Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Dear Bhaskar ji, Well said. I agree with you completly.Love and regards,Sreenadh , "Bhaskar" <rajiventerprises wrote:>> > Dear all,> > These are all matters of personal perspective .> > For me The Taj mahal would remain a creation of a Rajasthan King, a> temple destroyed and refabricated to look like a Musilm masoleum. But> for a pure Muslim this may noy be so. For me the ASdams bridge may be> the Setu built by Lord Rama, but to the atheist it may not be so, or for> the general American it may be humorous to think so and must be a> natural creation for them. For me the Qutub Minar would be a Vijay> sthamb built by a Hindu king, renamed as the Qutub Minar but for the> Musilm it may not be so. For me the rama lalas janma sthal would be the> actual place for his janma, for the fanatic Muslim it would a masjid.> > For the Jaini , he may like to look down upon a Buddhist King, and vice> versa for a Busshist. For the pure Hindu who is not even a Buddhist or a> Jaini, it would not matter . For the oppressed class, the Upper class> Kings may have looked like dictaors yo their eyes. For the oppressed*> class, a King from their own community could have looked like a Virtual> God to them. So the oppressed class may talk bad out the upper class> Kings, while the upper class may talk bad about the lowersr class born> kings. All this does not matter to a person with a open justice minded> view.> > For me personally the good eipthets of all the religions stand as right> and true, be it Hindu,Christianity,Moslem, and again in the furthered> branched out species of these religions, for me even the dictums of> Jainism stand as right, and so do the dictums of Buddhism, for they all> teach common behaviour norms to live like a good human being.> > Best wishes,> > Bhaskar.> > * Oppressed.> > This word takes a new meaning and is relative to the times and> centuries. Maybe the minorities were oppressed a 100 years back, if they> say so, but today the minorities are oppressing the majorities and> tables have turned, with the demands of "Sthans" increasing, demand for> Quotas increasing,demand for prvilges increasing, demand for Grants> increasing, demand for special seats increasing, demand for share of> percentages increasing in all walks of Life. So the oppressed of> yesteryears have turned the oprressors of today, but a generation with> no fault of theirs is suffering.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 " All this does not matter to a person with a open justice minded view. " Very true There can be as many perspectives as 6708700100 (world population). But there can be only and only one truth and by considering ourselves as part of a religion or community, we will never be able to see what is there but will see only what we want to see. Jaya , " Bhaskar " <rajiventerprises wrote: > > > Dear all, > > These are all matters of personal perspective . > > For me The Taj mahal would remain a creation of a Rajasthan King, a > temple destroyed and refabricated to look like a Musilm masoleum. But > for a pure Muslim this may noy be so. For me the ASdams bridge may be > the Setu built by Lord Rama, but to the atheist it may not be so, or for > the general American it may be humorous to think so and must be a > natural creation for them. For me the Qutub Minar would be a Vijay > sthamb built by a Hindu king, renamed as the Qutub Minar but for the > Musilm it may not be so. For me the rama lalas janma sthal would be the > actual place for his janma, for the fanatic Muslim it would a masjid. > > For the Jaini , he may like to look down upon a Buddhist King, and vice > versa for a Busshist. For the pure Hindu who is not even a Buddhist or a > Jaini, it would not matter . For the oppressed class, the Upper class > Kings may have looked like dictaors yo their eyes. For the oppressed* > class, a King from their own community could have looked like a Virtual > God to them. So the oppressed class may talk bad out the upper class > Kings, while the upper class may talk bad about the lowersr class born > kings. All this does not matter to a person with a open justice minded > view. > > For me personally the good eipthets of all the religions stand as right > and true, be it Hindu,Christianity,Moslem, and again in the furthered > branched out species of these religions, for me even the dictums of > Jainism stand as right, and so do the dictums of Buddhism, for they all > teach common behaviour norms to live like a good human being. > > Best wishes, > > Bhaskar. > > * Oppressed. > > This word takes a new meaning and is relative to the times and > centuries. Maybe the minorities were oppressed a 100 years back, if they > say so, but today the minorities are oppressing the majorities and > tables have turned, with the demands of " Sthans " increasing, demand for > Quotas increasing,demand for prvilges increasing, demand for Grants > increasing, demand for special seats increasing, demand for share of > percentages increasing in all walks of Life. So the oppressed of > yesteryears have turned the oprressors of today, but a generation with > no fault of theirs is suffering. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Dear jayaji, // But there can be only and only one truth and by considering ourselvesas part of a religion or community, we will never be able to see whatis there but will see only what we want to see. // No harm in that. One should be proud to consider oneself as part of a religion or community. I am sure You would consider yourself as part of this community 'Ancient indian astrology ' I cannot consider myself to be a part of others like the ' AID Communities' or the Gays communities ' How can I be a part of my neighbours family ? How can I consider their father as my father or the neighbours wife as mines ? So theres no harm if we we see what we want to see. We cannot blame the movie goers for the movies they want to see. Or the persons sitting in the Bars in the evening and seeing happiness in their glasses. Its their Life, and they may be right from their point of view and perspective. I am no one to judge them. We cannot judge what makes the robber rob. We have to go and sit in his position and maybe realise that few opf them maybe helpless and have no recourse to their next meals. Which of course does not mean that their actions are endorsed. It is a question of not judging or passing sentences. I would certainly like to see what I want to see and not Bhuta, pisacha and goblins in my dreams which are also a part of this world. So the community where I live in, a God fearing community, of Pooja pathis, satsangis, etc, makes me feel proud to be a part of them , and always keeps me secured and comfortable. Do not want to be in a no mans land. best wishes, Bhaskar. Postscript - we have to be in this world without being in it. We have to be in our own communities with access to all other communities. We have to be active in our own community and also have knowledge of what is hapenning in other communities etc. BBC, CNN, gives us access to the communities around the world. Our own indain news channels gives us access to knowledge about the hapennings in india. The relgious channels GOD etc. give us access to other satsangas of the Christianity community. So on and so forth . translate this into tangible physical Life, when we go for a walk and meet our friemds from the neighbourung colonies who tell us what new shop has opened near the lane they live in. But i will stay still, in my own building, own flat and use my own Bathroom, and not stay on the road. So talking is seperate and practising is seperate. One cannot discommunicate from his community and religion, and be happy or satisfied. Its not easy. , "revati_n27" <revati_n27 wrote:>> "All this does not matter to a person with a open justice minded> view." Very true> > There can be as many perspectives as 6708700100 (world population). > But there can be only and only one truth and by considering ourselves > as part of a religion or community, we will never be able to see what > is there but will see only what we want to see. > > Jaya> > > , "Bhaskar" > rajiventerprises@ wrote:> >> > > > Dear all,> > > > These are all matters of personal perspective .> > > > For me The Taj mahal would remain a creation of a Rajasthan King, a> > temple destroyed and refabricated to look like a Musilm masoleum. > But> > for a pure Muslim this may noy be so. For me the ASdams bridge may > be> > the Setu built by Lord Rama, but to the atheist it may not be so, > or for> > the general American it may be humorous to think so and must be a> > natural creation for them. For me the Qutub Minar would be a Vijay> > sthamb built by a Hindu king, renamed as the Qutub Minar but for the> > Musilm it may not be so. For me the rama lalas janma sthal would > be the> > actual place for his janma, for the fanatic Muslim it would a > masjid.> > > > For the Jaini , he may like to look down upon a Buddhist King, and > vice> > versa for a Busshist. For the pure Hindu who is not even a Buddhist > or a> > Jaini, it would not matter . For the oppressed class, the Upper > class> > Kings may have looked like dictaors yo their eyes. For the > oppressed*> > class, a King from their own community could have looked like a > Virtual> > God to them. So the oppressed class may talk bad out the upper > class> > Kings, while the upper class may talk bad about the lowersr class > born> > kings. All this does not matter to a person with a open justice > minded> > view.> > > > For me personally the good eipthets of all the religions stand as > right> > and true, be it Hindu,Christianity,Moslem, and again in the > furthered> > branched out species of these religions, for me even the dictums of> > Jainism stand as right, and so do the dictums of Buddhism, for they > all> > teach common behaviour norms to live like a good human being.> > > > Best wishes,> > > > Bhaskar.> > > > * Oppressed.> > > > This word takes a new meaning and is relative to the times and> > centuries. Maybe the minorities were oppressed a 100 years back, if > they> > say so, but today the minorities are oppressing the majorities and> > tables have turned, with the demands of "Sthans" increasing, demand > for> > Quotas increasing,demand for prvilges increasing, demand for Grants> > increasing, demand for special seats increasing, demand for share of> > percentages increasing in all walks of Life. So the oppressed of> > yesteryears have turned the oprressors of today, but a generation > with> > no fault of theirs is suffering.> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Dear Bhaskarji: What I wrote had nothing to do with human behavior. I was talking about Science or History, the truth in it and the need to look at it with an independent mind. Referring to the distortion of history. I am at a different time zone, cannot write a deatiled reply. But when I have free time, I will write what I meant by mail with relevent examples. I have no difference in opinion about what you have written at all. Jaya , " Bhaskar " <rajiventerprises wrote: > > Dear jayaji, // But there can be only and only one truth and by > considering ourselves > as part of a religion or community, we will never be able to see what > is there but will see only what we want to see. // No harm in that. > One should be proud to consider oneself as part of a religion or > community. I am sure You would consider yourself as part of this > community 'Ancient indian astrology ' I cannot consider myself to be a > part of others like the ' AID Communities' or the Gays communities ' > How can I be a part of my neighbours family ? How can I consider their > father as my father or the neighbours wife as mines ? So theres no > harm if we we see what we want to see. We cannot blame the movie goers > for the movies they want to see. Or the persons sitting in the Bars in > the evening and seeing happiness in their glasses. Its their Life, and > they may be right from their point of view and perspective. I am no one > to judge them. We cannot judge what makes the robber rob. We have to go > and sit in his position and maybe realise that few opf them maybe > helpless and have no recourse to their next meals. Which of course does > not mean that their actions are endorsed. It is a question of not > judging or passing sentences. I would certainly like to see what I > want to see and not Bhuta, pisacha and goblins in my dreams which are > also a part of this world. So the community where I live in, a God > fearing community, of Pooja pathis, satsangis, etc, makes me feel proud > to be a part of them , and always keeps me secured and comfortable. Do > not want to be in a no mans land. best wishes, Bhaskar. Postscript > - we have to be in this world without being in it. We have to be in our > own communities with access to all other communities. We have to be > active in our own community and also have knowledge of what is hapenning > in other communities etc. BBC, CNN, gives us access to the communities > around the world. Our own indain news channels gives us access to > knowledge about the hapennings in india. The relgious channels GOD etc. > give us access to other satsangas of the Christianity community. So on > and so forth . translate this into tangible physical Life, when we go > for a walk and meet our friemds from the neighbourung colonies who tell > us what new shop has opened near the lane they live in. But i will stay > still, in my own building, own flat and use my own Bathroom, and not > stay on the road. So talking is seperate and practising is seperate. > One cannot discommunicate from his community and religion, and be happy > or satisfied. Its not easy. , " revati_n27 " > <revati_n27@> wrote: > > > > " All this does not matter to a person with a open justice minded > > view. " Very true > > > > There can be as many perspectives as 6708700100 (world population). > > But there can be only and only one truth and by considering ourselves > > as part of a religion or community, we will never be able to see what > > is there but will see only what we want to see. > > > > Jaya > > > > > > , " Bhaskar " > > rajiventerprises@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > These are all matters of personal perspective . > > > > > > For me The Taj mahal would remain a creation of a Rajasthan King, a > > > temple destroyed and refabricated to look like a Musilm masoleum. > > But > > > for a pure Muslim this may noy be so. For me the ASdams bridge may > > be > > > the Setu built by Lord Rama, but to the atheist it may not be so, > > or for > > > the general American it may be humorous to think so and must be a > > > natural creation for them. For me the Qutub Minar would be a Vijay > > > sthamb built by a Hindu king, renamed as the Qutub Minar but for the > > > Musilm it may not be so. For me the rama lalas janma sthal would > > be the > > > actual place for his janma, for the fanatic Muslim it would a > > masjid. > > > > > > For the Jaini , he may like to look down upon a Buddhist King, and > > vice > > > versa for a Busshist. For the pure Hindu who is not even a Buddhist > > or a > > > Jaini, it would not matter . For the oppressed class, the Upper > > class > > > Kings may have looked like dictaors yo their eyes. For the > > oppressed* > > > class, a King from their own community could have looked like a > > Virtual > > > God to them. So the oppressed class may talk bad out the upper > > class > > > Kings, while the upper class may talk bad about the lowersr class > > born > > > kings. All this does not matter to a person with a open justice > > minded > > > view. > > > > > > For me personally the good eipthets of all the religions stand as > > right > > > and true, be it Hindu,Christianity,Moslem, and again in the > > furthered > > > branched out species of these religions, for me even the dictums of > > > Jainism stand as right, and so do the dictums of Buddhism, for they > > all > > > teach common behaviour norms to live like a good human being. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > * Oppressed. > > > > > > This word takes a new meaning and is relative to the times and > > > centuries. Maybe the minorities were oppressed a 100 years back, if > > they > > > say so, but today the minorities are oppressing the majorities and > > > tables have turned, with the demands of " Sthans " increasing, demand > > for > > > Quotas increasing,demand for prvilges increasing, demand for Grants > > > increasing, demand for special seats increasing, demand for share of > > > percentages increasing in all walks of Life. So the oppressed of > > > yesteryears have turned the oprressors of today, but a generation > > with > > > no fault of theirs is suffering. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Dear jayaji, I think I understood now what you tried to put forth. yes, hostory has certainly to be viewed from a third mans point of view, otherwise we would see only what we want to see and not the truth. i believ that. best wishes, bhaskar. , " revati_n27 " <revati_n27 wrote: > > Dear Bhaskarji: > > What I wrote had nothing to do with human behavior. > > I was talking about Science or History, the truth in it and the need > to look at it with an independent mind. > > Referring to the distortion of history. I am at a different time > zone, cannot write a deatiled reply. But when I have free time, I > will write what I meant by mail with relevent examples. > > I have no difference in opinion about what you have written at all. > > Jaya > , " Bhaskar " > rajiventerprises@ wrote: > > > > Dear jayaji, // But there can be only and only one truth and by > > considering ourselves > > as part of a religion or community, we will never be able to see > what > > is there but will see only what we want to see. // No harm in > that. > > One should be proud to consider oneself as part of a religion or > > community. I am sure You would consider yourself as part of this > > community 'Ancient indian astrology ' I cannot consider myself to > be a > > part of others like the ' AID Communities' or the Gays > communities ' > > How can I be a part of my neighbours family ? How can I consider > their > > father as my father or the neighbours wife as mines ? So theres > no > > harm if we we see what we want to see. We cannot blame the movie > goers > > for the movies they want to see. Or the persons sitting in the > Bars in > > the evening and seeing happiness in their glasses. Its their Life, > and > > they may be right from their point of view and perspective. I am no > one > > to judge them. We cannot judge what makes the robber rob. We have > to go > > and sit in his position and maybe realise that few opf them maybe > > helpless and have no recourse to their next meals. Which of course > does > > not mean that their actions are endorsed. It is a question of not > > judging or passing sentences. I would certainly like to see what I > > want to see and not Bhuta, pisacha and goblins in my dreams which > are > > also a part of this world. So the community where I live in, a God > > fearing community, of Pooja pathis, satsangis, etc, makes me feel > proud > > to be a part of them , and always keeps me secured and > comfortable. Do > > not want to be in a no mans land. best wishes, Bhaskar. > Postscript > > - we have to be in this world without being in it. We have to be in > our > > own communities with access to all other communities. We have to be > > active in our own community and also have knowledge of what is > hapenning > > in other communities etc. BBC, CNN, gives us access to the > communities > > around the world. Our own indain news channels gives us access to > > knowledge about the hapennings in india. The relgious channels GOD > etc. > > give us access to other satsangas of the Christianity community. So > on > > and so forth . translate this into tangible physical Life, when we > go > > for a walk and meet our friemds from the neighbourung colonies who > tell > > us what new shop has opened near the lane they live in. But i will > stay > > still, in my own building, own flat and use my own Bathroom, and not > > stay on the road. So talking is seperate and practising is > seperate. > > One cannot discommunicate from his community and religion, and be > happy > > or satisfied. Its not easy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " revati_n27 " > > <revati_n27@> wrote: > > > > > > " All this does not matter to a person with a open justice minded > > > view. " Very true > > > > > > There can be as many perspectives as 6708700100 (world > population). > > > But there can be only and only one truth and by considering > ourselves > > > as part of a religion or community, we will never be able to see > what > > > is there but will see only what we want to see. > > > > > > Jaya > > > > > > > > > , " Bhaskar " > > > rajiventerprises@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > These are all matters of personal perspective . > > > > > > > > For me The Taj mahal would remain a creation of a Rajasthan > King, a > > > > temple destroyed and refabricated to look like a Musilm > masoleum. > > > But > > > > for a pure Muslim this may noy be so. For me the ASdams bridge > may > > > be > > > > the Setu built by Lord Rama, but to the atheist it may not be > so, > > > or for > > > > the general American it may be humorous to think so and must be > a > > > > natural creation for them. For me the Qutub Minar would be a > Vijay > > > > sthamb built by a Hindu king, renamed as the Qutub Minar but > for the > > > > Musilm it may not be so. For me the rama lalas janma sthal would > > > be the > > > > actual place for his janma, for the fanatic Muslim it would a > > > masjid. > > > > > > > > For the Jaini , he may like to look down upon a Buddhist King, > and > > > vice > > > > versa for a Busshist. For the pure Hindu who is not even a > Buddhist > > > or a > > > > Jaini, it would not matter . For the oppressed class, the Upper > > > class > > > > Kings may have looked like dictaors yo their eyes. For the > > > oppressed* > > > > class, a King from their own community could have looked like a > > > Virtual > > > > God to them. So the oppressed class may talk bad out the upper > > > class > > > > Kings, while the upper class may talk bad about the lowersr > class > > > born > > > > kings. All this does not matter to a person with a open justice > > > minded > > > > view. > > > > > > > > For me personally the good eipthets of all the religions stand > as > > > right > > > > and true, be it Hindu,Christianity,Moslem, and again in the > > > furthered > > > > branched out species of these religions, for me even the > dictums of > > > > Jainism stand as right, and so do the dictums of Buddhism, for > they > > > all > > > > teach common behaviour norms to live like a good human being. > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > * Oppressed. > > > > > > > > This word takes a new meaning and is relative to the times and > > > > centuries. Maybe the minorities were oppressed a 100 years > back, if > > > they > > > > say so, but today the minorities are oppressing the majorities > and > > > > tables have turned, with the demands of " Sthans " increasing, > demand > > > for > > > > Quotas increasing,demand for prvilges increasing, demand for > Grants > > > > increasing, demand for special seats increasing, demand for > share of > > > > percentages increasing in all walks of Life. So the oppressed of > > > > yesteryears have turned the oprressors of today, but a > generation > > > with > > > > no fault of theirs is suffering. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Dear Jaya ji,==>There can be as many perspectives as 6708700100 (world population).But there can be only and only one truth and by considering ourselvesas part of a religion or community, we will never be able to see whatis there but will see only what we want to see.<== True, but that is fact of life... Complete objectivity not even a near impossibility, but a total impossibility... actually there are not a single thing that is totally objective in the world...nether object, nor view..neither fact nor concept... Everything is colored to a less or greater extend by the subjectivity...may be that is what makes life beautiful as well...Love and regards,Sreenadh , "revati_n27" <revati_n27 wrote:>> "All this does not matter to a person with a open justice minded> view." Very true> > There can be as many perspectives as 6708700100 (world population). > But there can be only and only one truth and by considering ourselves > as part of a religion or community, we will never be able to see what > is there but will see only what we want to see. > > Jaya> > > , "Bhaskar" > rajiventerprises@ wrote:> >> > > > Dear all,> > > > These are all matters of personal perspective .> > > > For me The Taj mahal would remain a creation of a Rajasthan King, a> > temple destroyed and refabricated to look like a Musilm masoleum. > But> > for a pure Muslim this may noy be so. For me the ASdams bridge may > be> > the Setu built by Lord Rama, but to the atheist it may not be so, > or for> > the general American it may be humorous to think so and must be a> > natural creation for them. For me the Qutub Minar would be a Vijay> > sthamb built by a Hindu king, renamed as the Qutub Minar but for the> > Musilm it may not be so. For me the rama lalas janma sthal would > be the> > actual place for his janma, for the fanatic Muslim it would a > masjid.> > > > For the Jaini , he may like to look down upon a Buddhist King, and > vice> > versa for a Busshist. For the pure Hindu who is not even a Buddhist > or a> > Jaini, it would not matter . For the oppressed class, the Upper > class> > Kings may have looked like dictaors yo their eyes. For the > oppressed*> > class, a King from their own community could have looked like a > Virtual> > God to them. So the oppressed class may talk bad out the upper > class> > Kings, while the upper class may talk bad about the lowersr class > born> > kings. All this does not matter to a person with a open justice > minded> > view.> > > > For me personally the good eipthets of all the religions stand as > right> > and true, be it Hindu,Christianity,Moslem, and again in the > furthered> > branched out species of these religions, for me even the dictums of> > Jainism stand as right, and so do the dictums of Buddhism, for they > all> > teach common behaviour norms to live like a good human being.> > > > Best wishes,> > > > Bhaskar.> > > > * Oppressed.> > > > This word takes a new meaning and is relative to the times and> > centuries. Maybe the minorities were oppressed a 100 years back, if > they> > say so, but today the minorities are oppressing the majorities and> > tables have turned, with the demands of "Sthans" increasing, demand > for> > Quotas increasing,demand for prvilges increasing, demand for Grants> > increasing, demand for special seats increasing, demand for share of> > percentages increasing in all walks of Life. So the oppressed of> > yesteryears have turned the oprressors of today, but a generation > with> > no fault of theirs is suffering.> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Dear Sreenadhji and Bhaskarji: I wished to but could not write the details of what I referred about " the truth " . For exapmple, Max Muller, who was one of many Christian missionaries to India and was committed to the Biblical lineage. According to his biblical belief date of creation given in the Bible at 4004 BC and the great flood at 1500 BC. This belief in his religion or faith made him to date the Rig Veda much later in time than an impartial scientist would have done in order to fit the entire Vedic tradition into a time-frame following the great flood, which Biblical scholars held took place in 1500 BC. This is a distortion from the truth. Now the information is open to all and none can hide it for the sake of any centrisms. I had posted one article from Science magazine showing the evidence that Saraswathi-Indus is as or more ancient than Mesopotomian and Egyptian. Moreover, had better quality life, with the finding of well planned city with irrigation system and oven baked brick buildings and so on as early as 9000 BC, only figures found were Shiva in yogic posture (Pasupati),. Which further confirms the existance of Yoga during that time, don't know whether they were called Hindus, but Hindu must have originated from there only. Jaya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 Dear Sunil ji, Thanks...and I do agree with you. It is money and not dharma that rules the world today. blessings Renu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 Dear Sreenadh ji, Thanks...I knew you would blessings Renu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 Hare rama krishna dear renu ji . sure Thanks regrds sunil nair , "renunw" <renunw wrote:>> Dear Sunil ji,> > Thanks...and I do agree with you. It is money and not dharma that> rules the world today.> > blessings> > Renu> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 Dear Sreenadh ji, Sorry ...I got late to reply. I, without any second thoughts agree with you regarding what you have written about religions. That is why I always say that Buddhism is not a religion. It is a philosophy which can be understood only through wisdom. That is why no one can force anyone to become a Buddhist. Everything in Buddhism revolves around one's MIND. Just because one is born to Buddhist parents or just because one fills in some data form against'Religion' - 'Buddhist'..one doesn't become a Buddhist. blessings Renu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.