My Own School of Thought

[Guest guest]

I have been reading astrology on and off since I was about 8 years

old. But only got to know about Vedic Astrology through Mountain

Astrologer and some web sites by Phyllis Chubb and other Western

Astrologers. I have practically scanned thru all the web sites

available for Vedic although I do not go into the details of the

calculations.

 

Most of my explanations are also additionally based on observation.

For example, most vedic western astrologers early on feel that

character analysis is based on Tropical Astrology and if one wants to

interpret houses they then use Vedic Astrology. Then one Western

Vedic and Tropical Astrologer by the name of Dennis (cannot remember

his surname) gave an interview in Mountain Astrologer mentioned that

both systems work for both character analysis and houses (chart)

interpretation. But throughout my years of observation of my chart

and other people's chart and their individual behaviour and reactions,

I came to the conclusion that both systems work for chart analysis and

for character analysis, but in ways that are not fathomed easily. For

character analysis, as I mentioned there is the inner and outer

character. So a person with planet in 0 degrees to 23 degrees in

Taurs, is credited with being stable and stubborn. But under Vedic,

the planet is under Aires and he is credited with being afraid of water!!!

 

I then observe and found out it turns out to be true although the

person's afraid of water is subtle - not outwardly voiced or shown.

 

Similarly with Houses. In fact even South Indian and North Indian

astrolgy use different houses to indicate the Father.

 

So all in all I try to think things logically and come up with what I

think is correct. Althought like I said East meets West since time

immemorial, but because of poor transportation, information may have

passed between groups, but sometimes inaccurately as most of the

people who journey in the past, are tradesmen etc who just happened to

mention in passing on subjects like Astrology unless the travelling

informer is a professional astrologer who plans to migrate or spread

his own version of teaching.

 

If we want to treat Astrology as a Science, then even if we have our

own school of thought, we can be open to new observations. This is

also one of the mission and vision of this group's web site. But of

course members are also free to disagree. This would put Astrology on

par with all other academic disciplines of study like Business

Administration, Computer Science etc. So I can say I myself do not

have a particular school of thought. But whatever I say in Vedic, is

based on observation - many times in fact - and I am amazed the world

did not document it down. But whatever I propose is not 100% new. I

will fill up the gaps.

 

(By the way I have both lights aspecting Uranus).

 

However, I must admit I am new to Vedic, so I may not 100% know what

the ancients have elucidated. Some of my views may contradict them

flatly. I welcome feedback and corrections anytime and also to learn

from the rest.

 

I am also new to such group websites (I seldom use my PC at home until

now other than surfing Vedic web sites). Did not understand about how

the protocol is. Sorry about that!

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr. Hockleong K,

Nice to know about your astro_interests and brief background. Thank you writing in ..... We appreciate. We like you, are more into vedic astrology {in general terminology} and know little about western astrology & its practises.

In the vedic astrology side we broadly have four groups.....

1) Sri B.V. Raman group - not much known for his exposition of astrology, better known for his services in popularization of astrology today....not much techniques contribution other than repository of articles in his Astrological Magazine, which is now defunct.

2) Sri Krishnamurthy system i.e. KP System { Krishnamurthy Paddathi. Paddathi=Method}. A blend of vedic astrology and western systems......good for Prasna...... works well in good hands.....this school thinks the KP System is panacea of all astro_questions & single point solutions for all.

3) Sri K.N. Rao group - popular for his analytical and logical techniques. He has avoided controversies...by keeping away from commentaries on astro_classics.....concentrated on modern techniques...gave new positive interpretations from otherwise doomsday predictions given in classics for certain combinations.....in line with modern day applications & society. Low profile group....yet have well educated breed of astros....

4) Mr. Sanjay Rath inspired/lead SJC group and most prominent in Internet. A mix of Point No.(1) and other intelligently termed Parampara Jyotish...with extreme radical interpretations... often at conflict with their own techniques & defined astro_rules. They have brought renaissance by mixing all known systems in a true WWF free style, at times questionable logics, a nice potpourri of all known systems in to one famous system called SJC system, true contributors to Unifield theory.... & can claim some distant relationship with Einstein.

Myself from Sri K.N. Rao school of thoughts and went back into timespace through help of "Time Machine" in delving deeper into known yet unknown realm of true . Much before into astrology, I went through advanced spiritual subjects....and comfortable with various spiritual school of thoughts....Sri Aurobindo or Sri Vivekananda or Sri Yogananda or Sri Juddu Krishnamurthy or Advaita or Dwaita or Shaiva or Vaishnava....etc., through direct interactions with many of the spiritual stalwarts / yogis..etc.

I appreciate that your avoidance of personal computer.....in this days of viruses & malware...better to use office.....for you have the network admin people to assist when required.....else...you end up burning holes in your pocket.....like Mr.Krishna has recently experienced.....

Surely, we have NOT much of a defined protocols....but have friendly & very informal astro_communication in the group. We are strict about refusing any personal readings in the group, unless the subject under discussion requires it.....however, it is left to the members discretion.....in all such cases....

Important Note: In any astro_analysis...we request members to apply techniques of respective school and not to mix. i.e. Parashari system should NOT be mixed with Jamini methods or Nadi methods or Prashna methods. Western & Indian astrology should not be mixed i.e. Use of Uranus or Pluto or Neptune are used in Indian systems. We strongly believe that every system has inherent strengths...to declare or conclude which works correctly and know where we are failing ..... can only be judged when you follow any single system. You may verify with other methods...and then moderate your results...- this is acceptable.

General Note:

Some of the content in this email is purely based on personal observations and views....the group in general may or may NOT ...and hence to be read with normal objective discretion.

With regards,

Sreeram_Srinivas

[Guest guest]

Hi Sreeram

 

I am from the K N Rao Group as before reading Mountain Astrologer, I

actually bought 4 of his books one covering all his Raja Yogas, one on

basic Joytish and another two more books.

 

The way he delineates is technical, analytical and logical.

 

I will follow what you said and modify my basic techniques based on

what I know from other methods.

 

Regards

 

Hock Leong

, " sreeram srinivas "

<sreeram64 wrote:

>

>

> Dear Mr. Hockleong K,

>

> Nice to know about your astro_interests and brief background. Thank you

> writing in ..... We appreciate. We like you, are more into vedic

> astrology {in general terminology} and know little about western

> astrology & its practises.

>

> In the vedic astrology side we broadly have four groups.....

>

> 1) Sri B.V. Raman group - not much known for his exposition of

> astrology, better known for his services in popularization of astrology

> today....not much techniques contribution other than repository of

> articles in his Astrological Magazine, which is now defunct.

>

> 2) Sri Krishnamurthy system i.e. KP System { Krishnamurthy Paddathi.

> Paddathi=Method}. A blend of vedic astrology and western

> systems......good for Prasna...... works well in good hands.....this

> school thinks the KP System is panacea of all astro_questions & single

> point solutions for all.

>

> 3) Sri K.N. Rao group - popular for his analytical and logical

> techniques. He has avoided controversies...by keeping away from

> commentaries on astro_classics.....concentrated on modern

> techniques...gave new positive interpretations from otherwise doomsday

> predictions given in classics for certain combinations.....in line with

> modern day applications & society. Low profile group....yet have well

> educated breed of astros....

>

> 4) Mr. Sanjay Rath inspired/lead SJC group and most prominent in

> Internet. A mix of Point No.(1) and other intelligently termed

> Parampara Jyotish...with extreme radical interpretations... often at

> conflict with their own techniques & defined astro_rules. They have

> brought renaissance by mixing all known systems in a true WWF free

> style, at times questionable logics, a nice potpourri of all known

> systems in to one famous system called SJC system, true contributors to

> Unifield theory.... & can claim some distant relationship with Einstein.

>

> Myself from Sri K.N. Rao school of thoughts and went back into timespace

> through help of " Time Machine " in delving deeper into known yet unknown

> realm of true . Much before into astrology, I

> went through advanced spiritual subjects....and comfortable with various

> spiritual school of thoughts....Sri Aurobindo or Sri Vivekananda or Sri

> Yogananda or Sri Juddu Krishnamurthy or Advaita or Dwaita or Shaiva or

> Vaishnava....etc., through direct interactions with many of the

> spiritual stalwarts / yogis..etc.

>

> I appreciate that your avoidance of personal computer.....in this days

> of viruses & malware...better to use office.....for you have the network

> admin people to assist when required.....else...you end up burning holes

> in your pocket.....like Mr.Krishna has recently experienced.....

>

> Surely, we have NOT much of a defined protocols....but have friendly &

> very informal astro_communication in the group. We are strict about

> refusing any personal readings in the group, unless the subject under

> discussion requires it.....however, it is left to the members

> discretion.....in all such cases....

>

> Important Note: In any astro_analysis...we request members to apply

> techniques of respective school and not to mix. i.e. Parashari system

> should NOT be mixed with Jamini methods or Nadi methods or Prashna

> methods. Western & Indian astrology should not be mixed i.e. Use of

> Uranus or Pluto or Neptune are used in Indian systems. We strongly

> believe that every system has inherent strengths...to declare or

> conclude which works correctly and know where we are failing ..... can

> only be judged when you follow any single system. You may verify with

> other methods...and then moderate your results...- this is acceptable.

>

> General Note:

>

> Some of the content in this email is purely based on personal

> observations and views....the group in general may or may NOT

> ...and hence to be read with normal objective discretion.

>

> With regards,

>

> Sreeram_Srinivas

>

[Guest guest]

Dear hockleongk ji, It seems that you are more well versed in the western style character analysis done using tropical astrology and not in predicting/interpreting INCIDENTS and LIFE EVENTS and LIFE CONDITIONS in which the practical astrologers and Indians are more interested in. Actually this only makes astrology trustworthy and interesting and NOT the simple vague character analysis. That is why we prefer Indian (Non-Vedic) Nirayana astrology than (Vedic or Western) Tropical astrology. It also so seems that after learning Western Tropical astrology, you are trying to apply the same principles in Nirayana Chart. It is also evident that you are calculating the chart using Western Tropical astrology software and then converting it to Nirayana chart just after deducting an approximate Ayanamsa. These are pitfalls which can guide one to erroneous results and interpretations. Anyway, like everything else if the same brings out near to true or dependable and concrete RESULTS (not the vague psychological character analysis paragraphs) especially life details - then the same too is welcome. I believe that some blind chart analysis exercises will help us to evaluate the merit or demerit of your approach. So I would love to watch your performance in some such exercises. It is good that Neelam ji introduced one such thread. Love and regards,Sreenadh , "hockleongk" <hockleongk wrote:>> I have been reading astrology on and off since I was about 8 years> old. But only got to know about Vedic Astrology through Mountain> Astrologer and some web sites by Phyllis Chubb and other Western> Astrologers. I have practically scanned thru all the web sites> available for Vedic although I do not go into the details of the> calculations.> > Most of my explanations are also additionally based on observation. > For example, most vedic western astrologers early on feel that> character analysis is based on Tropical Astrology and if one wants to> interpret houses they then use Vedic Astrology. Then one Western> Vedic and Tropical Astrologer by the name of Dennis (cannot remember> his surname) gave an interview in Mountain Astrologer mentioned that> both systems work for both character analysis and houses (chart)> interpretation. But throughout my years of observation of my chart> and other people's chart and their individual behaviour and reactions,> I came to the conclusion that both systems work for chart analysis and> for character analysis, but in ways that are not fathomed easily. For> character analysis, as I mentioned there is the inner and outer> character. So a person with planet in 0 degrees to 23 degrees in> Taurs, is credited with being stable and stubborn. But under Vedic,> the planet is under Aires and he is credited with being afraid of water!!!> > I then observe and found out it turns out to be true although the> person's afraid of water is subtle - not outwardly voiced or shown.> > Similarly with Houses. In fact even South Indian and North Indian> astrolgy use different houses to indicate the Father.> > So all in all I try to think things logically and come up with what I> think is correct. Althought like I said East meets West since time> immemorial, but because of poor transportation, information may have> passed between groups, but sometimes inaccurately as most of the> people who journey in the past, are tradesmen etc who just happened to> mention in passing on subjects like Astrology unless the travelling> informer is a professional astrologer who plans to migrate or spread> his own version of teaching.> > If we want to treat Astrology as a Science, then even if we have our> own school of thought, we can be open to new observations. This is> also one of the mission and vision of this group's web site. But of> course members are also free to disagree. This would put Astrology on> par with all other academic disciplines of study like Business> Administration, Computer Science etc. So I can say I myself do not> have a particular school of thought. But whatever I say in Vedic, is> based on observation - many times in fact - and I am amazed the world> did not document it down. But whatever I propose is not 100% new. I> will fill up the gaps.> > (By the way I have both lights aspecting Uranus).> > However, I must admit I am new to Vedic, so I may not 100% know what> the ancients have elucidated. Some of my views may contradict them> flatly. I welcome feedback and corrections anytime and also to learn> from the rest. > > I am also new to such group websites (I seldom use my PC at home until> now other than surfing Vedic web sites). Did not understand about how> the protocol is. Sorry about that!>

[Guest guest]

Hi

 

Thanks for the tutelage where you mention you and the group would

monitor my performance. That is the great thing about joining a group

as regards to just a blog. People at the helm are magnanimous.

 

By the way, just to let you know I manage to find Rao's Homepage and I

have downloaded his software. I will be using that from now on wards

for Vedic Chart Analysis.

 

As fare as the three aspects you mention, I am OK (not great) with

LIFE CONDITIONS, elementary with LIFE EVENTS and have not gone down to

LIFE INCIDENTS. If I have the time I will go through Rao's Tutorial

Online. (Singapore is a rat race - more so than India because it is a

city state like Hong Kong - not because of any other reasons. The

people do not have the countryside to relax and take things easy.)

 

By the way the books I bought was not Rao's but B V Raman. B V Raman

mentioned Rao in his book and I got mixed up.

 

Thanks.

Hock Leong

, " Sreenadh "

<sreesog wrote:

>

>

> Dear hockleongk ji,

> It seems that you are more well versed in the western style

character

> analysis done using tropical astrology and not in

> predicting/interpreting INCIDENTS and LIFE EVENTS and LIFE CONDITIONS in

> which the practical astrologers and Indians are more interested in.

> Actually this only makes astrology trustworthy and interesting and NOT

> the simple vague character analysis. That is why we prefer Indian

> (Non-Vedic) Nirayana astrology than (Vedic or Western) Tropical

> astrology.

> It also so seems that after learning Western Tropical astrology, you

> are trying to apply the same principles in Nirayana Chart. It is also

> evident that you are calculating the chart using Western Tropical

> astrology software and then converting it to Nirayana chart just after

> deducting an approximate Ayanamsa. These are pitfalls which can guide

> one to erroneous results and interpretations. Anyway, like everything

> else if the same brings out near to true or dependable and concrete

> RESULTS (not the vague psychological character analysis paragraphs)

> especially life details - then the same too is welcome.

> I believe that some blind chart analysis exercises will help us to

> evaluate the merit or demerit of your approach. So I would love to watch

> your performance in some such exercises. It is good that Neelam ji

> introduced one such thread.

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>

> , " hockleongk "

> <hockleongk@> wrote:

> >

> > I have been reading astrology on and off since I was about 8 years

> > old. But only got to know about Vedic Astrology through Mountain

> > Astrologer and some web sites by Phyllis Chubb and other Western

> > Astrologers. I have practically scanned thru all the web sites

> > available for Vedic although I do not go into the details of the

> > calculations.

> >

> > Most of my explanations are also additionally based on observation.

> > For example, most vedic western astrologers early on feel that

> > character analysis is based on Tropical Astrology and if one wants to

> > interpret houses they then use Vedic Astrology. Then one Western

> > Vedic and Tropical Astrologer by the name of Dennis (cannot remember

> > his surname) gave an interview in Mountain Astrologer mentioned that

> > both systems work for both character analysis and houses (chart)

> > interpretation. But throughout my years of observation of my chart

> > and other people's chart and their individual behaviour and reactions,

> > I came to the conclusion that both systems work for chart analysis and

> > for character analysis, but in ways that are not fathomed easily. For

> > character analysis, as I mentioned there is the inner and outer

> > character. So a person with planet in 0 degrees to 23 degrees in

> > Taurs, is credited with being stable and stubborn. But under Vedic,

> > the planet is under Aires and he is credited with being afraid of

> water!!!

> >

> > I then observe and found out it turns out to be true although the

> > person's afraid of water is subtle - not outwardly voiced or shown.

> >

> > Similarly with Houses. In fact even South Indian and North Indian

> > astrolgy use different houses to indicate the Father.

> >

> > So all in all I try to think things logically and come up with what I

> > think is correct. Althought like I said East meets West since time

> > immemorial, but because of poor transportation, information may have

> > passed between groups, but sometimes inaccurately as most of the

> > people who journey in the past, are tradesmen etc who just happened to

> > mention in passing on subjects like Astrology unless the travelling

> > informer is a professional astrologer who plans to migrate or spread

> > his own version of teaching.

> >

> > If we want to treat Astrology as a Science, then even if we have our

> > own school of thought, we can be open to new observations. This is

> > also one of the mission and vision of this group's web site. But of

> > course members are also free to disagree. This would put Astrology on

> > par with all other academic disciplines of study like Business

> > Administration, Computer Science etc. So I can say I myself do not

> > have a particular school of thought. But whatever I say in Vedic, is

> > based on observation - many times in fact - and I am amazed the world

> > did not document it down. But whatever I propose is not 100% new. I

> > will fill up the gaps.

> >

> > (By the way I have both lights aspecting Uranus).

> >

> > However, I must admit I am new to Vedic, so I may not 100% know what

> > the ancients have elucidated. Some of my views may contradict them

> > flatly. I welcome feedback and corrections anytime and also to learn

> > from the rest.

> >

> > I am also new to such group websites (I seldom use my PC at home until

> > now other than surfing Vedic web sites). Did not understand about how

> > the protocol is. Sorry about that!

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear hockleongk ji,

Your mail left me in a bit of confusion. For example -

> By the way, just to let you know I manage to find Rao's Homepage

> and I have downloaded his software. I will be using that from

> now on wards for Vedic Chart Analysis.

Which Rao you are mentioning? Is it KN Rao or PV Narasimha Rao? If

it is KN Rao - I don't about any astrology software written by him;

even though he is a good old astrology scholar. If it is PV Narasimha

Rao (PVR) then - yes, most of the people in this group use the JHora

7.0 software written by him for natal chart generation; but still

most of us are NOT in favor of the astro techniques and school of

throught (i.e. SJC) he follow.

Most of the member of these group are indipendant thinkers than the

students of KNR or PVR; even though some students of both schools are

also present in this group.

> If I have the time I will go through Rao's Tutorial Online.

Again I am confused because I don't know which Rao you are

mentioning and we are not specially in favor of any Rao.

> By the way the books I bought was not Rao's but B V Raman.

> B V Raman mentioned Rao in his book and I got mixed up.

This gives me the feel that you are speaking about KN Rao; but I

don't know about any software which KN Rao wrote and you are

mentioning that you downloaded his software. Why is this mix-up - is

it that you got confused or me?!!

> As fare as the three aspects you mention, I am OK (not great) with

> LIFE CONDITIONS, elementary with LIFE EVENTS and have not gone down

> to LIFE INCIDENTS.

These lines too makes me confused because I was NOT mentioning 3

types or categories. What I was doing was just emphasising the

differnece that -

* Western Tropical Astrology is more content with simple charecter

analysis - which makes it some thing pesudo and makes people doubt

whether apart from psychology anything extra is there or not.

* Non-Vedic Nirayana Astrology (which we term Ancient Indian

Astrology and some one else Siderial Astrology or erroniously as

Vedic astrology) tries to pinpoint life events than Charecter

analysis. (I was not satisfied with the word life events alone, and

that is why used the words life conditions and life incidents as

well; all meaning almost the same. I never intended to point to 3

categories - they are all similar as anyone can clearly see).

Any way I accpet the words in your mail " I got mixed up " and can

imagine what is happening. Anyway thanks for the sincere attempts

to learn and master the Nirayana Astrology - keep it up.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

,

" hockleongk " <hockleongk wrote:

>

> Hi

>

> Thanks for the tutelage where you mention you and the group would

> monitor my performance. That is the great thing about joining a

group

> as regards to just a blog. People at the helm are magnanimous.

>

> By the way, just to let you know I manage to find Rao's Homepage

and I

> have downloaded his software. I will be using that from now on

wards

> for Vedic Chart Analysis.

>

> As fare as the three aspects you mention, I am OK (not great) with

> LIFE CONDITIONS, elementary with LIFE EVENTS and have not gone down

to

> LIFE INCIDENTS. If I have the time I will go through Rao's Tutorial

> Online. (Singapore is a rat race - more so than India because it

is a

> city state like Hong Kong - not because of any other reasons. The

> people do not have the countryside to relax and take things easy.)

>

> By the way the books I bought was not Rao's but B V Raman. B V

Raman

> mentioned Rao in his book and I got mixed up.

>

> Thanks.

> Hock Leong

> , " Sreenadh "

> <sreesog@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear hockleongk ji,

> > It seems that you are more well versed in the western style

> character

> > analysis done using tropical astrology and not in

> > predicting/interpreting INCIDENTS and LIFE EVENTS and LIFE

CONDITIONS in

> > which the practical astrologers and Indians are more interested

in.

> > Actually this only makes astrology trustworthy and interesting

and NOT

> > the simple vague character analysis. That is why we prefer Indian

> > (Non-Vedic) Nirayana astrology than (Vedic or Western) Tropical

> > astrology.

> > It also so seems that after learning Western Tropical

astrology, you

> > are trying to apply the same principles in Nirayana Chart. It is

also

> > evident that you are calculating the chart using Western Tropical

> > astrology software and then converting it to Nirayana chart just

after

> > deducting an approximate Ayanamsa. These are pitfalls which can

guide

> > one to erroneous results and interpretations. Anyway, like

everything

> > else if the same brings out near to true or dependable and

concrete

> > RESULTS (not the vague psychological character analysis

paragraphs)

> > especially life details - then the same too is welcome.

> > I believe that some blind chart analysis exercises will help

us to

> > evaluate the merit or demerit of your approach. So I would love

to watch

> > your performance in some such exercises. It is good that Neelam ji

> > introduced one such thread.

> > Love and regards,

> > Sreenadh

> >

> > , " hockleongk "

> > <hockleongk@> wrote:

> > >

> > > I have been reading astrology on and off since I was about 8

years

> > > old. But only got to know about Vedic Astrology through Mountain

> > > Astrologer and some web sites by Phyllis Chubb and other Western

> > > Astrologers. I have practically scanned thru all the web sites

> > > available for Vedic although I do not go into the details of the

> > > calculations.

> > >

> > > Most of my explanations are also additionally based on

observation.

> > > For example, most vedic western astrologers early on feel that

> > > character analysis is based on Tropical Astrology and if one

wants to

> > > interpret houses they then use Vedic Astrology. Then one Western

> > > Vedic and Tropical Astrologer by the name of Dennis (cannot

remember

> > > his surname) gave an interview in Mountain Astrologer mentioned

that

> > > both systems work for both character analysis and houses (chart)

> > > interpretation. But throughout my years of observation of my

chart

> > > and other people's chart and their individual behaviour and

reactions,

> > > I came to the conclusion that both systems work for chart

analysis and

> > > for character analysis, but in ways that are not fathomed

easily. For

> > > character analysis, as I mentioned there is the inner and outer

> > > character. So a person with planet in 0 degrees to 23 degrees in

> > > Taurs, is credited with being stable and stubborn. But under

Vedic,

> > > the planet is under Aires and he is credited with being afraid

of

> > water!!!

> > >

> > > I then observe and found out it turns out to be true although

the

> > > person's afraid of water is subtle - not outwardly voiced or

shown.

> > >

> > > Similarly with Houses. In fact even South Indian and North

Indian

> > > astrolgy use different houses to indicate the Father.

> > >

> > > So all in all I try to think things logically and come up with

what I

> > > think is correct. Althought like I said East meets West since

time

> > > immemorial, but because of poor transportation, information may

have

> > > passed between groups, but sometimes inaccurately as most of the

> > > people who journey in the past, are tradesmen etc who just

happened to

> > > mention in passing on subjects like Astrology unless the

travelling

> > > informer is a professional astrologer who plans to migrate or

spread

> > > his own version of teaching.

> > >

> > > If we want to treat Astrology as a Science, then even if we

have our

> > > own school of thought, we can be open to new observations. This

is

> > > also one of the mission and vision of this group's web site.

But of

> > > course members are also free to disagree. This would put

Astrology on

> > > par with all other academic disciplines of study like Business

> > > Administration, Computer Science etc. So I can say I myself do

not

> > > have a particular school of thought. But whatever I say in

Vedic, is

> > > based on observation - many times in fact - and I am amazed the

world

> > > did not document it down. But whatever I propose is not 100%

new. I

> > > will fill up the gaps.

> > >

> > > (By the way I have both lights aspecting Uranus).

> > >

> > > However, I must admit I am new to Vedic, so I may not 100% know

what

> > > the ancients have elucidated. Some of my views may contradict

them

> > > flatly. I welcome feedback and corrections anytime and also to

learn

> > > from the rest.

> > >

> > > I am also new to such group websites (I seldom use my PC at

home until

> > > now other than surfing Vedic web sites). Did not understand

about how

> > > the protocol is. Sorry about that!

> > >

> >

>