Guest guest Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 Dear Shri Vinay As long as you do not give me a different method and derivation of vargamshas, there is not much to discuss. When you say it is not based on 30 degrees ,give me the proper derivation. Thats all. Basics/fundamentals. Rest we will discuss afterwards. Pradeep --- Dear Shri Vinay I am neither against you nor your software. It was not a deviation.There was an article on Varga on your website. Regarding ayanamsha i am not an expert to comment with authenticity.I cannot counter your claims unless i study them properly. In the case of shri Chandraharis views, i have supported the moola origin concept due to the reasons already given. Ayanamsha calculation is not simple and involves many assumptions, which can bring in differences.The concept of time and yugas may not be that sinple as we assume.Thus it involves deep study of basics and hence i cannot comment at the moment. Regarding testing ,proof pudding etc - i have expressed my view in the past as well. Unless basics are clear, i do not wish to waste my time.There may be many who wants to build a house first and then demolish it for weak basement. If it is fine with them they may do so. For me building the foundation is of utmost importance before building theories and promulgating them. Others better learned may disagree. Regards Pradeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2009 Report Share Posted January 21, 2009 Dear Pradeepji,Is Vinayji listening? I mean, does he still get our group mails? Regards,Sunil K. Bhattacharjya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2009 Report Share Posted January 21, 2009 Dear Sunil ji, Vinay ji is no more a member o this group. Love and regards, Sreenadh , Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya wrote: > > Dear Pradeepji, > > Is Vinayji listening? I mean, does he still get our group mails? > > Regards, > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > --- On Tue, 1/20/09, vijayadas_pradeep vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > vijayadas_pradeep vijayadas_pradeep > General Replies - Shri Vinay Jha > > Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 2:47 PM > > > > > Dear Shri Vinay > > > > As long as you do not give me a different method and derivation of > > vargamshas, there is not much to discuss. When you say it is not > > based on 30 degrees ,give me the proper derivation. Thats all. > > Basics/fundamentals . > > > > Rest we will discuss afterwards. > > > > Pradeep > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Dear Shri Vinay > > > > I am neither against you nor your software. > > It was not a deviation.There was an article on Varga on your website. > > > > Regarding ayanamsha i am not an expert to comment with authenticity. I > > cannot counter your claims unless i study them properly. In the case > > of shri Chandraharis views, i have supported the moola origin concept > > due to the reasons already given. > > > > Ayanamsha calculation is not simple and involves many assumptions, > > which can bring in differences. The concept of time and yugas may not > > be that sinple as we assume.Thus it involves deep study of basics and > > hence i cannot comment at the moment. > > > > Regarding testing ,proof pudding etc - i have expressed my view in > > the past as well. > > > > Unless basics are clear, i do not wish to waste my time.There may be > > many who wants to build a house first and then demolish it for weak > > basement. If it is fine with them they may do so. For me building the > > foundation is of utmost importance before building theories and > > promulgating them. > > > > Others better learned may disagree. > > > > Regards > > Pradeep > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.