Guest guest Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 Dear Mr. Sanjeev, 1) Let me assure you that we are not selective on any group member 2) There is NO coterie in this group....if any ....it is only a result of ficitious or creative 5H imagination... 3) Mr. Name_is_Ego has in past also posted similar birth data, but has never seen him asking for any reading in all my reading of his emails for last few years...{ Lost his track since my leaving VA groups in 2004 or 05}. 4) Some of his cases were learning through real cases....he has earlier posted the data of Son of Rupert Murdoh...from his second or ...wife. Surely such authentic data gives us enough combinations for knowing a person who when becomes an young man...would be inheriting billions/trillions.... 5) If you look at the archive, we have been open to chart reading....on specific topics that are under discussion. The blind chart posted by Ms. Neelam ....most of the responders indicated Alp Ayu..... just noticed another email of " Revati_27 " on the similar lines... 6) Members, whose credentials are beyond doubt are free to post any data...for they have over the years been active in ....and known for NOT having raised any personal queries...or family chart readings....such person's emails are allowed.... generally ... yet they are also watched......should you notice something odd....feel free to raise the alarm....to wake up the moderators......surely moderators in his human nature...has to depend on " alarm clocks " unless he is over confident.....!!! 7) Agree to your point....that chart reading has brought down many a ....atleast to the genuine astro_interests... 8) Dear Mr. Pashu_Sanju ji,.......participate in the subject discussions.....you will find truth in my above statements....and this group's openess...... 9) Please do contest any of my views should it have any incosistency when through your logics or points...with evidence.....we are open to criticism and also have humility to apologise is proved Example: We had a " pointer " from Mr. Udupa...recently....we proved our point with evidence....we commented on his subject thread....even though we had less knowledge on it ........for being astro_kids.....we are still waiting his own contribution having done our kilobytes on it..... Note: In past, we started or presented few astro_topics.....members did not respond....we have to bear it.....democracy man democracy.....we are not cribbing about lack of response from 2000+ members in the group....when active are mostly 50+ or less. Conclusion : Be participating......then your voice would grow...automatically louder & bolder.....the group is yours......NOT mine....so we all need to be alert.... Go through the archives...if you are not convinced....that is all I can say....Sanjeev ji. With regards, Sreeram_Srinivas , " pashu_sanju " <pashu_sanju wrote: > > Namaskar, > Few days back when someone posted a chart for discusions, it was > stated that this is group's policy not to encourage chart reading. In > a thread posted by nameisego, a chart of recently born child has been > put up for reading in disguise of finding interesting points. This > was lapped by some other members. This is contravention of what was > stated earlier goup memebers/owners/moderators, Now same is being > overlooked. May be because, it involves a coterie of some members of > the group, who have formed close group of discussing among themselves. > In an otherwise well managed group, these flouting of rules by some > while forcing others to follow rules is detrimental to the interest > of the group. > > Many lost their merits due to this. I wish uniform > convention following will help maintain group's reputation. > > Regards, > Sanjeev > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 Namaskar, Good to hear from moderator/owner, who has been taking pains to run group. This also goes on to establish that group is in sound hands. I compliment SS and others for this. Regards, Sanjeev , " sreeram srinivas " <sreeram64 wrote: > > > Dear Mr. Sanjeev, > > 1) Let me assure you that we are not selective on any group member > > 2) There is NO coterie in this group....if any ....it is only a result > of ficitious or creative 5H imagination... > > 3) Mr. Name_is_Ego has in past also posted similar birth data, but has > never seen him asking for any reading in all my reading of his emails > for last few years...{ Lost his track since my leaving VA groups in 2004 > or 05}. > > 4) Some of his cases were learning through real cases....he has earlier > posted the data of Son of Rupert Murdoh...from his second or ...wife. > Surely such authentic data gives us enough combinations for knowing a > person who when becomes an young man...would be inheriting > billions/trillions.... > > 5) If you look at the archive, we have been open to chart reading....on > specific topics that are under discussion. The blind chart posted by > Ms. Neelam ....most of the responders indicated Alp Ayu..... just > noticed another email of " Revati_27 " on the similar lines... > > 6) Members, whose credentials are beyond doubt are free to post any > data...for they have over the years been active in groups....and > known for NOT having raised any personal queries...or family chart > readings....such person's emails are allowed.... generally ... yet they > are also watched......should you notice something odd....feel free to > raise the alarm....to wake up the moderators......surely moderators in > his human nature...has to depend on " alarm clocks " unless he is over > confident.....!!! > > 7) Agree to your point....that chart reading has brought down many a > ....atleast to the genuine astro_interests... > > 8) Dear Mr. Pashu_Sanju ji,.......participate in the subject > discussions.....you will find truth in my above statements....and this > group's openess...... > > 9) Please do contest any of my views should it have any incosistency > when through your logics or points...with evidence.....we are open to > criticism and also have humility to apologise is proved > > Example: We had a " pointer " from Mr. Udupa...recently....we proved our > point with evidence....we commented on his subject thread....even though > we had less knowledge on it ........for being astro_kids.....we are > still waiting his own contribution having done our kilobytes on it..... > > Note: In past, we started or presented few astro_topics.....members did > not respond....we have to bear it.....democracy man democracy.....we are > not cribbing about lack of response from 2000+ members in the > group....when active are mostly 50+ or less. > > Conclusion : Be participating......then your voice would > grow...automatically louder & bolder.....the group is yours......NOT > mine....so we all need to be alert.... > > Go through the archives...if you are not convinced....that is all I can > say....Sanjeev ji. > > With regards, > > Sreeram_Srinivas > > > , " pashu_sanju " > <pashu_sanju@> wrote: > > > > Namaskar, > > Few days back when someone posted a chart for discusions, it was > > stated that this is group's policy not to encourage chart reading. In > > a thread posted by nameisego, a chart of recently born child has been > > put up for reading in disguise of finding interesting points. This > > was lapped by some other members. This is contravention of what was > > stated earlier goup memebers/owners/moderators, Now same is being > > overlooked. May be because, it involves a coterie of some members of > > the group, who have formed close group of discussing among themselves. > > In an otherwise well managed group, these flouting of rules by some > > while forcing others to follow rules is detrimental to the interest > > of the group. > > > > Many lost their merits due to this. I wish uniform > > convention following will help maintain group's reputation. > > > > Regards, > > Sanjeev > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.