we have to implement in upcoming time. > > As always, I request members to write directly to my personal id in > order to avoid controversy. > > Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > On 18 Oct 2004 15:55:35 -0000, Nandkishore rai rawal > <natkhatnandu@r...> wrote: > > Dear Pandey ji > > may I know who r the persons with whom u have discussed every thing and forming the constitution for the forum?? > > Nandu > > > > > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 Punit Pandey wrote : > > >Fellow Lalkitabists, > > >I don't know whether it was for good or bad, right or wrong. But all > > >matters have been sorted out and I can assure you that you will find > > >forum a better learning place. Yesterday, I discussed with many > > >members and more than happy to say that everybody is willing to > > >contribute. I also found myself most fortunate seeing so much love and > > >confidence from members. I also found that few of the points raised by > > >me were just due to miscommunication and misinterpretation. Probably > > >some part has also been played by my ego and now I back out of it. Let > > >us forget it and take the Lal Kitab learning towards the positive > > >directions. > > >During the past we are receiving some very good suggestions. We have > > >decided to implement them in step-by-step manner. Following three > > >suggestions are on the top of the implementation list - > > >1. Formation of Core Group (Expert Panel) > > >2. Online Conference using Group Chat > > >3. Forum Constitution > > >Following are also under consideration on which we will seek your opinion soon. > > >1. Moderation of Mails > > >2. Fake Identities > > >3. Paid consultancy > > >4. Discussion on Lal Kitab Grammar > > >5. ….. and many more thing that we will discuss soon > > >I will also write another mail for inviting experts on Expert Panel. > > >Please let me know who all want to contribute to the Expert Panel. > > >I'll write a mail soon regarding the formation of expert panel. And > > >Kulbir ji, let me assure you that no procrastination this time :-) > > >Let us start decoding Lal Kitab…….. > > >Regards, > > >Punit Pandey > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 RAKESH SEHAGAL BY USING KICK HIM OUT WHAT U WANT SHOW? FIRST U MIND U R OWN LANGUAGE THAN GIVE PRAVACHAN 2 OTHERS. " PAR UPADESH KUSHAL BAHUTERE " .KHUD APNI GAREBAN ME JHANK KAR DEKHO KI FOWL LANGUAGE PAHLE KISNE USE KARI FIR MUJH PAR DOSHAROPAN KARNA SAMJHE PUNJABI PUTTAR?? NANDU On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 rakeshsahgal wrote : >Punit >Your inactivity is rather surprising to say the least, moreso after >the discussion we had. >NandKishore Rawal has set a new low for the group. He has resorted to >profanity. It will be interesting to know what you propose to do about >it. I for one am asking you to KICK him out as it is incumbent upon >you to ENFORCE DISCIPLINE. >R S >lalkitab , ravindra panvholi ><ravindrapancholi> wrote: >> Punit JI >> Please do something 2 avoid this brickbating amongst members.AS A >SENIOR MEMBER OF THE GROUP WE EXPECT LOT OF THINGS AND GUIDANCE FROM >U. >> Regards. >> >> Ravindra Pancholi >> >> Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: >> Nandkishore ji, >> >> The people who were part of the controversy. I believe that taking >> anyone's name would not be a good idea. But the process doesn't stop >> there and I am willing to extend to as many members as possible. >> Everyone's suggestions are invited so that we can form a todo list >of >> the tasks that we have to implement in upcoming time. >> >> As always, I request members to write directly to my personal id in >> order to avoid controversy. >> >> Regards, >> >> Punit Pandey >> >> On 18 Oct 2004 15:55:35 -0000, Nandkishore rai rawal >> <natkhatnandu@r...> wrote: >> > Dear Pandey ji >> > may I know who r the persons with whom u have discussed every >thing and forming the constitution for the forum?? >> > Nandu >> > >> > >> > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 Punit Pandey wrote : >> > >Fellow Lalkitabists, >> > >I don't know whether it was for good or bad, right or wrong. But >all >> > >matters have been sorted out and I can assure you that you will >find >> > >forum a better learning place. Yesterday, I discussed with many >> > >members and more than happy to say that everybody is willing to >> > >contribute. I also found myself most fortunate seeing so much >love and >> > >confidence from members. I also found that few of the points >raised by >> > >me were just due to miscommunication and misinterpretation. >Probably >> > >some part has also been played by my ego and now I back out of >it. Let >> > >us forget it and take the Lal Kitab learning towards the positive >> > >directions. >> > >During the past we are receiving some very good suggestions. We >have >> > >decided to implement them in step-by-step manner. Following three >> > >suggestions are on the top of the implementation list - >> > >1. Formation of Core Group (Expert Panel) >> > >2. Online Conference using Group Chat >> > >3. Forum Constitution >> > >Following are also under consideration on which we will seek your >opinion soon. >> > >1. Moderation of Mails >> > >2. Fake Identities >> > >3. Paid consultancy >> > >4. Discussion on Lal Kitab Grammar >> > >5. ….. and many more thing that we will discuss soon >> > >I will also write another mail for inviting experts on Expert >Panel. >> > >Please let me know who all want to contribute to the Expert >Panel. >> > >I'll write a mail soon regarding the formation of expert panel. >And >> > >Kulbir ji, let me assure you that no procrastination this time >:-) >> > >Let us start decoding Lal Kitab…….. >> > >Regards, >> > >Punit Pandey >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 Friends, Please cool down and stop personal comments. Hopefully we will stop discussing individuals and focus on lal kitab. Regards, Punit Pandey On 19 Oct 2004 07:16:12 -0000, Nandkishore rai rawal <natkhatnandu wrote: > > RAKESH SEHAGAL > BY USING KICK HIM OUT WHAT U WANT SHOW? FIRST U MIND U R OWN LANGUAGE THAN GIVE PRAVACHAN 2 OTHERS. " PAR UPADESH KUSHAL BAHUTERE " .KHUD APNI GAREBAN ME JHANK KAR DEKHO KI FOWL LANGUAGE PAHLE KISNE USE KARI FIR MUJH PAR DOSHAROPAN KARNA SAMJHE PUNJABI PUTTAR?? > > NANDU > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 rakeshsahgal wrote : > > > >Punit > >Your inactivity is rather surprising to say the least, moreso after > >the discussion we had. > >NandKishore Rawal has set a new low for the group. He has resorted to > >profanity. It will be interesting to know what you propose to do about > >it. I for one am asking you to KICK him out as it is incumbent upon > >you to ENFORCE DISCIPLINE. > >R S > >lalkitab , ravindra panvholi > ><ravindrapancholi> wrote: > >> Punit JI > >> Please do something 2 avoid this brickbating amongst members.AS A > >SENIOR MEMBER OF THE GROUP WE EXPECT LOT OF THINGS AND GUIDANCE FROM > >U. > >> Regards. > >> > >> Ravindra Pancholi > >> > >> Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > >> Nandkishore ji, > >> > >> The people who were part of the controversy. I believe that taking > >> anyone's name would not be a good idea. But the process doesn't stop > >> there and I am willing to extend to as many members as possible. > >> Everyone's suggestions are invited so that we can form a todo list > >of > >> the tasks that we have to implement in upcoming time. > >> > >> As always, I request members to write directly to my personal id in > >> order to avoid controversy. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Punit Pandey > >> > >> On 18 Oct 2004 15:55:35 -0000, Nandkishore rai rawal > >> <natkhatnandu@r...> wrote: > >> > Dear Pandey ji > >> > may I know who r the persons with whom u have discussed every > >thing and forming the constitution for the forum?? > >> > Nandu > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 Punit Pandey wrote : > >> > >Fellow Lalkitabists, > >> > >I don't know whether it was for good or bad, right or wrong. But > >all > >> > >matters have been sorted out and I can assure you that you will > >find > >> > >forum a better learning place. Yesterday, I discussed with many > >> > >members and more than happy to say that everybody is willing to > >> > >contribute. I also found myself most fortunate seeing so much > >love and > >> > >confidence from members. I also found that few of the points > >raised by > >> > >me were just due to miscommunication and misinterpretation. > >Probably > >> > >some part has also been played by my ego and now I back out of > >it. Let > >> > >us forget it and take the Lal Kitab learning towards the positive > >> > >directions. > >> > >During the past we are receiving some very good suggestions. We > >have > >> > >decided to implement them in step-by-step manner. Following three > >> > >suggestions are on the top of the implementation list - > >> > >1. Formation of Core Group (Expert Panel) > >> > >2. Online Conference using Group Chat > >> > >3. Forum Constitution > >> > >Following are also under consideration on which we will seek your > >opinion soon. > >> > >1. Moderation of Mails > >> > >2. Fake Identities > >> > >3. Paid consultancy > >> > >4. Discussion on Lal Kitab Grammar > >> > >5. ….. and many more thing that we will discuss soon > >> > >I will also write another mail for inviting experts on Expert > >Panel. > >> > >Please let me know who all want to contribute to the Expert > >Panel. > >> > >I'll write a mail soon regarding the formation of expert panel. > >And > >> > >Kulbir ji, let me assure you that no procrastination this time > >:-) > >> > >Let us start decoding Lal Kitab…….. > >> > >Regards, > >> > >Punit Pandey > >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 1. Literacy - First test of that is, being able to write properly. You have failed that time and again. So you dont have any locus standii to talk about it. No matter what your cheerleaders say. Mind you I am merely talking literacy and not education. I wonder though if you know the difference between the two. 2. So called Experts? I speak for myself. I have stated time and again I am as yet at the stage of laying the foundation of the knowledge enshrined in the book. So has Kulbir(even though his knowledge is of the subject is very advanced). Publicly acknowledged fact is there are only a few experts here and their names dont need to be repeated. When you talk crap like orgies and such nonsense you need to be put in your place. Do it again and I will show you what it meeans to be publicly humiliated by a PUNJABI. 3. Punjabis are illiterate and discourage participation of others? This knowledge is the gift of a great punjabi to humanity. The experts here barring one i.e. Shukla ji are all Punjabis. Kulbir is a punjabi and so am I. We are great friends with Pervez a non-punjabi. We look forward to his musings. We dont need your bloody certificate. Now you. You are a pathetic apology for a human being and much as I would like to show you your place, I find you beneath my contempt. So I will just ignore you. PITY is the moderator is not taking a stand . I would like to remind him we all look upto him to do what is needed even though it is sometimes unpleasent. That also means if need be removing me as well from the group. R S lalkitab , " Nandkishore rai rawal " <natkhatnandu@r...> wrote: > > RAKESH SEHAGAL > BY USING KICK HIM OUT WHAT U WANT SHOW? FIRST U MIND U R OWN LANGUAGE THAN GIVE PRAVACHAN 2 OTHERS. " PAR UPADESH KUSHAL BAHUTERE " .KHUD APNI GAREBAN ME JHANK KAR DEKHO KI FOWL LANGUAGE PAHLE KISNE USE KARI FIR MUJH PAR DOSHAROPAN KARNA SAMJHE PUNJABI PUTTAR?? > > NANDU > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 rakeshsahgal wrote : > >Punit > >Your inactivity is rather surprising to say the least, moreso after > >the discussion we had. > >NandKishore Rawal has set a new low for the group. He has resorted to > >profanity. It will be interesting to know what you propose to do about > >it. I for one am asking you to KICK him out as it is incumbent upon > >you to ENFORCE DISCIPLINE. > >R S > >lalkitab , ravindra panvholi > ><ravindrapancholi> wrote: > >> Punit JI > >> Please do something 2 avoid this brickbating amongst members.AS A > >SENIOR MEMBER OF THE GROUP WE EXPECT LOT OF THINGS AND GUIDANCE FROM > >U. > >> Regards. > >> > >> Ravindra Pancholi > >> > >> Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > >> Nandkishore ji, > >> > >> The people who were part of the controversy. I believe that taking > >> anyone's name would not be a good idea. But the process doesn't stop > >> there and I am willing to extend to as many members as possible. > >> Everyone's suggestions are invited so that we can form a todo list > >of > >> the tasks that we have to implement in upcoming time. > >> > >> As always, I request members to write directly to my personal id in > >> order to avoid controversy. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Punit Pandey > >> > >> On 18 Oct 2004 15:55:35 -0000, Nandkishore rai rawal > >> <natkhatnandu@r...> wrote: > >> > Dear Pandey ji > >> > may I know who r the persons with whom u have discussed every > >thing and forming the constitution for the forum?? > >> > Nandu > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 Punit Pandey wrote : > >> > >Fellow Lalkitabists, > >> > >I don't know whether it was for good or bad, right or wrong. But > >all > >> > >matters have been sorted out and I can assure you that you will > >find > >> > >forum a better learning place. Yesterday, I discussed with many > >> > >members and more than happy to say that everybody is willing to > >> > >contribute. I also found myself most fortunate seeing so much > >love and > >> > >confidence from members. I also found that few of the points > >raised by > >> > >me were just due to miscommunication and misinterpretation. > >Probably > >> > >some part has also been played by my ego and now I back out of > >it. Let > >> > >us forget it and take the Lal Kitab learning towards the positive > >> > >directions. > >> > >During the past we are receiving some very good suggestions. We > >have > >> > >decided to implement them in step-by-step manner. Following three > >> > >suggestions are on the top of the implementation list - > >> > >1. Formation of Core Group (Expert Panel) > >> > >2. Online Conference using Group Chat > >> > >3. Forum Constitution > >> > >Following are also under consideration on which we will seek your > >opinion soon. > >> > >1. Moderation of Mails > >> > >2. Fake Identities > >> > >3. Paid consultancy > >> > >4. Discussion on Lal Kitab Grammar > >> > >5. ….. and many more thing that we will discuss soon > >> > >I will also write another mail for inviting experts on Expert > >Panel. > >> > >Please let me know who all want to contribute to the Expert > >Panel. > >> > >I'll write a mail soon regarding the formation of expert panel. > >And > >> > >Kulbir ji, let me assure you that no procrastination this time > >:-) > >> > >Let us start decoding Lal Kitab…….. > >> > >Regards, > >> > >Punit Pandey > >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.