Guest guest Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 This article in Organiser is all nonsense meant to fool the public and the less informed. How did the scholar compute the positions of 5100BC? How did he ensure that Moon in Punarvasu last pada and Cancer Ascendant coincided at the mid-day time of the deciphered date? Is he aware of the secular variation of the Earth's rotation? This is a vital data that anyone attempting a scientific dating of historical events will provide for reference. In 5100 BC there was no population at all in the Ayodhya it it was located in its modern place. Before the Iron age no human beings could have crossed the forests on the banks of Ganga and Yamuna to reach Ayodhya and have a settlement. If sentiments are driving us to reject all archaeological stuff as 'rubbish' then it is better not to claim as followers of Sastra. chandra hari , " kishore patnaik " <kishorepatnaik09 wrote: > > http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content & pa=showpage & pi\ d=203 & page=28 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.