let us get back to discussions

[Guest guest]

Sunil Jee@ & c:

 

Your comments : " in his enthusiasm for the ancient teachings, Vinayji

has shown some disdain for the modern science. "

 

I say that physical astronomy is perfectly true for physical world but

not for non-physical things ; it is not a rejection for for disdain of

modern science.

 

Astrology deals with non-physical deities incidentally bearing same

names as physical planets , and astrology deals with astrological

effects of these daities which is outside the subject matter of modern

science. I know no reputed scienctist in the world accepts astrology

as " scientific " and that is why scientists oppose teaching of

astrology in generak universities. They want to destroy astrology.

Persons like Sunil jee are exceptions who may believe astrology to be

a true branch of knowledge.

 

Astrology cannot be proven to be perfectly true unless it is tested on

the basis of its original mathematics, which Sunil jee interprets as

my disdain for modern science.

 

I could get approval for my work from world's reputed scientific

institutions only through my connections with astrological researches,

so great is disdain for astrology among most of scientists.

 

Before declaring me to be an opponent of modern science, Sunil jee

should have tested my proficiency in his own subject atomic physics,

which was my first love, followed by astronomy, I learnt astrology later.

 

_VJ