RE:Quize of the Day - 2nd lord in Lagna and Nasargic signification of houses

[Guest guest]

Dear Group,

 

I have written some verses on Laghu

Parasarai as that was triggered by some discussion on KAS list.

I had saved those on my blog for those who

would be interested.

 

http://ashscorner.blogspot.com/

 

 

 

Cheers !!!

Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of Gopal Goel

Monday January 7, 2008 12:28

AM

 

Subject:

Re: Quize of the Day - 2nd lord in Lagna and

Nasargic signification of houses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

 

What Renu ji saying about the functioning of houses is correct upto

some extent.

 

 

But one should remember that a nativity belongs to a particular person

and the various houses assume

 

 

some permanent signification and within that parameter

,acquired signification of the houses operate.

 

 

Let us take the example of 12H.This is bhagya house

from 4H (MOTHER), and Sukha house from 9H (Father).

 

 

Fate of mother and physical assets of father depend on the basic

signification of 12H OF NATIVE

 

 

i,e, losses,wasteful-expenditure.extravagance,hospitalisation

etc on negative side;moksa,divine knowledge etc on positive side.

 

 

This is the reason that whenever any planet occupies the signs

occupying Trik houses in any Varga chart , do attract some or the other

blemish.

 

 

 

 

 

2H and 7H are called Marka houses . This trait is acquired by these

houses on Bhavta-bhava principle , and is activated and operative only in

certain specific circumstances and timings.This is the reason Laghu Parasari in

sloka 33 says " If a Raja - yoga commences in the Sub-period of

 

 

Marka Planet(i.e. 2HL and 7HL),it continues even in subsequent

Sub-periods of Malefic planets.

 

 

P.M. Narshimha Rao is a good example.He assumed P.M.Ship in Mars/Rahu

period (Rahu placed in 2H), and completed his term.

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

 

G.K.GOEL

Ph: 09350311433

Add: L-409, SARITA VIHAR

NEW DELHI-110 076

INDIA

 

 

 

 

----- Original Message

----

renunw <renunw (AT) (DOT) co.uk>

 

Sunday, 6 January, 2008 11:22:09 PM

Re: Quize of the Day - 2nd lord in

Lagna

 

Dear

Sreenadh ji,

" The above point tells us

that no house lord can be truly considered as benefic or malefic - but only as

indicators of some results. Like a single human being can have divine as

well as devilish qualities; like the same dasa or even day can provide both

happy and sad results; like the life a mix of both positive and negative

things; like the same rose plant that contains both flower and the thrown - The

same planet itself can indicate both benefic and malefic results at the same

time. Even the best benefic placed in the best benefic house will have some

malefic result to indicate; even the worst malefic placed in the worst malefic

house will have some benefic result to indicate. "

How beautiful... this is simply LIFE

with its recurring ups and downs!

blessings

Renu

 

,

" Sreenadh " <sreesog wrote:

>

>

> Dear Renu ji, Neelam ji, Kiran ji,

> The points that becomes clear from this exercise is that -

> * Even though lord of a benefic house such as 2nd house (only

> 6-8-12 are malefic houses), even though the dasa of 2nd lord in lagna

> (lagna lord in sustana) can provide benefic results such as " good

> marriage in time; birth of daughters; good food and enough wealth;

> excelling in work due to mastery over speech, writing and

> documentation " etc the same placement itself can indicate malefic

> results such as " delay in having son, native not taking much interest

> in family and at times even acting against the interest of the family by

> not helping it " and so on.

> * The above point tells us that no house lord can be truly

> considered as benefic or malefic - but only as indicators of some

> results. Like a single human being can have divine as well as devilish

> qualities; like the same dasa or even day can provide both happy and sad

> results; like the life a mix of both positive and negative things; like

> the same rose plant that contains both flower and the thrown - The same

> planet itself can indicate both benefic and malefic results at the same

> time. Even the best benefic placed in the best benefic house will have

> some malefic result to indicate; even the worst malefic placed in the

> worst malefic house will have some benefic result to indicate.

> * Benefic/Malefic or Good/Bad classifications will not help us much

> in making prediction; but instead we would have to learn to " look

> through the results " .

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

> ancient_indian_ astrology, " neelam

gupta "

> neelamgupta07@ wrote:

> Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Quize of the Day - 2nd lord in Lagna

> Dear Renuji,

> I get your point and also fully agree with you. I meant the same though

> it wasn't clear in the way I said. I believe that good/bad is how we

> perceive things.

> However, i have a doubt. As per classics, there are malefics and

> benefics. Taking the same example of 2H, if the 2L is a natural malefic,

> say mars, as 2L it will give results according to its significations and

> PAC, which we may call benefic or malefic. What about its placement in

> lagan as a malefic only, not as a lord of any house. Any planet placed

> in a sign does impart its own nature to the sign and house. Will a

> malefic planet not cloud the house as per its own nature. Will not the

> aspect of this mars cause problems with 4H/7H/8H. We all know that

> benefic PAC on lagan makes a person good looking and malefic PAC takes

> away the good looks.

> Regards

> Neelam

>

> On 04/01/2008, renunw renunw

> <../../../../ post?postID= 3-qNRU0dO56ymRIC Zc8GfCtLOlIvioQE

df7YIZrsm6jtynV\

> ZTdOdMty2O8ko2pQbkq xG6JpBxmN_> > wrote:

> Dear Neelam ji,

>

> " Is this is what Sreenadhji wants us to understand "

>

> If I am not mistaken what Sreenadh ji wants us to understand is that

> there are no such thing as benefic or malefic planet. The same planet or

> rather the owner of a house can be benefic and malefic at the same time.

> Let me quote from one of his earlier lessons:

>

> " the benefic/malefic

> classification WILL NOT lead us to much in the proper direction;

> because

> the same placement, same planet/house can indicate BOTH beneficial and

> maleficial result at the same time. Thus no planet isbenefic/malefic, no

> house is benefic/malefic in the true sense. The truth is all

> signs/houses/ planets have several significances some of which are

> beneficial some maleficial - or better even treating some significance

> as beneficial/malefici al is too our assumption/imaginat ion - the truth

> being that the sign/house/house point to some 'thing or quolity' which

> is neither beneficial not maleficial. Thus it becomes clear that

> SIGNIFICANCE of sign/house/planet is what lies at the bottom of result

> derivation. "

>

> Note to Sreenadh ji: Isn't this what you want us to learn?

>

> blessings

> Renu

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Click

here