lalkitabee Ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Lalkitabee Ji

You explain the remedies very well.It helps to learn more about diagnosis &

choice of remedies.

Regards

Rajeev K Khattar

 

-

" jyotish_mail " <jyotish_mail

<lalkitab >

Thursday, August 05, 2004 7:07 AM

[lalkitab] Re: to Siddharth ji about brother in law

 

 

> Dear Lalkitabee Jee,

>

> Thanks for the upaya.

>

> I am not sure how feasible will it be feed 10 blind persons in one

> go.

>

> But sincerely would like to know if donations to homes where blinds

> live, could bring something similar to what your upay suggests.

>

> Regards

> Siddharth

>

>

> lalkitab , " lalkitabee " <lalkitabee>

> wrote:

> > Respected Siddharth Ji,

> > I think concerned person's varshfal is in shakki

> > position.Saturn & jupiter r in 10th & moon is in 2nd.So guru in

> 10th

> > & sani in 10 cannot be measured about their power.But moon has

> clear

> > affects so as a general remedy 1st of all :-

> > 10 blinds ko ek saath bhojan karvaaya jaye to shani ke

> > positive affects ke baare main jaana ja saktaa hai.

> > Kyonki 2nd house is not empty & shani 10th is shakki because

> > mutthi ke doosre ghar khaali hain.Job to mili magar tensions bhi

> mil

> > rahi hain.Kiska fal kya levain.So 1st of all do that remedy.Even

> guru

> > is there but shani is also there .So i recommended this remedy may

> be

> > there some blind-varshfal impacts.

> > With regards

> > lalkitabee

> > lalkitab , " jyotish_mail "

> <jyotish_mail>

> > wrote:

> > > What does lalkitab say about ignorance and sorrow.

> > >

> > > As Gita says ignorance is the cause of all sorrows.

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Lalkitabee ji

 

In confirmation to the analysis, reply is as follows:-

1) Subject is tall say 5'10 " , slim and reasonably mentally alert.

2) Education is different from the present profession.

3) Is a govt employee but not in forest department.In fact dislikes

forest related activities.

Yours

Arvinder

lalkitab , " lalkitabee " <lalkitabee> wrote:

>

> Respected Wadhwa ji

> I think according to this kundli that this jatak is most brilliant

> tall & slim.Hieght may be 5' 8 " or above.But all over impact shows

> that this person has the educaion about Business but his earning

> field will deffer than his education.Im not sure but May be this

> person a govt. employee & specially in forest dept.

> Plz. confirm

> With regards

> Lalkitabee

> lalkitab , " aswadhwa " <aswadhwa> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear Kulbir ji, lalkitabee,Nandkishore ji.

> >

> > I think we must not waste any more messages on analysing the

Kundli

> > of shri Nandkishoreji.The fact remains that there are mistakes in

> > analysing kundlis , however in this forum one must discuss the

> > shortcomings and try to rectify.

> > If the details of kundli are posted for analysis by someone, one

> must

> > critically look into it and try to learn from the mistakes in

> > analysis rather than shrugging off the efforts made by the

members.

> > If the members want to analyse i am puting forward a kundli

> > DOB 12/5/73

> > TOB : Midnight(12 Hrs)(Intervening night of 11 and 12)

> > POB New Delhi

> >

> > regards

> > Arvinder

> >

> >

> >

> > lalkitab , " lalkitabee " <lalkitabee>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > Reapected Kulbir ji

> > > Kisi Vyakyi ke keh dene maatra se yeh nahi ki lalkitab main

> > > likhi gayi baat galat ho gayi hai.Aaj tak yahi samjhaa jataa

hai

> ki

> > > Raja ko bhagyodya kahenge uska bhagyodya uske level ke mutabik

hi

> > > hogaa lekin ek begger ka bhagyodya kahenge to matlab veh rich

ho

> > > jayegaa. Lekin bhagyodya ka matlab hai ki kisi ki

paristithitiyon

> > > main anukool parivartan.Aur paristhitiyaan to pratyek vyakti ke

> > saath

> > > hain chahe veh raajaa ho ya rank. Aur yeh parivartan ko read

> karnaa

> > > hi astrology ka kaam hai.Agar koi yeh kahey ki main sabhi

sukhon

> se

> > > porn hoon aur astrological analyses per sandeh karey to use

> > smajhaana

> > > kathin hotaa hai aur veh vyakti samay aane per hi samajh saktaa

> hai

> > > vaise nahi.Nandu ji ke case main aap dhyaan se mangal, shukra

aur

> > > shani ketu aur guru ke vishad vistaar ko poori tarah padhnaa,

> > bilkul

> > > clear ho jayegaa ki mangal bad hai.Aur aapki likhi gayi durusti

> > > bilkul thik hai bhavishya ke liye maine unhain aagah kiyaa hai

> > lekin

> > > remedies koi nahi likhi hai.nandu ji ki mails ke prati

> > pratikriyaain

> > > padhker to unke swabhav main mangal bad ka touch dikh rahaa

hai.

> > Aise

> > > vyakti ki naak teekhi aur ankhain saaanp ki aankho ki kroorta

se

> > yukt

> > > hoti hain aur jabaan bhi patli hoti hai.bahut spasht aur sfut

> > > uchchaaran hotaa hai lekin likhne main jaldbaazi kartaa

> hai.Pratyek

> > > kaam main jaldbaazi se kaam karnaa drshtigochar hotaa

hai.Kyonki

> > > mangal bad shani per haavi hone ka prayaas kartaa hai gaur se

> > dekhiye

> > > mangal aur shani tatha budh shukra, ketu aur guru ACHANAK CHOT

ki

> > > drishti se dekh rahey hain aur yadi aisa vyakti kahe ki " OX

GIVES

> > > MILK " to answer dena chahiye ki yes it gives milk more than a

> > > cow.Kyonki veh jab tak practical anubhav prapt nahi ker lega

tab

> > tak

> > > use nahi manegaa use practical anubhav milne shuru hotey hain

to

> ek

> > > ke baad ek milney lagtey hain.Ateh haath dekhne ka swaal hi

nahi

> > > paida hotaa.Main jaanta hoon ki meri is mail ke baad nandu ji

> shayd

> > > ekdum se react na karain kyonki yeh karnaa unki kundli ke ek

aur

> > > pehloo ko ujaagar keregaa . Unki itni mails padhne ke baad

> svayam

> > hi

> > > nishkarsh nikaalaa ja saktaa hai.Aur jivan main yadi koi anisht

> > hote

> > > hote reh gaya hai to main keh saktaa hoon ki inki marriage

delay

> > > hoker hui hai yaani 28 ki umra ke baad, lekin iskaa abhipray ye

> > nahi

> > > ki anisht samapt ho gaya hai balki anisht apne doosre daur ki

> > tayyari

> > > main jut gayaa hai.aur kab achaanak chot karegaa yeh deep

> readings

> > se

> > > gyat ho saktaa hai.Aur ab unke jivan ka doosra 35 saala chakra

> chal

> > > rahaa hai.Im specially saying 2nd 35 years cycle.

> > > With regards

> > > Lalkitabee

> > > lalkitab , " Kulbir Singh Bains "

> > > <ceetabains> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nandkishore ji yeh galat baat hai. ilzam nbhi aap lagao vakil

> bhi

> > > aap

> > > > aur judge aur jallad bhi aap . ab batao to sahi na ki aapke

> tewe

> > ko

> > > > kisne kaise galat pada. main pahle bhi poocha tha ki mere

> poochne

> > > par

> > > > aap ke tewe ke 8 symptom bilkul thik match hue. ab aap kaise

> kahte

> > > > hain ki tewa galat padha. dekhiye bhagiye nahin. agar hum

galat

> > hain

> > > > to darusat karo ya phir apni galati maan lo. ab bataiye

> arrogant

> > aur

> > > > bad mannered kaun hai. apke samne tewe ka analysis pada hai.

> apne

> > > khud

> > > > swikaar kiya hai kissi aur ne nahin. agar baat shuru karne ka

> dam

> > > > rakhte ho to kissi logical mod par to khattam karo. aapka

faisla

> > > > jahangiri faisla to hai nahin ki apne kaha aur sabne maana.

> > bakiyon

> > > ko

> > > > chahe jitan kaam ho is mudde ke liye main bilkul free hun .

> chahe

> > > > jitna time lagain par sabit karen ki mera analysis galat tha

> aur

> > > uske

> > > > muqabla aap mujhe jinse ladwana chahte hain unka zyada thik

tha.

> > > > kulbir

> > > >

> > > > lalkitab , " Nandkishore rai rawal "

> > > > <natkhatnandu@r...> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Punit JI

> > > > > Mera teva sahi tha aur hai agar aapke socalled expert use

> galat

> > > > pdhte hai to ye batana mera kartavya hai ki bhai sahab aap

> basic

> > > right

> > > > rakhen.Mene aisa kabhi nahi kaha ki aap mere bharose

> hain .Darasal

> > > > this group has become mental orgy of a few ill knowledge

> > people " NEEM

> > > > HAKIM KHATRAYE A JAAN " A LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS DANGEROUS THING.

> > > > > PLEASE EXPELL ME FROM THIS GROUP I DONT WANT 2 BE THE PART

OF

> > > BUNCH

> > > > OF ARROGANT AND BAD MANNERED PEOPLE BYE AND THANKS.

> > > > > NANDU

> > > > > On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 Kulbir Singh Bains wrote :

> > > > > >Punit please don't be lax this time just answer my

question

> > and I

> > > > > >would appreciate if nandkishore also contributes. Please

> check

> > > the

> > > > > >message in which I asked him questions in my first mail.

> > > > > >I asked him if a tree casted shadow on his house.

> > > > > >I asked him if any member of his family had foot problem

> > > > > >I asked him if has a puja room in his room.

> > > > > >I asked him whether he is in debt inspite of good income.

> > > > > >I asked him about the sequence of his birth and his

> > > father/uncles,

> > > > > >which was correct as told.

> > > > > >I asked him if he had a pipal tree in vicinity of his

house.

> > > > > >I asked him that he hadn't received a bed in dowry from

his

> in-

> > > laws.

> > > > > >I asked him about son of course his son's condition is

> > > different but

> > > > > >it was true that he be blessed with a son.

> > > > > >Out of the questions I asked the above matched

accurately.

> Of

> > > course

> > > > > >some went wrong but that was the purpose to judge to tasir

> of

> > the

> > > > planets.

> > > > > >As per my capacity I also tried to give suggestions

> regarding

> > > remedies.

> > > > > >Punit ji you yourself are a practitsing astrologer at what

> > scale

> > > do

> > > > > >you measure this.

> > > > > >Not out of sense of competition but just to know where I

> went

> > > wrong I

> > > > > >would like to ask Shri nandkishore ji where did I fare

less

> > > compared

> > > > > >to the analysis by vasumati ji and priya ji. And

> nandkishore

> > ji

> > > the

> > > > > >question based on your uncle and foot trouble was not

based

> > on

> > > any

> > > > > >book but on principles taught by umesh. Just for curiosity

> > tell

> > > me at

> > > > > >what scale on the scale of 10 do I fare and how others

> surpass

> > > me. Let

> > > > > >it be an honest answer please let it not be biased on our

> > recent

> > > > > >rumblings. i would appreciate what priya ji and vasumati

> have

> > to

> > > say

> > > > > >in this regard.

> > > > > >Kulbir singh bains

> > > > > >lalkitab , Punit Pandey

<punitp@g...>

> > > wrote:

> > > > > >> Nandkishore ji,

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >> Main aap ki baat se sahamat nahin hun. Ek prediction

fail

> > hone

> > > se koi

> > > > > >> astrologer fail saabhit nahin hota. Iske kai karan ho

> sakte

> > > hain.

> > > > > >> Shayad hi koi astrologer aisa ho jiske predctions kabhi

> bhi

> > > fail na

> > > > > >> hue hon. Kya aap kisi ek doctor ka operation fail hone

par

> > use

> > > puri

> > > > > >> taraha failure kah sakte hain? Kisi astrologer ke bare

main

> > > > nishkarsha

> > > > > >> nikaalne se pahle hamare paas paryapta bada 'sample'

hona

> > > chaiye.

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >> Kripya aap is taraha se kisi ki pariksha na lein. Jaisa

ki

> > > sabhi

> > > > > >> jaante kain ki kisi bhi vyakti ki kundli ka adhyayan

karna

> > > bahut is

> > > > > >> samaya lene wala kaam hai. Aur khas kar ki is group main

> > jahan

> > > sabhi

> > > > > >> ki nighaein aapke analsysis ka chir-phad karne ko tayaar

> > hon.

> > > Hamein

> > > > > >> un sabhi logo ka, jinhone kundli adhyayan main apna

samaya

> > > lagaya,

> > > > > >> shukraguzar hona chahiye.

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >> Regards,

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >> Punit Pandey

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >