Malefic Planets

[Guest guest]

Rajeev sahib, sir kya hal hai , ap kuch hanme be giude karen please

Mangal+rahu=2 nd house

shani=6th house

moon +ketu 8th house

surya+budh=10th house

venus=11th house

guru-12th house

 

sir which of these r beneficial and malefic

 

Regards

HarritRajeev KKhattar <lalkitab wrote:

Dear Prabhakar sahebMy main aim to join this group was to learn and share knowledge with others & not to take their suggestions personally. I am glad to write thatexperienced astrologers are pointing at my short comings and thus helpingme learn more in the process.Kindly never think that I m offended , If I feel offended..i will let uknow.Vidya ke pujari naaraaz hona afford hi nahi kar sakte hain ! Ham ko VoArjun banna chaahiye,jiski nigaah sirf chidiya ki aankh par thi.Jai HindRajeev K Khattar-"Yograj Prabhakar" <yr_prabhakar<lalkitab >Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:47 PMRe: [lalkitab] Taviz/talisman..> Dear Khattar Sahib>> I am really sorry if your good self

thought that my> comments regarding Bazzari Kitab were anyway directed> towards you.>> This is the general perception I am having regarding> the modern LK Quacks who are presenting themselves as> the civil surgeons of the subject. I hope your good> self will understand the souls behind my message.>> In my personal opinion you are a civil surgeon.Because> a Quack never gives weight to a junoirs suggestion.>> Regards.>> Yograj Prabhakar.>>>>>>> --- Rajeev KKhattar <lalkitab wrote:>> > Dear Prabhakar Ji and Bhuwan Ji> > I am not at all offended. and i m not that senior & > > experienced> > astrologer...just a student of astrology.> > Regarding taveez , i am not acting as per any> > baazaari book, this has been> > told to me by a senior lalkitab

practitioner> > ......same views has been> > shared by Bhatia Saheb also ( mail sent by him on> > 8th Aug ) .> > this forum is meant to discuss lalkitab,the more we> > discuss...the more we> > will gain.> >> > a request, kindly share with us ...how to analyse a> > chart step by step , you> > can take Harry's sister's case for example.> >> > Regards> > Rajeev K Khattar> >> >> >> >> >> > -> > "Yograj Prabhakar" <yr_prabhakar> > <lalkitab >> > Tuesday, August 03, 2004 12:36 PM> > Re: [lalkitab] Re: taviz/talisman...kindly> > comment> >> >> > > Dear Bhuwan Ji> > >> > >> > > That is what I

wanted to hear. You explained the> > > situation in its true soul.And that is what LAL> > KITAB> > > says exactly regarding not accepting/keeping a> > > Taveez/Tamisman etc.> > >> > > These sort of lapses are the visible result of> > study> > > the subject from Bazaari Books.> > >> > > I hope Mr. Khattar will not feel offended from my> > > side.> > > Because my intentions are not at all malefide. He> > is> > > one of our seniors, and being the senior most> > junior> > > of the subject,I was surprised to hear this sort> > of> > > precaution from him.> > >> > > Innovations are good upto some extent. But> > > fabrications are not. I request the practitioners> > of> > > LK to study the original book thoroughly

before> > > recommending remedial measures to innocent> > peoples.> > >> > > Regards> > >> > > Yograj Prabhakar.> > >> > >> > > --- bhuwanvashishtha <bhuwanvashishtha> > > wrote:> > >> > > > Respected Khattar jee,> > > >> > > > Taking a tabeez from a faqir is prohibited only> > when> > > > the mercury of> > > > the 9th house in the janma kundali goes to the> > 11th> > > > house of the> > > > varsh phal. Here I quote from the book 1952 ed> > page> > > > 576 , mercury in> > > > the 11th house , mandee haalat sec# 3> > > >> > > > " Varsh Pahl ke mutabiq khana # 9 ka budh khana> > # 11> > > > mein aaya

huwa> > > > howe aur teve wala kisi faqir , sadhu wagerah se> > koi> > > > taabeez lewe to> > > > budh poora jaroon se ukhaar dega , yaani had se> > > > jyadaa manda asar> > > > dega / "> > > >> > > > Lines , not identical , but similar in meaning> > occur> > > > in Arun sanhita> > > > [ chandigarh ed ] on page 198 top.> > > >> > > > Therefore there is no ban on keeping a tabeez if> > one> > > > already has it.> > > > The prohibition is in regard to accepting a> > tabeez> > > > from a faqeer or a> > > > sadhu in that year when the mercury of 9th in> > the> > > > janma kundali goes> > > > to the 11th in the varsh phal> > > >> > > > But

most of the books available as notes on Lal> > > > Kitab donot carry the> > > > condition of prohibition , instead carry a> > blanket> > > > ban on keeping a> > > > tabeez, for example the Lal Kitab on our own> > groups> > > > file section> >> > > > page 23 , remedies # 4 }.> > > >> > > > We have to take extreme care about what to> > consult> > > > and what not to> > > > consult.> > > >> > > > sabhee gurujan ko naman,> > > >> > > > bhuwan> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > lalkitab , Rajeev KKhattar> > > > <lalkitab@v...>> >

> > wrote:> > > > > When mercury is affilicted,one should not keep> > > > talisman/tabeez ,in> > > > lalkitab> > > > > it is written for mercury in 11th.> > > > > mercury is affilicted in 3rd and 9th also. so> > i> > > > suggested this.He> > > > has> > > > > mercury in 3rd in varshphal.> > > > > Regards> > > > > Rajeev K Khattar> > > > >> > > > > -> > > > > "Yograj Prabhakar" <yr_prabhakar>> > > > > <lalkitab >> > > > > Monday, August 02, 2004 11:29 PM> > > > > Re: [lalkitab] case of Himanshu> > > > Porwal,Gurujans kindly> > > > > comment..another case of moon +

sat> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > Respected Khattar Sahib> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Can you elaborate why Mr.Himanshu Should not> > > > keep> > > > > > Taveez or Talisman in his office/house etc ?> > > > What is> > > > > > the logic behing your recommendations ? Is> > it> > > > > > mentioned anywhere in the legendary Lal> > Kitab ?> > > > Or s> > > > > > it your good self's own innovation ? I would> > > > love to> > > > > > hear from your side.> > > > > >> > > > > > Please dont take it otherwise. I am writing> > a> > > > research> > > > > > paper on this subject, so it is

very> > important> > > > for me> > > > > > to have the complete knowledge behind the> > > > remedial> > > > > > measures of LK.> > > > > >> > > > > > Regards> > > > > >> > > > > > Yograj Prabhakar.> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > --- Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar>> > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear Khattar Sahib> > > > > > >> > > > > > > I think you forget to mention the remedy> > for> > > > Rahu in> > > > > > > 11th; the most malefic planet in the> >> === message truncated ===>>>

> > > >>>>>