Guest guest Posted December 31, 2005 Report Share Posted December 31, 2005 Respected programmers, I've got another commercial jyotisa program, but recently I've started to use mainly JHora because of it's clarity and the accurate calculations. I really appreciate the fine program and the fact that it's available to everyone. I think that will greatly further the study of jyotisa, even globally. There's only one thing I don't understand and that's the longitude speed calculations. For example now when Sukra is retrogade, I think it's longitude speed should be negative. Parashara's Light 6.1 gives -0.18 degrees for today's Sukra longitude speed, the western program Solar Fire 6 gives -0.17.55. But JHora gives 1.25 degrees / day. What's this about? Could it be possible to get the actual daily speed of a planet from JHora and if so, how? Happy New Year to everyone, Sari Metsovuori Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 Hello Niranjan and thank you for the answer. You wrote: As far as the ephemeris are concerned actual position and visual positions do differ from each other. So better you go to preferences and set planetary calculation of you preference. There pr obably you might find the answer of your puzzling about difference in speed i.e. - I tried the switching, but it changes only a few seconds in the longitudes and it doesn't affect the " lon speed " menu at all (and this all is logical of course, because it shouldn't affect it). You wrote: -0.17.55. Here it seems that you have miss interpreted the calculations. What you read in this program is " 6 Cp.07'16.43 " " this means Venus is on 6th degree, 07 minutes and 16.43 seconds of Capricorn. The day you sent this message the Venus is shown on 6th degree,8 minutes and 57. 26 seconds. (6 Cap.8'57.26 " ) of Capricorn. So it is obvious that you have miss interpreted the reading the planetary signs in fraction. Actually even this program show the difference of -0.01.40.50 Venus is retrograde since 24th of last month. So it is in oscillation. And during oscillation the planet speed is as good as 0. or rather extremely dead slow. - Yes, I can see that. Now when I'm writing this it's the 2th of January at 12.54 o'clock GMT (0.00) and JHora gives the longitude of Venus as 5 degrees Capricorn 48'43.89. Tomorrow at 12.54 o'clock GMT Venus will be at 5 degrees Capricorn 25'21.56. The difference is 0 degrees 23'22.33 and that sould be the longitude speed as far as I understand. The very reliable western program Solar Fire gives -0.22 as today's longitude speed for Venus, so that's pretty close. But JHora says that the Lon Speed of Venus is the usual 1.250 deg/day. So I still don't understand this. But thank you anyway for your efforts. With kindest regards, Sari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 Dear friends, There indeed is an issue with speeds. I have to figure that out. Narasimha - Sari M. jhora Monday, January 02, 2006 8:05 AM Re: Longitude speeds of the planets? Hello Niranjan and thank you for the answer.You wrote:As far as the ephemeris are concerned actual position and visual positions do differ from each other. So better you go to preferences and set planetary calculation of you preference. There pr obably you might find the answer of your puzzling about difference in speed i.e.- I tried the switching, but it changes only a few seconds in the longitudes and it doesn't affect the "lon speed" menu at all (and this all is logical of course, because it shouldn't affect it).You wrote:-0.17.55. Here it seems that you have miss interpreted the calculations. What you read in this program is " 6 Cp.07'16.43 this means Venus is on 6th degree, 07 minutes and 16.43 seconds of Capricorn. The day you sent this message the Venus is shown on 6th degree,8 minutes and 57. 26 seconds. (6 Cap.8'57.26" ) of Capricorn. So it is obvious that you have miss interpreted the reading the planetary signs in fraction. Actually even this program show the difference of -0.01.40.50 Venus is retrograde since 24th of last month. So it is in oscillation. And during oscillation the planet speed is as good as 0. or rather extremely dead slow.- Yes, I can see that. Now when I'm writing this it's the 2th of January at 12.54 o'clock GMT (0.00) and JHora gives the longitude of Venus as 5 degrees Capricorn 48'43.89. Tomorrow at 12.54 o'clock GMT Venus will be at 5 degrees Capricorn 25'21.56. The difference is 0 degrees 23'22.33 and that sould be the longitude speed as far as I understand. The very reliable western program Solar Fire gives -0.22 as today's longitude speed for Venus, so that's pretty close. But JHora says that the Lon Speed of Venus is the usual 1.250 deg/day. So I still don't understand this.But thank you anyway for your efforts.With kindest regards, Sari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 Hello Mr. Sari, What u say is right. ur observation is too good. I didn't observe it may be because of familiar with planetary progression and here in India Indian Panchang. So issue that you have brought up should be considered on priority basis and pvr has taken the task. I am sure his highness will get the correction mad in programming Thanks once again With regards For Shreegauri AssociatesNiranjan Sant Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net>jhora Sent: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 10:13:43 -0500Re: Longitude speeds of the planets? Dear friends, There indeed is an issue with speeds. I have to figure that out. Narasimha - Sari M. jhora Monday, January 02, 2006 8:05 AM Re: Longitude speeds of the planets? Hello Niranjan and thank you for the answer.You wrote:As far as the ephemeris are concerned actual position and visual positions do differ from each other. So better you go to preferences and set planetary calculation of you preference. There pr obably you might find the answer of your puzzling about difference in speed i.e.- I tried the switching, but it changes only a few seconds in the longitudes and it doesn't affect the "lon speed" menu at all (and this all is logical of course, because it shouldn't affect it).You wrote:-0.17.55. Here it seems that you have miss interpreted the calculations. What you read in this program is " 6 Cp.07'16.43 this means Venus is on 6th degree, 07 minutes and 16.43 seconds of Capricorn. The day you sent this message the Venus is shown on 6th degree,8 minutes and 57. 26 seconds. (6 Cap.8'57.26" ) of Capricorn. So it is obvious that you have miss interpreted the reading the planetary signs in fraction. Actually even this program show the difference of -0.01.40.50 Venus is retrograde since 24th of last month. So it is in oscillation. And during oscillation the planet speed is as good as 0. or rather extremely dead slow.- Yes, I can see that. Now when I'm writing this it's the 2th of January at 12.54 o'clock GMT (0.00) and JHora gives the longitude of Venus as 5 degrees Capricorn 48'43.89. Tomorrow at 12.54 o'clock GMT Venus will be at 5 degrees Capricorn 25'21.56. The difference is 0 degrees 23'22.33 and that sould be the longitude speed as far as I understand. The very reliable western program Solar Fire gives -0.22 as today's longitude speed for Venus, so that's pretty close. But JHora says that the Lon Speed of Venus is the usual 1.250 deg/day. So I still don't understand this.But thank you anyway for your efforts.With kindest regards, Sari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 Hi! Mr. Sari Your observation is correct. Your issue is not the planets' accurate sign but only the title ' longitudinal speed". It is very true that speed is mentioned in degrees which should not have been. It is a mistake in programming and programmer of the jhora, Shri PVR, the highness, has taken the note of it. Keep using this program and connected to this group we shall do much better in astrology and astronomy too With regards For Shreegauri AssociatesNiranjan Sant Sari M. <gerdapp (AT) welho (DOT) com>jhora Sent: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:05:33 +0200Re: Longitude speeds of the planets? Hello Niranjan and thank you for the answer.You wrote:As far as the ephemeris are concerned actual position and visual positions do differ from each other. So better you go to preferences and set planetary calculation of you preference. There pr obably you might find the answer of your puzzling about difference in speed i.e.- I tried the switching, but it changes only a few seconds in the longitudes and it doesn't affect the "lon speed" menu at all (and this all is logical of course, because it shouldn't affect it).You wrote:-0.17.55. Here it seems that you have miss interpreted the calculations. What you read in this program is " 6 Cp.07'16.43 this means Venus is on 6th degree, 07 minutes and 16.43 seconds of Capricorn. The day you sent this message the Venus is shown on 6th degree,8 minutes and 57. 26 seconds. (6 Cap.8'57.26" ) of Capricorn. So it is obvious that you have miss interpreted the reading the planetary signs in fraction. Actually even this program show the difference of -0.01.40.50 Venus is retrograde since 24th of last month. So it is in oscillation. And during oscillation the planet speed is as good as 0. or rather extremely dead slow.- Yes, I can see that. Now when I'm writing this it's the 2th of January at 12.54 o'clock GMT (0.00) and JHora gives the longitude of Venus as 5 degrees Capricorn 48'43.89. Tomorrow at 12.54 o'clock GMT Venus will be at 5 degrees Capricorn 25'21.56. The difference is 0 degrees 23'22.33 and that sould be the longitude speed as far as I understand. The very reliable western program Solar Fire gives -0.22 as today's longitude speed for Venus, so that's pretty close. But JHora says that the Lon Speed of Venus is the usual 1.250 deg/day. So I still don't understand this.But thank you anyway for your efforts.With kindest regards, Sari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2006 Report Share Posted January 3, 2006 Dear Narasimha and Niranjan, thank you for your kind answers. I'm happy now when the issue is taken under consideration. There is another little bug I think and it has to do with the " When will lagna change sign in Navamsa " tool, which in itself is a really smart and useful feature. But with some birth times it gives obscure results. I have here for example the 2nd October 1962 at 8.10 PM (EET -2.00 East of GMT), Helsinki Finland 24E56 60N10 - this is a data of my friend. When I right-click Navamsa and " When will lagna change sign in Navamsa " , the program answers: " Lagna changes sign in Navamsa chart, if the birthtime is 23 hr 46 min 14 sec earlier " . Obviously this cannot be true. With most of the birth times the answer is correct, but sometimes it gives these " 23 hr " answers. I would be nice, if this would be corrected too. Otherwise, thank you for the fine program! Regards, Sari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2006 Report Share Posted January 6, 2006 Dear Sari, Both the bugs have been fixed (speed and 23 hrs). You'll get the fix in the next release. Thanks for reporting these bugs. Best regards, Narasimha - Sari M. jhora Tuesday, January 03, 2006 6:46 AM Re: Longitude speeds of the planets? Dear Narasimha and Niranjan,thank you for your kind answers. I'm happy now when the issue is taken under consideration.There is another little bug I think and it has to do with the "When will lagna change sign in Navamsa" tool, which in itself is a really smart and useful feature. But with some birth times it gives obscure results. I have here for example the 2nd October 1962 at 8.10 PM (EET -2.00 East of GMT), Helsinki Finland 24E56 60N10 - this is a data of my friend. When I right-click Navamsa and "When will lagna change sign in Navamsa", the program answers: "Lagna changes sign in Navamsa chart, if the birthtime is 23 hr 46 min 14 sec earlier". Obviously this cannot be true. With most of the birth times the answer is correct, but sometimes it gives these "23 hr" answers. I would be nice, if this would be corrected too.Otherwise, thank you for the fine program!Regards, Sari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2006 Report Share Posted January 6, 2006 Dear Narasimha, thank you very much for fixing these bugs! I have one more and the last question. I wonder, have you ever considered, if i t would be possible to make JHora compatible with Lois Rodden's AstroDatabank database? It's not an astrology program per se, but a database containing over 28 000 birth times - both of private persons and celebrities - collected for research purposes and categorized accorging to the accuracy of the birth time, profession, personality traits etc. etc. It works on the basis of Microsoft Access. Here's their site: http://www.astrodatabank.com/ AstroDatabank is a useful program and I use it a lot. It's compatible with many charting programs, both western and vedic, including one western freeware. Now when I've started to use mainly JHora, it would be great to look the AstroDatabank charts straight through it without writing the data in first. The ADB people say that it needs only a minor alteration to make a program compatible with theirs one. Here is their email address: Support Best Regards, Sari - Narasimha P.V.R. Rao jhora Friday, January 06, 2006 4:33 AM Re: Longitude speeds of the planets? Dear Sari, Both the bugs have been fixed (speed and 23 hrs). You'll get the fix in the next release. Thanks for reporting these bugs. Best regards, Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.