Guest guest Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 Dear Amar Puri ji, You have asked me four questions concerning the Lal Kitab . I will try to answer them to the best of my ability. At the outset I must make it very clear that I am neither enamoured by the book nor wish to belittle it. My interest in astrology is entirely academic and my approach therefore objective and detached . Question 1. What is the basis of this scripture ? There are quite a few astrology paddhatis prevalent in India today, be it KP , System's Approach , Krushna's ashtakvarg etc. they are all either elaborations or modifications upon the traditionally accepted Vedic astrology. Across all these paddhatis the basic parameters are the same . They differ either in approach or emphasis , the aim being the same in all cases. Lal Kitab also draws its basics from the Vedic astrology , but it differs in approach or what the book calls " grammer " ; and the emphasis is not so much on predicting the future as on solving the problem of today , hence the importance of Upaya. Therefore Lal Kitab is seldom used for long term predictions although it could well be. The very first page of the book states the two purposes the Lal Kitab is meant for : (a ) to help remove the blockage in the flow of fortune's water and ( b ) to help erect an obstacle in the path of adversity thus saving the native from misery . Therefore I believe that the Lal Kitab is as much a part of tradition as any other paddhati . Q.2 When and where it came into existance ? There are FIVE separate publications with varying length : 1939 ed of 383 pages, 1940ed of 156 pages;1941ed of 428 pages, 1942ed of 384 pages and finally the1952ed of 1171 pages. Surprisingly the name of the author has not been mentioned in any of these editions , instead they carry the name of the publisher , shri Girdhari Lal Sharma and his photograph. If it were an original work by any author , he definitely would have got his name on it. Therefore I believe that this book is a documentation of then prevalent thoughts and beliefs in that area. There are so many myths and legends about this book that it is really very difficult to sieve out the facts. Let me take them up one by one. { a } ... that the book was revealed in a dream . Never heard of dreams in installments and that too spreading over a period of twelve years. Because that is what alone could justify five publications. Not many takers for this fiction. { b }... that the book was received as ilham , kind of through akash-vani , thus adding mystical sanctity to the book. This was an effort to make it appear as sacrosanct so that there could be no criticism or scientific evaluation of the book. Well no body is going to believe that story either. { c } ... that this book was written by Arun the charioteer of Sun god. Later Ravan took it away to Lanka and from there it reached the middle east. It traveled back to India. This was an effort to get the book into the Samhita ranks , like other astrological samhitas in the name of rishis ,while at the same time trying to justify the use of urdu and persian words. Not many people believe that either. The fact is very simple : this is a book of astrology and that it was first published in 1939 by shri Girdhari Lal Sharma All subsequent publications are elaboration / explaination of the original. Every thing else about the book is irrelevant. All these books are available with some individuals or in the libraries. Q.3 Which Vedic parampara it comes from ? Of course from the same parampara as Sanket nidhi , Jatak Parijat ,Sarvarth Chintamani etc. You have to bear in mind that this book is a result of collective wisdom of a society which had lived in isolation of the northern hills for centuries . This tradition is still in use all the way from Kashmir to the Garhwal hills of Uttaranchal. In the Punjab it came to be known as Lal kitab , because of its first documentation appeared in the red binding, where as in the plains of Uttar Pradesh it is known as Pahari Jyotish. As the societies living in isolation grow their own idiom , culture and points of references , similarly this tradition of astrology had also developed its own idiom and 'grammar'. But the difference of idiom or the grammar does not make it come from any other parampara . You know the growth of Indo-European languages. Q 4 . Has this Lal Kitab knowledge been recognized by the Vedic Spiritual masters ? Do we really need that ? We are the end users and it is we who have to recognize the validity of an empirical tool. To me astrology is just a tool , nothing sacrosanct about it . I don't care who manufactured the device so long it is useful to me. I hope I have been able to answer your questions. With regards, Upadhyay " fas fas " <foreignersassistance upadhyay_iitd Lal Kitab Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:29:25 +0000 Dear Upadhyay Ji, Hare Krishna ! Thank you for your fascinating answers which I find very interesting. It looks that you believe in the reading of Lal Kitab. [ a ] I wonder what are the basis of this scripture ? [ b ] When and where it came in to existence ? [ c ]Has this Lal Kitab knowledge been recognized by the Vedic Spiritual Master ? [ d ] If so, which Vedic Parampara it comes from ? I live in Montréal, Canada. So, it is very hard to find the authenticity of this knowledge. My guess is that you live in Bharat (The land of Vedic knowledge) . Therefore, you may shed some more lights about the authentic knowledge of Lal Kitab. I heard that there are many translation by unauthorized (Commercial point of view) people. But you seem to know what you are talking about and believe in it. I wonder what is the source of your believe ???????? More later. With best wishes and regards. ..Amar Puri. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2003 Report Share Posted July 20, 2003 Dear friends, 1)'that the book was revealed in a dream .Never heard of dreams in installments and that too spreading over a period of twelve years' I would like to add the following. You may like to refer to the following two who had dreams/contacts with entities through which knowledge was chanelled for long durations. Madam Blavatsky of Theosphical Society fame. Secret Doctrine Vol I and other Vol were written over a long time. http://www.blavatsky.net/ Jane Roberts author of 'Seth Speaks' and about 10 other books in the series were also written over a long period . http://www.sethcenter.com/ The only diffrence is that the above two are known cases of Western origin and the same have been documented where as Lal Kitab's Author's Case has not been documented properly. Also if I understand properly I think all the five books are not diffrent.But again I have been told that he received this information for only about 2-3 years.I have got nothing to prove it though. 2)'Surprisingly the name of the author has not been mentioned in any of these editions , instead they carry the name of the publisher , shri Girdhari Lal Sharma and his photograph. If it were an original work by any author , he definitelywould have got his name on it.' My father was in Govt. service in Punjab.He retired in 1988.He wrote books under my Uncles name.Same was done by Pandit Roop Chand Joshi as he was also in Govt Service.Govt Service rules in India till now I think do not allow a person to have earnings from sources other then ancestor land.Therefore he could have got the books published under his cousin Girdhari Lal's name. 3)'In the Punjab it came to be known as Lal kitab , because of its first documentation appeared in the red binding' In 1952 edition,it is written ,"Jyotish kee neev per lal khuni rang(jo ki chamkilla na ho)shubh ho eske illava sabhi rang manhoos honge"In foundation of Jyotish blood red color(which should not be shining)is auspicious) I feel this book was printed with red cover for the above reason. With regards, Jagmeet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.