Guest guest Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 Even the Vish Kanya Yoga comes under such a category though mentioned in BPHS (???) . regards/Bhaskar. , " Bhaskar " <rajiventerprises wrote: > > > There ar certain tantric astrological combinations which normally are > kept secretive and not allowed to be known commonly. One boy living near > me has one of these combinations, he is 20 year old boy and he has such > a combination in his chart, that whomever childless couple he blessese > with a child, they will soon have one. When I told this to that young > boy, he laughed it off, and of course his mother , I have already told > her, and also added that his energies must not be wasted in such > blessings to anybody unless important. And she too is not interested. > She does not want her sons spiritual capital to be frettered away or > come in public view. > > Such combinations are there, but we do not have access to them, because > this comes from Vam panthi type of learnings. > > bes wishes, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > , val > galaxyandromeda22@ wrote: > > > > Dear AllI am not a student of Astrology but there was one point in > Sreenathji's answered which rung a bell...Local Panchagram and the > Almanac and main Panchagram differ. For matters on determining the Lagna > and the position of the star at birth, which is pure mathematics, the > slightest decimal point can strictly make a difference. Even in my case, > the time I was born though noted down by my Grandfather 0748 hrs in the > morning, sunrise time 9600AM in Madras, General Hospital. varied, from > the head appearing which is supposed to be the correct time...You can > check it out from my details which I enclose herewith..anyone from > Madras can verify the latitude and longitude of the General Hospital > which stands there to date...Name: Nayanika Jayaram [nee]Time of birth: > 0748 AM  [sunrise 0600 AM]Place of birth: Madras General Hospital, > Tamil NaduDate of birth: 22nd of September, 1948Ascendant: Mahabharani > NakshatramI also had one very significant Trikhon..which > > was unique and singular to this horoscope...A reading done by the > family Pundit who knew basic astrology said that the protection of the > Gods in my life will make me survive the worst ordeals..Much later , in > fact a few years back when I checked my Nadi Astrology from Bangalore, > Agasthya Nadi Jyothishar.. he read out the names of the Gods from my > scroll...and asked me for my blessing...which made me feel rather > abashed to say the least...Recollecting the treatment meted out to me by > my Russian husband who is still pestering me, after he asked and secured > the divorce to bed and possibly wed another woman, when the essence of > what makes and is a woman, central to the very being of who we are as > Super consciousness', completely and totally defeats them, since they do > not understand them in so many lives!!!!!Just sharing what came after my > meditations and my tryst with my MakerNamaskaramAvadhuta chintana Sri > Guru Deva Datta Digambaraa Digambaraa Sripada > > Vallabha Digambaraa Sri Datta Saranam Mama With pranams at Sri Datta's > feet,--- On Fri, 7/11/08, Sreenadh sreesog@ wrote:Sreenadh > sreesog: Re: Help in casting a > horoscope@: Friday, 7 November, 2008, > 3:17 PMDear All,  Considering approximate sign arc lengths to arrive > at the possible Lagna is just like assuming that, a sign is equal to 2 > hours. In this case the date was May 18. That meas sun was at the > beginning of Taurus sign. The BT in Khatika was 38/45, which is > equal to 15 hours 30 min.   If we allot 2 hours each to > signs Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra and Scorpio > (total 7 signs) we get 2 x 7 = 14 hours. Naturally we may assume > that possibly the Lagna is the next sign Sagittarius. (14+2 = 16 > hours. 15 hrs 30 min is within this) We may assume that the astrologer > who put Sagittarius as Lagna might be correct.   But > > when we really calculate, it reveals to us that the above > approximation was wrong, and that after 15 hrs 30 min from sunrise (5.32 > for that day in Delhi), in reality the Lagna was in Scorpio. > Yes, this is a common mistake - that even the astrologer who casted the > chart also might have committed.    I won't blame the > astrologer who prepared the chart. Usually in villages it happens > that the native comes to the astrologer for a chart and would be ready > to pay just 10 or 20 rupees only for preparing the same. The > astrologer too would not like to spend much time on those charts and so > will take the planetary position using some Panchanga (ephemeris) > locally available. He did not had access to computers etc as we > have today which gives the correct planetary position and other details > at our finger tips. They had to calculate everything manually. With > such feeble payment and considering the effort involved in doing the > detailed > > calculation, usually the astrologer will resort to approximation. > Even when he does know how to calculate and arrive at correct values, if > will feel that it is not required or useless, and will provide an > approximation to the native and will give a primary ready. This makes > both the native and astrologer happy for the moment. And the usual > end result? That is what we have seen just now. That is what even I > will do, if I was not paid enough for my efforts, or if I don't have > time Ц while working as a professional astrologer. There fore I > won't blame the astrologer (Pandit) involved for this mistake in > calculating Lagna.  Love and regards,Sreenadh--- In ancient_indian_ > astrology, " Sreenadh " sreesog@ wrote:>> Dear Nirmal > ji,> That was good demonstration of the method of arriving at Lagna > using> the approximate Arc length assigned to each Signs.> Note to all: > This method may not give correct lagna at times, and is> only > > approximate, due to the approximation involved.> Love and regards,> > Sreenadh> > ancient_indian_ astrology, " Nirmal > Kumar Bhardwaj " > nirbhar@ wrote:> >> > Respected Vinay Ji> >> > There is > a calculation mistake> >> > //in case of may-= 4+5+6+6+6+6+ 6+2.45 > =38.45 ghatis respectively the> > speed of lagna for Vrishabh,Mithuna, > karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra,> > Scorpio, Dhanu//> >> > This should be> >> > > in case of may-=4+5+6+6+ 6+6+5.45 =38.45 ghatis respectively the speed> > > of lagna for Vrishabh,Mithuna, karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra, Scorpio> >> > > So Lagna Should be Scorpio not Dhanu As stated earlier.> >> > Thanks for > bearing me for this mistake> >> > Regards> >> > Nirmal> >> > --- In > ancient_indian_ astrology, " Nirmal Kumar> > Bhardwaj " > nirbhar@ wrote:> > >> > > Respected Vinayji> > >> > > ///According to > the hand made horoscope, the Nakshatra is Rohini in> > its 3rd> > > > Charana, and the Lagna is Dhan. It also says > > Jyestha month> рд╕рдâ " рддреЗ> > ( guess it> > > > means Shukla)' paksha, Tithi is 1||2|рд╣реЗ :> > рдкрдâ–`реÐрддрд╛ 2, Ghati is 38/45. I> > > > attach with this mail copy of the hand written one for your> > > reference///> > >> > > I try to analyze by traditional method :> > >> > > > In jyeshtha Sun remain in Tauras sign. As per the position> > > explained by him> > > It is the birth of near amavas. Most probably Moon > will be within> > 2-3> > > nakshatra of Sun. As per details given Moon > is Tauras. In Jyeshtha> > Ammavas> > > normally falls near 15-16 th may> > > >> > > Let us verify with other factors> > >> > > Ghatis are 38.45 > this means this will> > >> > > in case of may-= 4+5+6+6+6+6+ 6+2.45 > =38.45 ghatis respectively the> > speed of> > > lagna for > Vrishabh,Mithuna, karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra, Scorpio, Dhanu> > >> > > The > birth shall be near 14th 15th or 16th may as Rohini Nakshatra> > is in> > > > tauras.> > >> > > Your Lagna may > > be Dhanu as per traditional method> > >> > > Regards> > >> > > Nirmal> > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 Sir, It appears that the learned Pundit who cast this horoscope assigned the Lagna after consulting the Lagna Sarini for Delhi on that date. Assigning the Ascendant through the Lagna Sarini was a very common practice before the computers arrived at the scene. The Lagna Sarini of Vishwa Vijay Panchang shows that at Delhi on May 18th the Dhanu lagna will rise at 21:01 and will set at 23:04 Since the time of birth works out to be : Sun rise at 5:33 am and the time of birth 15hrs 30 minutes after sun rise = 21 : 03 hrs therefore assigning Dhanu as the lagna would be quite justified. Through the computer with Lahiri ayanansh the lagna works out at 0Sg03 The Mars is at 0Vi09 at the time of birth. Since the learned pundit didn’t have a computer it would be quite possible for him to think that the Mars is still in Leo and therefore he placed it along with Saturn in Leo. Of course at 21: 3 hrs on May 18th,1950 the moon is in the 4th qtr of Rohini and not in the 3rd qtr. Sincerely, S P Khurana , " Sreenadh " <sreesog wrote: > > > Dear Vinay ji, > The Birth Time is given as 38 Khati 45 Vikahti after Sunrise. The > date is 18th May 1950 and the Sunrise time for that date in Delhi is > 5.32. Khati 38/45 transilates to 15 hours 30 minutes after sunrise. > That means the Birth Time is 9.02 PM at night. Thus - > > The correct DOB : 18th May 1950; 9.02 PM Dellhi. > > With this data, I casted the chart for that date using True Ayanamsa > (46 more than Lahari - i.e. Chandrahari Ayanamsa). The details > generated by JHora is given below - > > May 18, 1950 > > Time: 9:02:03 pm > > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) > > Place: 77 E 12' 00 " , 28 N 36' 00 " > > New Delhi, India > > Altitude: 0.00 meters > > > > Lunar Yr-Mo: Vikriti - Jyeshtha > > Tithi: Sukla Dwitiya (Mo) (53.04% left) > > Vedic Weekday: Thursday (Ju) > > Nakshatra: Rohini (Mo) (18.81% left) > > Yoga: Sukarman (Ma) (69.87% left) > > Karana: Balava (Mo) (6.09% left) > > Hora Lord: Mars (5 min sign: Vi) > > Mahakala Hora: Jupiter (5 min sign: Le) > > Kaala Lord: Sun (Mahakala: Sun) > > > > Sunrise: 5:33:17 am > > Sunset: 7:02:02 pm > > Janma Ghatis: 38.6986 > > > > Ayanamsa: 23-55-50.36 > > Sidereal Time: 12:23:50 > Body Longitude Nakshatra Pada Rasi Navamsa > > > > Lagna 29 Sc 05' 34.36 " Jye 4 Sc Pi > > Sun - DK 3 Ta 11' 28.04 " Krit 2 Ta Cp > > Moon - BK 20 Ta 49' 33.39 " Rohi 4 Ta Cn > > Mars - AK 29 Le 23' 47.98 " UPha 1 Le Sg > > Mercury ® - AmK 27 Ar 12' 18.43 " Krit 1 Ar Sg > > Jupiter - GK 11 Aq 08' 46.50 " Sata 2 Aq Cp > > Venus - MK 20 Pi 16' 31.74 " Reva 2 Pi Cp > > Saturn - PK 18 Le 39' 33.14 " PPha 2 Le Vi > > Rahu - PiK 10 Pi 53' 37.00 " UBha 3 Pi Li > > Ketu 10 Vi 53' 37.00 " Hast 1 Vi Ar > > The details tallies with what you said - > > Aries - Mercury > Taurus - Sun & Moon > Leo - Saturn & Mars > Virgo - Ketu > Aquarious - Jupiter > Pisces - Venus & Rahu > Laga - Scorpio (and NOT Sagetterious) > Nakshatra - Rohini > > Note: Please note that Since Birth time is available and given in the > horoscope (as Khati 38/45), this info itself is important rather than > the other information given in the chart. > Love and regards, > Sreenadh > > > > , " Vinay Gakkhar. " > <vgakkhar@> wrote: > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji, > > Dear Sreenadh ji, > > > > So nice of you both in trying to help. > > > > According to the hand made horoscope, the Nakshatra is Rohini in its > 3rd > > Charana, and the Lagna is Dhan. It also says Jyestha month > सिते ( guess it > > means Shukla)' paksha, Tithi is 1||2|हे : परà¥à¤¤à¤¾ > 2, Ghati is 38/45. I > > attach with this mail copy of the hand written one for your reference. > > > > According to a learned senior who tried to help, the correct date & > time > > should be 20.58.20 hrs on 18th May 1950 in Delhi. But if I take that > time > > & date I find that the Nakshatra Rohini was at that time in its 4th > > Charana, and also that Mars would then be in the 5th House instead of > > being in the 6th House as in the hand made chart. > > > > I do not know how important it is that the chart and the details > should > > both tally, but logically they both should. So I guess the timing > 20.58.20 > > hrs on 18th May 1950 in Delhi or the timing 21.13 hrs same day & place > > which I have so far been considering to be true, or the time 19.30 hrs > on > > 14 May 1950 at Delhi which I have been considering true since my early > age > > are all wrong because none of these give Rohini in 3rd Charana and > none of > > these have Mars in 6th House as is in the hand made chart. > > > > Now, over to you learned ones. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Vinay > > > > > > On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:32:32 +0530, Sreenadh sreesog@ wrote: > > > > > Dear Vinay, > > > Bhaskar ji is right. Provide the Nakshatra at the time of birth > (this > > > will fix the day), and Lagna (this will fix the time in a 2 hour > span) > > > as well. Any other info present in the hand made chart you have such > as > > > Tithi, Nitya yoga, Karana etc or the information available on > Navamsa > > > prositions are welcome. All this will help to locate the time of > birth. > > > Love and regards, > > > Sreenadh > > > > > > , " Bhaskar " > > > rajiventerprises@ wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> The positions are okay for mid of May , but from wherever you have > > >> copied this, obviously from a hand made chart, you should ask a > pundit > > >> and tell us the Lagna, in order to fix the app. time of birth for > you. > > >> > > >> regards/Bhaskar. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> , " Vinay Gakkhar. " > > >> vgakkhar@ wrote: > > >> > > > >> > I need help of senior knowledgeable members in correctly finding > > >> correct > > >> > date & time of birth based on the following informations: > > >> > > > >> > 1st House - Mercury > > >> > 2nd House - Sun & Moon > > >> > 5th House - Saturn & Mars > > >> > 6th House - Ketu > > >> > 11th House - Jupiter > > >> > 12th House - Venus & Rahu > > >> > Place of Birth: Delhi > > >> > Year of Birth: 1950 > > >> > Month: Either April or May > > >> > Date & time: Unknown, to be found > > >> > > > >> > Can someone please help me. > > >> > > > >> > Thank you & best regards, > > >> > > > >> > Vinay > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 Dear Bhaskar ji, Does the young man have his Ketu in the 9th house? One of the dictums of the Lal Kitab for Ketu in the 9th house says : shukhan beta lavaldi dete, hukum vidhata hota ho If a person with ketu in the 9th gives an aasheervad to a childless couple of having a child, it will be like a hukum from vidhata. Of course these dictums are subject to other planetary placements in the janma Kundali. The dictum is likely to come true if the Ketu is well placed in the 9th house and not afflicted. Sincerely, S P Khurana , " Bhaskar " <rajiventerprises wrote: > > > There ar certain tantric astrological combinations which normally are > kept secretive and not allowed to be known commonly. One boy living near > me has one of these combinations, he is 20 year old boy and he has such > a combination in his chart, that whomever childless couple he blessese > with a child, they will soon have one. When I told this to that young > boy, he laughed it off, and of course his mother , I have already told > her, and also added that his energies must not be wasted in such > blessings to anybody unless important. And she too is not interested. > She does not want her sons spiritual capital to be frettered away or > come in public view. > > Such combinations are there, but we do not have access to them, because > this comes from Vam panthi type of learnings. > > bes wishes, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > , val > <galaxyandromeda22@> wrote: > > > > Dear AllI am not a student of Astrology but there was one point in > Sreenathji's answered which rung a bell...Local Panchagram and the > Almanac and main Panchagram differ. For matters on determining the Lagna > and the position of the star at birth, which is pure mathematics, the > slightest decimal point can strictly make a difference. Even in my case, > the time I was born though noted down by my Grandfather 0748 hrs in the > morning, sunrise time 9600AM in Madras, General Hospital. varied, from > the head appearing which is supposed to be the correct time...You can > check it out from my details which I enclose herewith..anyone from > Madras can verify the latitude and longitude of the General Hospital > which stands there to date...Name: Nayanika Jayaram [nee]Time of birth: > 0748 AM � [sunrise 0600 AM]Place of birth: Madras General Hospital, > Tamil NaduDate of birth: 22nd of September, 1948Ascendant: Mahabharani > NakshatramI also had one very significant Trikhon..which > > was unique and singular to this horoscope...A reading done by the > family Pundit who knew basic astrology said that the protection of the > Gods in my life will make me survive the worst ordeals..Much later , in > fact a few years back when I checked my Nadi Astrology from Bangalore, > Agasthya Nadi Jyothishar.. he read out the names of the Gods from my > scroll...and asked me for my blessing...which made me feel rather > abashed to say the least...Recollecting the treatment meted out to me by > my Russian husband who is still pestering me, after he asked and secured > the divorce to bed and possibly wed another woman, when the essence of > what makes and is a woman, central to the very being of who we are as > Super consciousness', completely and totally defeats them, since they do > not understand them in so many lives!!!!!Just sharing what came after my > meditations and my tryst with my MakerNamaskaramAvadhuta chintana Sri > Guru Deva Datta Digambaraa Digambaraa Sripada > > Vallabha Digambaraa Sri Datta Saranam Mama With pranams at Sri Datta's > feet,--- On Fri, 7/11/08, Sreenadh sreesog@ wrote:Sreenadh > sreesog: Re: Help in casting a > horoscope@: Friday, 7 November, 2008, > 3:17 PMDear All, � Considering approximate sign arc lengths to arrive > at the possible Lagna is just like assuming that, a sign is equal to 2 > hours.� In this case the date was May 18. That meas sun was at the > beginning of Taurus sign.� The BT in Khatika was 38/45, which is > equal to 15 hours 30 min.� � � If we allot 2 hours each to > signs Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo,� Libra and Scorpio� > (total 7 signs) we get 2 x 7 = 14 hours.� Naturally we may assume > that� possibly the Lagna� is the next sign Sagittarius. (14+2 = 16 > hours. 15 hrs 30 min is within this) We may assume that the astrologer > who put� Sagittarius as Lagna might be correct. � � But > > when we� really calculate,� it reveals to us that the above > approximation was wrong, and that after 15 hrs 30 min from sunrise (5.32 > for that day in Delhi), in reality the� Lagna was� in Scorpio.� > Yes, this is a common mistake - that even the astrologer who casted the > chart also might have committed. � � � I won't blame the > astrologer who prepared the chart.� Usually in villages it happens > that the native comes to the astrologer for a chart and would be ready > to pay just 10 or 20 rupees only for preparing the same.� The > astrologer too would not like to spend much time on those charts and so > will take the planetary position using some Panchanga (ephemeris) > locally available.� He did not had access to computers etc as we > have today which gives the correct planetary position and other details > at our finger tips.� They had to calculate everything manually. With > such feeble payment� and considering the effort involved in doing the > detailed > > calculation,� usually the astrologer will resort to approximation. > Even when he does know how to calculate and arrive at correct values, if > will feel that it is not required or useless, and will provide an > approximation to the native and will give a primary ready. This makes > both the native and astrologer happy� for the moment. And the usual > end result? That is what we have seen just now. That is what even I > will do, if I was not paid enough for my efforts, or if I don't have > time Ц while working as a professional astrologer. There fore I > won't blame the astrologer (Pandit) involved for this mistake in > calculating Lagna. � Love and regards,Sreenadh--- In ancient_indian_ > astrology, " Sreenadh " sreesog@ wrote:>> Dear Nirmal > ji,> That was good demonstration of the method of arriving at Lagna > using> the approximate Arc length assigned to each Signs.> Note to all: > This method may not give correct lagna at times, and is> only > > approximate, due to the approximation involved.> Love and regards,> > Sreenadh> > ancient_indian_ astrology@ . com, " Nirmal > Kumar Bhardwaj " > nirbhar@ wrote:> >> > Respected Vinay Ji> >> > There is > a calculation mistake> >> > //in case of may-= 4+5+6+6+6+6+ 6+2.45 > =38.45 ghatis respectively the> > speed of lagna for Vrishabh,Mithuna, > karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra,> > Scorpio, Dhanu//> >> > This should be> >> > > in case of may-=4+5+6+6+ 6+6+5.45 =38.45 ghatis respectively the speed> > > of lagna for Vrishabh,Mithuna, karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra, Scorpio> >> > > So Lagna Should be Scorpio not Dhanu As stated earlier.> >> > Thanks for > bearing me for this mistake> >> > Regards> >> > Nirmal> >> > --- In > ancient_indian_ astrology, " Nirmal Kumar> > Bhardwaj " > nirbhar@ wrote:> > >> > > Respected Vinayji> > >> > > ///According to > the hand made horoscope, the Nakshatra is Rohini in> > its 3rd> > > > Charana, and the Lagna is Dhan. It also says > > Jyestha month> рд╕рд� " �рддреЗ> > ( guess it> > > > means Shukla)' paksha, Tithi is 1||2|рд╣реЗ :> > рдкрд��`реÐрддрд╛ 2, Ghati is 38/45. I> > > > attach with this mail copy of the hand written one for your> > > reference///> > >> > > I try to analyze by traditional method :> > >> > > > In jyeshtha Sun remain in Tauras sign. As per the position> > > explained by him> > > It is the birth of near amavas. Most probably Moon > will be within> > 2-3> > > nakshatra of Sun. As per details given Moon > is Tauras. In Jyeshtha> > Ammavas> > > normally falls near 15-16 th may> > > >> > > Let us verify with other factors> > >> > > Ghatis are 38.45 > this means this will> > >> > > in case of may-= 4+5+6+6+6+6+ 6+2.45 > =38.45 ghatis respectively the> > speed of> > > lagna for > Vrishabh,Mithuna, karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra, Scorpio, Dhanu> > >> > > The > birth shall be near 14th 15th or 16th may as Rohini Nakshatra> > is in> > > > tauras.> > >> > > Your Lagna may > > be Dhanu as per traditional method> > >> > > Regards> > >> > > Nirmal> > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 Dear All,Can anyone throw some light on Mahabharni Nakshatram? Is there any special position (degree or otherwise) when Bharni becomes MAHAN. Or is it just a case of calling lakshmi as mahalakshmi? Would be grateful for views.RegardsNeelam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 Dear Khurana ji, Yes he does have an uhnafflicted Ketu in the 9th. regards, Bhaskar. , " khurana_satpal " <khurana_satpal wrote: > > Dear Bhaskar ji, > > Does the young man have his Ketu in the 9th house? One of the dictums > of the Lal Kitab for Ketu in the 9th house says : > > shukhan beta lavaldi dete, hukum vidhata hota ho > > If a person with ketu in the 9th gives an aasheervad to a childless > couple of having a child, it will be like a hukum from vidhata. > > Of course these dictums are subject to other planetary placements in > the janma Kundali. The dictum is likely to come true if the Ketu is > well placed in the 9th house and not afflicted. > > Sincerely, > > S P Khurana > > > , " Bhaskar " > rajiventerprises@ wrote: > > > > > > There ar certain tantric astrological combinations which normally > are > > kept secretive and not allowed to be known commonly. One boy living > near > > me has one of these combinations, he is 20 year old boy and he has > such > > a combination in his chart, that whomever childless couple he > blessese > > with a child, they will soon have one. When I told this to that > young > > boy, he laughed it off, and of course his mother , I have already > told > > her, and also added that his energies must not be wasted in such > > blessings to anybody unless important. And she too is not > interested. > > She does not want her sons spiritual capital to be frettered away or > > come in public view. > > > > Such combinations are there, but we do not have access to them, > because > > this comes from Vam panthi type of learnings. > > > > bes wishes, > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > , val > > <galaxyandromeda22@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear AllI am not a student of Astrology but there was one point in > > Sreenathji's answered which rung a bell...Local Panchagram and the > > Almanac and main Panchagram differ. For matters on determining the > Lagna > > and the position of the star at birth, which is pure mathematics, > the > > slightest decimal point can strictly make a difference. Even in my > case, > > the time I was born though noted down by my Grandfather 0748 hrs in > the > > morning, sunrise time 9600AM in Madras, General Hospital. varied, > from > > the head appearing which is supposed to be the correct time...You > can > > check it out from my details which I enclose herewith..anyone from > > Madras can verify the latitude and longitude of the General Hospital > > which stands there to date...Name: Nayanika Jayaram [nee]Time of > birth: > > 0748 AM � [sunrise 0600 AM]Place of birth: Madras General Hospital, > > Tamil NaduDate of birth: 22nd of September, 1948Ascendant: > Mahabharani > > NakshatramI also had one very significant Trikhon..which > > > was unique and singular to this horoscope...A reading done by the > > family Pundit who knew basic astrology said that the protection of > the > > Gods in my life will make me survive the worst ordeals..Much > later , in > > fact a few years back when I checked my Nadi Astrology from > Bangalore, > > Agasthya Nadi Jyothishar.. he read out the names of the Gods from my > > scroll...and asked me for my blessing...which made me feel rather > > abashed to say the least...Recollecting the treatment meted out to > me by > > my Russian husband who is still pestering me, after he asked and > secured > > the divorce to bed and possibly wed another woman, when the essence > of > > what makes and is a woman, central to the very being of who we are > as > > Super consciousness', completely and totally defeats them, since > they do > > not understand them in so many lives!!!!!Just sharing what came > after my > > meditations and my tryst with my MakerNamaskaramAvadhuta chintana > Sri > > Guru Deva Datta Digambaraa Digambaraa Sripada > > > Vallabha Digambaraa Sri Datta Saranam Mama With pranams at Sri > Datta's > > feet,--- On Fri, 7/11/08, Sreenadh sreesog@ wrote:Sreenadh > > sreesog@: Re: Help in casting a > > horoscope@: Friday, 7 November, 2008, > > 3:17 PMDear All, � Considering approximate sign arc lengths to > arrive > > at the possible Lagna is just like assuming that, a sign is equal > to 2 > > hours.� In this case the date was May 18. That meas sun was at the > > beginning of Taurus sign.� The BT in Khatika was 38/45, which is > > equal to 15 hours 30 min.� � � If we allot 2 hours each to > > signs Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo,� Libra and Scorpio� > > (total 7 signs) we get 2 x 7 = 14 hours.� Naturally we may assume > > that� possibly the Lagna� is the next sign Sagittarius. (14+2 = 16 > > hours. 15 hrs 30 min is within this) We may assume that the > astrologer > > who put� Sagittarius as Lagna might be correct. � � But > > > when we� really calculate,� it reveals to us that the above > > approximation was wrong, and that after 15 hrs 30 min from sunrise > (5.32 > > for that day in Delhi), in reality the� Lagna was� in Scorpio.� > > Yes, this is a common mistake - that even the astrologer who casted > the > > chart also might have committed. � � � I won't blame the > > astrologer who prepared the chart.� Usually in villages it happens > > that the native comes to the astrologer for a chart and would be > ready > > to pay just 10 or 20 rupees only for preparing the same.� The > > astrologer too would not like to spend much time on those charts > and so > > will take the planetary position using some Panchanga (ephemeris) > > locally available.� He did not had access to computers etc as we > > have today which gives the correct planetary position and other > details > > at our finger tips.� They had to calculate everything manually. > With > > such feeble payment� and considering the effort involved in doing > the > > detailed > > > calculation,� usually the astrologer will resort to > approximation. > > Even when he does know how to calculate and arrive at correct > values, if > > will feel that it is not required or useless, and will provide an > > approximation to the native and will give a primary ready. This > makes > > both the native and astrologer happy� for the moment. And the usual > > end result? That is what we have seen just now. That is what > even I > > will do, if I was not paid enough for my efforts, or if I don't have > > time Ц while working as a professional astrologer. There fore I > > won't blame the astrologer (Pandit) involved for this mistake in > > calculating Lagna. � Love and regards,Sreenadh--- In > ancient_indian_ > > astrology, " Sreenadh " sreesog@ wrote:>> Dear > Nirmal > > ji,> That was good demonstration of the method of arriving at Lagna > > using> the approximate Arc length assigned to each Signs.> Note to > all: > > This method may not give correct lagna at times, and is> only > > > approximate, due to the approximation involved.> Love and > regards,> > > Sreenadh> > ancient_indian_ astrology@ . > com, " Nirmal > > Kumar Bhardwaj " > nirbhar@ wrote:> >> > Respected Vinay Ji> >> > > There is > > a calculation mistake> >> > //in case of may-= 4+5+6+6+6+6+ 6+2.45 > > =38.45 ghatis respectively the> > speed of lagna for > Vrishabh,Mithuna, > > karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra,> > Scorpio, Dhanu//> >> > This should be> > >> > > > in case of may-=4+5+6+6+ 6+6+5.45 =38.45 ghatis respectively the > speed> > > > of lagna for Vrishabh,Mithuna, karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra, Scorpio> > >> > > > So Lagna Should be Scorpio not Dhanu As stated earlier.> >> > > Thanks for > > bearing me for this mistake> >> > Regards> >> > Nirmal> >> > --- In > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " Nirmal Kumar> > > Bhardwaj " > > nirbhar@ wrote:> > >> > > Respected Vinayji> > >> > > ///According > to > > the hand made horoscope, the Nakshatra is Rohini in> > its 3rd> > > > > Charana, and the Lagna is Dhan. It also says > > > Jyestha month> рд╕рд� " �рддреЗ> > ( guess it> > > > > means Shukla)' paksha, Tithi is 1||2|рд╣реЗ :> > > рдкрд��`реÐрддрд╛ 2, Ghati is 38/45. I> > > > > attach with this mail copy of the hand written one for your> > > > reference///> > >> > > I try to analyze by traditional method :> > > >> > > > > In jyeshtha Sun remain in Tauras sign. As per the position> > > > explained by him> > > It is the birth of near amavas. Most probably > Moon > > will be within> > 2-3> > > nakshatra of Sun. As per details given > Moon > > is Tauras. In Jyeshtha> > Ammavas> > > normally falls near 15-16 th > may> > > > >> > > Let us verify with other factors> > >> > > Ghatis are 38.45 > > this means this will> > >> > > in case of may-= 4+5+6+6+6+6+ 6+2.45 > > =38.45 ghatis respectively the> > speed of> > > lagna for > > Vrishabh,Mithuna, karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra, Scorpio, Dhanu> > >> > > > The > > birth shall be near 14th 15th or 16th may as Rohini Nakshatra> > is > in> > > > > tauras.> > >> > > Your Lagna may > > > be Dhanu as per traditional method> > >> > > Regards> > >> > > > Nirmal> > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 Dear Bhaskar ji, Thank you for confirming the fact. Regards, S P Khurana , " Bhaskar " <rajiventerprises wrote: > > > Dear Khurana ji, > > Yes he does have an uhnafflicted Ketu in the 9th. > > regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > , " khurana_satpal " > <khurana_satpal@> wrote: > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji, > > > > Does the young man have his Ketu in the 9th house? One of the dictums > > of the Lal Kitab for Ketu in the 9th house says : > > > > shukhan beta lavaldi dete, hukum vidhata hota ho > > > > If a person with ketu in the 9th gives an aasheervad to a childless > > couple of having a child, it will be like a hukum from vidhata. > > > > Of course these dictums are subject to other planetary placements in > > the janma Kundali. The dictum is likely to come true if the Ketu is > > well placed in the 9th house and not afflicted. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > S P Khurana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Bhaskar " > > rajiventerprises@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > There ar certain tantric astrological combinations which normally > > are > > > kept secretive and not allowed to be known commonly. One boy living > > near > > > me has one of these combinations, he is 20 year old boy and he has > > such > > > a combination in his chart, that whomever childless couple he > > blessese > > > with a child, they will soon have one. When I told this to that > > young > > > boy, he laughed it off, and of course his mother , I have already > > told > > > her, and also added that his energies must not be wasted in such > > > blessings to anybody unless important. And she too is not > > interested. > > > She does not want her sons spiritual capital to be frettered away or > > > come in public view. > > > > > > Such combinations are there, but we do not have access to them, > > because > > > this comes from Vam panthi type of learnings. > > > > > > bes wishes, > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , val > > > <galaxyandromeda22@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear AllI am not a student of Astrology but there was one point in > > > Sreenathji's answered which rung a bell...Local Panchagram and the > > > Almanac and main Panchagram differ. For matters on determining the > > Lagna > > > and the position of the star at birth, which is pure mathematics, > > the > > > slightest decimal point can strictly make a difference. Even in my > > case, > > > the time I was born though noted down by my Grandfather 0748 hrs in > > the > > > morning, sunrise time 9600AM in Madras, General Hospital. varied, > > from > > > the head appearing which is supposed to be the correct time...You > > can > > > check it out from my details which I enclose herewith..anyone from > > > Madras can verify the latitude and longitude of the General Hospital > > > which stands there to date...Name: Nayanika Jayaram [nee]Time of > > birth: > > > 0748 AM � [sunrise 0600 AM]Place of birth: Madras General > Hospital, > > > Tamil NaduDate of birth: 22nd of September, 1948Ascendant: > > Mahabharani > > > NakshatramI also had one very significant Trikhon..which > > > > was unique and singular to this horoscope...A reading done by the > > > family Pundit who knew basic astrology said that the protection of > > the > > > Gods in my life will make me survive the worst ordeals..Much > > later , in > > > fact a few years back when I checked my Nadi Astrology from > > Bangalore, > > > Agasthya Nadi Jyothishar.. he read out the names of the Gods from my > > > scroll...and asked me for my blessing...which made me feel rather > > > abashed to say the least...Recollecting the treatment meted out to > > me by > > > my Russian husband who is still pestering me, after he asked and > > secured > > > the divorce to bed and possibly wed another woman, when the essence > > of > > > what makes and is a woman, central to the very being of who we are > > as > > > Super consciousness', completely and totally defeats them, since > > they do > > > not understand them in so many lives!!!!!Just sharing what came > > after my > > > meditations and my tryst with my MakerNamaskaramAvadhuta chintana > > Sri > > > Guru Deva Datta Digambaraa Digambaraa Sripada > > > > Vallabha Digambaraa Sri Datta Saranam Mama With pranams at Sri > > Datta's > > > feet,--- On Fri, 7/11/08, Sreenadh sreesog@ wrote:Sreenadh > > > sreesog@: Re: Help in casting a > > > horoscope@: Friday, 7 November, 2008, > > > 3:17 PMDear All, � Considering approximate sign arc lengths to > > arrive > > > at the possible Lagna is just like assuming that, a sign is equal > > to 2 > > > hours.� In this case the date was May 18. That meas sun was at > the > > > beginning of Taurus sign.� The BT in Khatika was 38/45, which > is > > > equal to 15 hours 30 min.� � � If we allot 2 hours > each to > > > signs Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo,� Libra and > Scorpio� > > > (total 7 signs) we get 2 x 7 = 14 hours.� Naturally we may > assume > > > that� possibly the Lagna� is the next sign Sagittarius. > (14+2 = 16 > > > hours. 15 hrs 30 min is within this) We may assume that the > > astrologer > > > who put� Sagittarius as Lagna might be correct. � � > But > > > > when we� really calculate,� it reveals to us that the > above > > > approximation was wrong, and that after 15 hrs 30 min from sunrise > > (5.32 > > > for that day in Delhi), in reality the� Lagna was� in > Scorpio.� > > > Yes, this is a common mistake - that even the astrologer who casted > > the > > > chart also might have committed. � � � I won't blame > the > > > astrologer who prepared the chart.� Usually in villages it > happens > > > that the native comes to the astrologer for a chart and would be > > ready > > > to pay just 10 or 20 rupees only for preparing the same.� The > > > astrologer too would not like to spend much time on those charts > > and so > > > will take the planetary position using some Panchanga (ephemeris) > > > locally available.� He did not had access to computers etc as > we > > > have today which gives the correct planetary position and other > > details > > > at our finger tips.� They had to calculate everything manually. > > With > > > such feeble payment� and considering the effort involved in > doing > > the > > > detailed > > > > calculation,� usually the astrologer will resort to > > approximation. > > > Even when he does know how to calculate and arrive at correct > > values, if > > > will feel that it is not required or useless, and will provide an > > > approximation to the native and will give a primary ready. This > > makes > > > both the native and astrologer happy� for the moment. And the > usual > > > end result? That is what we have seen just now. That is what > > even I > > > will do, if I was not paid enough for my efforts, or if I don't have > > > time Ц while working as a professional astrologer. There fore I > > > won't blame the astrologer (Pandit) involved for this mistake in > > > calculating Lagna. � Love and regards,Sreenadh--- In > > ancient_indian_ > > > astrology, " Sreenadh " sreesog@ wrote:>> Dear > > Nirmal > > > ji,> That was good demonstration of the method of arriving at Lagna > > > using> the approximate Arc length assigned to each Signs.> Note to > > all: > > > This method may not give correct lagna at times, and is> only > > > > approximate, due to the approximation involved.> Love and > > regards,> > > > Sreenadh> > ancient_indian_ astrology@ . > > com, " Nirmal > > > Kumar Bhardwaj " > nirbhar@ wrote:> >> > Respected Vinay Ji> >> > > > There is > > > a calculation mistake> >> > //in case of may-= 4+5+6+6+6+6+ 6+2.45 > > > =38.45 ghatis respectively the> > speed of lagna for > > Vrishabh,Mithuna, > > > karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra,> > Scorpio, Dhanu//> >> > This should be> > > >> > > > > in case of may-=4+5+6+6+ 6+6+5.45 =38.45 ghatis respectively the > > speed> > > > > of lagna for Vrishabh,Mithuna, karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra, Scorpio> > > >> > > > > So Lagna Should be Scorpio not Dhanu As stated earlier.> >> > > > Thanks for > > > bearing me for this mistake> >> > Regards> >> > Nirmal> >> > --- In > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, " Nirmal Kumar> > > > Bhardwaj " > > > nirbhar@ wrote:> > >> > > Respected Vinayji> > >> > > ///According > > to > > > the hand made horoscope, the Nakshatra is Rohini in> > its 3rd> > > > > > Charana, and the Lagna is Dhan. It also says > > > > Jyestha month> рд╕рд� " �рддреЗ> > ( > guess it> > > > > > means Shukla)' paksha, Tithi is 1||2|рд╣реЗ :> > > > рдкрд��`реÐрддрд╛ 2, Ghati is > 38/45. I> > > > > > attach with this mail copy of the hand written one for your> > > > > reference///> > >> > > I try to analyze by traditional method :> > > > >> > > > > > In jyeshtha Sun remain in Tauras sign. As per the position> > > > > explained by him> > > It is the birth of near amavas. Most probably > > Moon > > > will be within> > 2-3> > > nakshatra of Sun. As per details given > > Moon > > > is Tauras. In Jyeshtha> > Ammavas> > > normally falls near 15- 16 th > > may> > > > > >> > > Let us verify with other factors> > >> > > Ghatis are 38.45 > > > this means this will> > >> > > in case of may-= 4+5+6+6+6+6+ 6+2.45 > > > =38.45 ghatis respectively the> > speed of> > > lagna for > > > Vrishabh,Mithuna, karka,Sinh, Kanya, Libra, Scorpio, Dhanu> > >> > > > > The > > > birth shall be near 14th 15th or 16th may as Rohini Nakshatra> > is > > in> > > > > > tauras.> > >> > > Your Lagna may > > > > be Dhanu as per traditional method> > >> > > Regards> > >> > > > > Nirmal> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 Dear Neelam ji, Bharani might have been called MAHAN because of the scaring Yama is the lord. Just a thought. Regards, S P Khurana , " neelam gupta " <neelamgupta07 wrote: > > Dear All, > > Can anyone throw some light on Mahabharni Nakshatram? Is there any special > position (degree or otherwise) when Bharni becomes MAHAN. Or is it just a > case of calling lakshmi as mahalakshmi? > Would be grateful for views. > > Regards > Neelam > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 Thank you Khurana ji. Good thought. We're all scared of YAMA.The whole bureaucracy was so scared of MAYA in UP that they called the newly built flyover MAHAMAYA Flyover (in NOIDA), a college was named MAHAMAYA college to appease Devi Maya!! Let us see what others have to say.RegardsNeelam2008/11/7 khurana_satpal <khurana_satpal Dear Neelam ji, Bharani might have been called MAHAN because of the scaring Yama is the lord. Just a thought. Regards, S P Khurana , " neelam gupta " <neelamgupta07 wrote: > > Dear All, > > Can anyone throw some light on Mahabharni Nakshatram? Is there any special > position (degree or otherwise) when Bharni becomes MAHAN. Or is it just a > case of calling lakshmi as mahalakshmi? > Would be grateful for views. > > Regards > Neelam > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 dear Neelamji, Namaste, In south India, Bharani is never considered as Mahanaksthram. but there is a saying that those born in the star of Bharani will have thecapacity to rule the world. Here Mrigasira, Maham, swati are considered as Maha nakshtras. However if u take Bharani its longititude is 13 deg 20' to 28deg 40'. Its star lord being venus. It is the IInd star starting from aswini, and venus mahadasa is the longest. It starts at the midpoint of the House Aries. this feature of starting at 13 deg 20' is also seen in Poorva Phalguni and Poorvashada whose star lord is venus. I am not sure whether these stars also qualify for Maha nakshtras. regards, k.gopu --- On Fri, 11/7/08, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07 wrote: neelam gupta <neelamgupta07Re: Re: Help in casting a horoscope Date: Friday, November 7, 2008, 9:19 PM Thank you Khurana ji. Good thought. We're all scared of YAMA.The whole bureaucracy was so scared of MAYA in UP that they called the newly built flyover MAHAMAYA Flyover (in NOIDA), a college was named MAHAMAYA college to appease Devi Maya!!Let us see what others have to say.RegardsNeelam 2008/11/7 khurana_satpal <khurana_satpal@ > Dear Neelam ji,Bharani might have been called MAHAN because of the scaring Yama is the lord. Just a thought.Regards,S P Khuranaancient_indian_ astrology, "neelam gupta" <neelamgupta07@ ...> wrote:>> Dear All,> > Can anyone throw some light on Mahabharni Nakshatram? Is there any special> position (degree or otherwise) when Bharni becomes MAHAN. Or is it just a> case of calling lakshmi as mahalakshmi?> Would be grateful for views.> > Regards> Neelam> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 Respected Neelam Ji and Khurana Ji, My estranged Wife has a Bharani Nakshatra (2nd pada) i don't know whether it qualifies as MAHAN, But i had the Death-Like situtation/experiences whenever she came closer to me! Yama factor!! i guess..Luckily i have Shravana Nakshatra lorded by Vishnu!!:-) Just a PRACTICAL thought!! Regards Chandu2Chill , " neelam gupta " neelamgupta07 wrote: Thank you Khurana ji. Good thought. We're all scared of YAMA. The whole bureaucracy was so scared of MAYA in UP that they called the newly built flyover MAHAMAYA Flyover (in NOIDA), a college was named MAHAMAYA college to appease Devi Maya!! Let us see what others have to say. Regards Neelam 2008/11/7 khurana_satpal <khurana_satpal Dear Neelam ji, Bharani might have been called MAHAN because of the scaring Yama is the lord. Just a thought. Regards, S P Khurana --- In <% 40>, " neelam gupta " <neelamgupta07@> wrote: Dear All, Can anyone throw some light on Mahabharni Nakshatram? Is there any special position (degree or otherwise) when Bharni becomes MAHAN. Or is it just a case of calling lakshmi as mahalakshmi? Would be grateful for views. Regards Neelam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 Dear Gopu ji, Chandu ji and all,Thank you all for your views. Let us wait if someone can tell us why How and when Bharni can become Mahabharni.Somebody querist in this thread had said that her nakshatra was Mahabharni. I had never heard of it. That is why I put the question before the forum.RegardsNeelam2008/11/8 K Gopu <kgopu_24 dear Neelamji, Namaste, In south India, Bharani is never considered as Mahanaksthram. but there is a saying that those born in the star of Bharani will have thecapacity to rule the world. Here Mrigasira, Maham, swati are considered as Maha nakshtras. However if u take Bharani its longititude is 13 deg 20' to 28deg 40'. Its star lord being venus. It is the IInd star starting from aswini, and venus mahadasa is the longest. It starts at the midpoint of the House Aries. this feature of starting at 13 deg 20' is also seen in Poorva Phalguni and Poorvashada whose star lord is venus. I am not sure whether these stars also qualify for Maha nakshtras. regards, k.gopu --- On Fri, 11/7/08, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07 wrote: neelam gupta <neelamgupta07Re: Re: Help in casting a horoscope Date: Friday, November 7, 2008, 9:19 PM Thank you Khurana ji. Good thought. We're all scared of YAMA.The whole bureaucracy was so scared of MAYA in UP that they called the newly built flyover MAHAMAYA Flyover (in NOIDA), a college was named MAHAMAYA college to appease Devi Maya!! Let us see what others have to say.RegardsNeelam 2008/11/7 khurana_satpal <khurana_satpal@ > Dear Neelam ji,Bharani might have been called MAHAN because of the scaring Yama is the lord. Just a thought.Regards,S P Khuranaancient_indian_ astrology, " neelam gupta " <neelamgupta07@ ...> wrote:>> Dear All,> > Can anyone throw some light on Mahabharni Nakshatram? Is there any special> position (degree or otherwise) when Bharni becomes MAHAN. Or is it just a> case of calling lakshmi as mahalakshmi?> Would be grateful for views.> > Regards> Neelam> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 During Mahalaya Paksha the day of the Barani Nakshatra is called Maha barani and most suitable and auspicious to do Mahalaya Pitrusraddha. In Panchanga we can see the day is marked as Mahabarani. With regards. Hari.Venkataraman --- On Sat, 8/11/08, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07 wrote: neelam gupta <neelamgupta07Re: Re: Help in casting a horoscope Date: Saturday, 8 November, 2008, 5:30 PM Dear Gopu ji, Chandu ji and all,Thank you all for your views. Let us wait if someone can tell us why How and when Bharni can become Mahabharni.Somebody querist in this thread had said that her nakshatra was Mahabharni. I had never heard of it. That is why I put the question before the forum.RegardsNeelam 2008/11/8 K Gopu <kgopu_24 (AT) (DOT) co.uk> dear Neelamji, Namaste, In south India, Bharani is never considered as Mahanaksthram. but there is a saying that those born in the star of Bharani will have thecapacity to rule the world. Here Mrigasira, Maham, swati are considered as Maha nakshtras. However if u take Bharani its longititude is 13 deg 20' to 28deg 40'. Its star lord being venus. It is the IInd star starting from aswini, and venus mahadasa is the longest. It starts at the midpoint of the House Aries. this feature of starting at 13 deg 20' is also seen in Poorva Phalguni and Poorvashada whose star lord is venus. I am not sure whether these stars also qualify for Maha nakshtras. regards, k.gopu --- On Fri, 11/7/08, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ gmail.com> wrote: neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ gmail.com>Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Help in casting a horoscopeancient_indian_ astrologyFriday, November 7, 2008, 9:19 PM Thank you Khurana ji. Good thought. We're all scared of YAMA.The whole bureaucracy was so scared of MAYA in UP that they called the newly built flyover MAHAMAYA Flyover (in NOIDA), a college was named MAHAMAYA college to appease Devi Maya!!Let us see what others have to say.RegardsNeelam 2008/11/7 khurana_satpal <khurana_satpal@ > Dear Neelam ji,Bharani might have been called MAHAN because of the scaring Yama is the lord. Just a thought.Regards,S P Khuranaancient_indian_ astrology, "neelam gupta" <neelamgupta07@ ...> wrote:>> Dear All,> > Can anyone throw some light on Mahabharni Nakshatram? Is there any special> position (degree or otherwise) when Bharni becomes MAHAN. Or is it just a> case of calling lakshmi as mahalakshmi?> Would be grateful for views.> > Regards> Neelam> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.