Guest guest Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffs There is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamas It seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just because they are following them. when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like Yukteswar,chandrahari ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have the backing of ancient rishis and authorities DO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa? Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and vakya ? Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making corrections for minor differences occuring through the age BPHS 8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, the positions of the grahas are to be taken, as per Drig ganit. This is again important for us to know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different parts of the country. So following a standard system should be effective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 Dear Guruji I also eagerly look for ward vakya ayanamsa option which has got high relevance in TN and other southern india esp it helps in timing of the predictions more accurate. thanking you, with kind regards - Krishnan.N--- On Wed, 22/7/09, astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish wrote: astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish Drig ganitha ayanamsa in jhorajhora Date: Wednesday, 22 July, 2009, 9:42 AM Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffsThere is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamasIt seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just because they are following them.when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like Yukteswar,chandraha ri ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have the backing of ancient rishis and authoritiesDO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa?Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and vakya ?Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making corrections for minor differences occuring through the ageBPHS8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, the positions of the grahas are to be taken, as per Drig ganit.This is again important for us to know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different parts of the country. So following a standard system should be effective. Looking for local information? Find it on Local Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 || Om Gurave Namah ||Dear astrolearnjyotish , JHora uses Drig ganita ONLY for Calculating the graha positions. Warm RegardsSanjay P2009/7/22 astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish  Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffs There is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamas It seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just because they are following them. when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like Yukteswar,chandrahari ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have the backing of ancient rishis and authorities DO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa? Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and vakya ? Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making corrections for minor differences occuring through the age BPHS 8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, the positions of the grahas are to be taken, as per Drig ganit. This is again important for us to know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different parts of the country. So following a standard system should be effective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 Dear sanjay prabhakaran sir I beg to differ with your opinion as i am very sure the ayanamsa adopted by jhora is not Drigganitha. I mean lahiri,True lahiri and jagannatha all are different from Drigganitha ayanamsa There is a free website which allows casting of charts called astraura.com .In their website they have options for casting a chart based both on lahiri and Drigganitha.You can minutely observe the differences in dasa bhukti periods upto 2 months ,change of positions of mandi and planets in important divisional charts like Navamsa between lahiri and drigganitha ayanamsa I assume you know a software called astrovision which usually cast charts based on drigganitha and there also you will be able to see the difference between Lahiri and Drigganitha. The other part i would like to see included in jhora is vakya ayanamasa which has the backing of our ancient seers, truly vishnu jhora , Sanjay Prabhakaran <sanjaychettiar wrote: > > || Om Gurave Namah || > Dear astrolearnjyotish , > JHora uses Drig ganita ONLY for Calculating the graha positions. > > Warm Regards > Sanjay P > > > 2009/7/22 astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish > > > > > > > Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora > > > > It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should > > be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffs > > > > There is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration > > ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to > > differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamas > > > > It seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just > > because they are following them. > > > > when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like > > Yukteswar,chandrahari ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have > > the backing of ancient rishis and authorities > > > > DO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa? > > > > Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and > > vakya ? > > > > Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making > > corrections for minor differences occuring through the age > > > > BPHS > > > > 8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, > > > > the positions of the grahas > > are to be taken, as per Drig ganit. > > > > This is again important for us to > > know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a > > vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several > > different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different > > parts of the country. So following a standard system should be > > effective. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 Namaste, I have no clue what " drigganita ayanamsa " means to you. Drigganita means " observation based math " . To calculate planetary positions, some use old formulas given thousands of years back by scholars of that era. That is called vaakya ganita or vaakya panchanga (vaakya=words spoken by someone). JHora does not support it and has no plans for it. Some others use drigganita, i.e. formulas that have been updated based on the latest observations (e.g. NASA etc). This is the recommendation of rishis. In JHora, when you use Lahiri ayanamsa or any other ayanamsa, only drigganita is used. In fact, ayanamsa is an independent issue. It seems to me like you have wrong notions on what drigganita means, based on some website or the other. Thanks, Narasimha ---- astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish wrote: > Dear sanjay prabhakaran sir > > I beg to differ with your opinion as i am very sure the ayanamsa adopted by jhora is not Drigganitha. > > I mean lahiri,True lahiri and jagannatha all are different from Drigganitha ayanamsa > > There is a free website which allows casting of charts called astraura.com .In their website they have options for casting a chart based both on lahiri and Drigganitha.You can minutely observe the differences in dasa bhukti periods upto 2 months ,change of positions of mandi and planets in important divisional charts like Navamsa between lahiri and drigganitha ayanamsa > > I assume you know a software called astrovision which usually cast charts based on drigganitha and there also you will be able to see the difference between Lahiri and Drigganitha. > > The other part i would like to see included in jhora is vakya ayanamasa which has the backing of our ancient seers, > > truly > > vishnu > > jhora , Sanjay Prabhakaran <sanjaychettiar wrote: > > > > || Om Gurave Namah || > > Dear astrolearnjyotish , > > JHora uses Drig ganita ONLY for Calculating the graha positions. > > > > Warm Regards > > Sanjay P > > > > > > 2009/7/22 astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish > > > > > > > > > > > Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora > > > > > > It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should > > > be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffs > > > > > > There is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration > > > ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to > > > differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamas > > > > > > It seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just > > > because they are following them. > > > > > > when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like > > > Yukteswar,chandrahari ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have > > > the backing of ancient rishis and authorities > > > > > > DO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa? > > > > > > Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and > > > vakya ? > > > > > > Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making > > > corrections for minor differences occuring through the age > > > > > > BPHS > > > > > > 8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, > > > > > > the positions of the grahas > > > are to be taken, as per Drig ganit. > > > > > > This is again important for us to > > > know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a > > > vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several > > > different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different > > > parts of the country. So following a standard system should be > > > effective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 jhora , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > Namaste, > > I have no clue what " drigganita ayanamsa " means to you. > > Drigganita means " observation based math " . > > To calculate planetary positions, some use old formulas given thousands of years back by scholars of that era. That is called vaakya ganita or vaakya panchanga (vaakya=words spoken by someone). JHora does not support it and has no plans for it. > > Some others use drigganita, i.e. formulas that have been updated based on the latest observations (e.g. NASA etc). This is the recommendation of rishis. In JHora, when you use Lahiri ayanamsa or any other ayanamsa, only drigganita is used. In fact, ayanamsa is an independent issue. > > It seems to me like you have wrong notions on what drigganita means, based on some website or the other. > > Thanks, > Narasimha > > ---- astrolearnjyotish astrolearnjyotish wrote: > > Dear sanjay prabhakaran sir > > > > I beg to differ with your opinion as i am very sure the ayanamsa adopted by jhora is not Drigganitha. > > > > I mean lahiri,True lahiri and jagannatha all are different from Drigganitha ayanamsa > > > > There is a free website which allows casting of charts called astraura.com .In their website they have options for casting a chart based both on lahiri and Drigganitha.You can minutely observe the differences in dasa bhukti periods upto 2 months ,change of positions of mandi and planets in important divisional charts like Navamsa between lahiri and drigganitha ayanamsa > > > > I assume you know a software called astrovision which usually cast charts based on drigganitha and there also you will be able to see the difference between Lahiri and Drigganitha. > > > > The other part i would like to see included in jhora is vakya ayanamasa which has the backing of our ancient seers, > > > > truly > > > > vishnu > > > > jhora , Sanjay Prabhakaran sanjaychettiar@ wrote: > > > > > > || Om Gurave Namah || > > > Dear astrolearnjyotish , > > > JHora uses Drig ganita ONLY for Calculating the graha positions. > > > > > > Warm Regards > > > Sanjay P > > > > > > > > > 2009/7/22 astrolearnjyotish astrolearnjyotish@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora > > > > > > > > It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should > > > > be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffs > > > > > > > > There is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration > > > > ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to > > > > differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamas > > > > > > > > It seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just > > > > because they are following them. > > > > > > > > when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like > > > > Yukteswar,chandrahari ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have > > > > the backing of ancient rishis and authorities > > > > > > > > DO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa? > > > > > > > > Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and > > > > vakya ? > > > > > > > > Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making > > > > corrections for minor differences occuring through the age > > > > > > > > BPHS > > > > > > > > 8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, > > > > > > > > the positions of the grahas > > > > are to be taken, as per Drig ganit. > > > > > > > > This is again important for us to > > > > know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a > > > > vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several > > > > different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different > > > > parts of the country. So following a standard system should be > > > > effective. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 sorry my messge did not display at all in the previous post .I am posting again here. Namaste P.V.R.Rao ji You are right when you mean Drigganita is " observation based math " .vakya method of calculation is only approximate.I agree with all the above.I would like to make a point here that hereafter in this posting i am not going to mix ayanamsa and Drigganitha as it leads to confusion in communication and i accept that was an error. The point i wanted to make is this there is a " good amount " of difference between the charts cast by Drigganitha calculation used in jhora software ,likes like parashara light ,goravani jyotish and the " original drigganitha calculation " used by H.SEshadri iyer,P.S.Iyer and some softwares in use in Taminadu now which follow a similiar calculation method. i would like to point out the differences for your perusal and conclusion Here is the link to all the divisional charts cast by mr.H.Seshadri iyer (author of New techniques of Prediction) who believed in giving predictions using all divisional charts into considerations Here is the link for the same http://www.scribd.com/doc/17387359/prediction-by-HSESHADRI-IYER-AUTHOR-OF-NEW-TE\ CHNIQUES-OF-PREDICTIONREAD-DESCRIPTION-FOR-DOWNLOAD-BUTTON. This is a chart cast for a person born on June 18,1937 at 5.25 am at Udipi based on drigganitha For this chart D-24,D-10,D-9,D-5,D-4,D-3,D-12.D-8 exactly resemble the same as in jhora D-11 chart chart casted by H.seshadri iyer is completely different from both the rudramsa options available in Jhora In D-16 chart casted by H.IYER ascendant is in leo whereas in jhora ascendant is in virgo.Rest are fine In D-7 chart casted by H.IYER ,mercury is in capricorn whereas in jhora it is in aquarius.Rest are fine. In D-6 chart,many planets and ascendant are displaced by 1 house. Another main point to note,is for this chart saturn dasha-saturn antardasha ends on 5.10.1978 but accoeding to Jhora saturn-saturn antardasha ends on 21.11.1978 with lahiri ayanamsa which is a difference of 1 month and 16 days. P.S.IYER OF KERALA Another point i would like to bring to your notice is that The great P.S.IYER ,giant of astrology who died in 1994 during his lifetime used only Drigganitha for calculation There is a differences of approximately 2 months between dasha balance between the charts casted by Mr.P.S.IYER,Kerala and Jhora for all the charts tested.There is also a small difference upto 5 minutes in longitudes of planets in rashi chart casted by P.S.IYER And JHORA. I am not basing my points from observation froma single website or something.I am not an autority to comment whether NASA calculations are accurate or slightly off the mark. I can say for sure that,In Tamilnadu there are only 2 prominent types of panchangam used for casting a chart-both for traditional methods and also for horoscope generated by computer softwares produced by different companies. Drigganitha panchangam and calculations are popular all over Tamilnadu at this point of time whenever a chart is casted with Drigganitha panchangam and compared with Jhora chart casted with default options(lahiri) there is always a difference of approximately 2 months in Dasha balance and also few planets are displaced in position in few divisional charts. I am writing this post to just bring into light the charts casted on DRigganitha calculation used by greats like H.IYER and P.S.IYER and also the charts casted in Tamilnadu even today based on Drigganitha panchangam have a 2 month difference in dasa bhukti balance constantly and few possible displacements in divisional charts. Please take this message in a positive sense and i would be happy if you can reproduce the same Dasha bhukti calculations used by greats like P.S.IYER AND H.SESHADRI IYER and charts casted by various different softwares in Tamilnadu currently which seem to reproduce the charts used by P.S.IYER,H.IYER and other greats I believe my obserevations are genuine to the best of my knowledge and this is my attempt to bring " this differences " to an industrious genius astrolger like you to solve the issues. Thanks vishnu jhora , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > Namaste, > > The default hora, drekkana and trimsamsa given by JHora are what Maharshi Parasara taught in BPHS. JHora gives 7 other hora options, 3 other drekkana options and 2 other trimsamsa options. > > If an author you referred to used a different hora, drekkana and trimsamsa calculation, obviously the chart will be " completely different " . > > If I know what definition he used and if I think it is worth programming, I can consider adding another option. But, do realize that there are several different ways people cast hora, drekkana and trimsamsa charts. Also please be aware that JHora gives 9 different hora charts, 4 different drekkana charts and 3 different trimsamsa charts. > > Thanks, > Narasimhajhora , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > Namaste, > > I have no clue what " drigganita ayanamsa " means to you. > > Drigganita means " observation based math " . > > To calculate planetary positions, some use old formulas given thousands of years back by scholars of that era. That is called vaakya ganita or vaakya panchanga (vaakya=words spoken by someone). JHora does not support it and has no plans for it. > > Some others use drigganita, i.e. formulas that have been updated based on the latest observations (e.g. NASA etc). This is the recommendation of rishis. In JHora, when you use Lahiri ayanamsa or any other ayanamsa, only drigganita is used. In fact, ayanamsa is an independent issue. > > It seems to me like you have wrong notions on what drigganita means, based on some website or the other. > > Thanks, > Narasimha > > ---- astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish wrote: > > Dear sanjay prabhakaran sir > > > > I beg to differ with your opinion as i am very sure the ayanamsa adopted by jhora is not Drigganitha. > > > > I mean lahiri,True lahiri and jagannatha all are different from Drigganitha ayanamsa > > > > There is a free website which allows casting of charts called astraura.com ..In their website they have options for casting a chart based both on lahiri and Drigganitha.You can minutely observe the differences in dasa bhukti periods upto 2 months ,change of positions of mandi and planets in important divisional charts like Navamsa between lahiri and drigganitha ayanamsa > > > > I assume you know a software called astrovision which usually cast charts based on drigganitha and there also you will be able to see the difference between Lahiri and Drigganitha. > > > > The other part i would like to see included in jhora is vakya ayanamasa which has the backing of our ancient seers, > > > > truly > > > > vishnu > > > > jhora , Sanjay Prabhakaran <sanjaychettiar@> wrote: > > > > > > || Om Gurave Namah || > > > Dear astrolearnjyotish , > > > JHora uses Drig ganita ONLY for Calculating the graha positions. > > > > > > Warm Regards > > > Sanjay P > > > > > > > > > 2009/7/22 astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora > > > > > > > > It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should > > > > be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffs > > > > > > > > There is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration > > > > ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to > > > > differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamas > > > > > > > > It seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just > > > > because they are following them. > > > > > > > > when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like > > > > Yukteswar,chandrahari ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have > > > > the backing of ancient rishis and authorities > > > > > > > > DO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa? > > > > > > > > Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and > > > > vakya ? > > > > > > > > Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making > > > > corrections for minor differences occuring through the age > > > > > > > > BPHS > > > > > > > > 8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, > > > > > > > > the positions of the grahas > > > > are to be taken, as per Drig ganit. > > > > > > > > This is again important for us to > > > > know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a > > > > vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several > > > > different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different > > > > parts of the country. So following a standard system should be > > > > effective. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 Namaste, >>>> whenever a chart is casted with Drigganitha panchangam and compared with Jhora chart casted with default options(lahiri) there is always a difference of approximately 2 months in Dasha balance and also few planets are displaced in position in few divisional charts.<<<< That only means their " drigganita " is incorrect or they use a different ayanamsa or they use different definitions (e.g. apparent positions instead of true positions etc). By definition, formulas used in drigganita are to be updated constantly, based on the best available observations of the day. JHora uses Swiss Ephemeris, which is based on the latest NASA models. If somebody else uses less accurate or older observations to model planetary movements, one can get different calculations. Some planets can of course be off in some divisional charts and dasa dates can be off. You can play with different settings (e.g. geocentric vs topocentric, true vs apparent etc, which impact Moon's position considerably) and with ayanamsa of course. If you still cannot match the panchanga you follow, nothing can be done about it. If panchanga is based on old planetary models, we cannot match it. JHora is based on the latest and the most reliable drigganita of the day. Best regards, Narasimha ---- astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish wrote: > sorry my messge did not display at all in the previous post .I am posting again here. > > > Namaste P.V.R.Rao ji > > You are right when you mean Drigganita is " observation based math " .vakya method of calculation is only approximate.I agree with all the above.I would like to make a point here that hereafter in this posting i am not going to mix ayanamsa and Drigganitha as it leads to confusion in communication and i accept that was an error. > > The point i wanted to make is this there is a " good amount " of difference between the charts cast by Drigganitha calculation used in jhora software ,likes like parashara light ,goravani jyotish and the " original drigganitha calculation " used by H.SEshadri iyer,P.S.Iyer and some softwares in use in Taminadu now which follow a similiar calculation method. > > i would like to point out the differences for your perusal and conclusion > > Here is the link to all the divisional charts cast by mr.H.Seshadri iyer (author of New techniques of Prediction) who believed in giving predictions using all divisional charts into considerations > > Here is the link for the same > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/17387359/prediction-by-HSESHADRI-IYER-AUTHOR-OF-NEW-TE\ CHNIQUES-OF-PREDICTIONREAD-DESCRIPTION-FOR-DOWNLOAD-BUTTON. > > This is a chart cast for a person born on June 18,1937 at 5.25 am at Udipi based on drigganitha > > For this chart D-24,D-10,D-9,D-5,D-4,D-3,D-12.D-8 exactly resemble the same as in jhora > > D-11 chart chart casted by H.seshadri iyer is completely different from both the rudramsa options available in Jhora > > In D-16 chart casted by H.IYER ascendant is in leo whereas in jhora ascendant is in virgo.Rest are fine > > In D-7 chart casted by H.IYER ,mercury is in capricorn whereas in jhora it is in aquarius.Rest are fine. > > In D-6 chart,many planets and ascendant are displaced by 1 house. > > Another main point to note,is for this chart saturn dasha-saturn antardasha ends on 5.10.1978 but accoeding to Jhora saturn-saturn antardasha ends on 21.11.1978 with lahiri ayanamsa which is a difference of 1 month and 16 days. > > P.S.IYER OF KERALA > > Another point i would like to bring to your notice is that The great P.S.IYER ,giant of astrology who died in 1994 during his lifetime used only Drigganitha for calculation > > There is a differences of approximately 2 months between dasha balance between the charts casted by Mr.P.S.IYER,Kerala and Jhora for all the charts tested.There is also a small difference upto 5 minutes in longitudes of planets in rashi chart casted by P.S.IYER And JHORA. > > > I am not basing my points from observation froma single website or something.I am not an autority to comment whether NASA calculations are accurate or slightly off the mark. > > I can say for sure that,In Tamilnadu there are only 2 prominent types of panchangam used for casting a chart-both for traditional methods and also for horoscope generated by computer softwares produced by different companies. > > Drigganitha panchangam and calculations are popular all over Tamilnadu at this point of time > > whenever a chart is casted with Drigganitha panchangam and compared with Jhora chart casted with default options(lahiri) there is always a difference of approximately 2 months in Dasha balance and also few planets are displaced in position in few divisional charts. > > I am writing this post to just bring into light the charts casted on DRigganitha calculation used by greats like H.IYER and P.S.IYER and also the charts casted in Tamilnadu even today based on Drigganitha panchangam have a 2 month difference in dasa bhukti balance constantly and few possible displacements in divisional charts. > > Please take this message in a positive sense and i would be happy if you can reproduce the same Dasha bhukti calculations used by greats like P.S.IYER AND H.SESHADRI IYER and charts casted by various different softwares in Tamilnadu currently which seem to reproduce the charts used by P.S.IYER,H.IYER and other greats > > I believe my obserevations are genuine to the best of my knowledge and this is my attempt to bring " this differences " to an industrious genius astrolger like you to solve the issues. > > Thanks > > vishnu > > > > > > jhora , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > > > Namaste, > > > > The default hora, drekkana and trimsamsa given by JHora are what Maharshi Parasara taught in BPHS. JHora gives 7 other hora options, 3 other drekkana options and 2 other trimsamsa options. > > > > If an author you referred to used a different hora, drekkana and trimsamsa calculation, obviously the chart will be " completely different " . > > > > If I know what definition he used and if I think it is worth programming, I can consider adding another option. But, do realize that there are several different ways people cast hora, drekkana and trimsamsa charts. Also please be aware that JHora gives 9 different hora charts, 4 different drekkana charts and 3 different trimsamsa charts. > > > > Thanks, > > Narasimhajhora , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > > > Namaste, > > > > I have no clue what " drigganita ayanamsa " means to you. > > > > Drigganita means " observation based math " . > > > > To calculate planetary positions, some use old formulas given thousands of years back by scholars of that era. That is called vaakya ganita or vaakya panchanga (vaakya=words spoken by someone). JHora does not support it and has no plans for it. > > > > Some others use drigganita, i.e. formulas that have been updated based on the latest observations (e.g. NASA etc). This is the recommendation of rishis. In JHora, when you use Lahiri ayanamsa or any other ayanamsa, only drigganita is used. In fact, ayanamsa is an independent issue. > > > > It seems to me like you have wrong notions on what drigganita means, based on some website or the other. > > > > Thanks, > > Narasimha > > > > ---- astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish wrote: > > > Dear sanjay prabhakaran sir > > > > > > I beg to differ with your opinion as i am very sure the ayanamsa adopted by jhora is not Drigganitha. > > > > > > I mean lahiri,True lahiri and jagannatha all are different from Drigganitha ayanamsa > > > > > > There is a free website which allows casting of charts called astraura.com ..In their website they have options for casting a chart based both on lahiri and Drigganitha.You can minutely observe the differences in dasa bhukti periods upto 2 months ,change of positions of mandi and planets in important divisional charts like Navamsa between lahiri and drigganitha ayanamsa > > > > > > I assume you know a software called astrovision which usually cast charts based on drigganitha and there also you will be able to see the difference between Lahiri and Drigganitha. > > > > > > The other part i would like to see included in jhora is vakya ayanamasa which has the backing of our ancient seers, > > > > > > truly > > > > > > vishnu > > > > > > jhora , Sanjay Prabhakaran <sanjaychettiar@> wrote: > > > > > > > > || Om Gurave Namah || > > > > Dear astrolearnjyotish , > > > > JHora uses Drig ganita ONLY for Calculating the graha positions. > > > > > > > > Warm Regards > > > > Sanjay P > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/7/22 astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora > > > > > > > > > > It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should > > > > > be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffs > > > > > > > > > > There is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration > > > > > ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to > > > > > differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamas > > > > > > > > > > It seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just > > > > > because they are following them. > > > > > > > > > > when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like > > > > > Yukteswar,chandrahari ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have > > > > > the backing of ancient rishis and authorities > > > > > > > > > > DO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa? > > > > > > > > > > Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and > > > > > vakya ? > > > > > > > > > > Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making > > > > > corrections for minor differences occuring through the age > > > > > > > > > > BPHS > > > > > > > > > > 8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, > > > > > > > > > > the positions of the grahas > > > > > are to be taken, as per Drig ganit. > > > > > > > > > > This is again important for us to > > > > > know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a > > > > > vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several > > > > > different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different > > > > > parts of the country. So following a standard system should be > > > > > effective. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 Dear Narasimhaji,Your ephemeris, or rather the one you follow is, undoubtedly correct. I truly admire your contributions towards Jyotish very wonderfully!It is only due to your sftware that my Jyotish studies become easy and with more purpose.But the justice to Sahams are not yet over. Or I think that softwares are not able to compute it.. maybe.RishiRahuljhora CC: astrolearnjyotishFrom: pvrDate: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:53:43 -0400Re: Re: Drig ganitha ayanamsa in jhora Namaste, >>>> whenever a chart is casted with Drigganitha panchangam and compared with Jhora chart casted with default options(lahiri) there is always a difference of approximately 2 months in Dasha balance and also few planets are displaced in position in few divisional charts.<<<< That only means their "drigganita" is incorrect or they use a different ayanamsa or they use different definitions (e.g. apparent positions instead of true positions etc). By definition, formulas used in drigganita are to be updated constantly, based on the best available observations of the day. JHora uses Swiss Ephemeris, which is based on the latest NASA models. If somebody else uses less accurate or older observations to model planetary movements, one can get different calculations. Some planets can of course be off in some divisional charts and dasa dates can be off. You can play with different settings (e.g. geocentric vs topocentric, true vs apparent etc, which impact Moon's position considerably) and with ayanamsa of course. If you still cannot match the panchanga you follow, nothing can be done about it. If panchanga is based on old planetary models, we cannot match it. JHora is based on the latest and the most reliable drigganita of the day. Best regards, Narasimha ---- astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish > wrote: > sorry my messge did not display at all in the previous post .I am posting again here. > > > Namaste P.V.R.Rao ji > > You are right when you mean Drigganita is "observation based math".vakya method of calculation is only approximate.I agree with all the above.I would like to make a point here that hereafter in this posting i am not going to mix ayanamsa and Drigganitha as it leads to confusion in communication and i accept that was an error. > > The point i wanted to make is this there is a "good amount" of difference between the charts cast by Drigganitha calculation used in jhora software ,likes like parashara light ,goravani jyotish and the "original drigganitha calculation" used by H.SEshadri iyer,P.S.Iyer and some softwares in use in Taminadu now which follow a similiar calculation method. > > i would like to point out the differences for your perusal and conclusion > > Here is the link to all the divisional charts cast by mr.H.Seshadri iyer (author of New techniques of Prediction) who believed in giving predictions using all divisional charts into considerations > > Here is the link for the same > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/17387359/prediction-by-HSESHADRI-IYER-AUTHOR-OF-NEW-TECHNIQUES-OF-PREDICTIONREAD-DESCRIPTION-FOR-DOWNLOAD-BUTTON. > > This is a chart cast for a person born on June 18,1937 at 5.25 am at Udipi based on drigganitha > > For this chart D-24,D-10,D-9,D-5,D-4,D-3,D-12.D-8 exactly resemble the same as in jhora > > D-11 chart chart casted by H.seshadri iyer is completely different from both the rudramsa options available in Jhora > > In D-16 chart casted by H.IYER ascendant is in leo whereas in jhora ascendant is in virgo.Rest are fine > > In D-7 chart casted by H.IYER ,mercury is in capricorn whereas in jhora it is in aquarius.Rest are fine. > > In D-6 chart,many planets and ascendant are displaced by 1 house. > > Another main point to note,is for this chart saturn dasha-saturn antardasha ends on 5.10.1978 but accoeding to Jhora saturn-saturn antardasha ends on 21.11.1978 with lahiri ayanamsa which is a difference of 1 month and 16 days. > > P.S.IYER OF KERALA > > Another point i would like to bring to your notice is that The great P.S.IYER ,giant of astrology who died in 1994 during his lifetime used only Drigganitha for calculation > > There is a differences of approximately 2 months between dasha balance between the charts casted by Mr.P.S.IYER,Kerala and Jhora for all the charts tested.There is also a small difference upto 5 minutes in longitudes of planets in rashi chart casted by P.S.IYER And JHORA. > > > I am not basing my points from observation froma single website or something.I am not an autority to comment whether NASA calculations are accurate or slightly off the mark. > > I can say for sure that,In Tamilnadu there are only 2 prominent types of panchangam used for casting a chart-both for traditional methods and also for horoscope generated by computer softwares produced by different companies. > > Drigganitha panchangam and calculations are popular all over Tamilnadu at this point of time > > whenever a chart is casted with Drigganitha panchangam and compared with Jhora chart casted with default options(lahiri) there is always a difference of approximately 2 months in Dasha balance and also few planets are displaced in position in few divisional charts. > > I am writing this post to just bring into light the charts casted on DRigganitha calculation used by greats like H.IYER and P.S.IYER and also the charts casted in Tamilnadu even today based on Drigganitha panchangam have a 2 month difference in dasa bhukti balance constantly and few possible displacements in divisional charts. > > Please take this message in a positive sense and i would be happy if you can reproduce the same Dasha bhukti calculations used by greats like P.S.IYER AND H.SESHADRI IYER and charts casted by various different softwares in Tamilnadu currently which seem to reproduce the charts used by P.S.IYER,H.IYER and other greats > > I believe my obserevations are genuine to the best of my knowledge and this is my attempt to bring "this differences" to an industrious genius astrolger like you to solve the issues. > > Thanks > > vishnu > > > > > > jhora , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > > > Namaste, > > > > The default hora, drekkana and trimsamsa given by JHora are what Maharshi Parasara taught in BPHS. JHora gives 7 other hora options, 3 other drekkana options and 2 other trimsamsa options. > > > > If an author you referred to used a different hora, drekkana and trimsamsa calculation, obviously the chart will be "completely different". > > > > If I know what definition he used and if I think it is worth programming, I can consider adding another option. But, do realize that there are several different ways people cast hora, drekkana and trimsamsa charts. Also please be aware that JHora gives 9 different hora charts, 4 different drekkana charts and 3 different trimsamsa charts. > > > > Thanks, > > Narasimhajhora , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > > > Namaste, > > > > I have no clue what "drigganita ayanamsa" means to you. > > > > Drigganita means "observation based math". > > > > To calculate planetary positions, some use old formulas given thousands of years back by scholars of that era. That is called vaakya ganita or vaakya panchanga (vaakya=words spoken by someone). JHora does not support it and has no plans for it. > > > > Some others use drigganita, i.e. formulas that have been updated based on the latest observations (e.g. NASA etc). This is the recommendation of rishis. In JHora, when you use Lahiri ayanamsa or any other ayanamsa, only drigganita is used. In fact, ayanamsa is an independent issue. > > > > It seems to me like you have wrong notions on what drigganita means, based on some website or the other. > > > > Thanks, > > Narasimha > > > > ---- astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish wrote: > > > Dear sanjay prabhakaran sir > > > > > > I beg to differ with your opinion as i am very sure the ayanamsa adopted by jhora is not Drigganitha. > > > > > > I mean lahiri,True lahiri and jagannatha all are different from Drigganitha ayanamsa > > > > > > There is a free website which allows casting of charts called astraura.com .In their website they have options for casting a chart based both on lahiri and Drigganitha.You can minutely observe the differences in dasa bhukti periods upto 2 months ,change of positions of mandi and planets in important divisional charts like Navamsa between lahiri and drigganitha ayanamsa > > > > > > I assume you know a software called astrovision which usually cast charts based on drigganitha and there also you will be able to see the difference between Lahiri and Drigganitha. > > > > > > The other part i would like to see included in jhora is vakya ayanamasa which has the backing of our ancient seers, > > > > > > truly > > > > > > vishnu > > > > > > jhora , Sanjay Prabhakaran <sanjaychettiar@> wrote: > > > > > > > > || Om Gurave Namah || > > > > Dear astrolearnjyotish , > > > > JHora uses Drig ganita ONLY for Calculating the graha positions. > > > > > > > > Warm Regards > > > > Sanjay P > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/7/22 astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora > > > > > > > > > > It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should > > > > > be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffs > > > > > > > > > > There is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration > > > > > ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to > > > > > differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamas > > > > > > > > > > It seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just > > > > > because they are following them. > > > > > > > > > > when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like > > > > > Yukteswar,chandrahari ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have > > > > > the backing of ancient rishis and authorities > > > > > > > > > > DO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa? > > > > > > > > > > Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and > > > > > vakya ? > > > > > > > > > > Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making > > > > > corrections for minor differences occuring through the age > > > > > > > > > > BPHS > > > > > > > > > > 8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, > > > > > > > > > > the positions of the grahas > > > > > are to be taken, as per Drig ganit. > > > > > > > > > > This is again important for us to > > > > > know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a > > > > > vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several > > > > > different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different > > > > > parts of the country. So following a standard system should be > > > > > effective. > > > > With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your photos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 Namaste, Some issues with sahamas were fixed earlier. If you believe there is an issue, please give an example birthchart, what you are getting with JHora and what you believe is the correct calculation. I can look into it for a future release (post-7.33). Thanks, Narasimha ---- Rishi Rahul <rishirahul1961 wrote: > > Dear Narasimhaji, > > Your ephemeris, or rather the one you follow is, undoubtedly correct. I truly admire your contributions towards Jyotish very wonderfully! > > It is only due to your sftware that my Jyotish studies become easy and with more purpose. > > But the justice to Sahams are not yet over. Or I think that softwares are not able to compute it.. maybe. > > RishiRahul > > jhora > CC: astrolearnjyotish > pvr > Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:53:43 -0400 > Re: Re: Drig ganitha ayanamsa in jhora > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > >>>> whenever a chart is casted with Drigganitha panchangam and compared with Jhora chart casted with default options(lahiri) there is always a difference of approximately 2 months in Dasha balance and also few planets are displaced in position in few divisional charts.<<<< > > > > That only means their " drigganita " is incorrect or they use a different ayanamsa or they use different definitions (e.g. apparent positions instead of true positions etc). > > > > By definition, formulas used in drigganita are to be updated constantly, based on the best available observations of the day. JHora uses Swiss Ephemeris, which is based on the latest NASA models. If somebody else uses less accurate or older observations to model planetary movements, one can get different calculations. Some planets can of course be off in some divisional charts and dasa dates can be off. > > > > You can play with different settings (e.g. geocentric vs topocentric, true vs apparent etc, which impact Moon's position considerably) and with ayanamsa of course. If you still cannot match the panchanga you follow, nothing can be done about it. If panchanga is based on old planetary models, we cannot match it. JHora is based on the latest and the most reliable drigganita of the day. > > > > Best regards, > > Narasimha > > > > ---- astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish wrote: > > > sorry my messge did not display at all in the previous post .I am posting again here. > > > > > > > > > Namaste P.V.R.Rao ji > > > > > > You are right when you mean Drigganita is " observation based math " .vakya method of calculation is only approximate.I agree with all the above.I would like to make a point here that hereafter in this posting i am not going to mix ayanamsa and Drigganitha as it leads to confusion in communication and i accept that was an error. > > > > > > The point i wanted to make is this there is a " good amount " of difference between the charts cast by Drigganitha calculation used in jhora software ,likes like parashara light ,goravani jyotish and the " original drigganitha calculation " used by H.SEshadri iyer,P.S.Iyer and some softwares in use in Taminadu now which follow a similiar calculation method. > > > > > > i would like to point out the differences for your perusal and conclusion > > > > > > Here is the link to all the divisional charts cast by mr.H.Seshadri iyer (author of New techniques of Prediction) who believed in giving predictions using all divisional charts into considerations > > > > > > Here is the link for the same > > > > > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/17387359/prediction-by-HSESHADRI-IYER-AUTHOR-OF-NEW-TE\ CHNIQUES-OF-PREDICTIONREAD-DESCRIPTION-FOR-DOWNLOAD-BUTTON. > > > > > > This is a chart cast for a person born on June 18,1937 at 5.25 am at Udipi based on drigganitha > > > > > > For this chart D-24,D-10,D-9,D-5,D-4,D-3,D-12.D-8 exactly resemble the same as in jhora > > > > > > D-11 chart chart casted by H.seshadri iyer is completely different from both the rudramsa options available in Jhora > > > > > > In D-16 chart casted by H.IYER ascendant is in leo whereas in jhora ascendant is in virgo.Rest are fine > > > > > > In D-7 chart casted by H.IYER ,mercury is in capricorn whereas in jhora it is in aquarius.Rest are fine. > > > > > > In D-6 chart,many planets and ascendant are displaced by 1 house. > > > > > > Another main point to note,is for this chart saturn dasha-saturn antardasha ends on 5.10.1978 but accoeding to Jhora saturn-saturn antardasha ends on 21.11.1978 with lahiri ayanamsa which is a difference of 1 month and 16 days. > > > > > > P.S.IYER OF KERALA > > > > > > Another point i would like to bring to your notice is that The great P.S.IYER ,giant of astrology who died in 1994 during his lifetime used only Drigganitha for calculation > > > > > > There is a differences of approximately 2 months between dasha balance between the charts casted by Mr.P.S.IYER,Kerala and Jhora for all the charts tested.There is also a small difference upto 5 minutes in longitudes of planets in rashi chart casted by P.S.IYER And JHORA. > > > > > > > > > I am not basing my points from observation froma single website or something.I am not an autority to comment whether NASA calculations are accurate or slightly off the mark. > > > > > > I can say for sure that,In Tamilnadu there are only 2 prominent types of panchangam used for casting a chart-both for traditional methods and also for horoscope generated by computer softwares produced by different companies. > > > > > > Drigganitha panchangam and calculations are popular all over Tamilnadu at this point of time > > > > > > whenever a chart is casted with Drigganitha panchangam and compared with Jhora chart casted with default options(lahiri) there is always a difference of approximately 2 months in Dasha balance and also few planets are displaced in position in few divisional charts. > > > > > > I am writing this post to just bring into light the charts casted on DRigganitha calculation used by greats like H.IYER and P.S.IYER and also the charts casted in Tamilnadu even today based on Drigganitha panchangam have a 2 month difference in dasa bhukti balance constantly and few possible displacements in divisional charts. > > > > > > Please take this message in a positive sense and i would be happy if you can reproduce the same Dasha bhukti calculations used by greats like P.S.IYER AND H.SESHADRI IYER and charts casted by various different softwares in Tamilnadu currently which seem to reproduce the charts used by P.S.IYER,H.IYER and other greats > > > > > > I believe my obserevations are genuine to the best of my knowledge and this is my attempt to bring " this differences " to an industrious genius astrolger like you to solve the issues. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jhora , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > The default hora, drekkana and trimsamsa given by JHora are what Maharshi Parasara taught in BPHS. JHora gives 7 other hora options, 3 other drekkana options and 2 other trimsamsa options. > > > > > > > > If an author you referred to used a different hora, drekkana and trimsamsa calculation, obviously the chart will be " completely different " . > > > > > > > > If I know what definition he used and if I think it is worth programming, I can consider adding another option. But, do realize that there are several different ways people cast hora, drekkana and trimsamsa charts. Also please be aware that JHora gives 9 different hora charts, 4 different drekkana charts and 3 different trimsamsa charts. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Narasimhajhora , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > I have no clue what " drigganita ayanamsa " means to you. > > > > > > > > Drigganita means " observation based math " . > > > > > > > > To calculate planetary positions, some use old formulas given thousands of years back by scholars of that era. That is called vaakya ganita or vaakya panchanga (vaakya=words spoken by someone). JHora does not support it and has no plans for it. > > > > > > > > Some others use drigganita, i.e. formulas that have been updated based on the latest observations (e.g. NASA etc). This is the recommendation of rishis. In JHora, when you use Lahiri ayanamsa or any other ayanamsa, only drigganita is used. In fact, ayanamsa is an independent issue. > > > > > > > > It seems to me like you have wrong notions on what drigganita means, based on some website or the other. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Narasimha > > > > > > > > ---- astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish wrote: > > > > > Dear sanjay prabhakaran sir > > > > > > > > > > I beg to differ with your opinion as i am very sure the ayanamsa adopted by jhora is not Drigganitha. > > > > > > > > > > I mean lahiri,True lahiri and jagannatha all are different from Drigganitha ayanamsa > > > > > > > > > > There is a free website which allows casting of charts called astraura.com .In their website they have options for casting a chart based both on lahiri and Drigganitha.You can minutely observe the differences in dasa bhukti periods upto 2 months ,change of positions of mandi and planets in important divisional charts like Navamsa between lahiri and drigganitha ayanamsa > > > > > > > > > > I assume you know a software called astrovision which usually cast charts based on drigganitha and there also you will be able to see the difference between Lahiri and Drigganitha. > > > > > > > > > > The other part i would like to see included in jhora is vakya ayanamasa which has the backing of our ancient seers, > > > > > > > > > > truly > > > > > > > > > > vishnu > > > > > > > > > > jhora , Sanjay Prabhakaran <sanjaychettiar@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om Gurave Namah || > > > > > > Dear astrolearnjyotish , > > > > > > JHora uses Drig ganita ONLY for Calculating the graha positions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm Regards > > > > > > Sanjay P > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/7/22 astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should > > > > > > > be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration > > > > > > > ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to > > > > > > > differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just > > > > > > > because they are following them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like > > > > > > > Yukteswar,chandrahari ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have > > > > > > > the backing of ancient rishis and authorities > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and > > > > > > > vakya ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making > > > > > > > corrections for minor differences occuring through the age > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BPHS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the positions of the grahas > > > > > > > are to be taken, as per Drig ganit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is again important for us to > > > > > > > know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a > > > > > > > vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several > > > > > > > different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different > > > > > > > parts of the country. So following a standard system should be > > > > > > > effective. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________ > MSN Quiz The clash is on to find the best brains. Test your skills with avid quizzers on MSN quiz. > http://specials.msn.co.in/WLSocialNetworkConnector/Chrome.aspx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 Namaste, Sorry.. no plans for it. It requires a big effort to dig for the formulas used by them and program them. I am not sure if such an effort is worthwhile. Just a question for you - is vaakya panchanga used in Tamil Nadu based on Surya Siddhanta or something else? Which version? Thanks, Narasimha ---- Krishnan N <tnmuralikrishna wrote: > Â > Dear Guruji > Â > I also eagerly look for ward vakya ayanamsa option which has got high relevance in TN and other southern india esp it helps in timing of the predictions more accurate. > Â > thanking you, with kind regards - Krishnan.N > > --- On Wed, 22/7/09, astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish wrote: > > > astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish > Drig ganitha ayanamsa in jhora > jhora > Wednesday, 22 July, 2009, 9:42 AM > > > Â > > > > Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora > > It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffs > > There is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamas > > It seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just because they are following them. > > when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like Yukteswar,chandraha ri ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have the backing of ancient rishis and authorities > > DO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa? > > Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and vakya ? > > Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making corrections for minor differences occuring through the age > > BPHS > > 8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, > > the positions of the grahas > are to be taken, as per Drig ganit. > > This is again important for us to > know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a > vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several > different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different > parts of the country. So following a standard system should be > effective. > > > > > > > > > > > Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here http://cricket. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 i have researched and found out that topocentric settings gives most accurate dasha timelines and positions. several classical texts also mention that planetary positions must be accurately recorded from where the birth occurs. humble regards, chandan s sabarwal. jhora , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote: > > Namaste, > > Sorry.. no plans for it. It requires a big effort to dig for the formulas used by them and program them. I am not sure if such an effort is worthwhile. > > Just a question for you - is vaakya panchanga used in Tamil Nadu based on Surya Siddhanta or something else? Which version? > > Thanks, > Narasimha > > ---- Krishnan N <tnmuralikrishna wrote: > > Â > > Dear Guruji > > Â > > I also eagerly look for ward vakya ayanamsa option which has got high relevance in TN and other southern india esp it helps in timing of the predictions more accurate. > > Â > > thanking you, with kind regards - Krishnan.N > > > > --- On Wed, 22/7/09, astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish wrote: > > > > > > astrolearnjyotish <astrolearnjyotish > > Drig ganitha ayanamsa in jhora > > jhora > > Wednesday, 22 July, 2009, 9:42 AM > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > Why there is no drig ganitha ayanamsa in the Popular software JHora > > > > It is very evident from the shloka of BPHS itself that Drig ganitha should be used for calculating the position of planets and other stuffs > > > > There is always a difference of approximately 2 months in dasha duration ,change in position mandi in navamsa,sandhi planets changing rashi due to differences between Lahiri and Drigganitha ayanamas > > > > It seems like a group of astrologers are favouring Lahiri ayanamsa just because they are following them. > > > > when softwares like jhora can allow multiple ayanamsa like Yukteswar,chandraha ri ,they tend to avoid Drigganitha and vakya which have the backing of ancient rishis and authorities > > > > DO you have favouritism towards a particular ayanamsa? > > > > Is there a technical difficulty to integrate ayanamsa like Drig ganitha and vakya ? > > > > Drigganitha is also the most scientific ayanamsa got after making corrections for minor differences occuring through the age > > > > BPHS > > > > 8-9. yasmin kaale...drig ganita ekatam, > > > > the positions of the grahas > > are to be taken, as per Drig ganit. > > > > This is again important for us to > > know that the Parashara school recommends Drig Ganita. India is a > > vast country with one religion (I refer to Hinduism) but several > > different cultures. The Panchang system is different in different > > parts of the country. So following a standard system should be > > effective. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here http://cricket. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.