Fwd: To AKK (From Tripura Malini)

[Guest guest]

hinducivilization , Tripura Malini

<tripura_malini wrote:

 

Dear Kaul ji,

With my very

limited understanding, I fail to see where the problem is? Whether you

condemn

vedic astrology? or the prefix 'vedic' attached to astrology? or you are

against astrology as a branch of knowledge? Please clarify. I am

confused. Did

you feel better when KN Rao removed 'Vedic' from his predictive

astrology? Now

what do you want us to call it? Rao's Astrology? Every branch of

knowledge has

its origin somewhere in the past. When and where is the origin of

astrology

according to you? Or is it totally baseless? Or there is a foreign

hand which

brought it to India? Please tell us.

I do not know

much about your views as I just responded to one of your mails which

condemned

both astrology and astrologers. Now we must take up issues one by one.

If you

condemn both, no arguments, to each his own… there are many

non-believers and

it is fine with us.

You do seem to

believe in Muhurta. Where does Muhurta have its basis? Use of

astronomy to find

a good time for our activities on earth? So which system do you follow for

muhurta? Indian, Vedic or Greek? Or any other? Or you have propounded

your own

system? Kaul's Muhurta?

Similarly for

the festivals which have our religious sanctity more than any

astronomical or

astrological reasoning, if you want to change the dates, you will have to

become a Dharmguru and create a big force of disciples and command them to

change the dates… that's the only way.

We

are

young minds with a very limited understanding, but very keen on knowing

different aspects of our culture and heritage. Kindly first explain

these

issues one by one so that we can decide which way to go!!

Regards

Tripura

 

 

--- End forwarded message ---