Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Prabhakar Saheb

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Prabhakar saheb

 

My main aim to join this group was to learn and share knowledge with others

& not to take their suggestions personally. I am glad to write that

experienced astrologers are pointing at my short comings and thus helping

me learn more in the process.

 

Kindly never think that I m offended , If I feel offended..i will let u

know.

 

Vidya ke pujari naaraaz hona afford hi nahi kar sakte hain ! Ham ko Vo

Arjun banna chaahiye,jiski nigaah sirf chidiya ki aankh par thi.

 

Jai Hind

Rajeev K Khattar

 

 

 

-

" Yograj Prabhakar " <yr_prabhakar

<lalkitab >

Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:47 PM

Re: [lalkitab] Taviz/talisman..

 

 

> Dear Khattar Sahib

>

> I am really sorry if your good self thought that my

> comments regarding Bazzari Kitab were anyway directed

> towards you.

>

> This is the general perception I am having regarding

> the modern LK Quacks who are presenting themselves as

> the civil surgeons of the subject. I hope your good

> self will understand the souls behind my message.

>

> In my personal opinion you are a civil surgeon.Because

> a Quack never gives weight to a junoirs suggestion.

>

> Regards.

>

> Yograj Prabhakar.

--- Rajeev KKhattar <lalkitab wrote:

>

> > Dear Prabhakar Ji and Bhuwan Ji

> > I am not at all offended. and i m not that senior &

> > experienced

> > astrologer...just a student of astrology.

> > Regarding taveez , i am not acting as per any

> > baazaari book, this has been

> > told to me by a senior lalkitab practitioner

> > ......same views has been

> > shared by Bhatia Saheb also ( mail sent by him on

> > 8th Aug ) .

> > this forum is meant to discuss lalkitab,the more we

> > discuss...the more we

> > will gain.

> >

> > a request, kindly share with us ...how to analyse a

> > chart step by step , you

> > can take Harry's sister's case for example.

> >

> > Regards

> > Rajeev K Khattar

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > " Yograj Prabhakar " <yr_prabhakar

> > <lalkitab >

> > Tuesday, August 03, 2004 12:36 PM

> > Re: [lalkitab] Re: taviz/talisman...kindly

> > comment

> >

> >

> > > Dear Bhuwan Ji

> > >

> > >

> > > That is what I wanted to hear. You explained the

> > > situation in its true soul.And that is what LAL

> > KITAB

> > > says exactly regarding not accepting/keeping a

> > > Taveez/Tamisman etc.

> > >

> > > These sort of lapses are the visible result of

> > study

> > > the subject from Bazaari Books.

> > >

> > > I hope Mr. Khattar will not feel offended from my

> > > side.

> > > Because my intentions are not at all malefide. He

> > is

> > > one of our seniors, and being the senior most

> > junior

> > > of the subject,I was surprised to hear this sort

> > of

> > > precaution from him.

> > >

> > > Innovations are good upto some extent. But

> > > fabrications are not. I request the practitioners

> > of

> > > LK to study the original book thoroughly before

> > > recommending remedial measures to innocent

> > peoples.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > >

> > > Yograj Prabhakar.

> > >

> > >

> > > --- bhuwanvashishtha <bhuwanvashishtha

> > > wrote:

> > >

> > > > Respected Khattar jee,

> > > >

> > > > Taking a tabeez from a faqir is prohibited only

> > when

> > > > the mercury of

> > > > the 9th house in the janma kundali goes to the

> > 11th

> > > > house of the

> > > > varsh phal. Here I quote from the book 1952 ed

> > page

> > > > 576 , mercury in

> > > > the 11th house , mandee haalat sec# 3

> > > >

> > > > " Varsh Pahl ke mutabiq khana # 9 ka budh khana

> > # 11

> > > > mein aaya huwa

> > > > howe aur teve wala kisi faqir , sadhu wagerah se

> > koi

> > > > taabeez lewe to

> > > > budh poora jaroon se ukhaar dega , yaani had se

> > > > jyadaa manda asar

> > > > dega / "

> > > >

> > > > Lines , not identical , but similar in meaning

> > occur

> > > > in Arun sanhita

> > > > [ chandigarh ed ] on page 198 top.

> > > >

> > > > Therefore there is no ban on keeping a tabeez if

> > one

> > > > already has it.

> > > > The prohibition is in regard to accepting a

> > tabeez

> > > > from a faqeer or a

> > > > sadhu in that year when the mercury of 9th in

> > the

> > > > janma kundali goes

> > > > to the 11th in the varsh phal

> > > >

> > > > But most of the books available as notes on Lal

> > > > Kitab donot carry the

> > > > condition of prohibition , instead carry a

> > blanket

> > > > ban on keeping a

> > > > tabeez, for example the Lal Kitab on our own

> > groups

> > > > file section

> >

> > > > page 23 , remedies # 4 }.

> > > >

> > > > We have to take extreme care about what to

> > consult

> > > > and what not to

> > > > consult.

> > > >

> > > > sabhee gurujan ko naman,

> > > >

> > > > bhuwan

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > lalkitab , Rajeev KKhattar

> > > > <lalkitab@v...>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > When mercury is affilicted,one should not keep

> > > > talisman/tabeez ,in

> > > > lalkitab

> > > > > it is written for mercury in 11th.

> > > > > mercury is affilicted in 3rd and 9th also. so

> > i

> > > > suggested this.He

> > > > has

> > > > > mercury in 3rd in varshphal.

> > > > > Regards

> > > > > Rajeev K Khattar

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > " Yograj Prabhakar " <yr_prabhakar>

> > > > > <lalkitab >

> > > > > Monday, August 02, 2004 11:29 PM

> > > > > Re: [lalkitab] case of Himanshu

> > > > Porwal,Gurujans kindly

> > > > > comment..another case of moon + sat

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > > Respected Khattar Sahib

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Can you elaborate why Mr.Himanshu Should not

> > > > keep

> > > > > > Taveez or Talisman in his office/house etc ?

> > > > What is

> > > > > > the logic behing your recommendations ? Is

> > it

> > > > > > mentioned anywhere in the legendary Lal

> > Kitab ?

> > > > Or s

> > > > > > it your good self's own innovation ? I would

> > > > love to

> > > > > > hear from your side.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Please dont take it otherwise. I am writing

> > a

> > > > research

> > > > > > paper on this subject, so it is very

> > important

> > > > for me

> > > > > > to have the complete knowledge behind the

> > > > remedial

> > > > > > measures of LK.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Yograj Prabhakar.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > --- Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar>

> > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Khattar Sahib

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I think you forget to mention the remedy

> > for

> > > > Rahu in

> > > > > > > 11th; the most malefic planet in the

> >

> === message truncated ===

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...