Re:Birth particular's of Lord Rama//Address in Mails

[Guest guest]

Dear Goel ji, I wonder why you don't abide by the group policy regarding 'NOT TO INCLUDE ADDRSS IN MAILS" even after numerous intimations!!! Is it that you don't want to respect the group policy, or want to show that 'group policy is irrelevent to you?!! Dear Goel ji, I respect your knowledge, but not this attitude of following something in the group that is against the group policy. Note: I request moderators to keep a check on the address in mails present espcially in Goel ji's mails. If we allow it, that would be/and would cause a bad trend in group. Regards,Sreenadh , Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937 wrote:>> Dear Sir,> This anamoly is not resolved as yet.> If you take Sun on Zero degrees Aries and Moon at 3deg 20' Cancer,> this adds up to a angular distance of 93deg 20' only.> In the days of Lord Rama , probably mathmetical Lunar Tithis were not in use.> After the occurance of New Moon day , next day was Pitipada and so on.> It is quite possible that He was born on Ninth day from New-Moon day but mathmetical Tithi might> be Astmi. How to prove this. There is no way to know it.> In case , Moon was in slow Motion on his days of birth , this is a possibility.> In those days ,people were following 5 years of yuga cycle , and one yuga were having > 62 months , probably , of 30 days each.> Regards,> G.K.GOEL> Ph: 09350311433> Add: L-409, SARITA VIHAR> NEW DELHI-110 076> INDIA> > > > > Sunil Bhattacharjya sunil_bhattacharjya > Friday, 29 August, 2008 8:28:38 PM> Re:Date of Ramayana and Mahabharata> > > Dear Goelji,> > What according to you is the figure if the Sun is in 30 degree Meen? Rest after hearing from you.> > Regards,> > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya> > > Gopal Goel gkgoel1937 (AT) (DOT) co.in>> ancient_indian_ astrology> Friday, August 29, 2008 7:13:13 AM> Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re:Date of Ramayana and Mahabharata> > Dear Bhattacharjya,> According to your calculations , maximum angular distance between Sun and Moon > 92 deg.> Lord Rama was born on Sukla Nabmi(9), thus their angular distance should not be less than 96 deg> (12*8)=96.> How are you going to cover this anomoly.> Regarda,> > G.K.GOEL> > > Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjy a @>> ancient_indian_ astrology> Friday, 29 August, 2008 12:38:34 PM> [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re:Date of Ramayana and Mahabharata> > Dear Shreenadhji,> > Further the Lagna was Kark as Lord Rama was born at the Abhijit Muhurta (at noon).> > Regards> Sunil K. Bhattacharjya> > > Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjy a @>> ancient_indian_ astrology> Friday, August 29, 2008 12:01:58 AM> Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re:Date of Ramayana and Mahabharata> > Dear Sreenadhji,> > I have not read Brihat Prajapatya. I read quite some years a Bengali book which covered this subject. I think its name was Jatak Kaumudi. Neither I have the book with me now nor I should dare to think of pitting it against the Brihat Prajapatya, even if I would have had it with me. You are a scholar in Jyotish shastra and I do not claim to be so. Our discussion started with the dating of Lord Rama and I believe that the Graha positions at the time of the birth of Lord Rama were as follows:> > Surya------- ----0 to 1 degree in Mesh (Sun just reached Mesh)> Chandra --------0 to 3 degree in Kark (Moon in punarvasu)(Own house)> Mangal------ ----28 degree in Makar (Uccha)> Budh-------- --- in Mesh (Budhaditya yoga)> Brihaspati-- -----5 degree in Kark (Uccha)> Shukra------ ----27 degree in Meen (Uccha)> Shani------- ----20 degree in Tula (Uccha)> > I believe that Lord Rama lived in the Treta yuga and near the junction of Treta and Dwapara yuga as said in the Mahabharata and I also believe in the Yuga classification as given in the Bhagawat Purana, properly interpreted along the lines of the rule "Ankaanaam Vaamato Gati". According to this Lord Rama was born prior to 3102 + 3600 = 6702 BCE. My estimate is that he was born in 7319 BCE.> > This is just my own conviction but I shall not like anybody to take my word for it nor I wish to enter into any argument for validation of this date, as I have already clarified the premises. Anybody can reject it if he wants to. One must do his homework and get convinced of whatever date one arrives at.> > I shall be glad if you also kindly let us know when you think Lord Rama took birth and it will be still better if you wish to give the premises on which it is based.> > Regards and all the best,> > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya> > > Sreenadh sreesog >> ancient_indian_ astrology> Thursday, August 28, 2008 9:55:11 PM> [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re:Date of Ramayana and Mahabharata> > Dear Sunil Bhattacharjya ji, > You agree or disagree - what I wanted to convay was a FACT -> i.e. "AS per the ancient text Brihat Prajaptya by the Deksha Prajapati (the direct deciple of Skanda the author of Skanda hora) the word "Ucha" refers to Exaltation and this points to the WHOLE SIGN and the word "Paramocha" refers to 'Maximum degree of exaltation" and this only points to the degree of exaltation."> The fact that the Ancient text Brihat Prajapatya tells this remains a FACT. Hope this clarifies.> Love and Regards,> Sreenadh> ancient_indian_ astrology, Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjy a wrote:> >> > Dear Sreenadhji,> > > > You will have to pardon me as I cannot agree that we need not take the "Degree" into account in a"Rashi" when we talk of "Uccha" and "Neeccha". Astronomical dating cannot be precise by imagining any "Degree" within a "Rashi". > > > > Regards,> > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharya > > > > > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help./l/in//mail/mail/tools/tools-08.html/>