confusion

[Guest guest]

Dear list members ;

i would like to bring to your kind notice pl that FUTURE

SAMACHAR an astrological magazine published by future point new

delhi; in lalkitab special 2003 observed that lalkitab is of

foreign origin.the publishers are the foremost astrological software

persons in india and abroad ;their products are LEO GOLD AND LEO-

PALM.they are also involved in astrological and vaastu education in a

big manner.their centre in delhi is always full of persons

knowledgeble in astrology.

 

pt.krishna ashant in his books openly proclaims that lal kitab is a

compilation

of jyotish prevelent in many parts of india at that time and else

where.he clearly denies any -dream theory or a divine power behind

the red book.he has written five books on this subject and all of

them are very popular as per views of booksellers,economical and best

to sum up.

mr saurabh kwatra; a leading lalkitab practitioner in his articles in

net say it is arabic in origin.

sh. premkumar sharma a noted astrologer again asserts its foreign

origin.

the list of such persons having name and fame in astrology having

same opinion about lalkitab is endless.

i think majority of people usually never lieon a single point. imay

be wrong? "

 

the opinion of SH, SANJAY RATH that period ruled by rahu is an

indicative factor for getting involved with lalkitab is note worthy.

i will request listmembers to kindly check their planetary periods in

which they got interested in lal kitab pl.at least in my case it is

true; i have never met or seen mr rath; it shows the greatness of

jyotish.

 

AS FOR mr TARUN CHPOPRA and camel theory;

i would not like to comment much,he is known for such things: once he

wrote something about presence of natraj statue in homes causing

problems and now he is being pointed out for his views on ganesha

worship.he also used to claim about some new ayanamsha he developed

and that one by lahiri was not that much accurate; he got what he

deserved in almost all jyotish lists where he made such claims.in the

last he has his own list ;atleast now he shall remain in his

territory only and not try to waste time of others. ''BASE RAHO- BASE

RAHO.''

the messages of mr critic raised valid points but the replies of sh

bhatia were only emotional regarding atrocities on the family

concerned and cheating by a publisher,did not hold much water.

i wish ''critic'' if he/she is still on list to make some more

contribution pl.

 

AS FOR lalkitab list i dont think it has made any productive

contribution in philosophy of lal kitab as such. every time somebody

asks for help or astrological analysis ;a few regulars claim

of being busy in some urgent work ;a few say that they do not feel

confident enough or lack

expertise, rest keep mum. i have yet to see wonders of lalkitab on

the list messages pl.

w

the original site? remains under construction may be looking for

some wonder of red book to provide completion.

 

a new english version of lal kitab has been produced by SAGAR

PUBLICATIONS ; 72 VED MANSION;

JANAPTH NEW DELHI .PHONE=011-23320648.

 

i would like to see in the list name of a few astrologers in ANY

PART OF WORLD practising lalkitab honestly;because mr bhatia almost

always claims that there are only quacks in the field.

 

 

any news about when the lalkitab book ''under production'' is likely

to be available in market or it shall remain a promise only. i think

that atleast an ''AUTHENTIC''version of lalkitab is the first need of

time ,to make record clean.i dont think that there is dearth of

publishers in this regard.BECAUSE ONLY THEN

PEOPLECAN ''DIFFERENTIATE'' BETWEEN ORIGINAL AND ''FAKES''

i dont know why there is no expert of lalkitab on the list;

mr bhatia has yet to make clear that views are his personal or is he

speaking on behalf of any one else.

if there are some persons who have original lalkitab in possession

and have understood the same ;should come forward and put some useful

articles for benefit of list meembers and society at large.

let any body having expertise on the list analyse atleast one case

in details.

why not discuss and share the knowledge of lalkitab;which has no

controversies regarding principles or different perceptions of views.

sh jagmeet ji kindly forward my regards to sh sanjay rath regarding

accuracy of his comments pl.

hope the message is taken in honest perspective.

ak jain