My Own School of Thought..

[Guest guest]

Namaste Name_is_ego ji,

I can understand and relate your view point. My articulation is...use any system....traditional or radical or self evolved....but apply it consistently....then only one can know its results. Being an music enthusiastic.....have been tracking few yester years musicians...who have evolved their own "raagas" still the same stalwarts have realised that to establish a "raaga" is a life time effort and there is lots of "prana poshana" { Prana = Lifeforce, Poshana = support } to be done. That is what our Rishis have done in past. Truly Sri Krishnamurthy spent his life on his evolved system hence it is popular now. It is a fair to evolve......NO arguments on that.

I have seen people taking normal Parashara aspects, then do not use Jamini aspects simultaneously, similarly some astros take Rahu aspects..... If you use - use it consistently....do not be selective on the application.....

If one keeps mixing different systems and also be selective about it....then the astro_tools or predictions would work only for that learned person...others cannot replicate. That is the problem or issue with many of SJC techniques....which I did use them....before I concluded to be away from it. {Personal Opinion}

Hope I am successful in my clarification.....

With regards,

Sreeram_Srinivas , "nameisego" <nameisego wrote:>> Dear SreeramJi,> > You wrote,> > "Important Note: In any astro_analysis...we request members to apply > techniques of respective school and not to mix. i.e. Parashari system > should NOT be mixed with Jamini methods or Nadi methods or Prashna > methods. Western & Indian astrology should not be mixed i.e. Use of > Uranus or Pluto or Neptune are used in Indian systems. We strongly > believe that every system has inherent strengths...to declare or > conclude which works correctly and know where we are failing ..... can > only be judged when you follow any single system. You may verify > with other methods...and then moderate your results...- this is > acceptable.""> Unquote> > IMHO, every system has something good to offer.> Japan, adopted something from every place in the world and made herself > as one of the richest, most industrialised and successful nations.> > My personal approach has , as you might known., been one of the most > radical. My Rahu centric theory seems to be a difficult pill to swallow.> Apart from that, I use small principles from different schools to read > a chart which I have found to give a very accaptable result.> > I use them with a fair amount of success.> > So confining to one school of thought or just conventional schools of > Vedic astrology might not produce desired responses and participation.> > You can say that Conventional, Radical and potpouri school of astrology> may be followed here.> > Unless we do so, no new methods like mine can see the daylight (unless > I start beating my drum in a group created by me...which I do not > foresee will happen )> > Let us keep our minds open and accept anything that is effective or if > we want to adopt or leave it without denouncing it.> > Rgds> > Tatavam-Asi>