Shri Neelamji Suryasiddhanta - PragJyotishpu ra - Mayasura

[Guest guest]

Dear Neelam jiThanks for your valuable suggestions. I'm attaching other details mainly to learn as to why a'Jataka' despite benefics/ exalted positions remain a mediocre. sorry for troubling and taking your precious time. Please trust my soul mission is only for learningwith affection/ regardsR.kannan--- On Sun, 29/3/09, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07 wrote:neelam gupta <neelamgupta07Re: Re: Suryasiddhanta - PragJyotishpu ra - Mayasura Date: Sunday, 29 March, 2009, 5:52 AM

 

Dear Kannan ji,I think you're born on 11-12 May 1956. You have very good planetary placements and let me tell you, you share your chart with one of the most famous spiritual personality of India. Only your moon is in Taurus and his is in gemini with venus. So you score better there!

For your planets not giving the desired results, as Bhaskar ji has suggested, you may check on those parameters. What dashas you get will also be most important. If you do not mind, please post your exact details for any further examination.

RegardsNeelam2009/3/29 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Kannan,

 

Just forget character analysis and leave it for the Westerners . They

are experts in that, and I appreciate them for this . We must not waste

time in looking for personality traits in someones charts, because

personalities are deceptive and ever changing. What we must look for, is

what will happen and when.

 

Now your question which you put up, is exactly what i was trying to tell

you in my mail. Yogas, Dhan , Raj , or results of exalted planets and

debilitated retrograde ones, how and when they would arrive in a persons

Life , is what is all the study of astrology about.

 

But first we must check whether one really haves such Yogas, which is

your immediate query, about which you have adoubt since you dont

foresee the results of the combinations you apparently see in your

chart, as presented before you.

 

Please do the following -

 

Check the navamsha positions of the Planets. Where these exalted planets

of Your Natal Chart are placed in the navamsha. Do they loose their

exalted positions ? Do they go to evil Houses ? Check the nakshtra

owners of these planets ? What storied do they reveal ? check the bhava

chalit chart. Do the planets in a particular house in the natal chart,

changes its position, in the Bhava Chalit chart ? Check the Mahadasha,

and antardasha which you are running. What stories do they reveal ?

Check the strength of the planets, their avasthas, their Shadbalas,

their ashtakvarga points. What stories do they reveal ? Check the

current transits over the Natal position of the planets in your chart .

What stories do they reveal ?

 

The sum total of above should give you an idea, of why you are not

receiving what You should, according to you.

 

best wishes,

 

Bhaskar.

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, kannan padma

<kannan_padma30@ ...> wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskarji,

>

> Thanks for immediate response. I normally analyse my horoscope in many

ways to learn the nuances. My purpose is not to seek any free

consultation from you and not to disturb you . But one thing which irks

me is although I have the following planets in exalted positions, my

life is a normal, contented life with normal endowments, but with no

major achievements. I wonder where lies the block. Just for information

>

> Sun in Mesha, Moon, mercury, ketu in Rishaba, Venus in Mithuna,

Jupiter in Kataka, saturn and ragu in vrischika, Mars in Makara

ascendant) . Please sugggest where should I search to find answer

>

> with regards - R.Kannan

>

> --- On Sun, 29/3/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... wrote:

> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ...

> [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suryasiddhanta - PragJyotishpu

ra - Mayasura

> ancient_indian_ astrology

> Sunday, 29 March, 2009, 3:16 AM

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Dear Kannan ji,

>

>

>

> Astrology is not hard to understand for a good student who

consistently

>

> studys, reads and discusses, leatns to prepare charts, knows little

>

> astronomy, and lievs a proper way of Life.

>

>

>

> But it is not meant to be easy either . Or else it may fall in wrong

>

> hands, which is the reason. To become Gold one has to pass through the

>

> Fire several times.

>

>

>

> This is the reason that there are no hard and fast, single shot rules

>

> avaialbe in the texts, for any incident of Life, be it marriage, birth

>

> of a child, gains of wealth or whatever. It is purposely done so by

the

>

> Ancient rishi Munis, so that a budding astrologer must go through the

>

> rigors and pains of falling in traps again and again, falling,

>

> overstepping, getting up again, which is a continous process before

one

>

> can think of becoming a good astrologer. This is meant to seperate the

>

> grains from the chaff. Inthe resultatnt process only the serious would

>

> go ahead, and the rest, due to not acquiring the ability to predict

out

>

> of non-seriousness, would leave midway, if not in the beginning

itself,

>

> finding this too complex.

>

>

>

> None of the rules,dictums and shlokas in the Ancient texts, I would

say

>

> are wrong, including the current arguments of Janma nakshatra Phala.

>

> But which phal will be available when, is the whole beauty of the

Indian

>

> Astrology. To know this, requires great efforts and continous study on

>

> the paret of the astrologer. just like it is easy to pinpoint a Dhana

>

> Yoga, or a Raj Yoga, or some other good combination in someones chart,

>

> but when would the good and bad results be available, is what is the

>

> whole study of astrology about.

>

>

>

> regards/Bhaskar.

>

>

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, "Bhaskar"

>

> <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:

>

> >

>

> > Dear Kannan ji, The following assessment will collectively decide

the

>

> > personaluty of the native. 1) Sign of the Ascendant. 2) Lord of the

>

> > Ascendant. 3) Planets deposited in the Ascendant. 4) Planets

aspecting

>

> > the ascendant. 5) Planets in conjunction with the Ascendant Lord. 6)

>

> > Planets aspecting the Ascendant Lord. 7) Navamsha Lord of the

>

> Ascendant.

>

> > 8) Antardashapati of the Ascendant. 9) StarLord occupied by the

>

> > antardashapati of the Ascendant. 10) Sign Occupied by the Moon. 11)

>

> > Planets aspecting the Moon. 12) Sign ocupied by the Sun. 13) Planets

>

> > aspecting the Sun. 14) Planets deposited in the MC (Meridian Cusp)

15)

>

> > and,Planets deposited in the 3rd House (Sub Conscious Mind). I am

not

>

> > available though to judge, anyones personaluty, so please do not put

>

> up

>

> > any chart details. regards/Bhaskar.

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > ancient_indian_ astrology, kannan padma

>

> > kannan_padma30@ wrote:

>

> > >

>

> > > namaskaram

>

> > > i am a new astrologer with no practical knowledge but some little

>

> > theortical knowledge i would like to learn whether t is lagna or

rasi

>

> > which one decide the mans personality thanku

>

> > > --- On Sat, 28/3/09, ShankaraBharadwaj Khandavalli

>

> > shankarabharadwaj@ wrote:

>

> > > ShankaraBharadwaj Khandavalli shankarabharadwaj@

>

> > > Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suryasiddhanta -

>

> > PragJyotishpu ra - Mayasura

>

> > > ancient_indian_ astrology

>

> > > Saturday, 28 March, 2009, 9:01 PM

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > Sir,

>

> > >

>

> > > Both Rama and Krishna are related to Sun: Vishnu-Aditya. 16 kalas

of

>

> > the Avatar are common to the Purnavataras Rama and Krishna. In case

of

>

> > Krishna He alone descended with 16 kalas. In case of Rama it is said

>

> > that He shared the kalas with His brothers. That is the only

>

> difference.

>

> > >

>

> > > The sixteen thousand Gopikas are variedly interpreted. If Krishna

is

>

> > the Moon, the 16000 gopikas are stars of the sky. But more

>

> importantly,

>

> > Krishna is Gopati, Gopta - the ruler (of dawn), protector (of the

>

> > world). Gopi is the one ruled by the Gopta. Thus Gopi-Krishna is

just

>

> > the classical jiva-para notation. Radha-Krishna relation is also of

>

> > jiva-para nature.

>

> > >

>

> > > In case of Rama the jiva-para is seen in Hanuman-Rama relation.

>

> > Sita-Rama is Prakriti-Purusha relation.

>

> > >

>

> > > "Chakraborty, PL" <CHAKRABORTYP2@ iocl.co.in>

>

> > > ancient_indian_ astrology

>

> > > Saturday, March 28, 2009 2:35:22 PM

>

> > > RE: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Suryasiddhanta -

>

> > PragJyotishpu ra - Mayasura

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > Dear

>

> > > Sirs,

>

> > >

>

> > > Whenever Sri Krishna is mentioned, you will always find the No.

16.

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > The

>

> > > numbers may come like 16,000 too.

>

> > >

>

> > > The

>

> > > reason is, Sri Krishna is linked to Moon (As Sri Rama is linked to

>

> Sun

>

> > > etc)

>

> > > and

>

> > > similarly described as 16 Kalaa Avatar - just like the phases of

>

> > > Moon.

>

> > >

>

> > > May be

>

> > > I am not using the correct terminology, but hopefully able to

>

> > > convey

>

> > > the

>

> > > gist.

>

> > >

>

> > > regards

>

> > >

>

> > > Chakraborty

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

>

> > http://messenger. / invite/

>

> > >

>

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

http://messenger. / invite/

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now