Guest guest Posted January 21, 2009 Report Share Posted January 21, 2009 Astrolearner. --- On Wed, 21/1/09, Prashant Pandey <praspandey wrote: Prashant Pandey <praspandey [ind. & West. Astrology] Re: Annual rate of precession of V.E.Point Indian_Astrology_Group_Daily_Digest Wednesday, 21 January, 2009, 6:57 PM Dear Shri Goel Ji, Apart of precession,Nutation can also not be constant as Mo is also going away from earth (increasing its axial distance) due to enegry loss between earth surface and water.Mo's force on earth is not constatnt(Even if we take Mo's orbit as perfectly circular). So any software can't tell the planets position easily if we try to track the planets position in ancient times. Only ancient writtings can tell the exact location of planets if the author was aware of all astronomical parameters. Regs, Prashant Pandey Indian_Astrology_ Group_Daily_ Digest@grou ps.com, Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937@ ...> wrote: > > Dear Friends, > Lahiri's Ephemeris indicates the following rate Precession of VE.Point per year: > per tropical year=50 " . 29 > per sidereal year - 50 " .26 > Nutation in its longitude as on Jan 1, 2009 is +13 " .3 > JH HORA 7.32 does not consider Nutation , which is not the correct way > according to my thinking. > Regards, >  > G.K.GOEL > > > Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Grab now http://in.promos. / address > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger./invite/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2009 Report Share Posted January 21, 2009 Dear Friends, Lahiri's Ephemeris indicates the following rate Precession of VE.Point per year: per tropical year=50" . 29 per sidereal year - 50".26 Nutation in its longitude as on Jan 1, 2009 is +13".3 JH HORA 7.32 does not consider Nutation , which is not the correct way according to my thinking. Regards, G.K..GOEL Get rid of Add-Ons in your email ID. Get yourname. Sign up now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 Dear Prashant ji, No doubt Nutation is not constant and now calculated based according to new equations bases on planets weight, orbit and other influences on the axis of Earth. Lahiri adopts Nutation values as calculates by positional astronomical centres. Regards,  G.K.GOEL Ph: 09350311433 Add: L-409, SARITA VIHAR NEW DELHI-110 076 INDIA ________________________________ Prashant Pandey <praspandey Indian_Astrology_Group_Daily_Digest Thursday, 22 January, 2009 12:27:42 AM [ind. & West. Astrology] Re: Annual rate of precession of V.E.Point Dear Shri Goel Ji, Apart of precession,Nutation can also not be constant as Mo is also going away from earth (increasing its axial distance) due to enegry loss between earth surface and water.Mo's force on earth is not constatnt(Even if we take Mo's orbit as perfectly circular). So any software can't easily tell the planets position easily if we try to track the planets position in ancient times. Only ancient writtings can tell the exact location of planets if the author was aware of all astronomical parameters. Regs, Prashant Pandey Indian_Astrology_ Group_Daily_ Digest@grou ps.com, Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937@ ...> wrote: > > Dear Friends, > Lahiri's Ephemeris indicates the following rate Precession of VE.Point per year: > per tropical year=50 " . 29 > per sidereal year - 50 " .26 > Nutation in its longitude as on Jan 1, 2009 is +13 " .3 > JH HORA 7.32 does not consider Nutation , which is not the correct way > according to my thinking. > Regards, >  > G.K.GOEL > > > Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Grab now http://in.promos. / address > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger./invite/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 Namaste, The statement you made bwlow about JHora 7.32 is incorrect. Jagannatha Hora software does consider nutation when finding planetary positions. Best regards, Narasimha Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org Indian_Astrology_ Group_Daily_ Digest@grou ps.com, Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937@ ...> wrote: > > Dear Friends, > Lahiri's Ephemeris indicates the following rate Precession of VE.Point per year: > per tropical year=50 " . 29 > per sidereal year - 50 " .26 > Nutation in its longitude as on Jan 1, 2009 is +13 " .3 > JH HORA 7.32 does not consider Nutation , which is not the correct way > according to my thinking. > Regards, > Ã, > G.K.GOEL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 Dear Prashant ji, No doubt Nutation is not constant and now calculated based according to new equations bases on planets weight, orbit and other influences on the axis of Earth. Lahiri adopts Nutation values as calculates by positional astronomical centres. Regards, G.K.GOEL Prashant Pandey <praspandeyIndian_Astrology_Group_Daily_Digest Sent: Thursday, 22 January, 2009 12:27:42 AM[ind. & West. Astrology] Re: Annual rate of precession of V.E.Point Dear Shri Goel Ji,Apart of precession,Nutation can also not be constant as Mo is also going away from earth (increasing its axial distance) due to enegry loss between earth surface and water.Mo's force on earth is not constatnt(Even if we take Mo's orbit as perfectly circular).So any software can't easily tell the planets position easily if we try to track the planets position in ancient times.Only ancient writtings can tell the exact location of planets if the author was aware of all astronomical parameters.Regs,Prashant PandeyIndian_Astrology_ Group_Daily_ Digest@grou ps.com, Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937@ ...> wrote:>> Dear Friends,> Lahiri's Ephemeris indicates the following rate Precession of VE.Point per year:> per tropical year=50" . 29> per sidereal year - 50".26> Nutation in its longitude as on Jan 1, 2009 is +13".3> JH HORA 7.32 does not consider Nutation , which is not the correct way> according to my thinking.> Regards,> Â > G.K.GOEL> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 Namaste, The statement you made bwlow about JHora 7.32 is incorrect. Jagannatha Hora software does consider nutation when finding planetary positions. Best regards, Narasimha Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org Indian_Astrology_ Group_Daily_ Digest@grou ps.com, Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937@ ...> wrote: > > Dear Friends, > Lahiri's Ephemeris indicates the following rate Precession of VE.Point per year: > per tropical year=50 " . 29 > per sidereal year - 50 " .26 > Nutation in its longitude as on Jan 1, 2009 is +13 " .3 > JH HORA 7.32 does not consider Nutation , which is not the correct way > according to my thinking. > Regards, > Ã, > G.K.GOEL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.