Guest guest Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 Hare ramakrishna dear group and learned guru jan I was reading jaimini sutra adhyaya 1 pada 3 sutra 18th and 19th which says aruda pada is falls in kendra or trikona will make a nativ very rich ( from lagna or karakamsa lagna ( the rasi in navamsa were atmakaraka placed ,take in rasi chart --that lagna is karakamsa lagna ) but the stanza 19th says anye dustane means if falls in dustana like 6/8/12 it may be bad the doubt is i never find the arudha lagna is falling in dustana from lagna ,so may b from karakamsa lagna ---so i wanted to discuss in grps If possible with examples ,also i find some ppl is taking karakamasa is navamsa and som same rasi in navamsa in rasi chart as karakamsa lagna . I hope every one will particpate in this exercise regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 Dear Sunil ji,I think what is meant in these sutras is Arudha, not arudh pada. Arudh pada of lagna will never fall in 6/8/12 houses. In fact the padas of odd houses will always skip 6/8/12. B.S.Rao has not elaborated this sutra and one has to struggle to find its meaning. P.S. Shastri (p 98) has translated it to elaborate the meaning of this sutra. He has also given examples to illustrate this.If the arudha lagna and arudha of 7H falls in kendra or trikona from arudha of lagna, the native becomes prosperous and if they fall in 6/8/12 from each other native suffers poverty. KN Rao says that we should consider both karkamsha and Upapada together and 2nd and 7th from them should be studied. Regarding the use of karkamsha, he uses Karkamsha in birth horoscope only. This makes sense also. Suppose sun is AK, then he'll always be in karakamsha lagna, and people with sun as AK can be taken as being public servants or engaged in political activities!!! KL taken in birth horoscope is only the rashi taken as KL and the planets remain in their signs. Some people also make use of swamsha which is karakas and the entire navamsha. best regardsneelamOn 03/03/2008, sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala wrote: Hare ramakrishna dear group and learned guru jan I was reading jaimini sutra adhyaya 1 pada 3 sutra 18th and 19th which says aruda pada is falls in kendra or trikona will make a nativ very rich ( from lagna or karakamsa lagna ( the rasi in navamsa were atmakaraka placed ,take in rasi chart --that lagna is karakamsa lagna ) but the stanza 19th says anye dustane means if falls in dustana like 6/8/12 it may be bad the doubt is i never find the arudha lagna is falling in dustana from lagna ,so may b from karakamsa lagna ---so i wanted to discuss in grps If possible with examples ,also i find some ppl is taking karakamasa is navamsa and som same rasi in navamsa in rasi chart as karakamsa lagna . I hope every one will particpate in this exercise regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 Hare rama krishna dear neelam gupta ji , Thanks for the fast response ,but i am confused .MY questions r typed in between ur mail in diffrnt font as Q header .I also find diffrnt methods for calculating arudhas .But i stick to sri KN rao s method <tho Adaraniya sri CS patel ji also calculate diffrnt way >Also i am using 7 karakas proposed by sri KN rao and also his dasas LIke chara dasa for reading a chart tho yet to grab the knack of it . Dear Sunil ji,I think what is meant in these sutras is Arudha, not arudh pada. Q-i dont get the difference between arudha ,i was thinking arudha means arudha pada Arudh pada of lagna will never fall in 6/8/12 houses. In fact the padas of odd houses will always skip 6/8/12. B.S.Rao has not elaborated this sutra and one has to struggle to find its meaning.P.S. Shastri (p 98) has translated it to elaborate the meaning of this sutra. He has also given examples to illustrate this.If the arudha lagna and arudha of 7H falls in kendra or trikona from arudha of lagna, the native becomes prosperous and if they fall in 6/8/12 from each other native suffers poverty. KN Rao says that we should consider both karkamsha and Upapada together and 2nd and 7th from them should be studied. Q--can u explain if u hav time how sri KN rao was using to find UPapada ?Is it arudha of 12th or 5th Regarding the use of karkamsha, he uses Karkamsha in birth horoscope only. This makes sense also. Suppose sun is AK, then he'll always be in karakamsha lagna, and people with sun as AK can be taken as being public servants or engaged in political activities!!! KL taken in birth horoscope is only the rashi taken as KL and the planets remain in their signs. Q--I am confused again .KL in rasi chart means is it means the rasi of AK graha? Some people also make use of swamsha which is karakas and the entire navamsha. Q--swamsa is it navamsa lagna or karakamsa lagna or karaka lagna --is it is used exclusvly is navamsa or rasi chart can u take up any chart and can we discuss . Also i hav doubts abt placement of AK and amk from dasa rasi ,if they r in dustana what each indicates ,if in own or exaltation but in dustana from dasa rasi what it indicates .Also if u r using Lord of simhasan frm dasa rasi if in dustana again can u elaborate ??( all this i am got frm some writing of sri col.gaud ji ){if ur time allows pls explain if i am not asking too much ,or u can write me prvtly also as regrds to last question } best regardsneelam Regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 Dear Sunil ji,With whatever little know-how I have, I'll try to explain these statements, perhaps with examples. Both KN Rao and Col Gour insist on analyses through Parashari system and verifying through Jaimini. I'll soon put together my thoughts and mail to you. best regardsneelamOn 03/03/2008, sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala wrote: Hare rama krishna dear neelam gupta ji , Thanks for the fast response ,but i am confused .MY questions r typed in between ur mail in diffrnt font as Q header .I also find diffrnt methods for calculating arudhas .But i stick to sri KN rao s method <tho Adaraniya sri CS patel ji also calculate diffrnt way >Also i am using 7 karakas proposed by sri KN rao and also his dasas LIke chara dasa for reading a chart tho yet to grab the knack of it . Dear Sunil ji,I think what is meant in these sutras is Arudha, not arudh pada. Q-i dont get the difference between arudha ,i was thinking arudha means arudha pada Arudh pada of lagna will never fall in 6/8/12 houses. In fact the padas of odd houses will always skip 6/8/12. B.S.Rao has not elaborated this sutra and one has to struggle to find its meaning.P.S. Shastri (p 98) has translated it to elaborate the meaning of this sutra. He has also given examples to illustrate this. If the arudha lagna and arudha of 7H falls in kendra or trikona from arudha of lagna, the native becomes prosperous and if they fall in 6/8/12 from each other native suffers poverty. KN Rao says that we should consider both karkamsha and Upapada together and 2nd and 7th from them should be studied. Q--can u explain if u hav time how sri KN rao was using to find UPapada ?Is it arudha of 12th or 5th Regarding the use of karkamsha, he uses Karkamsha in birth horoscope only. This makes sense also. Suppose sun is AK, then he'll always be in karakamsha lagna, and people with sun as AK can be taken as being public servants or engaged in political activities!!! KL taken in birth horoscope is only the rashi taken as KL and the planets remain in their signs. Q--I am confused again .KL in rasi chart means is it means the rasi of AK graha? Some people also make use of swamsha which is karakas and the entire navamsha. Q--swamsa is it navamsa lagna or karakamsa lagna or karaka lagna --is it is used exclusvly is navamsa or rasi chart can u take up any chart and can we discuss . Also i hav doubts abt placement of AK and amk from dasa rasi ,if they r in dustana what each indicates ,if in own or exaltation but in dustana from dasa rasi what it indicates .Also if u r using Lord of simhasan frm dasa rasi if in dustana again can u elaborate ??( all this i am got frm some writing of sri col.gaud ji ){if ur time allows pls explain if i am not asking too much ,or u can write me prvtly also as regrds to last question } best regardsneelam Regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 Hare rama krishna dear neelam ji Thanks and i am waiting for ur mail . same time i think we can discuss lil bit of jaimini in grp also ,other things u can write in my personal mails regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah , " neelam gupta " <neelamgupta07 wrote: > > Dear Sunil ji, > With whatever little know-how I have, I'll try to explain these statements, > perhaps with examples. > Both KN Rao and Col Gour insist on analyses through Parashari system and > verifying through Jaimini. I'll soon put together my thoughts and mail to > you. > best regards > neelam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 Dear group members, A beginners observation ..related to arudha. To me, Arudha and Argala concepts have few things in common. In Argala, a planet can influence any point (lagna, any house), if there is no other planet equidistant from that point in other direction. Like a planet in 11H will simply influence the lagna provided there is no planet in 3H. If there is a planet in 3H -- some interaction of effects will take place, Let's look at the same thing from Arudha concept, say for AL. If Lagna lord is in 11H, the AL will fall in 3H. If there is no planet, it remains simple, But if there is some planet in 3H, then effect of that planet will enter in to the interpretation. Seems, Arudha and argala both are related to image only, Arudha being a more concrete concept and specialized (rashi and rashi lord). Regards Chakraborty sunil nair [astro_tellerkerala]Monday, March 03, 2008 5:29 PM Subject: Re:Jaimini sustra doubts Hare rama krishna dear neelam gupta ji , Thanks for the fast response ,but i am confused ..MY questions r typed in between ur mail in diffrnt font as Q header .I also find diffrnt methods for calculating arudhas .But i stick to sri KN rao s method <tho Adaraniya sri CS patel ji also calculate diffrnt way >Also i am using 7 karakas proposed by sri KN rao and also his dasas LIke chara dasa for reading a chart tho yet to grab the knack of it . Dear Sunil ji,I think what is meant in these sutras is Arudha, not arudh pada. Q-i dont get the difference between arudha ,i was thinking arudha means arudha pada Arudh pada of lagna will never fall in 6/8/12 houses. In fact the padas of odd houses will always skip 6/8/12. B.S.Rao has not elaborated this sutra and one has to struggle to find its meaning.P.S. Shastri (p 98) has translated it to elaborate the meaning of this sutra. He has also given examples to illustrate this.If the arudha lagna and arudha of 7H falls in kendra or trikona from arudha of lagna, the native becomes prosperous and if they fall in 6/8/12 from each other native suffers poverty. KN Rao says that we should consider both karkamsha and Upapada together and 2nd and 7th from them should be studied. Q--can u explain if u hav time how sri KN rao was using to find UPapada ?Is it arudha of 12th or 5th Regarding the use of karkamsha, he uses Karkamsha in birth horoscope only. This makes sense also. Suppose sun is AK, then he'll always be in karakamsha lagna, and people with sun as AK can be taken as being public servants or engaged in political activities!!! KL taken in birth horoscope is only the rashi taken as KL and the planets remain in their signs. Q--I am confused again .KL in rasi chart means is it means the rasi of AK graha? Some people also make use of swamsha which is karakas and the entire navamsha. Q--swamsa is it navamsa lagna or karakamsa lagna or karaka lagna --is it is used exclusvly is navamsa or rasi chart can u take up any chart and can we discuss .. Also i hav doubts abt placement of AK and amk from dasa rasi ,if they r in dustana what each indicates ,if in own or exaltation but in dustana from dasa rasi what it indicates .Also if u r using Lord of simhasan frm dasa rasi if in dustana again can u elaborate ??( all this i am got frm some writing of sri col.gaud ji ){if ur time allows pls explain if i am not asking too much ,or u can write me prvtly also as regrds to last question } best regardsneelam Regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah This Message was sent from Indian Oil Messaging Gateway. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 Dear Chakraborty ji,If Lagna lord is in 11H, the AL will fall in 3H....this is not correct. If LL is in 11H, AL will fall in 9H, i.e in 11th from 11th regardsneelamOn 04/03/2008, Chakraborty, PL <CHAKRABORTYP2 wrote: Dear group members, A beginners observation ..related to arudha. To me, Arudha and Argala concepts have few things in common. In Argala, a planet can influence any point (lagna, any house), if there is no other planet equidistant from that point in other direction. Like a planet in 11H will simply influence the lagna provided there is no planet in 3H. If there is a planet in 3H -- some interaction of effects will take place, Let's look at the same thing from Arudha concept, say for AL. If Lagna lord is in 11H, the AL will fall in 3H. If there is no planet, it remains simple, But if there is some planet in 3H, then effect of that planet will enter in to the interpretation. Seems, Arudha and argala both are related to image only, Arudha being a more concrete concept and specialized (rashi and rashi lord). Regards Chakraborty sunil nair [astro_tellerkerala]Monday, March 03, 2008 5:29 PM Subject: Re:Jaimini sustra doubts Hare rama krishna dear neelam gupta ji , Thanks for the fast response ,but i am confused ..MY questions r typed in between ur mail in diffrnt font as Q header .I also find diffrnt methods for calculating arudhas .But i stick to sri KN rao s method <tho Adaraniya sri CS patel ji also calculate diffrnt way >Also i am using 7 karakas proposed by sri KN rao and also his dasas LIke chara dasa for reading a chart tho yet to grab the knack of it . Dear Sunil ji,I think what is meant in these sutras is Arudha, not arudh pada. Q-i dont get the difference between arudha ,i was thinking arudha means arudha pada Arudh pada of lagna will never fall in 6/8/12 houses. In fact the padas of odd houses will always skip 6/8/12. B.S.Rao has not elaborated this sutra and one has to struggle to find its meaning.P.S. Shastri (p 98) has translated it to elaborate the meaning of this sutra. He has also given examples to illustrate this.If the arudha lagna and arudha of 7H falls in kendra or trikona from arudha of lagna, the native becomes prosperous and if they fall in 6/8/12 from each other native suffers poverty. KN Rao says that we should consider both karkamsha and Upapada together and 2nd and 7th from them should be studied. Q--can u explain if u hav time how sri KN rao was using to find UPapada ?Is it arudha of 12th or 5th Regarding the use of karkamsha, he uses Karkamsha in birth horoscope only. This makes sense also. Suppose sun is AK, then he'll always be in karakamsha lagna, and people with sun as AK can be taken as being public servants or engaged in political activities!!! KL taken in birth horoscope is only the rashi taken as KL and the planets remain in their signs. Q--I am confused again .KL in rasi chart means is it means the rasi of AK graha? Some people also make use of swamsha which is karakas and the entire navamsha. Q--swamsa is it navamsa lagna or karakamsa lagna or karaka lagna --is it is used exclusvly is navamsa or rasi chart can u take up any chart and can we discuss .. Also i hav doubts abt placement of AK and amk from dasa rasi ,if they r in dustana what each indicates ,if in own or exaltation but in dustana from dasa rasi what it indicates .Also if u r using Lord of simhasan frm dasa rasi if in dustana again can u elaborate ??( all this i am got frm some writing of sri col.gaud ji ){if ur time allows pls explain if i am not asking too much ,or u can write me prvtly also as regrds to last question } best regardsneelam Regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah This Message was sent from Indian Oil Messaging Gateway. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 Neelam-ji, U r right. But the overall concept is basically mirror image, in diferent directions.. Regards chakraborty neelam gupta [neelamgupta07]Tuesday, March 04, 2008 1:19 PM Subject: Re:Jaimini sustra doubts Dear Chakraborty ji,If Lagna lord is in 11H, the AL will fall in 3H....this is not correct. If LL is in 11H, AL will fall in 9H, i.e in 11th from 11thregardsneelam On 04/03/2008, Chakraborty, PL <CHAKRABORTYP2 (AT) iocl (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear group members, A beginners observation ..related to arudha. To me, Arudha and Argala concepts have few things in common. In Argala, a planet can influence any point (lagna, any house), if there is no other planet equidistant from that point in other direction. Like a planet in 11H will simply influence the lagna provided there is no planet in 3H. If there is a planet in 3H -- some interaction of effects will take place, Let's look at the same thing from Arudha concept, say for AL. If Lagna lord is in 11H, the AL will fall in 3H. If there is no planet, it remains simple, But if there is some planet in 3H, then effect of that planet will enter in to the interpretation. Seems, Arudha and argala both are related to image only, Arudha being a more concrete concept and specialized (rashi and rashi lord). Regards Chakraborty sunil nair [astro_tellerkerala (AT) (DOT) co.in]Monday, March 03, 2008 5:29 PM Subject: Re:Jaimini sustra doubts Hare rama krishna dear neelam gupta ji , Thanks for the fast response ,but i am confused ..MY questions r typed in between ur mail in diffrnt font as Q header .I also find diffrnt methods for calculating arudhas .But i stick to sri KN rao s method <tho Adaraniya sri CS patel ji also calculate diffrnt way >Also i am using 7 karakas proposed by sri KN rao and also his dasas LIke chara dasa for reading a chart tho yet to grab the knack of it . Dear Sunil ji,I think what is meant in these sutras is Arudha, not arudh pada. Q-i dont get the difference between arudha ,i was thinking arudha means arudha pada Arudh pada of lagna will never fall in 6/8/12 houses. In fact the padas of odd houses will always skip 6/8/12. B.S.Rao has not elaborated this sutra and one has to struggle to find its meaning.P.S. Shastri (p 98) has translated it to elaborate the meaning of this sutra. He has also given examples to illustrate this.If the arudha lagna and arudha of 7H falls in kendra or trikona from arudha of lagna, the native becomes prosperous and if they fall in 6/8/12 from each other native suffers poverty. KN Rao says that we should consider both karkamsha and Upapada together and 2nd and 7th from them should be studied. Q--can u explain if u hav time how sri KN rao was using to find UPapada ?Is it arudha of 12th or 5th Regarding the use of karkamsha, he uses Karkamsha in birth horoscope only. This makes sense also. Suppose sun is AK, then he'll always be in karakamsha lagna, and people with sun as AK can be taken as being public servants or engaged in political activities!!! KL taken in birth horoscope is only the rashi taken as KL and the planets remain in their signs. Q--I am confused again .KL in rasi chart means is it means the rasi of AK graha? Some people also make use of swamsha which is karakas and the entire navamsha. Q--swamsa is it navamsa lagna or karakamsa lagna or karaka lagna --is it is used exclusvly is navamsa or rasi chart can u take up any chart and can we discuss .. Also i hav doubts abt placement of AK and amk from dasa rasi ,if they r in dustana what each indicates ,if in own or exaltation but in dustana from dasa rasi what it indicates .Also if u r using Lord of simhasan frm dasa rasi if in dustana again can u elaborate ??( all this i am got frm some writing of sri col.gaud ji ){if ur time allows pls explain if i am not asking too much ,or u can write me prvtly also as regrds to last question } best regardsneelam Regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah This Message was sent from Indian Oil Messaging Gateway. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. This Message was sent from Indian Oil Messaging Gateway. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 Dear Neelam ji, > Both KN Rao and Col Gour insist on analyses through Parashari > system and verifying through Jaimini. I am a primary class student of Parashari/Jaimini system and what I felt was - * The system is based on a modified version of ancient BPHS possibly done by some AP astrologers. * The Jaimini sutra text possibly originated well after 10th century is a text based on this this modified BPHS and some unique methods presented in it. * This essentially points to the fact that " If someone sincerely want to learn and apply this new born AP born system of astrology then he/she should base his understanding on modified BPHS and verify his understanding using the available text called Jaimini Sutra " . Means, me too agree with KN Rao/Col Gour approach to such as " analyses through Parashari system and verifying through Jaimini " Love and regards, Sreenadh , " neelam gupta " <neelamgupta07 wrote: > > Dear Sunil ji, > With whatever little know-how I have, I'll try to explain these statements, > perhaps with examples. > Both KN Rao and Col Gour insist on analyses through Parashari system and > verifying through Jaimini. I'll soon put together my thoughts and mail to > you. > best regards > neelam > > On 03/03/2008, sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala wrote: > > > > > > > > Hare rama krishna > > > > dear neelam gupta ji , > > > > > > > > Thanks for the fast response ,but i am confused .MY questions r typed in > > between ur mail in diffrnt font as Q header .I also find diffrnt methods > > for calculating arudhas .But i stick to sri KN rao s method <tho Adaraniya > > sri CS patel ji also calculate diffrnt way >Also i am using 7 karakas > > proposed by sri KN rao and also his dasas LIke chara dasa for reading a > > chart tho yet to grab the knack of it . > > > > > > > > Dear Sunil ji, > > I think what is meant in these sutras is Arudha, not arudh pada. > > > > > > > > Q-i dont get the difference between arudha ,i was thinking arudha means > > arudha pada > > > > > > > > Arudh pada of lagna will never fall in 6/8/12 houses. In fact the padas of > > odd houses will always skip 6/8/12. B.S.Rao has not elaborated this sutra > > and one has to struggle to find its meaning. > > P.S. Shastri (p 98) has translated it to elaborate the meaning of this > > sutra. He has also given examples to illustrate this. > > If the arudha lagna and arudha of 7H falls in kendra or trikona from > > arudha of lagna, the native becomes prosperous and if they fall in 6/8/12 > > from each other native suffers poverty. > > KN Rao says that we should consider both karkamsha and Upapada together > > and 2nd and 7th from them should be studied. > > > > > > > > Q--can u explain if u hav time how sri KN rao was using to find UPapada > > ?Is it arudha of 12th or 5th > > > > > > Regarding the use of karkamsha, he uses Karkamsha in birth horoscope only. > > This makes sense also. Suppose sun is AK, then he'll always be in karakamsha > > lagna, and people with sun as AK can be taken as being public servants or > > engaged in political activities!!! KL taken in birth horoscope is only the > > rashi taken as KL and the planets remain in their signs. > > > > > > > > Q--I am confused again .KL in rasi chart means is it means the rasi of AK > > graha? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some people also make use of swamsha which is karakas and the entire > > navamsha. > > > > > > > > Q--swamsa is it navamsa lagna or karakamsa lagna or karaka lagna --is it > > is used exclusvly is navamsa or rasi chart > > > > > > > > can u take up any chart and can we discuss . > > > > Also i hav doubts abt placement of AK and amk from dasa rasi ,if they r > > in dustana what each indicates ,if in own or exaltation but in dustana from > > dasa rasi what it indicates .Also if u r using Lord of simhasan frm dasa > > rasi if in dustana again can u elaborate ??( all this i am got frm some > > writing of sri col.gaud ji ){if ur time allows pls explain if i am not > > asking too much ,or u can write me prvtly also as regrds to last question } > > > > > > > > best regards > > neelam > > > > > > > > Regrds sunil nair > > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 Dear Sreenadhji I think you're right about the origin of Jaimini. BPHS gives a very sketchy and unreliable account of Jaimini techniques. According to KN Rao most of the techniques are lost today and even Jaimini Sutra has many flaws and lacks proper commentry. He took up the task of reviving the techniques inpired by an andhra astrologer called Vemuri Rama Murthy Shastri who gave astounding predictions based on several jaimini dashas. Now KNR has given some of the techniques in his books like Jaimini Char Dasha, karakamsha and Mandook dasha and another one on sthir dasha co-authored by Akhila. The idea behind using Jaimini is two-fold: 1) Two methods simultaneously indicating an event to happen, gives more confidence to the astrologer about his reading. 1) jaimini knowledge is in nascent stages and many of the dictums are lost. So if we see an event in better understood parashari system, and then try to tackle it through Jaimini also, it serves as a test for that technique. love and regards neelam On 04/03/2008, Sreenadh <sreesog wrote: > > Dear Neelam ji, > > Both KN Rao and Col Gour insist on analyses through Parashari > > system and verifying through Jaimini. > I am a primary class student of Parashari/Jaimini system and what I > felt was - > * The system is based on a modified version of ancient BPHS > possibly done by some AP astrologers. > * The Jaimini sutra text possibly originated well after 10th > century is a text based on this this modified BPHS and some unique > methods presented in it. > * This essentially points to the fact that " If someone sincerely > want to learn and apply this new born AP born system of astrology > then he/she should base his understanding on modified BPHS and verify > his understanding using the available text called Jaimini Sutra " . > Means, me too agree with KN Rao/Col Gour approach to such as > " analyses through Parashari system and verifying through Jaimini " > Love and regards, > Sreenadh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.