Choice of year length (Tabulation against event)

[Guest guest]

Dear Neelam ji, Sorry, I just noticed that I made one more typo in that mail related to the Dasa listing related to L+365.2425 days. There fore I am posing the corrected mail again below -==> Please check yourself before buying some arguments on face value, even if provided by Chandra hari ji. Here is the actual values for your reference. (DOB: 18 Nov 1971; 2.55 AM; POB: Trivandrum, Kerala, India. Marriage date: 24 Feb 2008). The Vimsottari Dasa-Antara upto 5 levels using JHora for various Ayanamsa and year length combinations are given below.

 

 

 

 

 

CH(L+44);365.2425 days

 

Me-Ra-Su-Ke-Ra-Ve

 

Fails miserably

 

 

CH(L+44); 360 days

 

Me-Ju-Ju-Ke-Ju-Ve

 

Matches with the event. But none proposes this combination.

 

 

CH(L+46); 365.2425 days

 

Me-Ra-Su-Sa-Sa-Ma

 

Fails miserably.

 

 

CH (L+46); 360 days

 

Me-Ju-Ju-Me-Ve-Sa

 

Matches with the event; Perfect

 

 

L+365.2425 days

 

Me -Ju-Sa-Su-Ma-Mo

 

Almost there. But why Su, Ma and Mo? Where is Ve?

 

 

L+360 days

 

Me-Ju-Ke-Mo-Ju-Sa

 

Not satisfactory. Why Ke and Mo? And why not Ve present? From the above table it is clear that the opinion expressed by Chandrahari that the event took place in Me-Ju-Sa is wrong if we buy his argument on 44 more than Lahari and 365.2425 days. As per the conditions 44 min more than Lahari and 365.2425 days, it would be only "Me-Ra-Su-Ke-Ra-Ve which would fail as per every normal logic for deriving the marriage timing. As normal astrologers what would we expect, for something like marriage to fulfill in a chart as per Vimsottari dasa? For me the simple and straight rule would be - Involvement of 7th lord, lagna lord and Venus. If it is a love marriage the 5th lord should be involved. The involvement of 2nd lord, 11th lord, and any planet in its own Sign are also possibilities, even though secondary. As per this simple thumb rule, in the above chart, the planets I would expect to involve are - Ju (7th lord), Me (Lagna lord), Ve (marriage significator), Sa (5th lord, since it is a love marriage). Mo (the 11th lord) and Ke (planet placed in 11th) could be possibilities but only secondary. And I find only 2 sets of data in the above table that satisfies this condition, viz, 1) CH (L+46); 360 days 2) CH (L+44); 360 days. The third choice L + 365.2425 is almost there upto Paryantara level but not beyond that. I discard CH(L+44); 360 days due to the following reasons - 1) None is in support of such an argument 2) This is almost an exception, a rare case. When we consider numerous charts this usually does not seems to be as convincing as the other combination CH (L+46), 360 days. After contrasting L+44 with L+46, I feel more comfortable with L+46 for all practical purposes. Thus I resort to my last and usual choice - L+46; 360 days. But I know that, the people who use L+44 with 360 days and L with 365.2425 days would also be "Almost there". Hope I am clear.<==Love and regards,Sreenadh , "Sreenadh" <sreesog wrote:

Re: Choice of year length

 

Dear Neelam ji, There is a typo in my previous mail; It is NOT 2 Feb 2008 but instead 24th Feb 2008 as stated in previous mails. The table of Dasa-Antara provided in my earlier mail is prepared for 24 Feb 2008 it self and is correct.Love and regards,Sreenadh , "Sreenadh" <sreesog wrote:

Re: Choice of year length

Dear Neelam ji, Please verify it agin - especially the comparison of what Chandra hari is speaking about and what you are speaking about. * Please note that Chandra hari is speaking about L+44 along with 365.2425 days and NOT ABOUT Lahari + 365.2425 days; and you are speaking about Lahari + 365.25 days (Of course you are true that with Lahari+365.25 we will get Me-Ju-Sa. But that is NOT the issue here and that will not solve the problem - since the argument is, whether to use 365.2425 or 360 days along with CHANDRAHARI AYANAMSA) * DOB: 18 Nov 1971; 2.55 AM; POB: Trivandrum, Kerala. Marriage date: 2 Feb 2008. Year length: 365.2425 days (and NOT 365.25 days). Use the latest version of JHora. (It could be a JHora bug/correction as well) * Consider the Dasa from Moon only (and NOT from Lagna sputa) * Go up to the 5th level (and not just upto 3rd level) to ensure that Unintended planets are not involved. (When you go upto 5th level, you can easly see that L+365.2425 day combination too fails) Conclusion: Only L+46 along with 360 days savana year holds good.Love and regards,Sreenadh> , "neelam gupta"> neelamgupta07@ wrote:> >> > Dear Sreenadh ji,> >> > Namaste,> >> > With PL 7.1, lahiri ayanamsha, 365.25 days I am getting Mer-Ju-sa-ve> as the> > dasha sequence from 12 Feb -5 mar.> > This to me is showing an absolute possibility for marriage that> happened on> > 24-feb.> > Hence I said so. Reasons already given in my mail.> >> > Regards> >> > Neelam> >>