Guest guest Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 Dear Mr. Sreenivas, My reply in italics.sreeram srinivas <sreeram64 wrote: Dear Mr. Name_is_Ego ji, Let me take it up with Mr. Nair.....better to call truce and go ahead...... Mr. Nair may not be good in english .... possibly there can a mix up of what he wanted to say or communicate and end up with some thing totally different ......... meanwhile I request you to maintain status quo ..... hope to resolve this today itself ..... I always abhor arguements and generally keep away from such topics. But Mr. Nair , out of the blue posts something unpalatable to me. Status quo will be maintained. My own observations: 1) Age is not the criteria so long one is learning this subject...... This was in response to Mr. Nair's statement which was something about being senior. Hence I wrote about age and being a grandfather. 2) Similarly years of effort spent on the subject...is also not a true measure .... of quality { I go by western standards...where quality is given more importance than to Indian senority...a personal opionion case...} for Sri C.S. Patel during his younger days.....was par excellent than his peers....because of his poorva punya.....to quote an example... Please read above reply for this also. 3) One should NOT pressurize in other to accept a view point...... it is individuals discretion to accept or reject.... I am aghast at your observation. Where did I ever pressurise anyone about accepting anything? Please show me one instance. 4) Probably Mr. Sunil Nair is interested to know in detail about your Rahu Centric Theory .... so may be expecting it a sort of write up when you have analysed few charts.....possibly there may be few more people wanting to know more about your Rahu Centric Theory,...should you be using it more during your chart analysis ..... surely it may catch up with aspiring astros and people may have some thing to contribute to your theory ..... I am of the opinion like any other profession the astrologer should also take risks to promote his knowledgebase or theories. Failures in a astro_prediction are immaterial so long the logics applied are satisfactory .... for we are NOT so organized like the modern science organizations today ..... and we astros lack the corroboration of data .... or experience.....so we need bother about prediction failures .... I truely fail to understand that no where did I speak about Rahu centric theory in recent days. Then where is the question of anyone and also you to raise this Rahu centric theory ? Why it is raised. The whole thing came in response to my posting a 5th house Sani and a small interesting set of facts about this gentleman. Why the Rahu centric theory is cropping up now? In fact I am preparing a post of using Rahu centric theory as a powerful tool in analysing charts for longevity. Example: Sri K.N. Rao's double transit theory took time to be accepted ..... from initial sceptism that followed raised by many knowledgeable astros of his days ..... Note: What people know is only the double transit theory. There are certain variations to it .. which are not in public domain. 5) Whether a person is members in multiple groups or working whole time on astrology is not the focus ..... for it is individual driven ..... for there could be many reasons for a person to continue whole time or devote less time...... This again was in response to Mr. Nair's statement that he is a member of hundreds of groups 6) The current planetary positions are also contributing this flare-ups ..... happening in every group ....in some form or the other.. I agree. In Rahu dasa Rahu bhukti, I am at the receiving end. ... 7) In my opinion .... there is NO senior or junior in this group { so NO father-son-grandpa relations here... though we may take it in a relative sense, to make a point in our astro_discussions .... but surely NOT to settle personal scores ...... } .... all are on the same pedestal ... the one with superior logics are correct interpretations wins the argument .... or has the lasting effect on other astro_members .... I already replied to this senior/age thing Kindly bear with me till then..... With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas Same feelings here too Tatvam-Asi Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Search. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 Namaste Mr. Name_is_Ego ji, My comments were broad based and NOT a point wise replies ..... so I would not be going in detail to your replies at this moment except to resolve the issue at the earliest. In an internet medium, some differences may result in personal likes & dislikes, .... I want to be above that ..... as replied to your offline on this matter. Surely, I would NOT like to join the issue, but limit myself to doing - my role as the moderator in resolving it and marching ahead....which is my prime focus now..... hope you appreciate .... other things if any we can discuss offline .... Your co-operation to the above is solicited. With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 Dear Sreenivas ji and friends,I am reminded of a saying by Zen: Thought is a language that has no sound, while words are the symbols of a language. When language and thinking are excessive, they become a hindrance to wisdom....and astros are supposed to be wise...right!! In the wake of recent controversies...otherwise also...astrology being an ocean with n-number of theories floating around, both surface-types and indepth-types..I would humbly suggest that learned members may apply their theories and hypotheses to known or identifiable charts. The inferences drawn will be more acceptable and understanding will be clearer. I feel it will be an authentic and genuine way of proving a point...best regardsneelamOn 10/03/2008, sreeram srinivas <sreeram64 wrote: Namaste Mr. Name_is_Ego ji, My comments were broad based and NOT a point wise replies ..... so I would not be going in detail to your replies at this moment except to resolve the issue at the earliest. In an internet medium, some differences may result in personal likes & dislikes, .... I want to be above that ..... as replied to your offline on this matter. Surely, I would NOT like to join the issue, but limit myself to doing - my role as the moderator in resolving it and marching ahead....which is my prime focus now..... hope you appreciate .... other things if any we can discuss offline .... Your co-operation to the above is solicited. With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.