Psuedo-reseachers,Psuedo-critics and many Psuedos---

[Guest guest]

Namaskar,

It was a multi-cornered discussions(or duel) on psuedo-astrologers,

supra-science,frauds,sychophants, KN raos, BV Ramans, sanjay Raths

etc. many were drawn into acerbic verbal discussions, designed names,

called names. Sometimes it was raging other times it was ranting,

sometimes it was daunting and denting(to astrology).

 

Prominent among duel creators were Vijay H-G, Chandra hari-G,

Sreenadh-G,Sunil-G etc.(surprisingly Shrinivasji did not come forward

to defend his master K N Rao, which incidentally lent some

credibility to criticism hyped by Chadrahari ji on KNR)

 

There have been many such verbal animosities among various people who

throng of astrology. I have been through many such which

included sanjay rath, Sreenadh, PVR, and some disciples of Kn Rao.

Sometimes back Shrinivasji was disapproving of BV raman, sanjay rath

while praising K N Rao group. This time chandrahariji has condemned

one and all.

 

As astrolgers (most of the people who come in this group claims so),

what is most important is repeatitiveness , accuracy and uniformity

of predictions, whatever is theory proposed or propounded by any name

inculding K N Rao, BVR,PVR, Sanjay Rath or Chandrahari. If any one

claims to be good astrolger who has done many research then, he

should do 50 blind chart reading, and tell about some aspects and

past events of native. Whoever does that should be accepted as one

with genuine knowledge. Else we are condeming some and boasting about

some with malafide intention or to massage our ego.

 

Astrology is full of people who claims to have many such theories

which have not been properly researched or tested, all to further

their causes. Moderator of this group might do some acitivity to test

knowledge of some of above mentioned people(who call themselves and

eachothers, novice, masters, experts etc.) else this group will

become boxing ring for people with verbosia.

 

Regards,

Sanjeev

, " Sreenadh "

<sreesog wrote:

>

>

> Dear Chandra hari ji,

> While accepting the facts - may be we should also remember

that the

> well knowledgeable and much sincere members of this group Srinivas

ji,

> Neelam ji etc are the students of KN Rao ji and Goel ji is the

student

> of Sanjay Rath ji. May be BVB has produced many people who became

> genuinely interested in astrology; Any ay on Net we find only SJC

and

> BVB - right or wrong there contributions helped BOTH in

popularizing as

> well as distorting ancient indian astrology. Is that positive or

> negative? May be we should appreciate the positive trends as well

along

> with the negative. We (You and Me) are never in tune with the

instent

> cooked-up false astro theories of PVR, but we value his software

much -

> and what a great contribution it was! We may not agree in many

instances

> with Santanam, BV Raman, KN Rao or Sanjay Rath but is it not that

these

> are the names and individuals who contributed much to the current

> publication and internet popularity of Indian astrology? Of course

many

> of them might not have understood the depths and systematic approach

> (both in astronomy and astrology) of great ancient scholers like

> Aryabhata, Mihira or Maya; Many a texts might have been

unavailable to

> them - true research might have been lacking in many subjects; and

it

> too is possible that in many instances their contributions were

> invaluable. Shouldn't we see these possibilities?

> To be frank in my case - when feel that some theories (which

usually

> happens in most of the cases) proposed by these people are

unacceptable,

> I live it there reluctantly - because I think of Srinivas ji,

Neelam

> ji, Goel ji and so on. The lesson I learned is that, it is NOT due

to

> that pseudo researchers (?) that we keep quite and become

diplomatic -

> but due to the affectionate personal relationship with many of our

> friends in this group. Should we hurt the emotions of our

affectionate

> friends present in this group? - that is the question.

> Note: Yes, as you rightly pointed out, usually we avoid harsh

words

> due to diplomacy - it is atleast true in my case.

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>