] Sama-Saptaka-To Vijay Das Pradeep/Sreenadh ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadh ji

 

This meaning is taking us further close.Our understandings are going

in the right direction.

 

Thanks

Pradeep

 

, " Sreenadh "

<sreesog wrote:

>

> Dear Vijayadas ji,

> I would like to add -

> Navamsa = 1/9 th of a sign.

> Navamsaka = The sign to which that 1/9 th part is assigned to.

> Love,

> Sreenadh

>

> , " vijayadas_pradeep "

> <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sreenadh ji

> >

> > As usual,you are sharing lots of classical verses.When we have

> > support of Pramana,we are in the right track.

> > Thanks a lot for correcting the grammar.Hope to learn more.

> >

> > Pradeep

> >

> >

> > , sree nadh

> > <sreesog@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Vijayadas ji,

> > > Please go through my message on " How to predict with Navamsa " .

> > That also support and substantiate your view and understanding.

> > > For example:

> > > If Su in in 9 deg Aries, then -

> > > Navamsa = 3rd Navamsa of Aries.

> > > Navamsa " ka " = Gemini (Since the navamsa of Sun falls in

> > Gemini)

> > > There is no need to say " Navamshaka Rashi " . The word navamsaka

> > itself indicte a Rasi. Go through the classical quotes, and you

> will

> > understand this point.

> > >

> > > As you said:

> > > 1) Navamsha of Jupiter is IN Mithuna Rashi.

> > > Therefore Ju has Mithuna navamsaka. That is the navamsa OF

> > some sign falls IN Mithuna.

> > > 2) Navamsha''ka'' Rashi OF jupiter is Mithuna

> > > Yap. But there is no need of the word Rashi.

> > > " Navamsaka OF Ju is Mithuna " , that is enough. Since the

> > planets does not have navamsa but only signs, I would be better

> > pleased if you use the terminology -

> > > " Navamsaka FOR Ju is Mithuna "

> > > To conclude and clarify -

> > > Agin think that Su is in 9 deg Aries. Then -

> > > 1) Su is IN 3rd navamsa OF Aries.

> > > 2) Navamsaka OF Aries 3rd navamsa IS Gemini.

> > > 3) Navamsaka FOR Su IS Gemini

> > > Love,

> > > Sreenadh

> > >

> > > vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> > > Dear Madhu ji

> > >

> > > Thanks for sharing your valuable understanding as a confirmation

> > to my

> > > views.

> > >

> > > Regds

> > > Pradeep

> > >

> > > , VYASAJI

> > <vyasatvm@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Vijay,

> > > > I fully agree with your views and this is exactly what is

> > being

> > > followed by well known Astrologers of Kerala.

> > > > Best Regards

> > > > Madhu N Nair

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vijayadas_pradeep vijayadas_pradeep@ wrote:

> > > > Dear Narasimha ji & Sanjay ji

> > > >

> > > > Narasimha ji,i would like to second your opinion here.Sama-

> > Saptaka is

> > > > just pointing to mutual 1/7th.Sama is to qualify the ''similar''

> > > > distance from one another and saptaka explains the distance

> > > > viz,seven.This is the only relationship in jyotish,where the

> > distance

> > > is

> > > > similar and hence the usage of sama.

> > > >

> > > > Sanjayji -Myself had expressed similar concern over your

> > explanation

> > > of

> > > > karakamsha''ka'',for which you were not interested in a reply.In

> > > Kerala

> > > > the age old tradition(parampara) uses the word ''Amshakam'' for

> > the

> > > > Navamsha of planets.(Sathya is Sathyam as per our usage and

> hence

> > > > Amashaka is Amshakam for us).They also say ''Amshichirkkunna

> > Rashi'' -

> > > > Literally meaning :the Rashi on to which a planet is having

> > amsha.

> > > > Thus Navamsha or Karakamsha qualifies the source(planet or

> lagna)

> > > while

> > > > Navamshaka or Karakamshaka qualifies the destination

> (Rashi).Thus

> > we

> > > can

> > > > express navamsha in two grammatical forms.

> > > >

> > > > a)Navamsha of Jupiter is IN Mithuna Rashi

> > > > b)Navamsha''ka'' Rashi OF jupiter is Mithuna - (Kindly note the

> > > > grammatical difference )

> > > >

> > > > You are free to hold different views.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks

> > > > Pradeep

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " pvr@

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Pranaams Sanjay,

> > > > >

> > > > > > Sama-Saptaka " means mutual seventh and refers to the

> > placement of

> > > > two

> > > > > > 'otherwise friendly planets' in mutual one-seventh houses

> > from

> > > each

> > > > other.

> > > > > > The placement of two diremalefics in such places is not

> > considered

> > > > > > 'sama-saptaka'. For this purpose the planets must have at

> > least

> > > > 'SAMA'

> > > > > > relationship in the Graha Maitrya (five types of

> > relationship)

> > > > table.

> > > > >

> > > > > Is this simply your thinking or based on a classic or

> > tradition?

> > > > >

> > > > > Sama seems to suggest equality of placement (i.e. 7 and 7

> > instead of

> > > 6

> > > > and 8 or 8 and 6 or 2 and 12 etc) rather than neutrality of

> > > > relationship. Instead of saying " sapta-saptakam " (like

> > > " shad-ashtakam " ),

> > > > they say " sama saptakam " . It does not seem to suggest that

> > planets

> > > > should have atleast " sama " relationship. That would seem like a

> > > > far-fetched interpretation. Moreover, I have seen learned

> elders

> > using

> > > > the term " Ravi-Shani sama saptakam " when Sun and Saturn are in

> > Cp-Cn

> > > or

> > > > Sg-Ge etc.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thus, I will be skeptical about what you said, unless you

> have

> > some

> > > > kind of strong basis. Please let us know the basis for your

> > statement.

> > > > >

> > > > > May the light of Brahman shine within,

> > > > > Narasimha

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sneak preview the all-new .com. It's not radically

> > different.

> > > Just radically better.

> > > >

> > > >