Guest guest Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 Dear SreeramJi, You wrote, " Important Note: In any astro_analysis...we request members to apply techniques of respective school and not to mix. i.e. Parashari system should NOT be mixed with Jamini methods or Nadi methods or Prashna methods. Western & Indian astrology should not be mixed i.e. Use of Uranus or Pluto or Neptune are used in Indian systems. We strongly believe that every system has inherent strengths...to declare or conclude which works correctly and know where we are failing ..... can only be judged when you follow any single system. You may verify with other methods...and then moderate your results...- this is acceptable. " " Unquote IMHO, every system has something good to offer. Japan, adopted something from every place in the world and made herself as one of the richest, most industrialised and successful nations. My personal approach has , as you might known., been one of the most radical. My Rahu centric theory seems to be a difficult pill to swallow. Apart from that, I use small principles from different schools to read a chart which I have found to give a very accaptable result. I use them with a fair amount of success. So confining to one school of thought or just conventional schools of Vedic astrology might not produce desired responses and participation. You can say that Conventional, Radical and potpouri school of astrology may be followed here. Unless we do so, no new methods like mine can see the daylight (unless I start beating my drum in a group created by me...which I do not foresee will happen ) Let us keep our minds open and accept anything that is effective or if we want to adopt or leave it without denouncing it. Rgds Tatavam-Asi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.