Guest guest Posted August 4, 2004 Report Share Posted August 4, 2004 Dear Prabhakar saheb My main aim to join this group was to learn and share knowledge with others & not to take their suggestions personally. I am glad to write that experienced astrologers are pointing at my short comings and thus helping me learn more in the process. Kindly never think that I m offended , If I feel offended..i will let u know. Vidya ke pujari naaraaz hona afford hi nahi kar sakte hain ! Ham ko Vo Arjun banna chaahiye,jiski nigaah sirf chidiya ki aankh par thi. Jai Hind Rajeev K Khattar - " Yograj Prabhakar " <yr_prabhakar <lalkitab > Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:47 PM Re: [lalkitab] Taviz/talisman.. > Dear Khattar Sahib > > I am really sorry if your good self thought that my > comments regarding Bazzari Kitab were anyway directed > towards you. > > This is the general perception I am having regarding > the modern LK Quacks who are presenting themselves as > the civil surgeons of the subject. I hope your good > self will understand the souls behind my message. > > In my personal opinion you are a civil surgeon.Because > a Quack never gives weight to a junoirs suggestion. > > Regards. > > Yograj Prabhakar. --- Rajeev KKhattar <lalkitab wrote: > > > Dear Prabhakar Ji and Bhuwan Ji > > I am not at all offended. and i m not that senior & > > experienced > > astrologer...just a student of astrology. > > Regarding taveez , i am not acting as per any > > baazaari book, this has been > > told to me by a senior lalkitab practitioner > > ......same views has been > > shared by Bhatia Saheb also ( mail sent by him on > > 8th Aug ) . > > this forum is meant to discuss lalkitab,the more we > > discuss...the more we > > will gain. > > > > a request, kindly share with us ...how to analyse a > > chart step by step , you > > can take Harry's sister's case for example. > > > > Regards > > Rajeev K Khattar > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > " Yograj Prabhakar " <yr_prabhakar > > <lalkitab > > > Tuesday, August 03, 2004 12:36 PM > > Re: [lalkitab] Re: taviz/talisman...kindly > > comment > > > > > > > Dear Bhuwan Ji > > > > > > > > > That is what I wanted to hear. You explained the > > > situation in its true soul.And that is what LAL > > KITAB > > > says exactly regarding not accepting/keeping a > > > Taveez/Tamisman etc. > > > > > > These sort of lapses are the visible result of > > study > > > the subject from Bazaari Books. > > > > > > I hope Mr. Khattar will not feel offended from my > > > side. > > > Because my intentions are not at all malefide. He > > is > > > one of our seniors, and being the senior most > > junior > > > of the subject,I was surprised to hear this sort > > of > > > precaution from him. > > > > > > Innovations are good upto some extent. But > > > fabrications are not. I request the practitioners > > of > > > LK to study the original book thoroughly before > > > recommending remedial measures to innocent > > peoples. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Yograj Prabhakar. > > > > > > > > > --- bhuwanvashishtha <bhuwanvashishtha > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Respected Khattar jee, > > > > > > > > Taking a tabeez from a faqir is prohibited only > > when > > > > the mercury of > > > > the 9th house in the janma kundali goes to the > > 11th > > > > house of the > > > > varsh phal. Here I quote from the book 1952 ed > > page > > > > 576 , mercury in > > > > the 11th house , mandee haalat sec# 3 > > > > > > > > " Varsh Pahl ke mutabiq khana # 9 ka budh khana > > # 11 > > > > mein aaya huwa > > > > howe aur teve wala kisi faqir , sadhu wagerah se > > koi > > > > taabeez lewe to > > > > budh poora jaroon se ukhaar dega , yaani had se > > > > jyadaa manda asar > > > > dega / " > > > > > > > > Lines , not identical , but similar in meaning > > occur > > > > in Arun sanhita > > > > [ chandigarh ed ] on page 198 top. > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no ban on keeping a tabeez if > > one > > > > already has it. > > > > The prohibition is in regard to accepting a > > tabeez > > > > from a faqeer or a > > > > sadhu in that year when the mercury of 9th in > > the > > > > janma kundali goes > > > > to the 11th in the varsh phal > > > > > > > > But most of the books available as notes on Lal > > > > Kitab donot carry the > > > > condition of prohibition , instead carry a > > blanket > > > > ban on keeping a > > > > tabeez, for example the Lal Kitab on our own > > groups > > > > file section > > > > > > page 23 , remedies # 4 }. > > > > > > > > We have to take extreme care about what to > > consult > > > > and what not to > > > > consult. > > > > > > > > sabhee gurujan ko naman, > > > > > > > > bhuwan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , Rajeev KKhattar > > > > <lalkitab@v...> > > > > wrote: > > > > > When mercury is affilicted,one should not keep > > > > talisman/tabeez ,in > > > > lalkitab > > > > > it is written for mercury in 11th. > > > > > mercury is affilicted in 3rd and 9th also. so > > i > > > > suggested this.He > > > > has > > > > > mercury in 3rd in varshphal. > > > > > Regards > > > > > Rajeev K Khattar > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > " Yograj Prabhakar " <yr_prabhakar> > > > > > <lalkitab > > > > > > Monday, August 02, 2004 11:29 PM > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] case of Himanshu > > > > Porwal,Gurujans kindly > > > > > comment..another case of moon + sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Khattar Sahib > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you elaborate why Mr.Himanshu Should not > > > > keep > > > > > > Taveez or Talisman in his office/house etc ? > > > > What is > > > > > > the logic behing your recommendations ? Is > > it > > > > > > mentioned anywhere in the legendary Lal > > Kitab ? > > > > Or s > > > > > > it your good self's own innovation ? I would > > > > love to > > > > > > hear from your side. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please dont take it otherwise. I am writing > > a > > > > research > > > > > > paper on this subject, so it is very > > important > > > > for me > > > > > > to have the complete knowledge behind the > > > > remedial > > > > > > measures of LK. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > Yograj Prabhakar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Khattar Sahib > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think you forget to mention the remedy > > for > > > > Rahu in > > > > > > > 11th; the most malefic planet in the > > > === message truncated === > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.