A question on Grah Drishti - Please discuss

[Guest guest]

Respected M/s Bhatiaji, Lalkitabeeji and other learned scholars,

 

Relative to 'Grah Drishti' concept of Lalkitab, I have a doubt for

which I seek your educated advice.

 

While discussing, Grah Drishti Lalkitab says.... " Khana no. 8

peechhe ko dekhta hey.. khana no.8 ne no.2 ko dekha aur no.2 ne no.6

ko dekha to no.8 ka asar no.6 mein no.6 ne no.12 ko dekha to no.8 ka

asar no.12 mein chala gaya. Ya no.8 apna asar no.12 mein 25

pheesadi dalta hey. Jab no.2 mein 100 pheesadi no.8 ka asar mila hey

aur no.12 mein 2, 6 marphat 25 pheesadi no.8 ka asar mila hey goya

no.8 dekhta hey 25 pheesadi no.12 ko. "

 

1. From the above can it be inferred that Ghar no.8 will always

aspect no.12 by 25% aspect even if there are no planets in Ghar no.2

& 6.

 

2. OR there must be some planet in no.2 & 6 for this argument to be

true.

 

3. If there is a planet in no.2 but no planet in no.6 will this

chain break at no.6 and no.8 will not aspect no.12.

 

Hope to receive some valuable advise from the Gurujans.

 

Regards.

Nigam

[Guest guest]

Respected Nigampriya jee,

 

1 . A planet in the 8th house will aspect the 2nd house with 100%

drishti { retro drishti }, and the 12th house with 25% drishti . This

aspect on the 12th house is over and above the aspect it might carry

from the 2nd via the 6th , if there are planets in the 2nd and the

6th house.

 

2. The retrograde { peechhe mur kar dekhana } aspect of the planet in

the 8th house will be carried to the 12th house only if there are

planets both in the 2nd and the 6th house , otherwise the chain will

be broken.

 

3. If there is a planet in the 2nd house, and none in the 6th house,

in that case the effect of the aspect would go upto the 6th house and

no further.

 

sabhi gurujan ko naman,

 

bhuwan

 

 

 

 

 

 

lalkitab , " nigampriya " <nigampriya> wrote:

> Respected M/s Bhatiaji, Lalkitabeeji and other learned scholars,

>

> Relative to 'Grah Drishti' concept of Lalkitab, I have a doubt for

> which I seek your educated advice.

>

> While discussing, Grah Drishti Lalkitab says.... " Khana no. 8

> peechhe ko dekhta hey.. khana no.8 ne no.2 ko dekha aur no.2 ne

no.6

> ko dekha to no.8 ka asar no.6 mein no.6 ne no.12 ko dekha to no.8

ka

> asar no.12 mein chala gaya. Ya no.8 apna asar no.12 mein 25

> pheesadi dalta hey. Jab no.2 mein 100 pheesadi no.8 ka asar mila

hey

> aur no.12 mein 2, 6 marphat 25 pheesadi no.8 ka asar mila hey goya

> no.8 dekhta hey 25 pheesadi no.12 ko. "

>

> 1. From the above can it be inferred that Ghar no.8 will always

> aspect no.12 by 25% aspect even if there are no planets in Ghar

no.2

> & 6.

>

> 2. OR there must be some planet in no.2 & 6 for this argument to be

> true.

>

> 3. If there is a planet in no.2 but no planet in no.6 will this

> chain break at no.6 and no.8 will not aspect no.12.

>

> Hope to receive some valuable advise from the Gurujans.

>

> Regards.

> Nigam

[Guest guest]

Bhuwanji,

 

Thanks for your quick reply. You have clarified 2 of my queries but

the basic one still remains.

 

I have not been able to locate any mention to 25% drishti of 8th on

12th. (as in Pt. 1 below). I have read the whole section on grah

drishti running into some 20 odd pages (again after reading your

reply) but could not find any reference. If you are referring to

Krishan Ashantji's book where this is mentioned then I think it

Ashantji's own inference. I may be wrong. Please advise the exact

reference for my better understanding, if you know.

 

Appreciate your advise.

 

Regards.

Nigam

 

 

 

lalkitab , " bhuwanvashishtha "

<bhuwanvashishtha> wrote:

> Respected Nigampriya jee,

>

> 1 . A planet in the 8th house will aspect the 2nd house with 100%

> drishti { retro drishti }, and the 12th house with 25% drishti .

This

> aspect on the 12th house is over and above the aspect it might

carry

> from the 2nd via the 6th , if there are planets in the 2nd and the

> 6th house.

>

> 2. The retrograde { peechhe mur kar dekhana } aspect of the planet

in

> the 8th house will be carried to the 12th house only if there are

> planets both in the 2nd and the 6th house , otherwise the chain

will

> be broken.

>

> 3. If there is a planet in the 2nd house, and none in the 6th

house,

> in that case the effect of the aspect would go upto the 6th house

and

> no further.

>

> sabhi gurujan ko naman,

>

> bhuwan

lalkitab , " nigampriya " <nigampriya>

wrote:

> > Respected M/s Bhatiaji, Lalkitabeeji and other learned scholars,

> >

> > Relative to 'Grah Drishti' concept of Lalkitab, I have a doubt

for

> > which I seek your educated advice.

> >

> > While discussing, Grah Drishti Lalkitab says.... " Khana no. 8

> > peechhe ko dekhta hey.. khana no.8 ne no.2 ko dekha aur no.2 ne

> no.6

> > ko dekha to no.8 ka asar no.6 mein no.6 ne no.12 ko dekha to

no.8

> ka

> > asar no.12 mein chala gaya. Ya no.8 apna asar no.12 mein 25

> > pheesadi dalta hey. Jab no.2 mein 100 pheesadi no.8 ka asar mila

> hey

> > aur no.12 mein 2, 6 marphat 25 pheesadi no.8 ka asar mila hey

goya

> > no.8 dekhta hey 25 pheesadi no.12 ko. "

> >

> > 1. From the above can it be inferred that Ghar no.8 will always

> > aspect no.12 by 25% aspect even if there are no planets in Ghar

> no.2

> > & 6.

> >

> > 2. OR there must be some planet in no.2 & 6 for this argument to

be

> > true.

> >

> > 3. If there is a planet in no.2 but no planet in no.6 will this

> > chain break at no.6 and no.8 will not aspect no.12.

> >

> > Hope to receive some valuable advise from the Gurujans.

> >

> > Regards.

> > Nigam

[Guest guest]

Respected Nigampriya jee,

 

I am quoting :

 

[ 1 ] " 8 , 6we , do baithe 12 nazar chauthai karte hain "

 

{ page 102 urdu ed 1952 }

 

Now iterpreting this line :

 

The meaning of this line could be that the 8th house planet aspects

the 12 house planet with 25% aspect , the planet in the 6th aspects

the one in 12th with 25% , and the one placed in the 2nd { through

6th } also aspects the 12th with 25%.

Since the 8th house doesn't aspect the 6th house directly and the 8th

house aspects the 2nd house with 100% retro drishti , therefore the

earlier interpretation sounds logical.

 

I don't know whose inference this is , so long as it sounds logical

it is acceptable to me.

 

sabhee gurujan ko naman,

 

bhuwan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

lalkitab , " nigampriya " <nigampriya> wrote:

> Bhuwanji,

>

> Thanks for your quick reply. You have clarified 2 of my queries but

> the basic one still remains.

>

> I have not been able to locate any mention to 25% drishti of 8th on

> 12th. (as in Pt. 1 below). I have read the whole section on grah

> drishti running into some 20 odd pages (again after reading your

> reply) but could not find any reference. If you are referring to

> Krishan Ashantji's book where this is mentioned then I think it

> Ashantji's own inference. I may be wrong. Please advise the exact

> reference for my better understanding, if you know.

>

> Appreciate your advise.

>

> Regards.

> Nigam

>

>

>

> lalkitab , " bhuwanvashishtha "

> <bhuwanvashishtha> wrote:

> > Respected Nigampriya jee,

> >

> > 1 . A planet in the 8th house will aspect the 2nd house with 100%

> > drishti { retro drishti }, and the 12th house with 25% drishti .

> This

> > aspect on the 12th house is over and above the aspect it might

> carry

> > from the 2nd via the 6th , if there are planets in the 2nd and

the

> > 6th house.

> >

> > 2. The retrograde { peechhe mur kar dekhana } aspect of the

planet

> in

> > the 8th house will be carried to the 12th house only if there are

> > planets both in the 2nd and the 6th house , otherwise the chain

> will

> > be broken.

> >

> > 3. If there is a planet in the 2nd house, and none in the 6th

> house,

> > in that case the effect of the aspect would go upto the 6th house

> and

> > no further.

> >

> > sabhi gurujan ko naman,

> >

> > bhuwan

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > lalkitab , " nigampriya " <nigampriya>

> wrote:

> > > Respected M/s Bhatiaji, Lalkitabeeji and other learned scholars,

> > >

> > > Relative to 'Grah Drishti' concept of Lalkitab, I have a doubt

> for

> > > which I seek your educated advice.

> > >

> > > While discussing, Grah Drishti Lalkitab says.... " Khana no. 8

> > > peechhe ko dekhta hey.. khana no.8 ne no.2 ko dekha aur no.2 ne

> > no.6

> > > ko dekha to no.8 ka asar no.6 mein no.6 ne no.12 ko dekha to

> no.8

> > ka

> > > asar no.12 mein chala gaya. Ya no.8 apna asar no.12 mein 25

> > > pheesadi dalta hey. Jab no.2 mein 100 pheesadi no.8 ka asar

mila

> > hey

> > > aur no.12 mein 2, 6 marphat 25 pheesadi no.8 ka asar mila hey

> goya

> > > no.8 dekhta hey 25 pheesadi no.12 ko. "

> > >

> > > 1. From the above can it be inferred that Ghar no.8 will always

> > > aspect no.12 by 25% aspect even if there are no planets in Ghar

> > no.2

> > > & 6.

> > >

> > > 2. OR there must be some planet in no.2 & 6 for this argument

to

> be

> > > true.

> > >

> > > 3. If there is a planet in no.2 but no planet in no.6 will this

> > > chain break at no.6 and no.8 will not aspect no.12.

> > >

> > > Hope to receive some valuable advise from the Gurujans.

> > >

> > > Regards.

> > > Nigam

[Guest guest]

Respected BHuwanji,

 

Thanks for your reqponse. You have qutoed the write wordings. Just

to clarify the matters; my comment was to your statement, " This

aspect on the 12th house is over and above the aspect it might carry

from 2nd via 6th " , which is a bit confusing to me.

 

As you quoted from the book in below msg, the 25% drishti of 8th on

12th is via 2nd & 6th but not direct (not via) on 12th. So, though,

your inference (below) is same as mine but the earlier statement is

what I had the doubts about, from the begining.

 

Regards.

Nigam

 

 

lalkitab , " bhuwanvashishtha "

<bhuwanvashishtha> wrote:

> Respected Nigampriya jee,

>

> I am quoting :

>

> [ 1 ] " 8 , 6we , do baithe 12 nazar chauthai karte hain "

>

> { page 102 urdu ed 1952 }

>

> Now iterpreting this line :

>

> The meaning of this line could be that the 8th house planet

aspects

> the 12 house planet with 25% aspect , the planet in the 6th

aspects

> the one in 12th with 25% , and the one placed in the 2nd { through

> 6th } also aspects the 12th with 25%.

> Since the 8th house doesn't aspect the 6th house directly and the

8th

> house aspects the 2nd house with 100% retro drishti , therefore

the

> earlier interpretation sounds logical.

>

> I don't know whose inference this is , so long as it sounds

logical

> it is acceptable to me.

>

> sabhee gurujan ko naman,

>

> bhuwan

>

>

>

>

lalkitab , " nigampriya " <nigampriya>

wrote:

> > Bhuwanji,

> >

> > Thanks for your quick reply. You have clarified 2 of my queries

but

> > the basic one still remains.

> >

> > I have not been able to locate any mention to 25% drishti of 8th

on

> > 12th. (as in Pt. 1 below). I have read the whole section on grah

> > drishti running into some 20 odd pages (again after reading your

> > reply) but could not find any reference. If you are referring to

> > Krishan Ashantji's book where this is mentioned then I think it

> > Ashantji's own inference. I may be wrong. Please advise the

exact

> > reference for my better understanding, if you know.

> >

> > Appreciate your advise.

> >

> > Regards.

> > Nigam

> >

> >

> >

> > lalkitab , " bhuwanvashishtha "

> > <bhuwanvashishtha> wrote:

> > > Respected Nigampriya jee,

> > >

> > > 1 . A planet in the 8th house will aspect the 2nd house with

100%

> > > drishti { retro drishti }, and the 12th house with 25%

drishti .

> > This

> > > aspect on the 12th house is over and above the aspect it might

> > carry

> > > from the 2nd via the 6th , if there are planets in the 2nd and

> the

> > > 6th house.

> > >

> > > 2. The retrograde { peechhe mur kar dekhana } aspect of the

> planet

> > in

> > > the 8th house will be carried to the 12th house only if there

are

> > > planets both in the 2nd and the 6th house , otherwise the

chain

> > will

> > > be broken.

> > >

> > > 3. If there is a planet in the 2nd house, and none in the 6th

> > house,

> > > in that case the effect of the aspect would go upto the 6th

house

> > and

> > > no further.

> > >

> > > sabhi gurujan ko naman,

> > >

> > > bhuwan

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > lalkitab , " nigampriya "

<nigampriya>

> > wrote:

> > > > Respected M/s Bhatiaji, Lalkitabeeji and other learned

scholars,

> > > >

> > > > Relative to 'Grah Drishti' concept of Lalkitab, I have a

doubt

> > for

> > > > which I seek your educated advice.

> > > >

> > > > While discussing, Grah Drishti Lalkitab says.... " Khana no.

8

> > > > peechhe ko dekhta hey.. khana no.8 ne no.2 ko dekha aur no.2

ne

> > > no.6

> > > > ko dekha to no.8 ka asar no.6 mein no.6 ne no.12 ko dekha to

> > no.8

> > > ka

> > > > asar no.12 mein chala gaya. Ya no.8 apna asar no.12 mein

25

> > > > pheesadi dalta hey. Jab no.2 mein 100 pheesadi no.8 ka asar

> mila

> > > hey

> > > > aur no.12 mein 2, 6 marphat 25 pheesadi no.8 ka asar mila

hey

> > goya

> > > > no.8 dekhta hey 25 pheesadi no.12 ko. "

> > > >

> > > > 1. From the above can it be inferred that Ghar no.8 will

always

> > > > aspect no.12 by 25% aspect even if there are no planets in

Ghar

> > > no.2

> > > > & 6.

> > > >

> > > > 2. OR there must be some planet in no.2 & 6 for this

argument

> to

> > be

> > > > true.

> > > >

> > > > 3. If there is a planet in no.2 but no planet in no.6 will

this

> > > > chain break at no.6 and no.8 will not aspect no.12.

> > > >

> > > > Hope to receive some valuable advise from the Gurujans.

> > > >

> > > > Regards.

> > > > Nigam