] Re:Kambojas as Mlecchas (or Glaschas) vs Conservative Brhamnical (Vedic) people

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadhji,

 

Nobody claims that outsiders did not come to india India in the past as India

was not a fully barricaded country. But what is important is:  when did the

outsiders come to india? Along with these the  earliest date of training of

horse in the Teppes are also to be considered. You will find that when these

fundamental chronological questions are raised the western scholars shy away or

at most give a very vague answer. Only after  establishing these chronologies

that the scholars should have questioned / challenged  the dates of the movement

of people from India to outside.  The key to the whole question rests on the

dates ie when did these movements in either direction occurr, as this alone will

help one to ascertain which movement occurred earlier. If you have seen any such

the specific dates, furnished by western or other scholars, on these movements

from outside to India that will give us a better idea. As regards the antiquity

of the

Indian civilisation there are ample astronomical and other data.

 

Regards,

 

Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

 

 

--- On Mon, 2/9/09, Sreenadh <sreesog wrote:

 

Sreenadh <sreesog

Re:Kambojas as Mlecchas (or Glaschas) vs

Conservative Brhamnical (Vedic) people

 

Monday, February 9, 2009, 1:00 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sunil Bhattacharjya ji,

==>

> I am of the school that believes that though we all came from Africa 40,000

years ago

<==

  Yes, that could be true.  But considering the ancient Asian interactions it

seems that many went from India to outside and many from outside (especially

from Russian, Iranian region) came to India as well. Please note that  Scythian

(Saka; Central Russia), Bactian (Balhika), Tajikistan (Kamboja), Iranian and

Afghanistan (Asuras and Pahlava) are all mostly centered around Russia and

Iran.  I am not in favor of too much Babylonion, Asserian or Semittic (Abraham

tribe)  interactions with India. Mascidonian Greek interactions lies somewhere

in between it seems - not too much, not too less.  There is a possibility of

ancient Ionian or minnovan interactions than the mascidonian greeks.

==>

> Ancient texts  are full of references showing that people went out of India.

<==

 References of the otherway round is also not less.  We cannot discard the

possibility of modifications and interpretations specially in favor of India as

well.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, Sunil Bhattacharjya

<sunil_bhattacharjya wrote:

>

> Dear Sreenadhji,

>  

> Yes, there is disagreement and the best we can do is to agree to disagree. I

am of the school that believes that though we all came from Africa 40,000 years

ago, all those who went to Europe, before the Ice-age, perished.  After the

Ice-age was over in the 11th millennium BCE, India had the best habitable

climatic conditions in the world, thanks to the strategic location of the

Himalayas in the North , the seas to the south and its nearness to the equator,

all combined.. Patanjali said " Sthiram Sukham Asanam " as one of the

prerequisites for developing concentration. It also follows from the same that

intellectual development also requires a comfortable habitat and India offered

that to its intellectuals . It is because of this that  the People survived and

multiplied in India and  the Arya civilisation flourished in India before any

other civilisation developed in the ancient times, going back upto around

the 10th millennium BCE. Ancient

texts

> are full of references showing that people went out of India. Yayati, an

ancient king who had capital near Prayag (Allahabad), had several children who

left his kingdom and went away to far off places. Parashurama had sent away the

warrior groups like the Sakas from India, in the ancient times. These Sakas did

come back and some historians think that the Sakas are originaslly from outside

of India.

>  

> Regards,

>  

> Sunil K. bhattacharjya

>