Guest guest Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 Hare ramakrishna dear roshan ji I can only say u go with u r exp .if u find the reader is good followhis words .But it depends on evolving events and its accuracy . I am more concerned abt the secrets of nadis and its Logic behind it .Rishis were not writing some persons life sketchs it was an illustration and expansion of some theory applicable to any chart .Various rishis and nadis use various technics and i am after it only ,so cant support or deny any purticular reader . for example KN raos double transits theory is taken frm some nadies and he dont write or publish some of the exceptions which should be used .Some nadies dont use any dasa ,u see in ur reading they only used years ,this years are progression of planets .Rest depends on calibre of reader whether he got ur leaf or not . U can inform me or grp abt the devlpments in what happened after the readings . regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah . , rossin ucile <kandisa_ur wrote:>> Dear Sunilji,> > It is indeed a fascinating true tale...just want your> opinion on my case. I did my nadi reading with Mr> Murlidharan of Agastya nadi at Pune in Feb 2006, there> were "pariharam" and "japa" suggested to me which i> completed in next 3 months.> > The predictions were year by year and what i realize> now is that i was told that i would have got married> now, but I am pursuing my MBA abroad.> > I was amazed to see the eveolving nature of nadi> shastra?> > Wahat do u think i should do? When i m back in India> try and read the specific kandams?> > Best regards> > Roshan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.