Re:Kambojas as Mlecchas (or Glaschas) vs Conservative Brhamnical (Vedic) peopl

February 9, 2009

Dear Sunil Bhattacharjya ji, You are right.==>The key to the whole question rests on the dates ie when did these

movements in either direction occurr, as this alone will help one to

ascertain which movement occurred earlier. If you have seen any such

the specific dates, furnished by western or other scholars, on these

movements from outside to India that will give us a better idea.<== Being an 'arm chair historian', or a 'literary historian', I don't have much knowledge about all that. But I will certainly share any good info I gain, as and when it comes to me. :)Love and regards,Sreenadh , Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya wrote:>> Dear Sreenadhji,> > Nobody claims that outsiders did not come to india India in the past as India was not a fully barricaded country. But what is important is: when did the outsiders come to india? Along with these the earliest date of training of horse in the Teppes are also to be considered. You will find that when these fundamental chronological questions are raised the western scholars shy away or at most give a very vague answer. Only after establishing these chronologies that the scholars should have questioned / challenged the dates of the movement of people from India to outside. The key to the whole question rests on the dates ie when did these movements in either direction occurr, as this alone will help one to ascertain which movement occurred earlier. If you have seen any such the specific dates, furnished by western or other scholars, on these movements from outside to India that will give us a better idea. As regards the antiquity of the> Indian civilisation there are ample astronomical and other data.> > Regards,> > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya> > > --- On Mon, 2/9/09, Sreenadh sreesog wrote:> > Sreenadh sreesog Re:Kambojas as Mlecchas (or Glaschas) vs Conservative Brhamnical (Vedic) people> > Monday, February 9, 2009, 1:00 AM> > Dear Sunil Bhattacharjya ji,> ==>> > I am of the school that believes that though we all came from Africa 40,000 years ago> <==> Yes, that could be true. But considering the ancient Asian interactions it seems that many went from India to outside and many from outside (especially from Russian, Iranian region) came to India as well. Please note that Scythian (Saka; Central Russia), Bactian (Balhika), Tajikistan (Kamboja), Iranian and Afghanistan (Asuras and Pahlava) are all mostly centered around Russia and Iran. I am not in favor of too much Babylonion, Asserian or Semittic (Abraham tribe) interactions with India. Mascidonian Greek interactions lies somewhere in between it seems - not too much, not too less. There is a possibility of ancient Ionian or minnovan interactions than the mascidonian greeks.> ==>> > Ancient texts are full of references showing that people went out of India.> <==> References of the otherway round is also not less. We cannot discard the possibility of modifications and interpretations specially in favor of India as well.> Love and regards,> Sreenadh>