Blind chart reading - Quiz - Review -1 + child birth

[Guest guest]

Dear Pandit ji,

 

OK. I do respect your views. Let's try rashi chart only. That is

Meena lagna.

 

Relevant dasha for 1st daughter's birth: Ven/Rahu/ Saturn

 

1. The dispositor of Venus is Jupter, natural and Jaimini PK in this

case. This Jupiter aspects 5H and 5HL of rashi chart. Hence I feel

that Venus is qualified as a child giver through Jupiter.

Venus is in Mercury's nakshastra. Mercury is retrograde. Hence it's

aspects are valid from Makara too. Thus Mercury aspects 5H and 5HL

of rashi chart. Mercury also aspects 5H and 5HL of rashi chart

according to Jaimini aspects too. Hence Venus is qualified thru'

Mercury as well.

 

2. If Jupiter has some part to do with pregnancy, see Rahu's

dispositor is Sun. Jupiter is in Sun's nakshastra. Hence Rahu is

qualified thru' Sun thru' Jupiter.

Also if you are in support for Jaimini aspects, Rahu aspects Jupiter.

Hence Rahu is twice qualified thru' Jupiter.

 

3. Saturn not only aspects 5H and 5HL of rashi chart but also is in

conjunction with Jupiter.

 

See in all these cases, Jupiter has some strong connection to child

bearing. Jupiter is Jaimini PK in this case and also natural putra

karaka. This Jupiter is indirectly connected to relevant dasha lords

too.

 

Kindly correct me if I am wrong since I do not want to mislead

anyone.

 

blessings

 

Renu

 

 

, Panditji

<navagraha wrote:

>

> Thanks Renuji,

>

> I looked at Saptamsha, I get meena as lagna saptamsha. I am never

too

> sure about the TOB to make judgements based on lagna and houses

vis a

> vis lagna of a division. I personally do not think there are

houses in

> amshas. Although using 5HL in saptamsha may work for you I am not

sure

> it is based on ancient jyotish principles. I know, I may be in the

> minority here in the age of divisional charts.

>

> I prefer to see whether I can read the chart from rashi and rashi

> alone, with chandra lagna of rashi as one more reference point.

> Navansha positions are important but for me not as a navansha

chakra.

>

> May be your explanation for child birth in venus-rahu may be is ok.

> But for me I do not use houses in amshas so I need to find out why

> rahu anter dasha gave progeny.

>

> ...

>

> P.S. How can you be so sure of lagna of saptansha and use it as a

> chart/chakra? Won't it be erroneous if the lagna turns out to be

> different.

>

> On Nov 24, 2007 8:35 PM, renunw <renunw wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Pandit ji,

> >

> > By requesting explanations as to why we were wrong, you are

> > encouraging us to learn more. Good and thanks.

> >

> > I will try to explain, based on my little knowledge the birth of

> > firtst child in September 1989. I may be wrong. If so kinldy

correct

> > me.

> >

> > Vimsottari Dasha: Ven/Rahu/Saturn

> >

> > 1. Venus: is exalted in lagna, navamsa and Saptamsa too. This

Venus

> > is in the nakshastra of Revati, the 5HL in Saptamsa.

> >

> > 2. This Venus is aspected by natural putra karaka and Jaimini

putra

> > karaka in this particular native, Jupiter.

> >

> > 3. Rahu: is aspected by Jupiter [double putra karaka as mentioned

> > earlier] in birth horoscope - Jaimini aspect and in Saptamsa 5th

> > aspect of Jupiter.

> >

> > 4. Saturn: aspects 5H of lagna chart and is in conjunction with

> > natural PK, both in lagna and saptamsa charts.

> >

> > 5. is placed in Gemini. Hence double transit affect of

SaturnTransit on September 1989: Saturn is placed in Saggitarius and

> > Jupiter

> > and Jupiter on Saptamsa lagna Aquarius and 5H of Saptamsa

Gemini!!!

> > Mars has just enteren Virgo. So even Mars has aspected Saptamsa

> > lagna just a few days before child birth. [sri K. N. Rao's rule]

> >

> > 6. Finally, a girl: 5HL Moon is strong in 5H with 5AV points.

Venus

> > the alluring planet [which misguide men...I learn] is very

strong in

> > this native's chart.

> >

> > Of course let me add that this is only a post mortem. I failed to

> > see this earlier and would have never seen too.

> >

> > blessings

> >

> > Renu

> >

> > , Panditji

> >

> >

> > <navagraha@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Namaste Srinadh,

> > >

> > > Good exercise. Congratulations to Durgaji for good analysis and

> > others

> > > who got a lot of traits correct.

> > >

> > > Now we must understand why we were wrong on certain aspects.

> > >

> > > Let me start with my two statements that were wrong

> > >

> > > 1. May have chronic health problems: The reason, 8th lord in

> > lagna,

> > > and lagna lord debilited and with shani and aspect of mangal.

Moon

> > in

> > > papakaratari, but aspected by Guru a benefic and shani a

malefic.

> > It

> > > was wrong, can some one point to whythe native may not have

health

> > > issues?

> > >

> > > 2. May have chanlleges in marriage and would have led to health

> > problems:

> > >

> > > I thought mercury antara would give 7th house results, being

7th

> > lord

> > > and 7th house indications are not too good. Seems like the

native

> > did

> > > have challenges in marriage but the marriage ended a lot

earlier. I

> > > would like to know whehter anything traspire on 7th house

matters

> > in

> > > mercury antar dasha?

> > >

> > > 3. Exalted venus is lagna could give fair complexion and good

> > looks.

> > >

> > > 4. Birth of 1st child , I can not see in the dasha in happened

in

> > > venus-rahu.Any ideas why?

> > >

> > > ...

> > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>