Guest guest Posted October 30, 2007 Report Share Posted October 30, 2007 Krishna ji, Your humility and transparent self-appraisal together is inspirational. I would like to quote some of your thoughts in response to Raghvan ji: "(Or, I pick a principle and try to validate it using good> number> > of charts.) I may not be able to give any references to> Sanskrit> > shlokas etc. And, I have noticed that Astrologers in general> > don't value this. They look for some reference from a sage.> >> > Hence, even if I do some research on this specific topic, I> am> > sure there will not be many buyers. Hence, I generally pick> > areas that are closer to my heart when I do research. With> that> > I derive some satisfaction and I don't have the trouble of> > convincing others :-) I do share my work in my blog for> those> > few people who do respect the work done by mere mortals like> me." We all have a long way to go. Once our success goes to our head, we slide downhill. Humble even while soaring with our mantic expertise is what we all should keep trying to be. Your way of working with the discipline in my opinion is quite legit. We'd lik to see your blog. Pls give links. Thanks. Sincerely, RKKrishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998 wrote: Thanks for your comments sir!Regards,Krishna--- lion_draco1983 <lion_draco1983 > wrote:> > Dear Krishna ji .> > > > I happen to see Your blog page and also some of ur hard> work while> going tru archives of some astrological forums >dont think> that no body> Value your contributions .Finaly astrology is not what> differrent sages> told ,its the predictiv part any vedic astrologer or commoner> is> interested .> > So your effort in that direction is highly appreciated .> > > > Thanking you in advance .> > regrds Vijaya Raghavan Guruvayur .> > > > > > > , Krishnamurthy> Seetharama <krishna_1998 wrote:> >> > Dear Raghavan ji,> >> > Thanks for your kind words about my work. I have just taken> a> > couple of small steps and nothing more. I have a long way to> go.> > It appears that you have visited my blog.> >> > I intented to take up more areas for my reseach going> forward.> > However, in general, my style of research is working> backwards.> > That is, I study many charts and try to arrive at a> principle.> > (Or, I pick a principle and try to validate it using good> number> > of charts.) I may not be able to give any references to> Sanskrit> > shlokas etc. And, I have noticed that Astrologers in general> > don't value this. They look for some reference from a sage.> >> > Hence, even if I do some research on this specific topic, I> am> > sure there will not be many buyers. Hence, I generally pick> > areas that are closer to my heart when I do research. With> that> > I derive some satisfaction and I don't have the trouble of> > convincing others :-) I do share my work in my blog for> those> > few people who do respect the work done by mere mortals like> me.> >> > It gives a good feeling to be encouraged by people like you.> >> > Regards,> > Krishna> >> >> >> >> > --- lion_draco1983 lion_draco1983 wrote:> >> > >> > > Dear krishna ji ,> > >> > >> > >> > > I find u doing reserch of many astrological principles .> > >> > > So why cannot u take the task of seeing the effect of moon> > > -sun yoga .> > >> > >> > >> > > As i think this is more than simple dwi graha yoga .As sun> and> > > moon are> > > very personal level planets and controller of all points> we> > > take while> > > in delintation of chart .panchanga effects or even birth> hora> > > ,masa ,day> > > all is based on sun and some based on their respective> > > distance .> > >> > > Also please consider the effect of nite birth in this> > > purticular> > > combination as in nite being amavasya moon the deha karaka> > > will be power> > > less .U should also concentrate the moon approaching sun> or> > > crossed sun> > > chart also for seeing the correct results .> > >> > >> > >> > > I think this is a real challenge .> > >> > > All the best to u> > >> > > regrds Vijaya raghavan Guruvayur.> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ,> Krishnamurthy> > > Seetharama krishna_1998@ wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Sreendah,> > > >> > > > I don't under estimate the need to study basics before> > > applying> > > > it in practice. It is very important in a scientific and> > > > structured approach. My mail was only a reaction to your> > > > following statement:> > > >> > > > <<[As you know, I don't like spending too much time on> > > specific> > > > charts ] >>> > > >> > > > Hope I am clear :-)> > > >> > > > Regards,> > > > Krishna> > > >> > > > --- Sreenadh sreesog@ wrote:> > > >> > > > > Dear Krishna ji,> > > > > I agree with you. But during study, I believe, good> amount> > > > > of time> > > > > should be first given to understanding the concept and> > > > > underlying> > > > > principles the sages propose, prior to applying the> same> > > with> > > > > boldness> > > > > in horoscopes. That is, I am approaching the question> from> > > a> > > > > learner's> > > > > perspective. I will explain -> > > > > * You must have noticed that when we discussed 'Sun in> > > > > various> > > > > houses' we got almost 80% of derivations right, to the> > > point.> > > > > i.e.> > > > > Apply to any horoscope - it would be true.> [House-Planet> > > Base]> > > > > * The same with the discussion on 'Lagna lord in> various> > > > > houses'.> > > > > Almost 80% or more truth in those derivations you can> > > expect> > > > > for sure> > > > > - and apply the same with confidence in various> charts.> > > [House> > > > > Base]> > > > > * Now comes the question "What about 2-planet> > > combinations?> > > > > Can you> > > > > confidently say that the derivations would be true up> to> > > 80%> > > > > or at> > > > > least up to 60%?". [Planet Base] As you could clearly> see> > > -> > > > > the answer> > > > > is 'NO'! So the first step is to clear the grounds,> > > understand> > > > > the> > > > > basic rules - so that we can derive 'Planet Base'> > > derivations> > > > > - that> > > > > will become true at least to 80% accuracy - Which we> > > currently> > > > > don't> > > > > have in the same - as even your example clarifies.> > > > > That is why I emphasized - "First let us complete our> > > > > discussion on> > > > > Su-Mo combination (It is not complete yet). And then> we> > > will> > > > > look into> > > > > the charts with that combination." Some of the> === message truncated === Save all your chat conversations. Find them online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2007 Report Share Posted October 31, 2007 Dear RK ji, Thanks for your kind words. You can reach my blog at: http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com Please note that the oldest article titled " Astrological Inheritence " needs some more work before I say that it is fully mature. It is a good intermediate report though. The other articles on Diabetes and Bandhana Yoga are more complete. Please feel free to give your views on the above. Regards, Krishna --- rk dash <arkaydash wrote: > Krishna ji, > Your humility and transparent self-appraisal together is > inspirational. I would like to quote some of your thoughts in > response to Raghvan ji: > > " (Or, I pick a principle and try to validate it using good > > number > > > of charts.) I may not be able to give any references to > > Sanskrit > > > shlokas etc. And, I have noticed that Astrologers in > general > > > don't value this. They look for some reference from a > sage. > > > > > > Hence, even if I do some research on this specific topic, > I > > am > > > sure there will not be many buyers. Hence, I generally > pick > > > areas that are closer to my heart when I do research. With > > that > > > I derive some satisfaction and I don't have the trouble of > > > convincing others :-) I do share my work in my blog for > > those > > > few people who do respect the work done by mere mortals > like > > me. " > > We all have a long way to go. Once our success goes to our > head, we slide downhill. Humble even while soaring with our > mantic expertise is what we all should keep trying to be. Your > way of working with the discipline in my opinion is quite > legit. We'd lik to see your blog. Pls give links. Thanks. > > Sincerely, > RK > > Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998 wrote: > Thanks for your comments sir! > > Regards, > Krishna > > --- lion_draco1983 <lion_draco1983 wrote: > > > > > Dear Krishna ji . > > > > > > > > I happen to see Your blog page and also some of ur hard > > work while > > going tru archives of some astrological forums >dont think > > that no body > > Value your contributions .Finaly astrology is not what > > differrent sages > > told ,its the predictiv part any vedic astrologer or > commoner > > is > > interested . > > > > So your effort in that direction is highly appreciated . > > > > > > > > Thanking you in advance . > > > > regrds Vijaya Raghavan Guruvayur . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > Krishnamurthy > > Seetharama <krishna_1998 wrote: > > > > > > Dear Raghavan ji, > > > > > > Thanks for your kind words about my work. I have just > taken > > a > > > couple of small steps and nothing more. I have a long way > to > > go. > > > It appears that you have visited my blog. > > > > > > I intented to take up more areas for my reseach going > > forward. > > > However, in general, my style of research is working > > backwards. > > > That is, I study many charts and try to arrive at a > > principle. > > > (Or, I pick a principle and try to validate it using good > > number > > > of charts.) I may not be able to give any references to > > Sanskrit > > > shlokas etc. And, I have noticed that Astrologers in > general > > > don't value this. They look for some reference from a > sage. > > > > > > Hence, even if I do some research on this specific topic, > I > > am > > > sure there will not be many buyers. Hence, I generally > pick > > > areas that are closer to my heart when I do research. With > > that > > > I derive some satisfaction and I don't have the trouble of > > > convincing others :-) I do share my work in my blog for > > those > > > few people who do respect the work done by mere mortals > like > > me. > > > > > > It gives a good feeling to be encouraged by people like > you. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- lion_draco1983 lion_draco1983 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear krishna ji , > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find u doing reserch of many astrological principles . > > > > > > > > So why cannot u take the task of seeing the effect of > moon > > > > -sun yoga . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As i think this is more than simple dwi graha yoga .As > sun > > and > > > > moon are > > > > very personal level planets and controller of all points > > we > > > > take while > > > > in delintation of chart .panchanga effects or even birth > > hora > > > > ,masa ,day > > > > all is based on sun and some based on their respective > > > > distance . > > > > > > > > Also please consider the effect of nite birth in this > > > > purticular > > > > combination as in nite being amavasya moon the deha > karaka > > > > will be power > > > > less .U should also concentrate the moon approaching sun > > or > > > > crossed sun > > > > chart also for seeing the correct results . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this is a real challenge . > > > > > > > > All the best to u > > > > > > > > regrds Vijaya raghavan Guruvayur. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > > Krishnamurthy > > > > Seetharama krishna_1998@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sreendah, > > > > > > > > > > I don't under estimate the need to study basics before > > > > applying > > > > > it in practice. It is very important in a scientific > and > > > > > structured approach. My mail was only a reaction to > your > > > > > following statement: > > > > > > > > > > <<[As you know, I don't like spending too much time on > > > > specific > > > > > charts ] >> > > > > > > > > > > Hope I am clear :-) > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > > --- Sreenadh sreesog@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Krishna ji, > === message truncated === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.