mars & moon debilita

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandra Hari Ji,

 

I am not trying to teach anything here and I have not made any absolute

statements. I have never stated that moon-mars combination is good or bad.

We were just trying to discuss various possibilities as per classics.

 

My knowledge and exposure in astrology is nothing to boast about, and I am a

learner myself.

 

You have a problem with my posts...be it so... I don't mind withdrawing

myself...

 

I neither have time nor inclination for such constricting activities.

 

 

Regards

 

Neelam

 

 

 

 

On 16/04/2008, chandra_hari18 <chandra_hari18 wrote:

>

> Dear Neelam ji,

>

> I don't see any lines which you say as I have crossed. If astrology is

> divine, there are no lines. Why are you obsessed with lines, Lakshmana

> rekhas in academic discussion?

>

> You address the real issue I have raised? Why we astrologers fail in

> fixing the Lagna of a known personality? I am not pointing out your

> shortcoming or that of KN Rao who according to your statement had been

> tested many events of Hillary with the Mithuna Lagna chart.

>

> Evading to explain that limitation, you are justifying the use of

> transits. You can't apply transits to someone in US - just because your

> imagination is propelling you to do so. Astrological reasoning is valid only

> when the Daivajna is prompted by an appropriate agency to look into

> someone's future. Astrological rules are not absolute that your guess work

> shall have any relevance to an individua living beyond seven seas.

>

> First, define what is astrology? What is the role of divine in that?

> Whether the gimmicks that are being taught by a few unscrupulous guys for

> their publicity sake have any value as forming Jyotisha? I raised my cynical

> questions because your mumbo-jumbo adds nothing to people. You discussed

> Mars-Moon exchange as a bad combination. I s it so? None can have such

> absolute reading. Such yogas work based on the Kulam. I have been studying

> charts since 1985 and I have realized that such derivations of logic based

> on few examples say 'n' never work in the 'n+1' case. Why?

>

> Jargon and prediction are different businesses. It is the BVB culture

> created by Rao to teach and publish mumbo jumbo which none can put into

> practice. Can you predict on a chart I give? Anything like Profession,

> Education, Career rise, kids anything like that with all the mumbo jumbo

> including the transit wisdom?

>

> What the Mars will do by its transit into Cancer? Nothing. It is sheer

> chance that someone having Mars in Cancer may be somehow affected. There

> will be 100 people with Mars in Cancer and having no effect on them. What

> then is the use of such wisdom?

>

> Did any classics say that such planetary transits spells bad? Where it is

> said that Mars transiting into Neecha rasi will have bad effect on the

> natives? It is your imagination that because Mars is getting debiliated he

> will cause something bad. Take Leo native with Mars in 12th in Cancer. Will

> the transit of Mars into Cancer cause bad things? Can you give such absolute

> judgments?

>

> Please think over as to what is the kind of astrology you are trying to

> teach students? Make the students to think scientifically. How bias can be

> removed from understanding the charts, how careful we must be in drawing

> conclusions from few examples etc.

>

> What did you illustrate with Hillary's chart? I could not understand. When

> you don't know the Lagna itself, what meaninful prediction can be made from

> transit?

>

> *In ancient times great men having mantra siddhi had been using such

> principles for divination to people who approached them. Transit does not

> make an independent division of Jyotisham.* Jatakam, Prasnam, Nimittam etc

> are the branches of astrology. Not Gochara. You are teaching Gochara as if

> it is another branch of astrology.

>

> chandra hari