: Aspiring for Own Residential House-II

[Guest guest]

Interestingly Pt Ashant says and I quote ad verbatim(page 292):

 

" SHANI 10 KE SAMAY AISE ADMI KI 48 SALA UMRA TAK YADI NAYA MAKAAN

BANAAYA JAAYE TO US MAKAAN KI KI KEEMAT BARABAR DHAN NASHT HO JAATA

HAI AUR AAMDAN BHI AAGE BARNE SE RUK JAATI HAI "

 

This sure needs some clarification. Will someone please oblige?

Thanks in advance,

 

Regards

 

 

 

R S

 

lalkitab , " rakeshsahgal " <rakeshsahgal>

wrote:

> Rajeev Jee

>

>

> Kindly clarify the following:

>

>

> For Shani in Khaana #10 - Is owning a house malefic or constructing

> one?

>

> Owning can also mean acquisition via purchase or getting a house via

> inheritance/gift, in addition to construction .

>

> Look forward to your valued insight.Thanks in advance.

>

> Regards

>

>

>

> R S

>

>

>

> lalkitab , Arun Sharma <netproindia>

wrote:

> > Respected Rajeev ji,

> >

> > I do not wear specs as yet, but since some days, i am strongly

feel

> that i am loosing focus of my right eye, and therefore may wear

specs

> if suggested.

> >

> > Yes, some time, if the things are not going favourable, i use to

get

> depressed, sometime ' junjhualahat hoti hai'

> >

> > i had to drop out for a year during 1985 when i was in 12th

> standard, but got immediately employed at the age of 18 and then

> privately completed my graduation. i got admission in MBA, but could

> not complete, also two years back, i tried to study astrology by

> jioining classes in Chandigarh, that due to business, could not

> continue.

> >

> > Yes, my mother is having serious health problems since long, she

has

> frequent problems of health for the last 28 years, since the birth

of

> my younger brother. I enjoy coardial relations with mother, but we

are

> living separate for the last six years due to my shifting to

> Chandigarh for business from Jalandhar.

> >

> > yes, i admit that i am keeping my money in a leather purse, which

i

> will stop immediately.

> >

> > can i have house in the name of my wife ?? her details are ...

> >

> > DOB: 06-11-1969

> > TOB: 01:44 AM

> > POB : Neem Ka Thana, District SIKAR, Rajasthan

> >

> > 1. Ketu, Chandra

> > 2.Brihaspati

> > 3.Surya, Budh, Shukra

> > 4.

> > 5.

> > 6. Mangal

> > 7. Rahu

> > 8.

> > 9.Shani

> > 10.

> > 11.

> > 12.

> >

> > please suggest accordingly

> >

> > Saadar Pranaam

> >

> > Arun Sharma

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Rajeev KKhattar <lalkitab@v...> wrote:

> > Dear Arun Sharma Ji

> > you have saturn in 10 and about house,lalkitab says when saturn in

> 10,one will become poor after having a house of his own.earnings

will

> come to an end.

> > about finances-- you have sat and moon together,lalkitab says your

> money will be like a jumping monkey, you can see but can't catch

hold

> of.

> >

> > do you wear specs ? undergo depression quite often ? , problem in

> getting/completing education ? bed health of mother or no good

> relations with mother ?

> >

> >

> > suggestions: not to take white milk after sunset, not to keep

money

> in leather purse,throw a handful of coins in a BBAWRI ( well with

> steps )

> >

> > I request Gurujans to suggest a remedy for moon+sat combination

and

> comment upon my analysis.

> >

> >

> > Regards

> > Rajeev K Khattar

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > Arun Sharma

> > lalkitab

> > Monday, August 02, 2004 2:46 PM

> > [lalkitab] Upaya Needed : Aspiring for Own Residential

> House

> >

> >

> > Pujya Sarv Gurujans,

> >

> > i need upayas and your blessings as i am trying hard to own a

house

> for my residence but, facing difficulties in materilising my plans :

> >

> > DOB: 30-06-1967

> > TOB : 06:28AM

> > POB : Jalandhar Punjab,

> >

> > i am having small business in partnership at Chandigarh, and

> earnings are not so good,

> >

> > please advise me, kya kismat mein apna ghar hona likha hai, aur

uske

> liye kya upaya karne honge,

> >

> > Charan Sparsh to all the gurujans, aapke aashirwaad se nishchit hi

> mera bahut bhala hoga.

> >

> > Arun Sharma

> >

> > India Matrimony: Find your life partner online.

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Sahgal Sahib,

To see how flawed the interpretation of LalKitab help-book-writers is, please refer to the actual text in LalKitab 1952 edition.

Once you read the original text, you will agree with my action - I've discarded all the help-books and I read only the original text whether I understand it or not. I am sorry - my job is consuming all my time otherwise I'd have loved to quote the original.

 

Can someone please do so (quote Saturn 10, mandee haalat ) for the benefit of all? Thanks.

 

Respectfully,

Rajinder Bhatia

rakeshsahgal <rakeshsahgal wrote:

Interestingly Pt Ashant says and I quote ad verbatim(page 292):"SHANI 10 KE SAMAY AISE ADMI KI 48 SALA UMRA TAK YADI NAYA MAKAANBANAAYA JAAYE TO US MAKAAN KI KI KEEMAT BARABAR DHAN NASHT HO JAATAHAI AUR AAMDAN BHI AAGE BARNE SE RUK JAATI HAI"This sure needs some clarification. Will someone please oblige?Thanks in advance,Regards

 

 

[Guest guest]

Bhatia sahib Namaste,

 

Thanks for responding.

 

Just one question if you can spare the time - Is there any single

translation that is a word for word translation of the original?

 

I have been scouring the Nai Sarak market to see if I can lay my hands

on the originals in Urdu and then get down to learning to urdu. But up

until now I have only drawn a blank.

 

Regards

 

 

R S

 

lalkitab , Rajinder Bhatia

<rajinderbhatia2002> wrote:

> Sahgal Sahib,

> To see how flawed the interpretation of LalKitab help-book-writers

is, please refer to the actual text in LalKitab 1952 edition.

> Once you read the original text, you will agree with my action -

I've discarded all the help-books and I read only the original text

whether I understand it or not. I am sorry - my job is consuming all

my time otherwise I'd have loved to quote the original.

>

> Can someone please do so (quote Saturn 10, mandee haalat ) for the

benefit of all? Thanks.

>

> Respectfully,

> Rajinder Bhatia

>

>

> rakeshsahgal <rakeshsahgal> wrote:

> Interestingly Pt Ashant says and I quote ad verbatim(page 292):

>

> " SHANI 10 KE SAMAY AISE ADMI KI 48 SALA UMRA TAK YADI NAYA MAKAAN

> BANAAYA JAAYE TO US MAKAAN KI KI KEEMAT BARABAR DHAN NASHT HO JAATA

> HAI AUR AAMDAN BHI AAGE BARNE SE RUK JAATI HAI "

>

> This sure needs some clarification. Will someone please oblige?

> Thanks in advance,

>

> Regards

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Respected Bhatia Jee,

 

What Pt. Krishna Ashant has written in his book is more or less true.

Here I quote from 1952 ed page 631 , Saturn in #10 nek halat section

# 9

 

" jab tak sharab na peeye, shanishchar ki barkat barhtee rahegi aur

uska bhed kisee ko zahir na hoga/ aur agar 48 sala umra tak naya

makaan na banaaye to shanishchar teve wale ko makaan ki qeemat wa

saamaan ke barabar dhan daulat deta jawe / lekin jab hi makaan ban

jawe shanishchar apnee madad ka boriya bistar utha kar le jawe aur us

din se aage aur jyadaa nafa na hoga / magar yeh matlab nahee hai ki

bura asar dene lag jayega / muraad sirf yeh hai ki us din ke baad ,

yani jab makaan ban jawe , shani makaan banaane ke liye faaltu dhan

jamaa na hone dega / "

 

Therefore what Pt Krishna Ashant jee had written is not far from the

truth.

 

sabhee gurujan ko naman,

 

bhuwan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

lalkitab , Rajinder Bhatia

<rajinderbhatia2002> wrote:

> Sahgal Sahib,

> To see how flawed the interpretation of LalKitab help-book-writers

is, please refer to the actual text in LalKitab 1952 edition.

> Once you read the original text, you will agree with my action -

I've discarded all the help-books and I read only the original text

whether I understand it or not. I am sorry - my job is consuming all

my time otherwise I'd have loved to quote the original.

>

> Can someone please do so (quote Saturn 10, mandee haalat ) for the

benefit of all? Thanks.

>

> Respectfully,

> Rajinder Bhatia

>

>

> rakeshsahgal <rakeshsahgal> wrote:

> Interestingly Pt Ashant says and I quote ad verbatim(page 292):

>

> " SHANI 10 KE SAMAY AISE ADMI KI 48 SALA UMRA TAK YADI NAYA MAKAAN

> BANAAYA JAAYE TO US MAKAAN KI KI KEEMAT BARABAR DHAN NASHT HO JAATA

> HAI AUR AAMDAN BHI AAGE BARNE SE RUK JAATI HAI "

>

> This sure needs some clarification. Will someone please oblige?

> Thanks in advance,

>

> Regards

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Respected Seghal Sahib,

 

 

Here is the original text about which Shri Rajinder

Bhatia ji was indicating (it is on page no 631 for

1952 edition on LAL KITAB :

 

" AGAR 48 SAALA UMAR TAK NAYA MAKAAN NAA BANAYE TO

SANICHAR TEVE WALE KO MAKAAN KI QEEMAT VA SAMAAN KE

BARABAR DHAN DAUAT DETA JAAYE, LEKIN JAB HI MAKAAN BAN

JAAYE SANICHAR APNI MADAD KA BISTRA-BORIYA UTHA KAR LE

JAAYEGA, AUR US DIN SE AAGE AUR ZYADA NAFA NA DEGA.

MAGAR YEH MATLAB NAHIN KI BURA ASAR DENE LAG JAYEGA.

MURAD SIRF YEH HAI KI US DIN KE BAAD YAANI JAB MAKAAN

BAN JAAYE, SANICHAR MAKAAN BANAANE KE LIYE FALTOO DHAN

JAMAH NAA HONE DEGA. "

 

I am also completely agreed with Bhatia Sahib

regarding the so-called help books avalable in the

market. These books are the main culprit for

mushrooming of the Quacks of Lal Kiab Jyotish.

 

 

Regards.

 

Yograj Prabhakar.

 

--- Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002

wrote:

 

> Sahgal Sahib,

> To see how flawed the interpretation of LalKitab

> help-book-writers is, please refer to the actual

> text in LalKitab 1952 edition.

> Once you read the original text, you will agree with

> my action - I've discarded all the help-books and I

> read only the original text whether I understand it

> or not. I am sorry - my job is consuming all my time

> otherwise I'd have loved to quote the original.

>

> Can someone please do so (quote Saturn 10, mandee

> haalat ) for the benefit of all? Thanks.

>

> Respectfully,

> Rajinder Bhatia

>

>

> rakeshsahgal <rakeshsahgal wrote:

> Interestingly Pt Ashant says and I quote ad

> verbatim(page 292):

>

> " SHANI 10 KE SAMAY AISE ADMI KI 48 SALA UMRA TAK

> YADI NAYA MAKAAN

> BANAAYA JAAYE TO US MAKAAN KI KI KEEMAT BARABAR DHAN

> NASHT HO JAATA

> HAI AUR AAMDAN BHI AAGE BARNE SE RUK JAATI HAI "

>

> This sure needs some clarification. Will someone

> please oblige?

> Thanks in advance,

>

> Regards

>

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Vashishtaa jee( I know I know you are ignoring me) and Prabhakar jee ,

 

Thanks very much for taking the trouble.

 

If I can now impose a little further on you gentlemen the inference

that can be drawn therefore is, the bar is essentialy on acquiring

land and constructing a house thereon but not on acquiring a house

through a purchase transaction or via inheritance? Additionally the

bar ceases to be operative after the age of 48?

 

Thanking you both in advance.

 

Regards

 

 

R S

lalkitab , Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar>

wrote:

> Respected Seghal Sahib,

>

>

> Here is the original text about which Shri Rajinder

> Bhatia ji was indicating (it is on page no 631 for

> 1952 edition on LAL KITAB :

>

> " AGAR 48 SAALA UMAR TAK NAYA MAKAAN NAA BANAYE TO

> SANICHAR TEVE WALE KO MAKAAN KI QEEMAT VA SAMAAN KE

> BARABAR DHAN DAUAT DETA JAAYE, LEKIN JAB HI MAKAAN BAN

> JAAYE SANICHAR APNI MADAD KA BISTRA-BORIYA UTHA KAR LE

> JAAYEGA, AUR US DIN SE AAGE AUR ZYADA NAFA NA DEGA.

> MAGAR YEH MATLAB NAHIN KI BURA ASAR DENE LAG JAYEGA.

> MURAD SIRF YEH HAI KI US DIN KE BAAD YAANI JAB MAKAAN

> BAN JAAYE, SANICHAR MAKAAN BANAANE KE LIYE FALTOO DHAN

> JAMAH NAA HONE DEGA. "

>

> I am also completely agreed with Bhatia Sahib

> regarding the so-called help books avalable in the

> market. These books are the main culprit for

> mushrooming of the Quacks of Lal Kiab Jyotish.

>

>

> Regards.

>

> Yograj Prabhakar.

>

> --- Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002>

> wrote:

>

> > Sahgal Sahib,

> > To see how flawed the interpretation of LalKitab

> > help-book-writers is, please refer to the actual

> > text in LalKitab 1952 edition.

> > Once you read the original text, you will agree with

> > my action - I've discarded all the help-books and I

> > read only the original text whether I understand it

> > or not. I am sorry - my job is consuming all my time

> > otherwise I'd have loved to quote the original.

> >

> > Can someone please do so (quote Saturn 10, mandee

> > haalat ) for the benefit of all? Thanks.

> >

> > Respectfully,

> > Rajinder Bhatia

> >

> >

> > rakeshsahgal <rakeshsahgal> wrote:

> > Interestingly Pt Ashant says and I quote ad

> > verbatim(page 292):

> >

> > " SHANI 10 KE SAMAY AISE ADMI KI 48 SALA UMRA TAK

> > YADI NAYA MAKAAN

> > BANAAYA JAAYE TO US MAKAAN KI KI KEEMAT BARABAR DHAN

> > NASHT HO JAATA

> > HAI AUR AAMDAN BHI AAGE BARNE SE RUK JAATI HAI "

> >

> > This sure needs some clarification. Will someone

> > please oblige?

> > Thanks in advance,

> >

> > Regards

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Respected All Gurujan,

As per Sh. Bhatis ji’s instruction I am trying to type what is written in lalkitab.

 

1.Jab tak sharaab na piye shani ki barqat badhti rahey. Us ka Bhaid kisi ko prakat na hoga aur agar 48 saala umar tak makan na bana paye to shani teva wale ko makan kee keemat tatha saman ke brabar dhan daulat deta jaayeaur jab makan ban jaawey shani apni madad kaa boria bistra gol kar jaaway aur us din se aagey aur adhik labh na dega ye arth nahee kee bura asar deney lag jayega, arth kewal yey hai ki us din ke baad yani jab makan ban jeway shani makan bananey key lieay phaltu dhan jama na hone dega.

 

Mandee Halat shani#10

 

1 Dadee aur mooch ke baal kam ya bilkul saaf to kam hosla. USKI PAIDA KEE HUI ZAYADAD NA HOGI. 310 main shani pratham to manda hee na hoga agar ho jaay to khooni ajdaha hoga.

 

2. Shubh grah (sur. Chan. Mangal ya koi aur manda grah agar sath sathi ho to sabhi grah andhey balki shani khud bhee bhi manda hoga.

 

3.Agar #4 main sur. Cha. Mangal ho to guru ki madad sahayak hogi

 

rajni

 

Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002 wrote:

 

Sahgal Sahib,

To see how flawed the interpretation of LalKitab help-book-writers is, please refer to the actual text in LalKitab 1952 edition.

Once you read the original text, you will agree with my action - I've discarded all the help-books and I read only the original text whether I understand it or not. I am sorry - my job is consuming all my time otherwise I'd have loved to quote the original.

 

Can someone please do so (quote Saturn 10, mandee haalat ) for the benefit of all? Thanks.

 

Respectfully,

Rajinder Bhatia

rakeshsahgal <rakeshsahgal wrote:

Interestingly Pt Ashant says and I quote ad verbatim(page 292):"SHANI 10 KE SAMAY AISE ADMI KI 48 SALA UMRA TAK YADI NAYA MAKAANBANAAYA JAAYE TO US MAKAAN KI KI KEEMAT BARABAR DHAN NASHT HO JAATAHAI AUR AAMDAN BHI AAGE BARNE SE RUK JAATI HAI"This sure needs some clarification. Will someone please oblige?Thanks in advance,Regards

 

 

 

Mail is new and improved - Check it out!

[Guest guest]

Rajni Jee

 

Thanks very much for taking the trouble.

 

Regards

 

 

R S

lalkitab , Rajni Bhargava <rajni4051>

wrote:

>

> Respected All Gurujan,

>

> As per Sh. Bhatis ji's instruction I am trying to type what is

written in lalkitab.

>

>

>

> 1.Jab tak sharaab na piye shani ki barqat badhti rahey. Us ka Bhaid

kisi ko prakat na hoga aur agar 48 saala umar tak makan na bana paye

to shani teva wale ko makan kee keemat tatha saman ke brabar dhan

daulat deta jaayeaur jab makan ban jaawey shani apni madad kaa boria

bistra gol kar jaaway aur us din se aagey aur adhik labh na dega ye

arth nahee kee bura asar deney lag jayega, arth kewal yey hai ki us

din ke baad yani jab makan ban jeway shani makan bananey key lieay

phaltu dhan jama na hone dega.

>

>

>

> Mandee Halat shani#10

>

>

>

> 1 Dadee aur mooch ke baal kam ya bilkul saaf to kam hosla. USKI

PAIDA KEE HUI ZAYADAD NA HOGI. 310 main shani pratham to manda hee

na hoga agar ho jaay to khooni ajdaha hoga.

>

>

>

> 2. Shubh grah (sur. Chan. Mangal ya koi aur manda grah agar sath

sathi ho to sabhi grah andhey balki shani khud bhee bhi manda hoga.

>

>

>

> 3.Agar #4 main sur. Cha. Mangal ho to guru ki madad sahayak hogi

>

>

>

> rajni

Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002> wrote:Sahgal Sahib,

> To see how flawed the interpretation of LalKitab help-book-writers

is, please refer to the actual text in LalKitab 1952 edition.

> Once you read the original text, you will agree with my action -

I've discarded all the help-books and I read only the original text

whether I understand it or not. I am sorry - my job is consuming all

my time otherwise I'd have loved to quote the original.

>

> Can someone please do so (quote Saturn 10, mandee haalat ) for the

benefit of all? Thanks.

>

> Respectfully,

> Rajinder Bhatia

>

>

> rakeshsahgal <rakeshsahgal> wrote:

> Interestingly Pt Ashant says and I quote ad verbatim(page 292):

>

> " SHANI 10 KE SAMAY AISE ADMI KI 48 SALA UMRA TAK YADI NAYA MAKAAN

> BANAAYA JAAYE TO US MAKAAN KI KI KEEMAT BARABAR DHAN NASHT HO JAATA

> HAI AUR AAMDAN BHI AAGE BARNE SE RUK JAATI HAI "

>

> This sure needs some clarification. Will someone please oblige?

> Thanks in advance,

>

> Regards

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

hi ,

some one told me not to buy or trade in land / property related jobs ,

Pls. analyse why he told me so .

is it prohibted for ever or this was just for that perticular year.

my details are

 

dob : 28-07-1975

time 9:50 am

place : patiala ( punjab)

 

Regards

 

AMIT